辉河湿地河岸带土壤微生物群落组成与土壤理化关系

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.014

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1393-1405.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.014

辉河湿地河岸带土壤微生物群落组成与土壤理化关系

刘晶晶^1,2, 李金花², 季燕³, 靳三玲¹, 王旭^1,2, 刁兆岩¹, 关潇¹

1. 中国环境科学研究院生态研究所, 北京 100012;
2. 兰州大学生态学院, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3. 北京林业大学草业与草原学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2022-10-14 修回日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-31
通讯作者: 刁兆岩,E-mail:diaozhy@126.com;关潇,E-mail:cynthia815@126.com
作者简介:刘晶晶(1996-),女,汉族,河南周口人,硕士研究生,主要从事恢复生态学研究,E-mail:liujj961208@163.com;
基金资助:
中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(No.2020-YSKY-020);中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务专项(No.2020-JY-008)资助

Relationship between Soil Microbial Community Composition and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Riparian Zone of Huihe Wetland

LIU Jing-jing^1,2, LI Jin-hua², JI Yan³, JIN San-ling¹, WANG Xu^1,2, DIAO Zhao-yan¹, GUAN Xiao¹

1. Institute of Ecology, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, Beijing 100012, China;
2. College of Ecology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China;
3. School of Grassland Science, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2022-10-14 Revised:2023-01-03 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究依托于高通量测序的技术,通过研究辉河湿地河岸带上游、中上游、中游、中下游和下游河段不同淹水条件下土壤微生物群落组成,揭示辉河湿地河岸带不同淹水条件下土壤微生物群落变化及与土壤理化的关系。结果表明:拟杆菌门(Bacteroidota)和广古菌门(Halobacterota)丰度在3条淹水样带中的变化趋势为长期淹水区(W)>干湿交替区(WD)>未淹水区(D)(P<0.05),酸杆菌门(Acidobacteriota)和放线菌门(Actinobacteriota)丰度在3条淹水样带中的变化趋势为长期淹水区(W)<干湿交替区(WD)<未淹水区(D)(P<0.05),在属水平上,甲烷毛发菌属(Methanosaeta)、甲烷八叠球菌属(Methanosarcina)和unidentified-Bathyarchaeia丰度在3条样带中的变化趋势为长期淹水区(W)>干湿交替区(WD)>未淹水区(D)(P<0.05),RB41和Candidatus_Udaeobacter丰度在3条淹水样带中的变化趋势为长期淹水区(W)<干湿交替区(WD)<未淹水区(D)(P<0.05);微生物多样性与土壤容重和植物地上生物量呈显著负相关(P<0.05),土壤pH值、电导率、容重、土壤含水量、总磷和总有机碳是影响微生物群落组成的主要驱动因素。该研究为辉河湿地河岸带生态效果评估与修复提供了科学依据。

关键词: 辉河湿地, 河岸带, 淹水状态, 土壤微生物群落

Abstract: Based on high-throughput sequencing technology,this paper studied the soil microbial community composition in the upper,upper-middle,middle,middle-lower and lower reaches of the riparian zone of Huihe wetland under different flooding conditions,and revealed the changes of soil microbial communities and their relationship with soil physical and chemical properties under different flooding status. The results showed that:the abundance of Bacteroidota and Halobacterota in the three flooded zones displayed a trend of that in the Wetted State (W) > Wetting-drying State (WD) > Dried State (D) (P < 0.05),The abundance of Acidobacteriota and Actinobacteriota in the three flooded zones showed a trend of that in the Wetted State (W) < Wetting-drying State (WD) < Dried State (D) (P < 0.05). At the genus level,the abundance of Methanosaeta,Methanosarcina and unidentified-Bathyarchaeia in the three transits showed a trend of that in the Wetted State (W) > Wetting-drying State (WD) > Dried State (D) (P < 0.05). The variation trends of RB41 and Candidatus_udaeobacter abundance in three flooded zones were as follows:Wetted State (W) < Wetting-drying State (WD) < Dried State (D) (P < 0.05). Microbial diversity was negatively correlated with soil bulk density and aboveground biomass (P < 0.05). The soil pH,electrical conductivity,bulk density,soil water content,total phosphorus and total organic carbon were the main driving factors affecting microbial community composition. This study provided a scientific basis for the ecological assessment on the restoration of the riparian zone of the Hui River Wetland.

Key words: Huihe wetlands, Riparian zones, Flooded status, Soil microbial community

中图分类号:

X171.1

刘晶晶, 李金花, 季燕, 靳三玲, 王旭, 刁兆岩, 关潇. 辉河湿地河岸带土壤微生物群落组成与土壤理化关系[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1393-1405.

