植被退化对尕海湿地土壤有机碳库及碳库管理指数的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.03.022

草地学报 ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (3): 687-694.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.03.022

植被退化对尕海湿地土壤有机碳库及碳库管理指数的影响

马维伟¹, 李广¹, 宋捷¹, 闫丽娟², 武利玉¹

1. 甘肃农业大学林学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2019-01-04 修回日期:2019-04-10 出版日期:2019-06-15 发布日期:2019-07-19
通讯作者: 李广
作者简介:马维伟(1980-),男,甘肃靖远人,博士,副教授,主要从事水土保持与荒漠化防治研究,Email:maww@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31860143，41561022）；甘肃农业大学青年导师资金项目（GAU-QNDS-201713）；甘肃省GEF/OP12三期专题研究（GS-GEF/OP12-01）；甘肃省科技计划项目（18JR3RA163）；2019陇原青年创新创业（个人项目）“气候变化背景下尕海退化湿地生态系统恢复技术研究”；甘肃省财政厅项目“农牧交错带生态经济发展模式示范推广”和甘肃省高等学校科学研究创新团队项目（2018C-16）共同资助

Effect of Vegetation Degradation on Soil Organic Carbon Pool and Carbon Pool Management Index in the Gahai Wetland,China

MA Wei-wei¹, LI Guang¹, SONG Jie¹, YAN Li-juan², WU Li-yu¹

1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070 China;
2. College of Agriculture, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou 730070 China

Received:2019-01-04 Revised:2019-04-10 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-07-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以青藏高原东缘尕海湿地不同植被退化程度样地（未退化healthy vegetation（CK）、轻度退化slightly degraded vegetation（SD）、中度退化moderately degraded vegetation（MD）和重度退化heavily degraded vegetation（HD））为研究对象，分析了植被退化对湿地土壤不同层次总碳、活性碳、微生物量碳的影响，并计算了各退化程度的碳库管理指数。结果表明：除HD的活性炭外，土壤总有机碳和活性碳均随土层的增加而减少，0~40 cm平均总有机碳含量为CK > SD > MD > HD，CK显著高于其他退化阶段；土壤活性有机碳含量为CK > MD > SD > HD，植被退化显著降低土壤活性有机碳，尤其0~10 cm，10~20 cm土层的土壤活性碳比CK分别下降了72.31%和53.31%；CK和SD的微生物量碳随土层加深显著降低，HD恰好相反，0~40 cm平均土壤微生物量碳含量为MD > CK > SD > HD，MD显著增加土壤微生物量碳，而HD显著降低土壤微生物量碳；尕海湿地0~40 cm土层的碳库各项指数受表层的影响比较大，植被退化能显著降低表层土壤的总有机碳、稳态碳和碳库指数，而显著增加湿地碳库活度指数。

关键词: 植被退化, 总有机碳, 活性碳, 碳库管理指数

Abstract: The research took different degradation stages of Gahai Wetland (CK:non degradation,SD:light degradation,MD:moderate degradation,HD:heavy degradation) in the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau as research objects. The total organic carbon (TOC),active organic carbon (AOC),microbial biomass carbon (MBC) and carbon pool management index (CPMI) of soil during vegetation degradation succession was discussed. The results indicated that except for AOC in HD,the TOC and AOC pool were decreased with the deeper layer. The order of average TOC in 0-40 cm was CK > SD > MD > HD. CK was significantly greater than other degradation stages. The AOC order of 0~40 cm was CK > MD > SD > HD. Vegetation degradation significantly reduced AOC,especially in 0~10 cm and 10~20 cm layer,where the AOC were 72.31% and 53.31% lower than CK,respectively. Contents of MBC in CK and SD were decreased significantly with the deeper layer,but HD was the opposite. The order of average MBC in 0~40 cm was MD > CK > SD > HD. MD significantly increased MBC,while HD significantly decreased MBC. The Soil C Pool Management Index of 0~40 cm was greatly affected by the surface layer in Gahai wetland. Vegetation degradation significantly reduced TOC,inactive carbon (UAC) and CPMI,but significantly increased activity index (AI) in the alpine wetland.

Key words: Vegetation degradation, Total organic carbon, The active organic carbon, Carbon pool management index

中图分类号:

S714

马维伟, 李广, 宋捷, 闫丽娟, 武利玉. 植被退化对尕海湿地土壤有机碳库及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 687-694.

MA Wei-wei, LI Guang, SONG Jie, YAN Li-juan, WU Li-yu. Effect of Vegetation Degradation on Soil Organic Carbon Pool and Carbon Pool Management Index in the Gahai Wetland,China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(3): 687-694.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.03.022

