Winter Survival Rate,Tillering Characteristics,and Production Performance of Autumn-Sown Forage Oats in Henan Province

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.027

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 528-539.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.027

Winter Survival Rate,Tillering Characteristics,and Production Performance of Autumn-Sown Forage Oats in Henan Province

YAO Jin¹, HE Yun⁴, LU Jia-ding¹, ZHANG Xiao-xia⁵, CUI Ya-lei^1,2,3, MA Sen^1,2,3, WANG Zhi-chang^1,2,3, ZHU Xiao-yan^1,2,3, SHI Ying-hua^1,2,3, LI De-feng^1,2,3, SUN Hao^1,2,3

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450046, China;
2. Henan Key Laboratory of Innovation and Utilization of Grassland Resources, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450046, China;
3. Henan Forage Engineering Technology Research Center, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450046, China;
4. College of Animal Science, Henan Institute of Science and Technology, Xinxiang, Henan Province 453003, China;
5. Forage and Feed Station of Henan Province, Zhengzhou, Henan Province 450008, China

Received:2022-08-15 Revised:2022-09-20 Published:2023-02-28

河南省秋播饲用燕麦的越冬率、分蘖特性及其生产性能

姚晋¹, 何云⁴, 卢家顶¹, 张晓霞⁵, 崔亚垒^1,2,3, 马森^1,2,3, 王志昌^1,2,3, 朱晓艳^1,2,3, 史莹华^1,2,3, 李德锋^1,2,3, 孙浩^1,2,3

1. 河南农业大学动物科技学院, 河南郑州 450046;
2. 河南省草地资源创新与利用重点实验室, 河南郑州 450046;
3. 河南省牧草工程技术研究中心, 河南郑州 450046;
4. 河南科技学院动物科学学院, 河南新乡 453003;
5. 河南省畜牧局饲草饲料站, 河南郑州 450008

通讯作者: 李德锋,E-mail:Leadephone@126.com;孙浩,E-mail:sunhao921023@163.com
作者简介:姚晋(1998-),男,汉族,河南南阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草生产研究,E-mail:yaojin0326@163.com
基金资助:
河南省科技攻关计划项目(222102110133)；财政部和农业农村部国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-34)资助

Abstract

Abstract: To explore the winter survival and production performance of autumn-sown oat in Henan Province,this experiment was carried out to measure agronomic traits such as winter survival rate,tillering characteristics,hay yield,lodging resistance,and nutritional quality for 21 autumn-sown oat varieties. The results showed that the winter survival rates of oat varieties ranged from 33% to 86%,with above 60% in thirteen oat varieties. Autumn-sown oats had a strong tiller capacity with two tillering peaks before and after winter respectively,and only the tillers before winter were effective ones. The plant height of each variety was 1.04～1.42 m and the hay yield was 9.95～18.69 t·hm^-2. Among the 21 varieties,'Titan' had the tallest plant height,and 'Baler' was with the highest hay yield. Correlation analysis showed that hay yield was significantly positively correlated with plant height,and there was no significant correlation between tillering and hay yield. The principal component analysis for nutritional indicators showed that the principal components could be used to score nutritional quality quantitatively. The comprehensive evaluation by combining lodging resistance,hay yield,and nutritional quality showed that 'Baler' 'Haymaker' and 'Baler' II obtained higher scores,and they were appropriate for autumn sowing in Henan Province and Huang-Huai-Hai Plain.

Key words: Forage oat, Production performance, Principal component analysis, Winter survival rate, Tillering

摘要： 为探明河南省秋播燕麦的越冬情况和生产性能，本试验秋播21个燕麦品种，对其越冬率、分蘖情况等农艺性状及干草产量、抗倒伏性、营养品质进行测定和综合评价。结果表明：各秋播燕麦品种越冬率为33%～86%，其中有13个品种越冬率在60%以上。秋播的燕麦分蘖能力较强，越冬前和越冬后为2次分蘖高峰期，且越冬前分蘖为有效分蘖。各品种株高为1.04～1.42 m，'太阳神'的株高最高；干草产量为9.95～18.69 t·hm^-2，'贝勒'最高。相关分析表明，干草产量与株高呈极显著正相关关系，干草产量与分蘖等指标无显著相关性关系。对各品种营养指标进行主成分分析表明，可利用主成分分析法对营养品质进行量化评分。综合抗倒伏性、干草产量和营养品质综合评价表明，'贝勒''牧王'和'贝勒2'得分较高，适宜在河南省及黄淮海平原进行秋播推广。

关键词: 燕麦, 生产性能, 主成分分析, 越冬率, 分蘖

CLC Number:

S512.6

YAO Jin, HE Yun, LU Jia-ding, ZHANG Xiao-xia, CUI Ya-lei, MA Sen, WANG Zhi-chang, ZHU Xiao-yan, SHI Ying-hua, LI De-feng, SUN Hao. Winter Survival Rate,Tillering Characteristics,and Production Performance of Autumn-Sown Forage Oats in Henan Province[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 528-539.

