检测燕麦干草主要营养成分含量的近红外光谱分析模型

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.014

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 2645-2651.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.014

• • 上一篇

检测燕麦干草主要营养成分含量的近红外光谱分析模型

王储¹, 麻冬梅², 李跃¹, 屈新月¹, 李智林¹, 胡倩楠¹, 乔葭月¹, 孙彦¹

1. 中国农业大学草业科学与技术学院, 北京 100093;
2. 宁夏大学生态环境学院, 宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2022-03-29 修回日期:2022-06-12 发布日期:2022-11-05
通讯作者: 孙彦,E-mail:02008@cau.edu.cn
作者简介:王储(1998-),男,汉族,辽宁大连人,博士,主要从事草坪科学与管理研究,E-mail:wangchu188@163.com
基金资助:
宁夏自治区农业育种专项(2019NYYZ0401)；国家牧草产业技术体系项目资助(编号：CARS-34)资助

Near Infrared Spectroscopic Model for the Detection of the Main Nutrient Components of Oat Hay

WANG Chu¹, MA Dong-mei², LI Yue¹, QU Xin-yue¹, LI Zhi-lin¹, HU Qian-nan¹, QIAO Jia-yue¹, SUN Yan¹

1. College of Grassland Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100093, China;
2. College of Ecology and Environment Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia Province 750021, China

Received:2022-03-29 Revised:2022-06-12 Published:2022-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探索NIRS技术在测定燕麦(Avena sative)干草品质上的应用，试验于2020—2021年收集了249份不同品种、年限和生长时期的燕麦干草，通过WinISI III定标软件建立燕麦干草主要营养成分的近红外光谱模型。结果显示：粗蛋白(CP)、中性洗涤纤维(NDF)和粗脂肪(EE)预测模型的定标系数(RSQ)和外部验证决定系数(RSQv)均在0.83以上，校正标准误(SEC)、交叉验证误差(SECV)和预测标准误差(RMSEP)均小于0.02，相对标准误差(RPD)均大于3，预测值逼近化学分析的精度具有良好的预测效果。酸性洗涤纤维含量(ADF)建模效果较差，定标系数和外部验证决定系数分别为0.83和0.84，校正标准误(SEC)、交叉验证误差(SECV)和预测标准误差(RMSEP)均小于0.01，接近化学分析精度，且RPD大于2.50。因此，所建ADF模型也可用于近红外预测。

关键词: 燕麦干草, 主要营养成分, 近红外光谱

Abstract: To explore the application of the NIRS technique in determining the quality of oat hay (Avena sative),the trial collected 249 oat hays of different varieties,years,and growth periods from 2020-2021. The NIR spectra of the main nutrients of oat hay were modelled by WinISI III calibration software. The results showed that the calibration coefficients (RSQ) and prediction coefficient (RSQv) of the prediction models for crude protein (CP),neutral detergent fiber (NDF) and ether extract (EE) were all above 0.83,the standard errors of correction (SEC),cross-validation errors (SECV) and prediction standard error (RMSEP) were all less than 0.02,and the RPDs were all greater than 3. The accuracy of the approximate chemical analysis has good predictive effect. Acid detergent fiber content (ADF) was poorly modelled,with a coefficient of determination for both calibration and external validation of 0.83 and 0.84 respectively. The standard error of calibration (SEC),cross-validation error (SECV) and prediction standard error (RMSEP) were all less than 0.01,close to the accuracy of the chemical analysis. The RPD is greater than 2.50,indicating that the proposed ADF model can also be used for NIR prediction.

Key words: Oat hay, Main nutrients, NIRS technology

中图分类号:

S543+.7

王储, 麻冬梅, 李跃, 屈新月, 李智林, 胡倩楠, 乔葭月, 孙彦. 检测燕麦干草主要营养成分含量的近红外光谱分析模型[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2645-2651.

WANG Chu, MA Dong-mei, LI Yue, QU Xin-yue, LI Zhi-lin, HU Qian-nan, QIAO Jia-yue, SUN Yan. Near Infrared Spectroscopic Model for the Detection of the Main Nutrient Components of Oat Hay[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(10): 2645-2651.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I10/2645

