混播比例和浇水频率对热研2号柱花草和巴西含羞草生长早期种间竞争的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.024

草地学报 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (5): 1088-1096.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.024

混播比例和浇水频率对热研2号柱花草和巴西含羞草生长早期种间竞争的影响

李雪枫¹, 赵庆杰², 王坚¹

1. 海南大学热带农林学院, 海南海口 570228;
2. 海南大学应用科技学院, 海南儋州 571737

收稿日期:2016-11-02 修回日期:2017-09-18 出版日期:2017-10-15 发布日期:2018-01-25
通讯作者: 王坚,E-mail:wangjian901@163.com
作者简介:李雪枫(1974-),女,宁夏隆德人,博士,讲师,主要从事植物保护与资源利用教学与研究,E-mail:xfli0922@163.com
基金资助:
海南省自然科学基金项目（312062）；海南大学青年基金项目（HDqnjj1211）资助

Effects of the Mixed Sowing Ratio and Watering Frequency on the Inter-specific Competition between Stylosanthes guianensis ‘Reyan No.2’ and Mimosa invisa during Early Growth

LI Xue-feng¹, ZHAO Qing-jie², WANG Jian¹

1. Institute of Tropical Agriculture and Forestry, Hainan University, Haikou, Hainan Province 570228, China;
2. College of Applied Science and Technology, Hainan University, Danzhou, Hainan Province 571737, China

Received:2016-11-02 Revised:2017-09-18 Online:2017-10-15 Published:2018-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为明确热研2号柱花草（Stylosanthes guianensis ‘Reyan No.2’）与巴西含羞草（Mimosa invisa）生长早期的种间竞争关系，探索巴西含羞草替代控制的途径和管理策略，在盆栽条件下，设置5种柱花草和巴西含羞草分株数混播比例（柱：巴=8：0，6：2，4：4，2：6，0：8）、4种浇水频率（1次·1d^-1，1次·3d^-1，1次·5d^-1和1次·7d^-1），研究了2种植物的生长变化情况。试验结果表明：随着柱花草混播占比的减少，柱花草的单株总生物量、根冠比、根茎叶各部分生物量、株高、生长速度和叶面积指数均比单播时逐渐降低，而巴西含羞草的各对应指标均逐渐增大；柱：巴小于4：4会使柱花草的各生长指标显著降低，而巴西含羞草的显著增加。有利于柱花草总生物量累积、伸长生长和生物量优先向茎叶分配的浇水频率为1次·3d^-1，巴西含羞草为1次·5d^-1。因此，要利用热研2号柱花草替代控制巴西含羞草，首先注意柱花草的播种量，确保柱花草在群落中的成株比例大于1：1，还要保障其营养生长早期浇水频率达1次·3d^-1，每次浇水量为土壤最大持水量70%。

关键词: 巴西含羞草, 热研2号柱花草, 生物量累积, 替代控制

Abstract:

In order to clarify the inter-specific competitive interaction between Stylosanthes guianensis ‘Reyan No.2’ and Mimosa invisa and to explore the methods of controlling the invasive weed M. invisa by displacing it with S. guianensis, the effects of 5 mixed sowing proportions (plant numbers proportion of S. guianensis to M. invisa were 8:0,6:2,4:4,2:6 and 0:8 per pot) and 4 watering frequencies (1 time·1d^-1, 1 time·3d^-1, 1 time·5d^-1 and 1 time·7d^-1, 70% of the maximum water-holding capacity of the soil per watering) on the growth of 2 plants were studied by pot experiment. The results indicated that the total biomass, root/shoot ratio, biomass allocation, plant height, growth rate, and leaf area index of S. guianensis were gradually lower than monoculture with decreasing mixed proportion of experimental plant numbers, and M. invisa vice versa. When the ratio of S. guianensis to M. invisa were less than 4:4, the growth performance and various growth indexes of S. guianensis decreased significantly, but M. invisa increased significantly. Watering frequency at 1 time·3d^-1 was beneficial to the biomass accumulation, elongation growth and preferential distribution for stem and leaves of S. guianensis, but 1 time·5d^-1 was more helpful to M. invisa. Therefore, increasing seeding rate to insure the plant number of S. guianensis in community at more than 1:1, and supplying water at 1 time·3d^-1 of watering frequency and 70% of the maximum water-holding capacity of the soil of watering amount every time will be a promising strategy for replacement control of M. invisa by using S. guianensis as a competitor.

