Abstract: The policy of subsidy and reward for grassland ecological protection(PSRGEP) aims to maintain the grassland ecological function and promote the herdsmen’s income,which is one of the important actions of grassland ecological compensation in China. In accordance with the main idea of the policy,this article made an overall effect evaluation of the current situation of China’s PSRGEP while combing the existing policy effect evaluation research. The results showed that the current PSRGEP in China still has problems such as the lack of institutional system and low compensation standards. There are regional differences in the degree of satisfaction of herders with the policy. Although the compensation funds have increased herders’ income to a certain extent,it has limited effect on motivating herders to reduce livestock. Since 2010,the overall ecological quality of grassland in China has improved,but the effect in some areas makes no sense. Future research can appropriately focus on the economic benefits of the restoration of grassland ecological functions. These research should cover a wider range of policy pilot areas on the existing basis,and ascertain the baseline values of herdsmen’s livelihoods and grassland ecology before the policy was initiated.

Key words: Policy of subsidy and reward for grassland ecological protection, Standards for subsidies and rewards, Policy satisfaction, Pastoral livelihood, Grassland ecological function

摘要： 草原补奖政策旨在维持草地生态功能，促进牧民增收，是当前我国草原生态补偿的重要举措之一。本文依照政策的主体思路，梳理已有的政策效应评价研究，并对我国草原补奖政策做出总体效应评价。结果显示，当前我国草原补奖政策存在制度体系缺失以及补奖标准偏低等问题，牧民对政策的满意程度存在区域差异，补奖资金虽然在一定程度上提高了牧民收入但对牧民减畜的激励作用有限。自2010年以来，我国草地生态恢复总体成效显著，但也存在局部区域效果不佳。未来的研究可适当聚焦于草地生态功能恢复产生的经济效益，并在现有研究的基础上覆盖更广泛的政策试点区域，探明政策启动以前的牧民生计、草原生态基线值。

关键词: 草原补奖政策, 补奖标准, 政策满意度, 牧民生计, 草地生态功能