姚晋, 何云, 卢家顶, 张晓霞, 崔亚垒, 马森, 王志昌, 朱晓艳, 史莹华, 李德锋, 孙浩. 河南省秋播饲用燕麦的越冬率、分蘖特性及其生产性能[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 528-539.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2023/V31/I2/528

References

[1] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 西北半干旱区引种燕麦品种产量与品质的关联分析及评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(1):125-133
[2] 谷粟琨. 奶业振兴新形势下对于河北省完善奶业保障机制的思考[J]. 中国奶牛,2019(9):58-63
[3] 高菲,王铁梅,卢欣石. 2021 年我国商品饲草生产形势分析与 2022 年趋势展望[J]. 畜牧产业,2022(3):32-37
[4] 娄春华,王博,李德锋,等. 黄河滩区16个春播燕麦品种的生产性能和营养品质[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(7):1843-1851
[5] CHAWADE A,LINDÉN P,BRÉUTIGAM M,et al. Development of a Model System to Identify Differences in Spring and Winter Oat[J]. PloS One,2012,7(1):e29792
[6] WOOTEN D R,LIVINGSTON D,JELLEN E N,et al. An Intergenomic Reciprocal Translocation Associated with Oat Winter Hardiness Component Traits[J]. Crop Science,2007,47(5):1832-1840
[7] WOOTEN D,LIVINGSTON III D,LYERLY H,et al. Quantitative Trait Loci and Epistasis for Oat Winter-Hardiness Component Traits[J]. Crop science,2009,49(06):1989-1998
[8] WOOTEN JR D R. New Genetic Tools for Improving Oat Winter Hardiness[D]. North Carolina:North Carolina State University,2007:41-47
[9] HASSANPOUR-BOURKHEILI S,GHEREKHLOO J,KAMKAR B,et al. No Fitness Cost Associated with Asn-2041-Ile Mutation in Winter Wild Oat Seed Germination under Various Environmental Conditions[J]. Scientific Reports,2021,11:1572
[10] AAKASH C,PERNILLA L,MARCUS B,et al. Development of a Model System to Identify Differences in Spring and Winter Oat[J]. PloS One,2012,7(1):e29792
[11] 闫天芳,魏臻武,王爱华,等. 8份燕麦材料在江淮地区生产性能及饲用价值评价[J]. 中国草地学报,2020,42(3):111-118
[12] 景婷婷,任淑娉,王登平,等. 播期和播量对成都平原“英迪米特”燕麦饲草产量及相关性状的影响[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(10):2594-2600
[13] 吴亚,张卫红,陈鸣晖,等. 不同品种燕麦在扬州地区的生产性能[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(7):1728-1733
[14] HOWARTH C J,MARTINEZ-MARTIN P M,COWAN A A,et al. Genotype and Environment Affect the Grain Quality and Yield of Winter Oats (Avena sativa L.)[J]. Foods,2021,10(10):2356
[15] 郭孝,齐爽,牛晖,等. 4个燕麦品种在黄河滩区生产性能和农艺性状的研究[J]. 畜牧与饲料科学,2019,40(8):38-41
[16] 张莹,陈志飞,张晓娜,等. 不同刈割期对春播、秋播燕麦干草产量和品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(11):124-135
[17] 蒋海亮. 黄土旱塬区秋播燕麦与箭筈豌豆间作系统的生产力和资源利用研究[D]. 兰州:兰州大学,2013:1-12
[18] 庄克章,吴荣华,张春艳,等. 鲁南地区耐低温饲用燕麦秋播和春播生产性能比较[J]. 饲料研究,2021,44(15):105-108
[19] 杜燕,孙黛珍,王曙光,等. 小麦品种持绿性与农艺性状及产量性状相关分析[J]. 山西农业科学,2021,49(6):699-704
[20] 黄文辉,王会,梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志,2018,34(4):13-19
[21] 中国畜牧业协会. T/CAAA 002—2018 燕麦干草质量分级[J]. 饲料与畜牧,2019(1):40-43
[22] 武迪. 中信银行财务竞争力评价及提升研究[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学,2020,30-31
[23] 郭昱. 权重确定方法综述[J]. 农村经济与科技,2018,29(8):252-253
[24] 张伟,周青平,陈有军,等. 呼伦贝尔地区10个引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲草品质比较[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(12):129-142
[25] 孙建平,薛竹慧,杨国义,等. 施氮对晋北燕麦饲草主要农艺性状及干物质产量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(4):964-970
[26] 翟苗苗. 饲草燕麦在辽西半干旱地区的产量与品质效应研究[D]. 沈阳:辽宁大学,2014,21-26
[27] 胡远彬,梁小玉,季杨,等. 禾本科牧草分蘖性状研究进展[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2017(10):65-68
[28] YU B,LIN Z,LI H,et al. TAC1,a Major Quantitative Trait Locus Controlling Tiller Angle in Rice[J]. The Plant Journal,2007,52(5):891-898
[29] 徐利利,杨习文,周苏玫,等. 小麦无效分蘖次生根的发生与作用[J]. 生态学杂志,2021,40(11):3650-3659
[30] 郑曦,魏臻武,武自念,等. 不同燕麦品种(系) 在扬州地区的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(2):272-279
[31] 柳茜,孙启忠,乔雪峰,等. 6个燕麦品种在攀西地区生产性能比较[J]. 草学,2019(4):38-43
[32] 徐长林. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种生长特性比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(2):280-285
[33] 徐惠云,王盼忠. 晋北高寒区不同燕麦品种生长特性比较研究[J]. 中国农学通报,2016,32(27):53-57
[34] 耿小丽,韩天虎,张少平,等. 30 个燕麦品种(品系) 在甘肃天祝地区的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(6):1743-1750
