Study on Yield Stability and Test Site Representativeness of Eight Oat Varieties in Gansu Province

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.05.026

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (5): 1100-1107.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.05.026

Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on Yield Stability and Test Site Representativeness of Eight Oat Varieties in Gansu Province

CHAI Ji-kuan, MU Ping, ZHAO Gui-qin

Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2015-11-10 Revised:2016-03-12 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2017-01-13

8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究

柴继宽, 慕平, 赵桂琴

甘肃农业大学, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 慕平
作者简介:柴继宽(1983-),男,甘肃陇西人,博士,讲师,主要从事牧草种质资源及育种,E-mail:cjk_100@163.com
基金资助:
现代农业产业体系（nycytx-14）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

In this study, GGE-biplot method was used to analyze the regional trial data of eight oat varieties from five sites in 2012, aiming to evaluate the yield stability and adaption of oat varieties objectively and accurately in Gansu province. The results showed that in oat planting region, the effect of interaction between variety and environment on yield variation were about 4.02 times as high as that of variety effects.‘Longyan No.2’ and ‘Longyan No.3’ had higher yield and better yield stability than other varieties, while ‘Qingyin No.1’ was deserved to promote in local areas for its idioadaptation. These five test sites were broadly classified into two environments. ‘Longyan No.1’ was the best genotypes for semi-arid regions of central Gansu province, and ‘Longyan No.3’ was the best genotypes for chilling and humid region of high-elevation of Gansu province. As for environment representativeness and identification varieties capacity, Tongwei was the best representative in the five test sites, and Tianzhu had the best discrimination capacity.

Key words: Oat, GGE biplot, Genotype×, Environment interaction, Yield stability

摘要：

为了客观、准确地评价燕麦品种的稳定性和适应性，本研究采用GGE双标图对2012年甘肃省燕麦（Avena sativa）种植区域5个试点中的8个燕麦品种试验数据进行分析。结果表明：在燕麦种植区的大环境下，品种与环境互作效应对产量变异的影响约为品种效应的4.02倍。‘陇燕2号’和‘陇燕3号’属于高产、稳产性好的品种；‘青引1号’具有特殊适应性，在局部地区有推广价值。5个燕麦区试点可划分为2个不同的类型区，其中在甘肃中部半干旱地区表现最好的品种是‘陇燕1号’，在甘肃高寒阴湿区表现最好的品种是‘陇燕3号’。从环境代表性和对品种鉴别能力两方面分析，5个试点中代表性最好的是通渭，鉴别力最好的是天祝。

关键词: 燕麦, GGE双标图, 基因型×, 环境交互作用, 产量稳定性

CLC Number:

S338
S543.7

CHAI Ji-kuan, MU Ping, ZHAO Gui-qin. Study on Yield Stability and Test Site Representativeness of Eight Oat Varieties in Gansu Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107.

柴继宽, 慕平, 赵桂琴. 8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(5): 1100-1107.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.05.026

