黄土丘陵区森林草原带不同退耕年限植物群落和土壤N,P化学计量特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.02.012

草地学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 322-329.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.02.012

黄土丘陵区森林草原带不同退耕年限植物群落和土壤N,P化学计量特征

戚德辉¹, 温仲明^1,2,3, 杨士梭², 王红霞², 郭茹³

1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2015-03-18 修回日期:2016-01-07 出版日期:2016-04-15 发布日期:2016-06-06
通讯作者: 温仲明
作者简介:戚德辉(1988-),男,山东滨州人,硕士,主要从事资源环境监测与评价方面的研究,E-mail:qdh271897661@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(41271297,41030532);中国科学院重要方向项目(KZCX2-EW-406)资助

Concentration of N, P and Stoichiometry Characteristics of Plant Communities and Soil under Different Restoration Stages at a Forest-steppe Zone in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau, China

QI De-hui¹, WEN Zhong-ming^1,2,3, YANG Shi-suo², WANG Hong-xia², GUO Ru³

1. College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A & F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Science, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2015-03-18 Revised:2016-01-07 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2016-06-06

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

以黄土丘陵森林草原区5个退耕阶段的植物群落和土壤为研究对象,通过测定土壤和植物群落叶片、细根全N、全P含量,阐明了不同退耕阶段植物群落和土壤N,P的化学计量特征。结果表明:各土层全N含量及N/P值在不同退耕年限间差异显著(P < 0.05);同一土层中,全N含量和N/P值随着退耕年限的增加呈现出先减少后增加的趋势,大体在第3阶段(退耕16~22年)值最小;在不同退耕年限内,全N、全P、N/P均随土层加深呈现出逐渐减小的趋势。植物群落叶N含量,叶P含量,叶N/P和根P含量在不同退耕年限间差异极显著(P < 0.01);随着退耕年限的增加,叶N含量,叶P含量和根P含量呈现出先减小后增加的趋势,并且在第3阶段值最小;而根P含量在第4阶段(退耕25~30年)达到最小值;叶N/P大于根N/P。植物群落水平的叶片,细根和土壤的N,P及N/P之间存在不同的相关关系。P是黄土丘陵区森林草原带植物群落生物生长和群落演替的限制因素。

关键词: 黄土丘陵区, 退耕年限, 植物群落, 土壤, 化学计量特征

Abstract:

In this study, we selected five plant communities and soil under different vegetation restoration stages at a forest-steppe zone in hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau, and measured the concentration of N and P in leaf, fine root and soil at five restoration stages. The aims of this study were to clarify the N, P and N/P stoichiometry characteristics of plant communities and soil. The results showed that the total N concentration and N/P was significantly different (P < 0.05) among vegetation restoration stages in 0~20 cm, 20~40 cm and 40~60 cm soil layers. The total N concentration and N/P decreased first and then increased with increasing vegetation restoration stages, and they reached the lowest value at the third stage (restored 16~22 years). Meanwhile, the total N concentration, P concentration and N/P decreased with the increase of the soil layer depth at any stage. The total N concentration, P concentration and N/P in leaf and P concentration in fine root was significantly different (P < 0.01) among different stages. The total N concentration, P concentration of leaf and P concentration of fine root decreased first and then increased with increasing vegetation restoration stages, and reached the lowest value at the third stage; while P concentration of fine root reached the lowest values in the fourth stage(restored 25~30 years). The N/P of leaf was greater than that of fine root. The total N concentration, total P concentration and the N/P of leaf, fine root and soil had different correlativity. P was the limiting factor of plant growth and communities restoration at the forest-steppe zone in hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau.

Key words: Hilly and gully region of the Loess Plateau, Vegetation restoration, Plant communities, Soil, Stoichiometry characteristics

中图分类号:

Q948

戚德辉, 温仲明, 杨士梭, 王红霞, 郭茹. 黄土丘陵区森林草原带不同退耕年限植物群落和土壤N,P化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 322-329.