[35] 郭兴燕,田忠,梁丹妮,等. 11 个燕麦品种种子产量与主要农艺性状的通径分析[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(1):142-147
[36] 吴海艳,曲尼,曲珍. 6个燕麦品种在昂仁县的生产性能及饲草品质比较[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(4):72-80
[37] 阿啟兰,张然,刘勇,等. 4个燕麦品种在互助地区的适应性评价[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志,2018,48(3):12-16
[38] 彭先琴,周青平,刘文辉,等. 川西北高寒地区6个燕麦品种生长特性的比较分析[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(5):1208-1217
[39] 郑国强,刘自刚,魏家萍,等. 北方强冬性区白菜型冬油菜临界安全越冬率及产量补偿效应分析[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2021,39(5):19-28
[40] 柏晓玲,周青平,陈有军,等. 燕麦幼苗对低温胁迫的响应[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(7):1375-1382
[41] 徐鑫磊,宋彦涛,赵京东,等. 施肥和刈割对呼伦贝尔草甸草原牧草品质的影响及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(7):1-10
[42] 付刚,王俊皓,李少伟,等. 藏北高寒草地牧草营养品质对放牧的响应机制[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(9):38-50
[43] 王彦超,宋磊,张凡凡,等. 不同燕麦品种生育期农艺性状、生产性能及品质的比较[J]. 新疆农业科学,2020,57(2):254-263
[44] 周启龙,多吉顿珠,益西央宗. 拉萨地区16个燕麦引进品种的灰色关联度评价[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(2):389-396
[45] 姚军虎. 反刍动物碳水化合物高效利用的综合调控[J]. 饲料工业,2013,34(17):1-12
[46] 裴彩霞. 牧草中的水溶性碳水化合物[J]. 四川草原,2005(6):13-16
[47] 孙雷雷,赵桂琴,柴继宽,等. 贮藏方式和时间对紫花苜蓿干草营养品质的影响[J]. 草原与草坪,2020,40(6):33-38
[48] 王腾飞,常怡然,邓雪,等. 饲用燕麦品种在宁夏雨养区的适应性评价[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(7):1755-1762
[49] 张吉鹍,卢德勋,刘建新,等. 粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展[J]. 草业科学,2004，21(9):55-61
[50] 荆瑞勇,卫佳琪,王丽艳,等. 基于主成分分析的不同水稻品种品质综合评价[J]. 食品科学,2020,41(24):179-184
[51] 任丽娟,赵连生,陈雅坤,等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析方法综合评价东北地区不同品种全株玉米青贮饲料的青贮品质[J]. 动物营养学报,2020,32(8):3856-3868
[52] 唐凤,李瑶,王永琪,等. 22份野生披碱草属种质农艺性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价[J]. 种子,2021,40(6):44-51
[53] 李志强. 燕麦干草质量评价[J]. 中国奶牛,2013(19):1-3
[54] WU W,MA B L. Erect-leaf Posture Promotes Lodging Resistance in Oat Plants under High Plant Population[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,2019,103:175-187
[55] 南铭,赵桂琴,柴继宽. 20份饲草型燕麦品种的抗倒伏性研究[J]. 草原与草坪,2019,39(5):62-68
[56] SILVEIRA D C,BASSO S M S,EBONE L A,et al. Morphological Traits of Stem to Indirect Selection of Resistance to Lodging in Avena sativa L[J]. Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology,2022,25(1):39-50
[57] 邵庆勤,周琴,王笑,等. 种植密度对不同小麦品种茎秆形态特征、化学成分及抗倒性能的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报,2018,41(5):9
[58] 南铭,赵桂琴,李晶,等. 不同燕麦品种茎秆形态特征与抗倒伏性的关系[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1382-1391
[59] MUSTIKARINI E D,PRAYOGA G I,SANTI R,et al. Genetic Parameter Contributing to Lodging Resistance of F2 Population in Red Rice[C]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science,2019:012066
[60] 韩金玲,杨晴,周印富,等. 冀东地区种植密度对小麦京冬 8号抗倒伏能力和产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2015,35(5):667-673
[61] 卢杰,董连生,常成,等. 种植密度对不同小麦品种产量构成及抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2021,41(1):81-87
[62] 冯学颖,米俊珍,刘景辉,等. 宽幅条播和种植密度对燕麦抗倒伏性及产量的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2021,41(7):914-920
[63] MARCOS V R,JOS A G D S,ANDERSON M,et al. The Management of Sowing Density on Yield and Lodging in the Main Oat Biotype Grown in Brazil[J]. African Journal of Agricultural Research,2016,11(21):1935-1944
[64] 王雪莱,郭潇潇,郭伟,等. 种植密度对松嫩平原西部燕麦产量形成的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2020,40(7):881-889
[65] 周萍萍,赵军,颜红海,等. 播期,播种量与施肥量对裸燕麦籽粒产量及农艺性状的影响[J]. 草业科学,2015(3):433-441
[66] FINNAN J,HYLAND L,BURKE B. The Effect of Seeding Rate on Radiation Interception,Grain Yield and Grain Quality of Autumn Sown Oats[J]. European journal of agronomy,2018,101:239-247
[67] MUSZYNSKA A,GUENDEL A,MELZER M,et al. A mechanistic View on Lodging Resistance in Rye and Wheat:a Multiscale Comparative Study[J]. Plant biotechnology journal,2021,19(12):2646-2661
[68] 姜慧新,柏杉杉,吴波,等. 22个燕麦品种在黄淮海地区的农艺性状与饲草品质综合评价[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(1):140-149

