黄河中游湿地土壤养分与酶活性特征及相关性研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.03.010

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 474-479,484.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.03.010

黄河中游湿地土壤养分与酶活性特征及相关性研究

刘云鹏¹, 申卫博^2,3, 张社奇¹, 解迎革¹, 郑纪勇^2,3

1. 西北农林科技大学理学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2012-11-08 修回日期:2013-02-05 出版日期:2013-06-15 发布日期:2013-06-05
通讯作者: 申卫博
作者简介:刘云鹏(1971- ),男,新疆库尔勒人,讲师,硕士,主要从事土壤生态与水土保持方面研究工作,E-mail:yunpengliu@nwsuaf.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(41071195);中国科学院西部之光项目(XBZG-2010-15)资助

Characteristics and Correlation Analysis of Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activities of the Middle Yellow River Wetland

LIU Yun-peng¹, SHEN Wei-bo^2,3, ZHANG She-qi¹, XIE Ying-ge¹, ZHENG Ji-yong^2,3

1. College of Science, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2012-11-08 Revised:2013-02-05 Online:2013-06-15 Published:2013-06-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在陕西合阳黄河湿地,通过野外采样和室内分析相结合的方法,研究该湿地退化过程中不同土地利用方式(湿地、天然草地、开荒耕地和盐碱地)对土壤养分(有机质和N,P,K)和酶活性(脲酶、蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶、碱性磷酸酶)的影响及其变化规律。结果表明:土地利用方式对土壤养分和酶活性的影响极显著(P<0.01),其排列顺序为:天然草地>开荒耕地>湿地>盐碱地。开荒耕地的土壤有机质和土壤养分介于天然草地和湿地之间,盐碱地土壤有机质仅为天然草地和湿地的3.4%和6.9%,土地资源的过渡开发利用会严重影响土壤肥力导致土壤退化。酶活性与土壤有机质及各养分成显著和极显著相关,且不同土壤酶活性间也存在显著相关性。不同土地利用方式下,脲酶、蔗糖酶、过氧化氢酶和碱性磷酸酶差异极显著(P<0.01),其活性高低与土壤养分变化顺序基本一致。土壤酶活性反映出土壤肥力水平的高低,可以作为评价黄河湿地土壤肥力的指标。

关键词: 黄河中游湿地, 土地利用方式, 土壤养分, 酶活性

Abstract: The effects of different land use patterns (wetland, natural meadow, cultivated land, saline-alkali land) on soil nutrient (organic matter, N, P, K) and enzyme activities (urease, invertase, catalase, alkaline phosphatase) in wetland degradation were studied for the Yellow River wetland of Shaanxi using field sampling and indoor analysis. Results indicated that soil nutrient and soil enzyme activities had significant differences among different land use patterns (P<0.01). The order was natural meadow>cultivated land>wetland>saline-alkali land. Soil organic matter and soil nutrients of cultivated land fell between that of natural meadow and wetland, but saline-alkali land was far below that of natural meadow and wetland by 3.4% and 6.9%, indicating that over-exploitation of land resources will seriously affect soil fertility and lead to soil degradation. Enzyme activities were significantly correlated with soil organic matter and soil nutrient, and between soil enzyme activities themselves. The activities of urease, invertase, catalase, alkaline phosphatase were significantly different under diverse land use patterns (P<0.01), varied in the same order as that of soil nutrient. Soil enzyme activities could indicate the level of soil fertility, and could be used as an index for soil fertility evaluation of wetlands.

Key words: The middle Yellow River wetland, Land use patterns, Soil nutrition, Enzyme activities

中图分类号:

刘云鹏, 申卫博, 张社奇, 解迎革, 郑纪勇. 黄河中游湿地土壤养分与酶活性特征及相关性研究[J]. , 2013, 21(3): 474-479,484.

LIU Yun-peng, SHEN Wei-bo, ZHANG She-qi, XIE Ying-ge, ZHENG Ji-yong. Characteristics and Correlation Analysis of Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activities of the Middle Yellow River Wetland[J]. , 2013, 21(3): 474-479,484.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.03.010