QI De-hui, WEN Zhong-ming, YANG Shi-suo, WANG Hong-xia, GUO Ru. Concentration of N, P and Stoichiometry Characteristics of Plant Communities and Soil under Different Restoration Stages at a Forest-steppe Zone in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau, China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(2): 322-329.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.02.012

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2016/V24/I2/322

参考文献

[1] Elser J J, Dobberfuhl D R, MacKay N A, et al. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry[J]. BioScience, 1996,46(9):674-684
[2] 王绍强,于贵瑞. 生态系统碳氮磷元素的生态化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(8):3937-3947
[3] Koerselman W, Meuleman A F M. The vegetation N:P ratio:a new tool to detect the nature of nutrient limitation[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1996,33(6):1441-1450
[4] Wright I J, Reich P B, Westoby M, et al. The worldwide leaf economics spectrum[J]. Nature,2004,428(6985):821-827
[5] Vitousek P M, Porder S, Houlton B Z, et al. Terrestrial phosphorus limitation: mechanisms, implications, and nitrogen-phosphorus interactions[J]. Ecological applications,2010,20(1):5-15
[6] Vitousek P M, Howarth R W. Nitrogen limitation on land and in the sea: how can it occur?[J]. Biogeochemistry,1991,13(2):87-115
[7] 杨雪,李奇,王绍美,等. 两种白刺叶片及沙堆土壤化学计量学特征的比较[J]. 中国沙漠,2011,31(5):1156-1160
[8] 刘万德,苏建荣,李帅锋,等. 云南普洱季风常绿阔叶林演替系列植物和土壤C、N、P化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(23):6581-6590
[9] Wassen M J, Olde Venterink H G M, Swart E O A M. Nutrient concentrations in mire vegetation as a measure of nutrient limitation in mire ecosystems[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1995,6(1):5-16
[10] 隋媛媛,杜峰,张兴昌. 黄土丘陵区撂荒群落土壤速效养分空间变异性研究[J]. 草业学报,2011,20(2):76-84
[11] 温仲明,焦峰,赫晓慧,等. 黄土高原森林边缘区退耕地植被自然恢复及其对土壤养分变化的影响[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(1):16-23
[12] 朱秋莲,邢肖毅,张宏,等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区不同植被区土壤生态化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2013,33(15):4674-4682
[13] 温仲明,焦峰,刘宝元,等. 黄土高原森林草原区退耕地植被自然恢复与土壤养分变化[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(11):2025-2029
[14] Dijkstra F A, Pendall E, Morgan J A, et al. Climate change alters stoichiometry of phosphorus and nitrogen in a semiarid grassland[J]. New Phytologist,2012,196(3):807-815
[15] Zhang H Y, Wu H H, Yu Q, et al. Sampling date, leaf age and root size: implications for the study of plant C:N:P stoichiometry[J]. PloS one,2013,8(4):e60360
[16] 王凯博,上官周平. 黄土丘陵区燕沟流域典型植物叶片C、N、P化学计量特征季节变化[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(17):4985-4991
[17] 郑颖,温仲明,宋光,等. 环境及遗传背景对延河流域植物叶片和细根功能性状变异的影响[J]. 生态学报,2014,34(10):2682-2692
[18] 王维奇,仝川,贾瑞霞. 不同淹水频率下湿地土壤碳氮磷生态化学计量特征[J]. 水土保持学报,2010,24(3):238-242
[19] 王晶苑,王绍,李纫兰,等. 中国四中森林主要优势植物的C:N:P化学计量学特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2011,35(6):587-595
[20] Wu T G, Yu M K, Wang G G, et al. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across forty-two woody species in Southeast China[J]. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology,2012,44(10):255-263
[21] 宋彦涛,周道玮,李强,等. 松嫩草地80种草本植物叶片氮磷化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2012,36(3):222-230
[22] 杨阔,黄建辉,董丹,等. 青藏高原草地植物群落冠层叶片氮磷化学计量学分析[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):17-22
[23] 高三平,李俊祥,徐明策,等. 天童常绿阔叶林不同演替阶段常见种叶片 N, P 化学计量学特征[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(3):948-952
[24] 刘兴诏,周国逸,张德强,等. 南亚热带森林不同演替阶段植物与土壤中N、P的化学计量特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):64-71
[25] 徐冰,程雨曦,甘慧洁,等. 内蒙古锡林河流域典型草原植物叶片与细根性状在种间及种内水平上的关联[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):29-38
[26] 温仲明,焦峰,焦菊英. 黄土丘陵区延河流域潜在植被分布预测与制图[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(9):1897-1904
[27] 秦伟,朱清科,张宇清,等. 陕北黄土区生态修复过程中植物群落物种多样性变化[J]. 应用生态学报,2009,20(2):403-409
[28] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30
[29] 龚时慧,温仲明,施宇. 延河流域植物群落功能性状对环境梯度的响应[J]. 生态学报,2011,31(20):6088-6097
[30] 焦峰,温仲明,焦菊英,等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地土壤养分变异特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(6):724-730
[31] 焦菊英,马祥华,白文娟,等. 黄土丘陵沟壑区退耕地植物群落与土壤环境因子的对应分析[J]. 土壤学报,2005,42(05):42-50
[32] 魏孝荣,邵明安. 黄土高原沟壑区小流域坡地土壤养分分布特征[J]. 生态学报,2007,27(2):603-612
[33] Niklas K J, Owens T, Reich P B, et al. Nitrogen/phosphorus leaf stoichiometry and the scaling of plant growth[J]. Ecology Letters,2005,8(6):636-642
[34] He J S, Wang L, lynn Dan F B, et al. Leaf nitrogen: phosphorus stoichiometry across Chinese grassland biomes[J]. Oecologia,2007,155(2):301-310
[35] Reich P B, Oleksyn J. Global patterns of plant leaf N and P in relation to temperature and latitude[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2004,101(30):11001-11006
[36] 张文彦,樊江文,钟华平,等. 中国典型草原优势植物功能群氮磷化学计量学特征研究[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(4):503-509
[37] Han W X, Fang J Y, Guo D L, et al. Leaf nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry across 753 terrestrial plant species in China[J]. New Phytologist,2005,168(2):377-385
[38] 任书杰,于贵瑞,陶波,等. 中国东部南北样带654种植物叶片氮和磷的化学计量学特征研究[J]. 环境科学,2007,28(12):2665-2673
[39] Chapin C T, Pastor J. Nutrient limitations in the northern pitcher plant Sarracenia purpurea[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1995,73(5):728-734
[40] Shaver G R, Chapin F S III. Long-term responses to factorial, NPK fertilizer treatment by Alaskan wet and moist tundra sedge species[J]. Ecography,1995,18(3):259-275
[41] Güsewell S. N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance[J]. New Phytologist,2004,164(2):243-266
[42] 施宇,温仲明,龚时慧,等. 黄土丘陵区植物功能性状沿气候梯度的变化规律[J]. 水土保持研究,2012,19(001):107-111