LIU Jing-jing, LI Jin-hua, JI Yan, JIN San-ling, WANG Xu, DIAO Zhao-yan, GUAN Xiao. Relationship between Soil Microbial Community Composition and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Riparian Zone of Huihe Wetland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1393-1405.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I5/1393

参考文献

[1] LEMETRE C,MAMIKO J,CHARLOP P,et al. Bacterial natural product biosynthetic domain composition in soil correlates with changes in latitude on a continent-wide scale[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2017,114(44):11615-11620
[2] MORRISSEY E M,MAU R L,SCHWARTXE,et al. Bacterial carbon use plasticity,phylogenetic diversity and the priming of soil organic matter[J]. The ISME journal,2017,11(8):1890-1899
[3] 郭二辉,云菲,冯志培,等. 河岸带不同植被格局对表层土壤养分分布和迁移特征的影响[J]. 自然资源学报,2016,31(7):1164-1172
[4] 佟斌,曾昭文,焉志远. 蚂蚁河河岸缓冲带湿地优势种植物群落构建技术研究[J]. 国土与自然资源研究,2018(3):93-96
[5] BING H J,WU Y H,ZHOU J,et al. Spatial variation of heavy metal contamination in the riparian sediments after two-year flow regulation in the Three Gorges Reservoir,China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2019(649):1004-1016
[6] SCHILING K E,JACOBSON P J,WOLTER C F. Using riparian zone scaling to optimize buffer placement and effectiveness[J]. Landscape Ecology,2018(33):147-156
[7] 郭二辉,樊子豪,张瑞香,等. 河岸带生态系统植被与土壤对水文变化的响应研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(23):1-10
[8] GREENWAY. Macrophyte zonation in stormwater wetlands:getting it right! A case study from subtropical Australia[J]. Water Science and Technology,2007,56(3):223-231
[9] 杨宁,邹冬生,杨满元,等. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地恢复过程中土壤微生物生物量与土壤养分演变[J]. 林业科学,2014,50(12):144-150
[10] 杨宁,杨满元,雷玉兰,等. 紫色土丘陵坡地土壤微生物群落的季节变化[J]. 生态环境学报,2015,24(1):34-40
[11] 钱进,郑浩,朱月明,等. 干湿交替对河岸带环境效应的影响机制研究进展[J]. 水利水电科技进展,2016,36(1):11-22
[12] 雷宏霖,王生荣,韩士杰,等. 土壤干湿交替对长白山阔叶红松林土壤微生物活性与区系的影响[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2009,37(7):80-86
[13] 靳永超,罗建武,朱彦鹏,等. 内蒙古辉河国家级自然保护区湿地保护成效[J]. 环境科学研究,2015,28(9):1424-1429
[14] 罗琰,苏德荣,吕世海,等. 辉河湿地河岸带植物物种多样性与土壤因子的关系[J]. 湿地科学,2016,14(3):396-402
[15] 靳勇超,王伟,辛利娟,等. 辉河国家级自然保护区土地覆盖与景观格局变化分析[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(10):1859-1866
[16] 靳三玲,郑志荣,刁兆岩,等. 呼伦贝尔草原辉河湿地表层土壤盐分分布特征[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(4):749-756
[17] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].第三版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:178-196
[18] CAPORASO G J,CHRISTIAN L L,WILLIAM A W,et al. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2011,108(Supplement 1):4516-4522
[19] 季淮,韩建刚,李萍萍,等. 洪泽湖湿地植被类型对土壤有机碳粒径及微生物群落结构特征的影响[J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,45(1):141-150
[20] 韩晓丽,黄春国,张芸香,等. 文峪河上游河岸带不同植被类型土壤nirS反硝化菌群结构及功能[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(6):1977-1989
[21] 陈影,陈苏,马鸿岳,等.辽河干流河岸带植物及微生物多样性研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2020,39(9):2048-2057
[22] YU X,HE X W,FENG Z S,et al. A comprehensive analysis of the microbial diversity in natural and engineered ecosystems based on high-throughput sequencing of 16S rRNA gene[J]. International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation,2019,140:160-168
[23] YANG Z Y,HOLLEBONE B P,SHAHK,et al. Biodegradation potential assessment by using autochthonous microorganisms from the sediments from Lac Mégantic (Quebec,Canada) contaminated with light residual oil[J]. Chemosphere,2020,239:124796