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2016/V24/I5/1100

References

[1] 余懋群,马欣荣,张庆勤. 三种燕麦的核型研究[J]. 武汉植物学研究,1995,13(2):177-179
[2] Gabriel K R. The biplot graphic display of matrices with application to principal component analysis[J]. Biometrika,1971,58:453-467
[3] 王磊,C G Mclaren,杨仕华. 利用双标图分析基因型和环境交互作用[J]. 科技通报,1997,13(5):281-286
[4] 张泽,鲁成,向仲怀. 基于AMMI模型的品种稳定性分析[J]. 作物学报,1998,24(3):304-309
[5] Yan W K. Methodology of cultivar evaluation based on yield trial data with special reference to winter wheat in Ontario[M]. Guelph:University of Guelph,Canada,1999:87
[6] Yan W K, Hunt L A, Sheng Q, et al. Cultivar evaluation and mega-environment investigation based on the GGE biplot[J]. Crop Science,2000,40:597-605
[7] Yan W K. GGE biplot A windows application for graphical analysis of multi-environment trial data and other types of two-way data[J]. Agronomy Journal,2001,93:1111-1118
[8] Yan W K,Hant L A. Biplot analysis of diallel data[J]. Crop Science,2002,42:21-30
[9] Yan W, Rajcan I. Biplot analysis of test sites and trait relations of soybean in Ontario[J]. Crop Science,2002,42:11-20
[10] 张海娟,王化俊,马小乐,等. 基于GGE双标图的北方大麦区试品种稳产性及试点代表性评价[J]. 麦类作物学报,2015,35(9):1250-1256
[11] 王磊,程本义,鄂志国,等. 基于GGE双标图的水稻区试品种丰产性、稳产性和适应性评价[J]. 中国水稻科学,2015,29(4):408-416
[12] 许乃银,李健,张国伟,等. 基于GGE双标图和马克隆值选择的棉花区域试验环境评价[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2013,21(10):1241-1248
[13] 尚毅,李少钦,李殿荣,等. 用双标图分析油菜双列杂交试验[J]. 作物学报,2006,32(2):243-248
[14] 张志芬,付晓峰,刘俊青,等. 用GGE双标图分析燕麦区域试验品系产量稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 作物学报,2010,36(8):1377-1385
[15] 张勇,何中虎,张爱民. 应用GGE双标图分析我国春小麦的淀粉峰值粘度[J]. 作物学报,2003,29(2):245-251
[16] 陈四龙,李玉荣,程增书,等. 用GGE双标图分析种植密度对高油花生生长和产量的影响[J]. 作物学报,2009,35(7):1328-1335
[17] Yan W K. Optimal use of biplots in analysis of multi-location variety test data[J]. Acta Agronomica Sincia,2010,36(11):1805-1819
[18] Gauch H G. Identifying mega-environments and targeting genotypes[J]. Crop Science,1997,37:311-326
[19] Yan W K, Kang M S. GGE biplot analysis:A graphical tool for breeders, geneticists, and agronomists[M]. Boca Raton,Florida:CRC Press,2003:25
[20] Yan W K. GGE biplot-a windows application for graphical analysis of multi environment trial data and other types of two-way data[J]. Agronomy Journal,2001,93:1111-1118
[21] 严威凯,盛庆来,胡跃高,等. GGE盈图法-分析品种×环境互作模式的理想方法[J]. 作物学报,2001,27(1):22-28
[22] Kempton R A. The use of biplots in interpreting variety by environment interactions[J]. Agricultural Science,1984,103:123-135
[23] Wamatu J N, Thomas E. The influence of genotype-environment interaction on the grain yields of 10 Pigeonpea cultivars grown in Kenya[J]. Jounal of Agonomy and Crop Science,2002,188(1):25-33
[24] 马洪文,王昕,殷延勃,等. 基因型与环境互作下粳稻农艺性状的遗传效应分析[J]. 西北农业学报,2009,18(2):74-78
[25] 焦伟红,刘景辉,齐冰洁,等. 用GGE双标图分析燕麦品种(系)农艺与品质性状[J]. 中国农学通报,2011,27(01):24-29
[26] 常磊,柴守玺. GGE双标图在我国旱地春小麦稳产性分析中的应用[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2010,18(5):988-994
[27] Yan W, Hunt L A. Genetic and environment causes of genotype by environment interaction for winter wheat yield in Ontario[J]. Crop Science,2001,41:19-25
[28] Yan W, Cornelius P L, Crossa J, et al. Two types of GGE biplot for analyzing multi-environmenttrial data[J]. Crop Science,2001,41:656-663
[29] 罗俊,张华,邓祖湖,等. 用GGE双标图分析甘蔗品种性状稳定性及试点代表性[J]. 应用生态学报,2012,23(5):1319-1325
[30] 慕平,赵桂琴,柴继宽. 基于GGE-Biplot的甘肃省不同生态区燕麦生产性能及适应性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2015,23(6):705-712
[31] 孙艳,王益权,仝瑞强. 土壤紧实胁迫对黄瓜叶片光合作用及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2009,15(3):638-642
[32] Adams D B, Adams Ⅲ W W. Photoprotection and other responses of plants to high light stress[J]. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant MolBiol,1992,43:599-626
[33] Demmig B, Winter K, Krüger A, et al. Photoinhibition and zeaxanthin formation in intact leaves. A possible role of the xanthophyII cycle in the dissipation of excess light energy[J]. Plant Physiology,1987,84:218-224
[34] Yan W, Hunt L A. Biplot analysis of Diallel data[J]. Crop Science,2002,42:21-30
[35] 李本贵,阎俊,何中虎,等. 用AMMI模型分析作物区域试验中的地点鉴别力[J]. 作物学报,2004,30(6):593-596

