Evaluations on the Adaptability of Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.016

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1626-1634.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.016

Previous Articles Next Articles

Evaluations on the Adaptability of Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province

WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua

College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem of Education Ministry/Sino-U. S. Centers for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2020-07-14 Revised:2020-08-13 Online:2020-12-15 Published:2020-12-02

甘农4号’小黑麦品种在青海省不同区域的适应性评价

王伟强, 刘晶, 田新会, 杜文华

甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 杜文华
作者简介:王伟强(1994-),男,甘肃甘谷人,硕士研究生,主要从事农艺与种业研究,E-mail:1466941912@qq.com
基金资助:
西藏饲草产业专项（XZ201801NA02，XZ201901NA03）；国家重点研发计划（2018YFD0502402-3）；甘肃省草地畜牧业可持续发展创新团队项目（2017C-11）；现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-40-09B）共同资助

Abstract

Abstract: In this experiment,Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ was used as the experimental material,triticale varieties ‘Shida No.1’ (CK₁) and ‘Zhongsi 1048’ (CK₂) were used as controls,by studying its hay yield and nutritional value in different regions of Qinghai Province (Haiyan,Huangzhong,Ping'an),the adaptability was evaluated. Results showed that,the average hay yield (14.07 t·hm^-2) of ‘Gannong No.4’ at the 3 experimental sites was significantly higher than that of CK₁ and CK₂;the average CP content of the 3 triticale varieties in Haiyan (10.54%) was significantly higher than Huangzhong and Ping'an;the average hay yield of the 3 triticale varieties in 2018 (12.98 t·hm^-2) was significantly higher than that in 2019 (9.23 t·hm^-2). For the interaction of 2 factors,the averaged CP content (11.08%) of ‘Gannong No.4’ at Haiyan experimental site was significantly higher than the other treatments for the interaction of varieties and experimental sites;The averaged hay yield (16.26 t·hm^-2) of ‘Gannong No.4’ in 2018 was significantly higher than the other treatments for the interaction of variety and year;And the averaged hay yield (15.20 t·hm^-2) of 3 triticale varieties at the Ping'an experimental site in 2018 was significantly higher than the other treatments for the interaction of experimental sites and years. In the interaction of the 3 factors,the hay yield (20.45 t·hm^-2) of triticale in Ping'an site ‘Gannong No.4’ in 2018 was significantly higher than other treatments. Comprehensive evaluation showed that ‘Gannong No.4’ triticale is more suitable to be planted in places with low altitude and rich water and heat conditions in Qinghai Province. This is the first condition for obtaining high-yield and high-quality triticale forage.

Key words: Triticale, Hay yield, Nutritional quality, Planting area, Adaptability

摘要： 本试验以‘甘农4号’小黑麦（×Triticale Wittmack）品种为试验材料，‘石大1号’（CK₁）和‘中饲1048’（CK₂）为对照，通过研究在青海省不同区域（海晏、湟中、平安）的干草产量和营养价值，以评价其适应性。结果表明：从单因素看，‘甘农4号’在3个试验点的平均干草产量（14.07 t·hm^-2）显著高于CK₁和CK₂；海晏点3个小黑麦品种的平均CP含量（10.54%）显著高于湟中和平安点；2018年3个小黑麦品种的平均干草产量（12.98 t·hm^-2）显著高于2019年（9.23 t·hm^-2）。2因素间，品种×试验点交互作用中，‘甘农4号’在海晏试验点的平均CP含量（11.08%）显著高于其他处理；品种×年份交互作用中，2018年‘甘农4号’小黑麦的平均干草产量（16.26 t·hm^-2）显著高于其他处理；试验点×年份交互作用中，平安点2018年3个小黑麦品种的平均干草产量（15.20 t·hm^-2）显著高于其他处理。3因素交互作用中，2018年平安点‘甘农4号’小黑麦的干草产量（20.45 t·hm^-2）显著高于其他处理。综合评价表明，‘甘农4号’小黑麦更适宜于在青海省低海拔且水热条件丰富的地方推广种植，这是获得小黑麦高产优质饲草的首要条件。

关键词: 小黑麦, 干草产量, 营养品质, 种植区域, 适应性

CLC Number:

S512.4

WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Evaluations on the Adaptability of Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1626-1634.

王伟强, 刘晶, 田新会, 杜文华. 甘农4号’小黑麦品种在青海省不同区域的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1626-1634.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.06.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2020/V28/I6/1626