Key words: Mimosa invisa, Stylosanthes guianensis ‘Reyan No.2’, Biomass accumulation, Replacement control

中图分类号:

Q948.122.1

李雪枫, 赵庆杰, 王坚. 混播比例和浇水频率对热研2号柱花草和巴西含羞草生长早期种间竞争的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 1088-1096.

LI Xue-feng, ZHAO Qing-jie, WANG Jian. Effects of the Mixed Sowing Ratio and Watering Frequency on the Inter-specific Competition between Stylosanthes guianensis ‘Reyan No.2’ and Mimosa invisa during Early Growth[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2017, 25(5): 1088-1096.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2017.05.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2017/V25/I5/1088

参考文献

[1] Spellman B T, Wurtz T L. Invasive sweetclover (Melilotus alba) impacts native seedling recruitment along floodplains of interior Alaska[J]. Biological Invasions,2011,13(8):1779-1790
[2] Gurevitch J, Padilla D K. Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions?[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2004,19(19):470-474
[3] 范志伟,沈奕德,刘丽珍. 海南外来入侵杂草名录[J]. 热带作物学报,2008,29(6):781-792
[4] 吴德邻,陈邦余,卫兆芬,等. 中国植物志(第39卷)[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2007:15-16
[5] 万方浩,刘全儒,谢明,等. 生物入侵:中国外来入侵植物图鉴[M]. 北京:科学出版社,2012:106-107
[6] Simon M F, Proença C. Phytogeographic Patterns of Mimosa (Mimosoideae, Leguminosae) in the Cerrado biome of Brazil:An Indicator Genus of High-Altitude Centers of Endemism?[J]. Biological Conservation,2000,96(3):279-296
[7] Koravieh M M, Roff M N M, Othman R Y. First report of a whitefly-transmitted geminivirus infecting Mimosa invisa in Malaysia[J]. Australasian Plant Disease Notes,2008,3(1):25-26
[8] Ekhator F, Uyi O O, Ikuenobe C E, et al. The distribution and problems of the invasive alien plant, Mimosa diplotricha C. Wright ex Sauvalle (Mimosaceae) in Nigeria[J]. American Journal of Plant Sciences,2013,4(4):866-877
[9] Wakjira M. An invasive alien weed giant sensitive plant (Mimosa diplotricha Sauvalle) invading south-western Ethiopia[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Re-search,2011,6(1):127-131
[10] Anning A K, Yeboah-Gyan K. Diversity and distribution of invasive weeds in ashanti region, Ghana[J]. African Journal of Ecology,2007,45(3):355-360
[11] Vitelli M P, Garcia C, Lockett C J, et al. Host specificity and biology of the moth Psigida walkeri (Lepidoptera:Citheroniidae), a potential biological control agent for Mimosa diplotricha in Australia and the South Pacific[J]. Biological Control,2001,22(1):1-8
[12] Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation. Giant sensitive plant:Mimosa diplotricha (=Mimosa invisa):declared class 2 pest plant[M]. Brisbane:Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation,2011:27-30
[13] Alabi B S, Ayeni A O, Agboola A A, et al. Giant sensitive plant interference in cassava[J]. Weed Science,2009,49(2):171-176
[14] Byers J E, Cuddington K, Jones C G, et al. Using ecosystem engineers to restore ecological systems[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2006,21(9):493-500
[15] 蒋智林,刘万学,万方浩,等. 非洲狗尾草与紫茎泽兰的竞争效应[J]. 中国农业科学,2008,41(5):1347-1354
[16] 皇甫超河,张天瑞,刘红梅,等. 三种牧草植物对黄顶菊田间替代控制[J]. 生态学杂志,2010,29(8):1511-1518
[17] 唐塞春,吕仕洪,潘玉梅,等. 广西喀斯特地区割草结合植树方法对飞机草的控制效果[J]. 应用生态学报,2011,22(7):1944-1948