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2013/V21/I3/474

参考文献

[1] 廖玉静,宋长春.湿地生态系统退化研究综述[J].土壤通报,2009,40(5):1199-1203
[2] 安娜,高乃云,刘长娥.中国湿地的退化原因、评价及保护[J].生态学杂志,2008,27(5):821-828
[3] Gllvear D J, Bradley C. Hydrological monitoring and surveillance for wetland conservation and management; a UK perspective[J]. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere,2000,25(7):571-588
[4] Hao F, Lai X. Effects of land use changes on the ecosystem service values of a reclamation farm in northeast China[J].Environmental Management,2012,50(5):888-899
[5] Kang H, Freeman C. Phosphatase and arylsulphatase activities in wetland soil: Annual variation and controlling factors[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1999,31(3):449-454
[6] 王静,张仁陟,张天佑.保护性耕作方式对土壤微生物生理类群和酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2011,25(7):168-172
[7] 胡慧蓉,马焕成,王艳霞,等.土地利用方式变化对土壤养分与有机碳、氮的影响[J].中国水土保持,2010(11):40-42
[8] 薛立,邝立刚,陈红跃,等.不同林分土壤养分、微生物与酶活性的研究[J].土壤学报,2003,40(2):280-285
[9] Cabezas A, Comín F A. Carbon and nitrogen accretion in the topsoil of the Middle Ebro River Floodplains (NE Spain): Implications for their ecological restoration[J]. Ecological Engineering,2010,36(5):640-652
[10] 安韶山,黄懿梅,郑粉莉,等.黄土丘陵区草地土壤脲酶活性特征及其与土壤性质的关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):233-237
[11] 杜峰,梁宗锁,徐学选,等.陕北黄土丘陵区撂荒草地群落生物量及植被土壤养分效应[J].生态学报,2007,27(5):1673-1683
[12] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986:94-112
[13] 关松荫.土壤酶及其研究法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1986:136-152
[14] Lal R. Challenges and opportunities in soil organic matter research[J].European Journal of Soil Science,2009,60(2):158-169
[15] Makoi J R, Ndakidemi P A.Selected soil enzymes: examples of their potential roles in the ecosystem[J]. African Journal of Biotechnology,2008,7(3):181-191
[16] 鲍文,赖奕卡.湘中红壤丘陵区不同土地利用类型对土壤特性的影响[J].中国水土保持,2011(10):47-50
[17] 崔晓东,侯龙鱼,马风云,等.黄河三角洲不同土地利用方式土壤养分特征和酶活性及其相关性研究[J].西北林学院学报,2007,22(4):66-69
[18] Omidi H, Tahmasebi Z, Torabi H, et al. Soil enzymatic activities and available P and Zn as affected by tillage practices, canola (Brassica napus L.) cultivars and planting dates[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2008,44(4):443-450
[19] 周礼恺.土壤酶活性的总体在评价土壤肥力水平中的作用[J].土壤学报,1983,20(4):413-417
[20] 刘美英,高永,李强,等.神东矿区复垦地土壤酶活性变化和分布特征[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(1):164-168
[21] Cunqi L, Jianjian L. Landward changes of soil enzyme activities in a tidal flat wetland of the Yangtze River Estuary and correlations with physico-chemical factors[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2009,27(9):3663-3669
[22] 梁艳茹,和文祥,邢少峰,等.不同价态铬对土壤碱性磷酸酶活性的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报,2010,38(5):156-160
[23] 吕春花,郑粉莉,安韶山.子午岭地区植被演替过程中土壤养分及酶活性特征研究[J].干旱地区农业研究,2009,27(2):227-232
[24] 何斌,温远光,袁霞,等.广西英罗港不同红树植物群落土壤理化性质与酶活性的研究[J].林业科学,2002,38(2):21-26
[25] Bandick A K, Dick R P. Field management effects on soil enzyme activities[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1999,31(11):1471-1479
[26] 邱丽萍,刘军,王益权,等.土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2004,10(3):277-280

黄河中游湿地土壤养分与酶活性特征及相关性研究

Characteristics and Correlation Analysis of Soil Nutrient and Enzyme Activities of the Middle Yellow River Wetland

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[2]	赵朋波, 邱开阳, 谢应忠, 赵香君, 陈林, 刘王锁, 李海泉, 孟文芬, 虎学琴, 何毅, 黄业芸, 李亚园. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同固沙灌木下土壤养分的空间异质性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[3]	王文军, 刘磊, 朱碧锋, 王成之, 王含笑, 马云锡, 魏江文, 王森山. 芥子油苷对豌豆蚜生长、存活及保护酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1675-1681.
[4]	王宝强, 赵颖, 朱晓林, 王旺田, 魏小红. 盐碱胁迫对藜麦幼苗叶片光合特性及抗氧化系统的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1689-1696.
[5]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[6]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[7]	于铁峰, 郝凤, 张永亮, 高凯. 沙地豆禾混播草地土壤酶与土壤养分对混播比例的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1217-1223.
[8]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[9]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[10]	宿敬龙, 祁娟, 刘艳君, 杨航, 李明. 不同氮素水平及施氮方式对老芒麦根际土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 259-269.
[11]	刘崇义, 靳旭妹, 王莹莹, 李腾飞, 陈新义, 曹馨悦, 龙明秀, 何树斌. 生草对关中平原有机猕猴桃园土壤养分及细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2711-2720.
[12]	陈白洁, 樊博, 汪新川, 张振华. 不同材质可降解无纺布覆盖种植对高寒人工草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2752-2762.
[13]	向雪梅, 德科加, 林伟山, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体, 钱诗祎. 氮素添加对高寒草甸植物群落多样性和土壤生态化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2769-2777.
[14]	李文, 魏廷虎, 阿保地, 永措巴占, 才仁塔次, 周玉海, 李文浩, 郭卫兴, 张雁平. 化肥减施配合有机肥对高寒区燕麦营养品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[15]	刘麟, 沙栢平, 高雪芹, 伏兵哲. 宁夏引黄灌区水肥耦合对苜蓿地土壤分形特征和养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2538-2546.