[24] 沈聪,刘爽,苏建宇,等. 半干旱荒漠区柠条根际细菌群落结构与功能[J]. 基因组学与应用生物学,2020,40(11-12):3508-3517
[25] WANG X J,ZHANG Z C,YU Z Q,et al. Composition and diversity of soil microbial communities in the alpine wetland and alpine forest ecosystems on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2020(747):141358
[26] HAN W J,ZHAO S,LIU H H,et al. Isolation identification and agarose degradation of a polysaccharide-degrading marine bacterium Persicobacter sp.JZB09[J]. Acta Microbiological Sinica,2012,52(6):776
[27] 章妮,陈克龙,祁闻,等. 模拟增温对青海湖鸟岛土壤产甲烷菌群落特征的影响[J]. 微生物学杂志,2022,42(1):17-25
[28] 台喜生,冯佳丽,李梅,等. 鞘氨醇单胞菌在生物降解方面的研究进展[J]. 湖南农业科学,2011(7):21-25
[29] 余锦涛,刘慧,李翠,等. 氯代脂肪烃污染土壤微生物群落结构的主控因子[J]. 环境科学与技术,2022,45(6):29-36
[30] MASZENANA M,BESSARAB I B,WILLIAM R B H,et al. The phylogeny,ecology and ecophysiology of the glycogen accumulating organism (GAO) Defluviicoccus in wastewater treatment plants[J]. Water Research,2022(221):118729
[31] ZHANG M Y,PATRICK J O,ZHANG J Y,et al. Linking soil nutrient cycling and microbial community with vegetation cover in riparian zone[J]. Geoderma,2021(384):114801
[32] 程萌,马俊杰,刘丹,等. CO₂封存泄漏的稻田土壤细菌监测指标筛选研究[J]. 环境科学学报,2021,41(6):2390-2401
[33] ZHENG Q,HU Y T,ZHANG S S,et al. Soil multifunctionality is affected by the soil environment and by microbial community composition and diversity[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2019(136):107521
[34] 潘福霞,来晓双,李欣,等. 不同湿地植物脱氮效果与根际土壤微生物群落功能多样性特征分析[J]. 环境科学研究,2020,33(6):1497-1503
[35] 丁成翔,杨晓霞,董全民. 青藏高原高寒草原放牧方式对植被、土壤及微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(1):159-169
[36] 李秀清,李晓红. 鄱阳湖湿地不同植物群落土壤养分及微生物多样性研究[J]. 生态环境学报,2019,28(2):385-394
[37] 李兴福,苏德荣,吕世海,等. 呼伦贝尔草原辉河湿地不同淹水状态的土壤碳氮磷特征比较[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(6):2204-2212
[38] 郭娜,孙丽娜,孟越,等. 辽河保护区河岸带土壤微生物群落结构特征[J]. 沈阳大学学报(自然科学版),2016,28(6):457-463
[39] 付莉娇,李雪琴,范继辉,等. 藏北高寒草原典型植物根际土壤细菌群落结构多样性及根系特征分析[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):1130-1140
[40] 姚世庭,芦光新,邓晔,等. 模拟增温对高寒草地土壤原核生物群落组成及多样性影响[J]. 草地学报,2021,29:27-34
[41] 汪焱,张英,苏贝贝,等. 高寒区不同地域燕麦根际土壤微生物多样性研究[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(2):358-366
[42] 张杰雪,王占青,全小龙,等. 高寒地区人工草地土壤微生物群落对不同种植方式和年限的响应[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(2):270-280
[43] SCHIMEL J P,GULLEDGE J M,CLEIN-CURLEY J S,et al. Moisture effects on microbial activity and community structure in decomposing birch litter in the Alaskan taiga[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1999,31(6):831-838
[44] 蔡晓布,张永青,邵伟. 不同退化程度高寒草原土壤肥力变化特征[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(3):1034-1044
[45] 孔涛,吴祥云,赵雪淞,等. 浑河上游河岸带土壤微生物数量及酶活性特征[J]. 水土保持通报,2014,34(1):123-128

辉河湿地河岸带土壤微生物群落组成与土壤理化关系

Relationship between Soil Microbial Community Composition and Soil Physicochemical Properties in Riparian Zone of Huihe Wetland

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[2]	靳三玲, 郑志荣, 刁兆岩, 王旭, 马普, 吕世海. 呼伦贝尔草原辉河湿地表层土壤盐分分布特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 749-756.
[3]	姚玉娇, 梁婷, 马源, 周会程, 肖海龙, 孙斌, 张德罡, 陈建纲. 土壤微生物群落多样性对高寒草甸退化程度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1489-1497.
[4]	余飞燕, 王坤悦, 叶鑫, 董洪君, 黄凯, 罗志力, 郝建锋. 金马河温江段河岸带不同生境草本群落物种多样性和生物量变化研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3): 793-800.
[5]	张萌萌, 敖红, 李鑫, 张景云, 王宁, 鞠成梅, 王佳, 蔡敦江, 孙广玉. 桑树/苜蓿间作对根际土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 302-309.
[6]	高艳芝, 宗俊勤, 孟璠, 陈静波, 赵瑞霜, 刘建秀. 不同暖季型草坪草种耐淹性能评价[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1021-1030.