[18] 刘国道. 热带牧草栽培学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2006:1-260
[19] 张莹,李思锋,王庆,等. 含羞草种子萌发特性研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2010,26(24):52-55
[20] 丁文利,舒佳礼,徐伟洲,等. 水分胁迫和组合比例对白羊草与达乌里胡枝子叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(1):94-100
[21] 周雨露,李凌云,高俊琴,等. 种间竞争对入侵植物和本地植物生长的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(6):1504-1510
[22] 郝虎东,田青松,石凤翎,等. 无芒雀麦地上生物量及各构件生物量分配动态[J]. 中国草地学报,2009,31(4):85-90
[23] Kolb A, Alpert P, Enters D, et al. Patterns of invasion within a grassland community[J]. Journal of Ecology,2002,90(5):871-881
[24] Schwinning S, Weiner J. Mechanisms determining the degree of size asymmetry in competition among plants[J]. Oecologia,1998,113(4):447-455
[25] 皇甫超河,王楠楠,陈冬青,等. 增施氮肥对黄顶菊与高丹草苗期竞争的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2010,19(3):672-678
[26] 陈仁飞,姬明飞,关佳威,等. 植物对称性竞争与非对称性竞争研究进展及展望[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(5):530-540
[27] 陈积山,朱瑞芬,高超,等. 苜蓿和无芒雀麦混播草地种间竞争研究[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(6):1157-1161
[28] Falster D S, Westoby M. Plant height and evolutionary games[J]. Trends in Ecology and Evolution,2003,18(7):337-343
[29] Sapijanskas J, Paquette A, Potvin C, et al. Tropical tree diversity enhances light capture through crown plasticity and spatial and temporal niche differences[J]. Ecology,2014,95(9):2479-2492
[30] Fonseca C R, Overton J M, Collins B, et al. Shift in trait-combination along rainfall and phosphorus gradients[J]. Journal of Ecology,2001,88(6):964-977
[31] 李永华,卢琦,吴波,等. 干旱区叶片形态特征与植物响应和适应的关系[J]. 植物生态学报,2012,36(1):88-98
[32] Quétier F, Thébault A, Lavorel S. Plant traits in a state and transition framework as markers of ecosystem response to land-use change[J]. Ecological Monographs,2007,77(1):33-52
[33] Nash S K, Goldberg D E. Variation in the effect of vegetation and litter on recruitment across productivity gradients[J]. Journal of Ecology,1999,87(3):436-449
[34] Monaco T A, Johnson D A, Creech J E. Morphological and physiological responses of the invasive weed Isatis tinctoria to contrasting light, soil-nitrogen and water[J]. Weed Research,2005,45(6):460-466
[35] Li B, Suzuki J I, Hara T. Competitive ability of two Brassica varieties in relation to biomass allocation and morphological plasticity under varying nutrient availability[J]. Ecological Research,1999,14(3):255-266
[36] Li B, Watkinson A R. Competition along a nutrient gradient:a case study with Daucus carota and Chenopodium album[J]. Ecological Research,2000,15(3):293-306
[37] Craine J M, Fargione J, Sugita S. Supply pre-emption, not concentration reduction, is the mechanism of competition for nutrients[J]. New Phytologist,2005,166(3):933-940
[38] 杜峰,梁宗锁,胡莉娟. 植物竞争研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志,2004,23(4):157-163

混播比例和浇水频率对热研2号柱花草和巴西含羞草生长早期种间竞争的影响

Effects of the Mixed Sowing Ratio and Watering Frequency on the Inter-specific Competition between Stylosanthes guianensis ‘Reyan No.2’ and Mimosa invisa during Early Growth

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王森森, 贾宏定, 张志飞, 胡龙兴, 陈桂华. 入侵植物美洲商陆与3种牧草的竞争效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 95-102.
[2]	白昌军, 刘国道, 姚庆群, 虞道耿, 陈志权. 太空搭载‘热研2号’柱花草后代RAPD多态性分析[J]. , 2008, 16(4): 336-340.