川西北沙地植被恢复对土壤碳氮磷及生态化学计量特征的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.003

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 523-531.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.003

• 生态与草原修复 • 上一篇

川西北沙地植被恢复对土壤碳氮磷及生态化学计量特征的影响

曹全恒, 胡健, 陈雪玲, 孙梅玲, 刘小龙, 杨丽雪, 周青平

1. 西南民族大学四川若尔盖高寒湿地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 四川成都 610041;
2. 西南民族大学青藏高原研究院, 四川成都 610041

收稿日期:2021-11-11 修回日期:2021-12-27 发布日期:2022-03-30
通讯作者: 周青平,E-mail:qingpzh@aliyun.com
作者简介:曹全恒(1995-),男,汉族,河南鲁山人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态保护与恢复研究,E-mail:1175667662@qq.com
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目(2019QZKK0307)；国家自然科学基金项目(42007057)；西南民族大学研究生创新型科研项目(CX2021SZ24)资助

Effects of Vegetation Restoration of Sandy Land on the Characteristics of Soil Carbon,Nitrogen,Phosphorus and its Ecological Stoichiometry in Northwest Sichuan

CAO Quan-heng, HU Jian, CHEN Xue-ling, SUN Mei-ling, LIU Xiao-long, YANG Li-xue, ZHOU Qing-ping

1. Sichuan Zoige Alpine Wetland Ecosystem National Observation and Research Station, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
2. Institute of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China

Received:2021-11-11 Revised:2021-12-27 Published:2022-03-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本文以川西北退化草地植被恢复区自然放牧草地(NGG)、围栏封育沙化草地(FEDG)、自然灌丛草地(NS)和人工种植高山柳沙化草地(SCDG)为研究对象，通过植物群落调查与土壤理化性质的测定，探讨川西北自然与人工恢复沙化草地土壤碳氮磷及生态化学计量特征。结果表明，除土壤全磷储量外，所选草地植被类型在0~60cm土层土壤碳、氮、磷的含量、储量和比值都存在显著差异(P<0.05)，土壤全磷含量高低顺序为NS>FEDG>NGG>SCDG，除氮磷比(N∶P)外，其余土壤指标高低顺序为NS>NGG>FEDG>SCDG，土壤全磷储量在NS显著高于其它类型(P<0.05)。4类植被类型的土壤全氮和全磷含量及NS和NGG的有机碳含量随土层深度增加而显著降低(P<0.05)。除N∶P外，NGG和NS的土壤碳氮比(C∶N)、碳磷比(C∶P)都随土壤土层深度的加深而显著降低(P<0.05)。自然灌丛草地比自然草地和人工植被恢复沙地具有更高的土壤养分含量，可作为沙地生态恢复模式进一步优化的参考。

关键词: 沙化草地, 灌丛草地, 人工恢复, 土壤化学计量

Abstract: The study chose the natural grazing grassland,fencing enclosure desertified grassland,natural shrubland,and artificially planted Salix cupularis desertified grassland to investigate the plant community and soil physicochemical properties in the vegetation recovery area of degraded grassland of Northwest Sichuan. And we determined the characteristics of soil carbon,nitrogen,phosphorus,and ecological stoichiometry of natural and artificially restored desertified grassland. The results showed that all grassland vegetation types had significant differences in the content,storage,and ratio of soil carbon,nitrogen,and phosphorus in 0~60 cm profile except for the storage of total soil phosphorus (P<0.05). At the same time,the order of total soil phosphorus content was NS>FEDG>NGG>SCDG,while other soil indexes were NS>NGG>FEDG>SCDG,except for the ratio of N∶P,especially in the storage of total soil phosphorus under the NS (P<0.05). The content of total soil nitrogen and phosphorus among the four vegetation types and organic carbon content under the NS and NGG decreased significantly with the increase of soil depth (P<0.05). The proportion of C∶N and C∶P under the NGG and NS decreased substantially with the soil depth except for the ratio of N∶P (P<0.05). Natural shrub grassland had higher soil nutrients than natural grassland,and artificial vegetation recovery sandy land. This study can be used as a reference for further optimizing the ecological restoration measures.