黄土丘陵区森林草原带不同退耕年限植物群落和土壤N,P化学计量特征

Concentration of N, P and Stoichiometry Characteristics of Plant Communities and Soil under Different Restoration Stages at a Forest-steppe Zone in Hilly and Gully Region of the Loess Plateau, China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[2]	秦海蓉, 陈长成, 胡月明, 王立亚, 肖武, 赵之重, 胡永强, 赵理, 马秉云, 霍俊领, 王福成. 青海省高寒草地土壤侵蚀强度及其空间分布特点[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 104-112.
[3]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[4]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[5]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[6]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[7]	晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[8]	陈国茜, 祝存兄, 李素雲, 周秉荣, 李甫, 曹晓云, 周华坤. 三江源地区土壤水分的地理分区遥感模型构建及时空变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 199-207.
[9]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[10]	王晓芬, 吴玉鑫, 肖海龙, 张格非, 陈建纲, 张德罡. 三江源退化高寒草原植物种间亲和性和土壤团聚体特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2001-2009.
[11]	郭文章, 井长青, 王公鑫, 侯志雄, 赵苇康. 天山北坡荒漠草原土壤呼吸和生态系统呼吸对降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
[12]	赵朋波, 邱开阳, 谢应忠, 赵香君, 陈林, 刘王锁, 李海泉, 孟文芬, 虎学琴, 何毅, 黄业芸, 李亚园. 毛乌素沙地南缘不同固沙灌木下土壤养分的空间异质性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2040-2048.
[13]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[14]	孟宣辰, 马鹏程, 马杰, 段珍, 韩阳阳, 张吉宇. 黄土高原半干旱区紫花苜蓿覆膜垄沟和施肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[15]	曲艳, 宋倩, 杨合龙, 赵坤, 赵敏, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 戎郁萍. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.