References

[1] 张红. 引进CIMMYT小黑麦的鉴定及其遗传多样性分析[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2005:6-19
[2] 邰丽萍,范亚菊,梁世博,等. 小黑麦的类型、特点及其利用[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2010(05):98-99
[3] 赵雅姣,田新会,杜文华. 饲草型小黑麦遗传多样性的ISSR分析[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(03):574-581
[4] 张英俊,任继周,王明利,等. 论牧草产业在我国农业产业结构中的地位和发展布局[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2013,15(04):61-71
[5] 李冬梅,田新会,杜文华. 5个小黑麦新品系的种子产量及产量构成因素分析[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(1):245-248
[6] 刘云飞. 混播方式对小黑麦产量与品质的影响[J]. 西藏农业科技,2019,41(01):14-16
[7] 游永亮,李源,赵海明,等. 种植密度对饲用小黑麦、饲用黑麦种子生产性能的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(7):1522-1529
[8] 刘晶,曲广鹏,田新会,等. 基于响应面设计的饲草型小黑麦新品系C31栽培条件优化筛选[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(1):37-49
[9] 张舒芸. 小黑麦和黑麦的抗旱性与抗寒性研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2018:47
[10] 孙海群,孙康迪,马世鹏. 青海省野生种子植物区系分析[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016,10(19):144-150
[11] 任昱鑫,刘汉成,田新会,等. 甘南高寒牧区秋播小黑麦对氮肥施用量和播种密度的响应[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(04):1044-1051
[12] 刘晶,宋谦,田新会,等. 基于隶属函数法和GGE双标图的饲草型小黑麦种质适应性评价[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(05):85-96
[13] 谢楠,李源,赵海明,等. 饲用小黑麦适宜刈割时期及刈割次数研究[J]. 草原与草坪,2014,34(2):57-62
[14] 戴征煌,徐桂花,李翔宏,等. 有机肥对红壤丘陵地区冬闲田的牧草产量及土壤的影响[J]. 江西畜牧兽医杂志,2019(04):59-63
[15] 焦浩,纪永民,张存岭. 种植方式和密度对大豆产量和单株性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志,2008(05):50-53
[16] 韩路. 不同苜蓿品种的生产性能分析及评价[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2002:1-7
[17] 王晓光. 饲草型全混日粮饲用价值评价研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2011:1-31
[18] 侯建杰. 高寒牧区燕麦青干草品质的影响因素研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2013:27-30
[19] 张霞. 青贮饲草营养价值评定及其育肥肉牛研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2019:35-38
[20] 李冬梅,田新会,杜文华. 小黑麦新品系的草产量及营养价值研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(06):1164-1169
[21] 王洪刚,姜丽君,张德水,等. 小麦叶片中硝酸还原酶活性、游离氨基酸和粗蛋白含量与籽粒蛋白质含量关系研究[J]. 西北植物学报,1995,15(04):282-287
[22] 李慧英. 水热条件对牧草产量的影响[J]. 新疆气象,1988(05):36-37
[23] 吕巡均,牛斌,李晶,等. 温度对贺兰县春小麦产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技,2019(11):24-25
[24] 郭孝,陈理盾,陈小改. 多年生禾草物候特征与分蘖动态的研究[J]. 家畜生态,2002,23(04):17-19
[25] 柳芳,黎贞发. 降水量和积温变化对天津冬小麦产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象,2010,31(03):431-435
[26] 白玛才吉. 生育期玉树市高寒草甸群落生物量变化[J]. 青海草业,2019,28(04):34-36

Evaluations on the Adaptability of Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province

甘农4号’小黑麦品种在青海省不同区域的适应性评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[5]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[6]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[7]	NIE Cong, YANG Xiao-peng, LIU Zhe-chuan, ZHAO Yu-han, CHEN Wan-ting, HE Run-hao, LIU Wei, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Different Preceding Combination and Planting Density on Production Performance and Quality of Forage Corn [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 709-716.
[8]	LI Wen-jing, WANG Jun-feng, GAO Xiao-di, SHI Yu-jie, MU Chun-sheng. Effects of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Addition on the Hay Yield and Quality of Leymus chinensis Under Drought Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 743-748.
[9]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Adaptability Evaluation of Secale cereale ‘Gannong No.2’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 504-514.
[10]	SU Li-he, ZHANG Fan-fan, WANG Xu-zhe, WANG Ting, FU Dong-qing, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Snow Cover on the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa with Different Fall-dormancy Levels [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 356-363.
[11]	YAO Xi-xi, ZHOU Rui, LI Chang-hui, DUOJIE Suo-nan. Effects of Slope Aspect on Vegetation Distribution Pattern and Forage Quality Characteristics of Alpine Grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2792-2799.
[12]	LI Wen, WEI Ting-hu, Abaodi, Yongcuobazhan, Cairentaci, ZHOU Yu-hai, LI Wen-hao, GUO Wei-xing, ZHANG Yan-ping. Effects of Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer and Organic Manure Supplement on Oat Nutrient Quality and Soil Nutrient in Alpine Cold Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[13]	YUE Li-nan, SHI Shang-li, QI Juan, YANG Pei-zhi, LIU Gang, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Ying-jun, JING Jing-ying. Effects of No-tillage Reseeding on Productivity and Nutritional Quality of Degraded Grassland in Northern China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2583-2590.
[14]	HE Peng-liang, WANG Ya-mei, JIE Hong-dong, DENG Hui-fen, XING Hu-cheng, JIE Yu-cheng. Effects of Different Cutting Time on the Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Triticale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2609-2614.
[15]	HOU Pai, CHEN Cai-jin, ZHANG Jing-ni, FAN Long, DING Wang. Study on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Different Silage Maize in Guyuan Area of Ningxia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2346-2354.