Key words: Desertified grassland, Shrubland, Artificial restoration, Soil stoichiometry

中图分类号:

S153.61

曹全恒, 胡健, 陈雪玲, 孙梅玲, 刘小龙, 杨丽雪, 周青平. 川西北沙地植被恢复对土壤碳氮磷及生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 523-531.

CAO Quan-heng, HU Jian, CHEN Xue-ling, SUN Mei-ling, LIU Xiao-long, YANG Li-xue, ZHOU Qing-ping. Effects of Vegetation Restoration of Sandy Land on the Characteristics of Soil Carbon,Nitrogen,Phosphorus and its Ecological Stoichiometry in Northwest Sichuan[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 523-531.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.03.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I3/523

参考文献

[1] JACOBS B F,KINGSTON J D,JACOBS L L. The origin of grass-dominated ecosystems[J]. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden,1999,86(2):590-643
[2] DIXON A P,FABER-LANGENDOEN D,JOSSE C,et al. Distribution Mpping of World Grassland Types[J]. Journal of Biogeography,2014,41(11):2003-2019
[3] 孙鸿烈,郑度,姚檀栋,等. 青藏高原国家生态安全屏障保护与建设[J]. 地理学报,2012,7(1):3-12
[4] 孙建,张振超,董世魁. 青藏高原高寒草地生态系统的适应性管理[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(4):933-938
[5] LI J C,WANG W L,HU G Y,et al. Changes in Ecosystem Service Values in Zoige Plateau,China[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment,2010,139(4):766-770
[6] SHUANG X,GUO R,WU N,et al. Current status and future prospects of Zoige Marsh in Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2009,35(4):553-562
[7] 李森,董玉祥,董光荣. 青藏高原沙漠化问题与可持续发展[M]. 北京:中国藏学出版社,2001:2-4
[8] WANG C,GAO Q,YU M. Quantifying trends of land change in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau during 2001-2015[J]. Remote Sensing,2019,11(20):2-21
[9] FENG D,BAO W. Shrub encroachment alters topsoil C∶N∶P stoichiometric ratios in a high-altitude forest cutover[J]. Iforest-Biogeosciences and Forestry,2018,11(5):594-599
[10] GAO X L,LI X G,ZHAO L,et al. Regulation of soil phosphorus cycling in grasslands by shrubs[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019,133:1-11
[11] GAO X L,LI X G,ZHAO L,et al. Shrubs magnify soil phosphorus depletion in Tibetan meadows:conclusions from C∶N∶P stoichiometry and deep soil profiles[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2021,785:147320
[12] ELDRIDGE D J,BOWKER M A,MAESTRE F T,et al. Impacts of shrub encroachment on ecosystem structure and functioning:towards a global synthesis[J]. Ecology Letters,2011,14(7):709-722
[13] ZHANG Y Q,AI J J,SUN Q W,et al. Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen stocks as affected by vegetation types and altitude across the mountainous regions in the Yunnan Province,south-western China[J]. Catena,2021,196:104872
[14] DING L,WANG P,ZHANG W,et al. Shrub encroachment shapes soil nutrient concentration,stoichiometry and carbon storage in an abandoned subalpine grassland[J]. Sustainability,2019,11(6):1732
[15] GAO Y,HE N P,YU G R,et al. Long-term effects of different land use types on C,N,and P stoichiometry and storage in subtropical ecosystems:A case study in China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2014,67:171-181
[16] DAMIEN F,KATHRYN P,KERRILYN C,et al. Ecological stoichiometry controls the transformation and retention of plant-derived organic matter to humus in response to nitrogen fertilisation[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2016,99:117-127
[17] SUN J,GAO P,LI C,et al. Ecological stoichiometry characteristics of the leaf-litter-soil continuum of Quercus acutissima Carr and Pinus densiflora Sieb in Northern China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2019,78(1):20
[18] CLEVELAND C C,LIPTZIN D. C∶N∶P stoichiometry in soil:is there a "Redfield ratio" for the microbial biomass?[J]. Biogeochemistry,2007,85(3):235-252
[19] ZENG Q,LIU Y,FANG Y,et al. Impact of vegetation restoration on plants and soil C∶N∶P stoichiometry on the Yunwu Mountain Reserve of China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2017,109:92-100
[20] 苟小林,涂卫国,李玲,等. 川西北地区沙化草地特征研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(4):768-775
[21] 万婷,涂卫国,席欢,等. 川西北不同程度沙化草地植被和土壤特征研究[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(4):650-657
[22] 何佳,胡玉福,舒向阳,等. 川西北高寒沙地不同年限高山柳土壤生态化学计量及储量变化特征[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(4):27-33
[23] 陈冬明,张楠楠,刘琳,等. 不同恢复措施对若尔盖沙化草地的恢复效果比较[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2016,22(4):573-578
[24] DONG Z B,HU G Y,YAN C Z,et al. Aeolian desertification and its causes in the Zoige Plateau of China’s Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,201,59(8):1731-1741
[25] 鄢武先,邓东周,余凌帆,等. 川西北地区沙化土地治理有关技术问题探讨——以川西北防沙治沙试点示范工程为例[J]. 四川林业科技,2015,6(3):62-68
[26] 舒向阳,胡玉福,何佳,等. 川西北高寒沙地不同大小高山柳对土壤氮素的影响[J]. 草业学报,2017,6(7):55-61