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2019/V27/I3/687

参考文献

[1] Zheng Y M,Niu Z G,Gong P, et al. Preliminary estimation of the organic carbon pool in China's wetlands[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin,2013,58:662-670
[2] Saunders M J,Kansiime F,Jones MB. Reviewing the carbon cycle dynamics and carbon sequestration potential of Cyperus papyrus L. wetlands in tropical Africa[J]. Wetlands Ecology and Management,2014,22:143-155
[3] 高俊琴,徐兴良,张锋,等. 水分梯度对若尔盖高寒湿地土壤活性有机碳分布的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2008(03):126-131
[4] 王改玲,李立科,郝明德. 长期施肥和秸秆覆盖土壤活性有机质及碳库管理指数变化[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2017,23(1):20-26
[5] 罗原骏,蒲玉琳,龙高飞,等. 施肥方式对土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 浙江农业报,2018,30(08):1389-1397
[6] 杨丽霞,潘剑君. 土壤活性有机碳库测定方法研究进展[J]. 土壤通报,2004,35(4):502-506
[7] 蒲玉琳,叶春,张世熔,等. 若尔盖沙化草地不同生态恢复模式土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数变化[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(02):367-377
[8] 杨文焕,王铭浩,李卫平,等. 黄河湿地包头段不同地被类型对土壤有机碳的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2018,27(6):1034-1043
[9] 马维伟,王跃思,李广,等. 尕海湿地植被退化过程中植被-土壤系统有机碳储量变化特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(12):3900-3906
[10] 刘育红,李希来,李长慧,等. 三江源区高寒草甸湿地植被退化与土壤有机碳损失[J]. 农业环境科学学报,2009,28(12):2559-2567
[11] 马维伟,李广,石万里,等. 甘肃尕海湿地退化过程中植物生物量及物种多样性变化动态[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(5):960-966
[12] Ma W,Alhassan A R M,Wang Y, et al. Greenhouse gas emissions as influenced by wetland vegetation degradation along a moisture gradient on the eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau of North-West China[J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,2018,112:335-354
[13] 唐国勇,李昆,孙永玉,等. 土地利用方式对土壤有机碳和碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 林业科学研究,2011,24(6):754-759
[14] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:106-231
[15] 李琳,李素娟,张海林,等. 保护性耕作下土壤碳库管理指数的研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2006,20(03):106-109
[16] 张秀兰,王方超,方向民,等. 亚热带杉木林土壤有机碳及其活性组分对氮磷添加的响应[J]. 应用生态学报,2017,28(02):449-455
[17] Marklein A R,Houlton B Z. Nitrogen inputs accelerate phosphorus cycling rates across a wide variety of terrestrial ecosystems[J]. New Phytologist,2012,193:696-704
[18] 黎嘉成,高明,田冬,等. 秸秆及生物炭还田对土壤有机碳及其活性组分的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(5):39-50
[19] Jackson R B,Canadell J,Ehleringer J R,et al. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomass[J]. Oecologia,1996,108:389-411
[20] Conteh A,Lefroy R D B,Blair G J. Dynamics of organic matter in soil as determined by variations in13C/12C isotopic ratios and fractionation by ease of oxidation[J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research,1997,35:881-890
[21] Thorburn P J,Meier E A,Collins K, et al. Changes in soil carbon sequestration,fractionation and soil fertility in response to sugarcane residue retention are site-specific[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2012,120:99-111
[22] 王国兵,赵小龙,王明慧,等. 苏北沿海土地利用变化对土壤易氧化碳含量的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2013,24(04):921-926
[23] 张春霞,郝明德,魏孝荣,等. 不同农田生态系统土壤微生物生物量碳的变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2006,14(1):81-83
[24] 徐秋芳,姜培坤,沈泉. 灌木林与阔叶林土壤有机碳库的比较研究[J]. 北京林业大学学报,2005,27(2):18-22
[25] 谢锦升,杨玉盛,杨智杰,等. 退化红壤植被恢复后土壤轻组有机质的季节动态[J]. 应用生态学报,2008(03):557-563
[26] 胡婵娟,傅伯杰,靳甜甜,等.黄土丘陵沟壑区植被恢复对土壤微生物生物量碳和氮的影响[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(01):45-50
[27] 王风芹,田丽青,宋安东,等. 华北刺槐林与自然恢复植被土壤微生物量碳、氮含量四季动态[J]. 林业科学,2015,51(03):16-24
[28] Goberna M,Snchez J,Pascual J A,et al. Surface andsubsurface organic carbon,microbial biomass and activity in a forest soil sequence[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38:2233-2243
[29] Bundt M,Widmer F,Pesaro M,et al. Preferential flow paths:Biological'hot spots'in soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2001,33:729-738
[30] 罗原骏,蒲玉琳,龙高飞,等. 施肥方式对土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数的影响[J]. 浙江农业学报,2018,30(8):1389-1397
[31] 蒲玉琳,叶春,张世熔,等.若尔盖沙化草地不同生态恢复模式土壤活性有机碳及碳库管理指数变化[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(2):367-377
[32] Wu P,Zhang H,Cui L,et al. Impacts of alpine wetland degradation on the composition,diversity and trophic structure of soil nematodes on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Scientific Reports,2017,7(1):837
[33] Yang G,Chen H,Wu N,et al. Effects of soil warming,rainfall reduction and water table level on CH4 emissions from the Zoige peatland in China[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2014,78:83-89
[34] 魏文彬,李婷,李俊臻. 尕海湿地生态系统的保护与管理[J]. 湿地科学与管理,2010,6(3):32-34
[35] 李斌,董锁成,江晓波,等. 若尔盖湿地草原沙化驱动因素分析[J]. 水土保持研究,2008,15(3):112-115

植被退化对尕海湿地土壤有机碳库及碳库管理指数的影响

Effect of Vegetation Degradation on Soil Organic Carbon Pool and Carbon Pool Management Index in the Gahai Wetland,China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 4

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张丽华, 崔东, 杨海军, 赵阳, 张雨露, 刘海军, 闫俊杰, 王晓龙. 海拔对伊犁河谷草原苦豆子种群土壤活性有机碳特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 200-206.
[2]	孙文颖, 马维伟, 李广, 吴江琪, 许延昭. 尕海湿地植被退化过程中土壤蔗糖酶和淀粉酶活性的动态特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 88-96.
[3]	聂志刚, 吴江琪, 马维伟, 李广, 闫丽娟. 甘南尕海湿地不同退化程度植物碳、氮、磷的化学计量特征及动态变化[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 386-392.
[4]	冯文兰, 钟昊哲, 王永前, 龚雪梅. 2001—2013年若尔盖地区植被退化的时空格局分析[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(2): 239-245.