Study on Yield Stability and Test Site Representativeness of Eight Oat Varieties in Gansu Province

8个燕麦品种在甘肃的产量稳定性及试点代表性研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SONG Ci, HUANG Xiao-tao, SHI Guo-xi, ZHOU Hua-kun, WANG Fang-ping, YAO Bu-qing. Effects of Sowing Dates on the Growth and Forage Quality of Oat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 121-127.
[2]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[3]	CHEN Cai-jin, ZHANG Shang-pei, SHI Shang-li, ZENG Yan-xia, WU Juan, SHANG Ji-hong, GAO Ting, ZHANG Rong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Fertility and Stability of Alfalfa Varieties Based on GGE-biplot [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 912-918.
[4]	TONG Yong-shang, YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Peng-bin, SONG Jian-chao, LI Zhen, LI Ying. Effects of Sowing Date on Forage Yield and Quality of Seven Oat Varieties in Tianzhu Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[5]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, MA Xiang. Phenotypic Diversity of the Panicle Among 590 Covered Oats Germplasm Resources in Apline of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[6]	LIU Bei, SONG Yu-mei, SUN-ming, MAO Pei-sheng. Physiological Responses of Mitochondrial AsA-GSH Cycle to Imbibition of Deteriated Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[7]	JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Gui-qin. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Sowing Rate on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Phytohormone Content and Grain Yield of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 293-302.
[8]	LI Wen, WEI Ting-hu, Abaodi, Yongcuobazhan, Cairentaci, ZHOU Yu-hai, LI Wen-hao, GUO Wei-xing, ZHANG Yan-ping. Effects of Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer and Organic Manure Supplement on Oat Nutrient Quality and Soil Nutrient in Alpine Cold Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[9]	WANG Xue, LIU Xiao-jing, ZHAO Ya-jiao, WANG Jing. Effects of Alfalfa/Oat Intercropping on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Matter Accumulation of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2258-2264.
[10]	ZHOU Lei, WANG Lu, ZHAO Bao-ping, MI Jun-zhen, WANG Feng-wu, LIU Jing-hui, ZHANG Dan, LIU Ye-kun. Effect of Different Sowing Date and Cutting Time on Yield and Quality of Forage Oat in Agro-pastoral Ecotone of Northern China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2355-2363.
[11]	FU Dong-qing, WANG Yan-chao, SONG Lei, WANG Xu-zhe, ZHANG Fan-fan, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Production Performance of Early Maturing Forage Oat in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2364-2371.
[12]	JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Gui-qin. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Plant Density on Oat Leaf Senescence Characteristics and Cell Structure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 80-87.
[13]	SUN Hao-yang, ZHAO Gui-qin, ZHANG Jian-gui, LI Xin, YANG Yan-shan, CHAI Ji-kuan, ZENG Liang, JIAO Run-an, JIN Xiao-wen, LI Rong, GONG Wen-long. Incidence of Oat Powdery Mildew and Pathogen Identification in the Main Oat Production Areas of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1535-1543.
[14]	LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, LIANG Guo-ling. Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[15]	HAO Shuang-nan, QIN Jie, LIU Pan-feng, YANG Wu-de, ZHANG Mei-jun, FENG Mei-chen, WANG Chao, SONG Xiao-yan. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on Stem Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1572-1579.