[27] LI Q,SHEN X,HUANG Q,et al. Resource islands of Salix cupularis facilitating seedling emergence of the companion herbs in the restoration process of desertified alpine meadow,the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2021,289(5):112434
[28] D’DORICO P,OKIN G S,BESTELMEYER B T. A synthetic review of feedbacks and drivers of shrub encroachment in arid grasslands[J]. Ecohydrology,2012,5(5):520-530
[29] 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2004:94-104
[30] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2005:12-292
[31] GUO L B,GIFFORD R M. Soil carbon stocks and land use change:a meta analysis[J]. Global Change Biology,2002,8(4):345-360
[32] WANG L L,ZHANG G H,ZHU P Z,et al. Soil C,N and P contents and their stoichiometry as affected by typical plant communities on steep gully slopes of the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Catena,2022,208:105740
[33] LI H,SHEN H H,CHEN L Y,et al. Effects of shrub encroachment on soil organic carbon in global grasslands[J]. Scientific Reports,2016,6:28974
[34] HE J L,LI X G. Potentilla fruticosa has a greater capacity to translocate phosphorus from the lower to upper soils than herbaceous grasses in an alpine meadow[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2016,228:19-29
[35] LI H,SHEN H,ZHOU L,et al. Shrub encroachment increases soil carbon and nitrogen stocks in temperate grasslands in China[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2019,30(7):756-767
[36] JACKSON S. Rooting depths,lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems[J]. Journal of Ecology,2002,90(3):480-494
[37] SIX J,CONANT R T,PAUL E A,et al. Stabilization mechanisms of soil organic matter:implications for C-saturation of soils[J]. Plant and Soil,2002,241(2):155-176
[38] 吴鹏,崔迎春,赵文君,等. 喀斯特森林植被自然恢复过程中土壤化学计量特征[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2019,41(3):80-92
[39] 王瑞璋,黎建强,杨关吕,等. 磨盘山典型森林生态系统土壤营养元素储量及其价值量评估[J]. 西部林业科学,2019,48(6):93-99
[40] LIAO C R,LI H D,LV G P,et al. Effects of ecological restoration on soil properties of the aeolian sandy land around Lhasa,southern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecosphere,2020,11(1):e03009
[41] LIU L,ZENG K,WU N,et al. Variation in physicochemical and biochemical soil properties among different plant species treatments early in the restoration of a desertified alpine meadow[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2019,30(16):1889-1903
[42] JIN Z,DONG Y,WANG Y,et al. Natural vegetation restoration is more beneficial to soil surface organic and inorganic carbon sequestration than tree plantation on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2014,485:615-623
[43] CHEN C R,CONDRON L M,XU Z H. Impacts of grassland afforestation with coniferous trees on soil phosphorus dynamics and associated microbial processes:a review[J]. Forest Ecology and Management,2008,255(3-4):396-409
[44] 胡金娇,周青平,吕一河,等. 青藏高原东缘半湿润沙地典型生态恢复模式的效果比较研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(20):7410-7418
[45] 陶晓,俞元春,张云彬,等. 城市森林土壤碳氮磷含量及其生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态环境学报,2020,29(1):88-96
[46] 由政,张鹏,薛萐,等. 退耕地植被演替过程对土壤化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(3):657-661
[47] FENG D F,BAO W K,PANG X Y. Consistent profile pattern and spatial variation of soil C/N/P stoichiometric ratios in the subalpine forests[J]. Journal of soil and sediments,2017,17(8):2054-2065
[48] WANG M,GONG Y,LAFLEUR P,et al. Patterns and drivers of carbon,nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry in Southern China’s grasslands[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2021,785:147201
[49] ZHAO H L,ZHOU R L,SU Y Z,et al. Shrub facilitation of desert land restoration in the Horqin Sand Land of Inner Mongolia[J]. Ecological Engineering,2007,31(1):1-8
[50] APONTE C,MARAÓN T,GARCIA L V. Microbial C,N and P in soils of Mediterranean oak forests:influence of season,canopy cover and soil depth[J]. Biogeochemistry,2010,101(1):77-92
[51] CORNWELL W K,CORNELISSEN J,AMATANGELO K,et al. Plant species traits are the predominant control on litter decomposition rates within biomes worldwide[J]. Ecology Letters,2010,11(10):1065-1071
[52] STERNER R W,ELSER J J. Ecological stoichiometry:The biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere[M]. Princeton:Princeton University Press,2002:42-44
[53] 张光德,赵传燕,戎战磊,等. 祁连山中部不同植被类型土壤生态化学计量特征研究[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2019,55(4):533-540
[54] LIU R S,WANG D M. Soil C,N,P and K stoichiometry affected by vegetation restoration patterns in the alpine region of the Loess Plateau,Northwest China[J]. Plose One,2020,15(11):e0241859