参考文献

[1] 杨燕燕,孙宇,吴春会,等.应用CNCPS体系比较饲用小黑麦和燕麦草的营养价值组分[J].草地学报,2022,30(4):931-935
[2] 刘刚,赵桂琴.刈割对燕麦产草量及品质影响的初步研究[J].草业科学,2006,23(11):41-45
[3] RASANE P,JHA A,SABIKHI L,et al. Nutritional Advantages of Oats and Opportunities for its Processing as Value Added Foods-A Review[J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology-Mysore,2015,52(2):662-675
[4] 马春晖,韩建国,李鸿祥,等.播种比例、施氮量和刈割期对混播草地牧草产量和质量的影响[J].中国草地,1999(4):10-17
[5] 白文明,侯龙鱼,宋世环,等.饲草料优化配比是实现草-畜高效转化的关键[J]科学通报,2018,63(17):1689-1692
[6] 熊乙,许庆方,玉柱,等.不同苜蓿干草营养成分及饲用价值评价[J].草地学报,2018,26(5):1262-1266
[7] 冯豆,滕站伟,梁美娟,等.近红外光谱技术在动物营养领域中应用的研究进展[J].动物营养学报,2018,30(11):4349-4356
[8] BROGNA N,PALMONARI A,CANESTRARI G. Technical Note:Near Infrared Reflectance Spectrosco-Py to Predict Fecal Indigestible Neutral Detergent Fiber for Dairy Cows[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2018,101(2):1234-1239
[9] HU N Y,LI W,DU C H,et al. Predicting Micronutrients of Wheat Using Hyperspec-tral Imaging[J]. Food Chemistry,2020,(2)343:128473
[10] FENG L,ZHU S S,ZHANG C,et al. Variety Identification of Raisins Using Near-Infrared hyperspectral ima ging[J]. Molecules,2018,23(11):2907
[11] WANG L,SUN C W,PU H B,et al. Quality Analysis,Classification,and Authentic-ation of Liquid Foods by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy:A Review of Recent Research Developments[J]. Critical Reviews in Food and Nutrition,2017,57(7):1524-1538
[12] 何云,张亮,武小姣,等.苜蓿干草常规营养成分含量近红外预测模型的建立[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(10):4684-4690
[13] 李军涛.近红外反射光谱快速评定玉米和小麦营养价值的研究[D].北京:中国农业大学,2014:20-22
[14] 赵环环,胡跃高,赵其波,等.近红外光谱分析技术在黑麦草粉粗蛋白测定中的应用[J].动物营养学报,2001,13(4):40-43
[15] 纳嵘,任晋东,胡波,等.基于不同预处理方法建立苜蓿营养成分近红外快速分析模型的研究[J].家畜生态学报,2021,42(12):37-43
[16] SINNAEVE G,DARDENCE P,AGNEESSENS R,et al. Quantitative Analysis of Raw Apple Juices Using Near Infrared,Fourier-Transform Near Infrared and Fourier-transform Infrared Instruments:A Comparison of Their Analytical Performances[J]. Journal of Near Infrared Spectrosc,1997,5(1):1-17
[17] PARK R S,AGNEW R E,GORDON F J,et al. The Development and Transfer of Undried Grass Silage Calibrations Between Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy Instruments[J].Animal Feed Science and Technology,1998,72(1):155-167
[18] 张进,胡芸,周罗雄,等.近红外光谱分析中的化学计量学算法研究新进展[J].分析测试学报,2020,39(10):1196-1203
[19] 陈积山,朱瑞芬,张强,等.建立近红外特征波长模型快速测定羊草常规营养成分的研究[J].草地学报,2019,27(4):867-873
[20] CHEN J S,ZHU R F,XU R X,et al. Evaluation of Leymus Chinensis Quality Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy with Three Different Statistical Analyses[J]. PeerJ,2015,3(7):1416
[21] 隋莉,郭团结,杨红伟,等.饲料企业近红外规模化应用关键控制点[J].中国畜牧杂志,2017,53(11):108-113
[22] 赵秀芳,李卫建,黄伟等.燕麦干草品质的近红外光谱定量分析[J].光谱学与光谱分析,2008,28(9):2094-2097
[23] 张书阅,熊安然,潘予琮,等.燕麦常规营养成分含量近红外预测模型的建立[J].动物营养学报,2022,34(2):1334-1342
[24] 张志芬,任长忠,杨海顺,等.基于SD-GGE双标图进行饲草燕麦品种归类和区域划分[J].中国农业大学学报,2021,26(5):10-21
[25] 李伟,肖爱平,冷鹃.近红外光谱技术及其在农作物中的应用[J].中国农学通报,2009,25(3):56-59
[26] 王旭,张凤清,林家永,等.便携式近红外谷物分析仪快速测定小麦蛋白质的研究[J].粮食与饲料工业,2012(1):13-17
[27] 刘哲,王玉琴,薛树媛,等.近红外漫反射光谱定量分析天然牧草营养成分[J].草地学报,2018,26(1):249-255
[28] 张凡凡,尉小霞,段宏伟,等.新疆沙尔套山天然草地主要混合牧草营养指标近红外光谱分析[J].草地学报,2019,27(3):661-667

检测燕麦干草主要营养成分含量的近红外光谱分析模型

Near Infrared Spectroscopic Model for the Detection of the Main Nutrient Components of Oat Hay

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈积山, 张强, 刘杰淋, 邸桂俐, 朱瑞芬, 孔晓蕾. 基于近红外预测羊草水分含量的特征光谱模型研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1774-1780.
[2]	张凡凡, 尉小霞, 段宏伟, 于磊, 张文举. 新疆沙尔套山天然草地主要混合牧草营养指标近红外光谱分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 661-667.
[3]	刘哲, 王玉琴, 薛树媛, 金海, 李元晓, 王建平, 李发弟, 张盼盼. 近红外漫反射光谱定量分析天然牧草营养成分[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 249-255.
[4]	薛祝林, 刘楠, 张英俊. 近红外光谱法预测紫花苜蓿草捆的营养品质和消化率[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 165-171.
[5]	高燕丽, 孙彦. 利用近红外光谱分析预测紫花苜蓿干草品质[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(5): 1080-1085.