川西北沙地植被恢复对土壤碳氮磷及生态化学计量特征的影响

Effects of Vegetation Restoration of Sandy Land on the Characteristics of Soil Carbon,Nitrogen,Phosphorus and its Ecological Stoichiometry in Northwest Sichuan

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	付皓宇, 井长青, 郭文章, 陈宸, 邓小进. 准噶尔盆地荒漠灌丛草地土壤呼吸变化及其对土壤温、湿度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1677-1684.
[2]	陈莹, 王茜, 王子苑, 王小利. 不同石漠化程度对灌丛草地土壤细菌遗传多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(4): 756-761.
[3]	由政, 张鹏, 薛萐, 王国梁, 姚旭. 退耕地植被演替过程对土壤化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 657-661.
[4]	赵锦梅, 赵晶忠, 耿妍, 权佳, 徐长林. 祁连山东段不同高寒灌丛草地土壤性状特征变化[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 991-997.
[5]	陈子萱, 田福平, 郑阳. 施肥对玛曲高寒沙化草地主要植物种生态位的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 884-888.
[6]	刘发央, 徐长林, 龙瑞军. 牦牛放牧强度对金露梅灌丛草地群落物种多样性的影响[J]. , 2008, 16(6): 613-618.
[7]	吕世海, 冯长松, 高吉喜, 卢欣石. 呼伦贝尔沙化草地围封效应及生物多样性变化研究[J]. , 2008, 16(5): 442-447.
[8]	陈子萱, 田福平, 牛俊义, 王军强, 轩春香. 玛曲高寒沙化草地植物生态位特征研究[J]. , 2007, 15(6): 525-530.
[9]	曹文侠, 张德罡, 洪绂曾. 祁连山高寒灌丛草地杜鹃属植物的水分动态及生态适应[J]. , 2006, 14(1): 67-71.
[10]	许庆方, 董宽虎, 史书瑞, 刘锐, 张小明, 李胜和. 放牧利用白羊草灌丛草地的植被特征[J]. , 2004, 12(2): 136-139,157.
[11]	万里强, 李向林, 苏加楷, 白静仁. 三峡地区灌丛草地放牧山羊日粮组成及其喜食性[J]. , 2000, 8(3): 186-192.