Winter Survival Rate,Tillering Characteristics,and Production Performance of Autumn-Sown Forage Oats in Henan Province

河南省秋播饲用燕麦的越冬率、分蘖特性及其生产性能

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	XUE Jian, XING Qiang, CHENG Wen-jing. Effects of Traffic on the Physical Properties of Lawn Soil and Roots of Two Turfgrasses [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 448-455.
[2]	WANG Qi-yu, LIU Huan, RENZENG Wang-dui, WANG Jing-long, LUO Jian-min, HUANG Ying, Dong Kai. Comprehensive Evaluation of Drought Resistance of Artemisia wellbyi Germplasm at the Seedling Stage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 148-156.
[3]	JIA Xiao-hui, ZHANG Feng-ju, XIE Xiao-wei, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, CHEN Yue-juan, XU Xing. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizers on Performance and Nutrient Uptake of Echinochloa frumentacea in Saline-alkali Land [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 272-279.
[4]	ZHANG Yu-juan, GUO Rui, ZHANG Zhao-heng, ZHANG Yan, MA Hui-ling, DONG Wen-ke. Effect of Clod Plasma Treatment on Salt Resistance of Poa pratensis Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2365-2374.
[5]	HU Guo-fu, LI Wei-yao, XIAO Hui-chuan, CUI Guo-wen, SONG Xue, WEI Yin-zhu, SU Ying-miao, QIN Li-gang. Effects of ABA and GA₃ on Seed Germination, Physiological Characteristics and Endogenous Hormone Contents of Allium senescens L. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2399-2406.
[6]	GUO Chang-ying, WANG Wei, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WEI Xiao-li, PENG Dan, XU Cheng-ti. Effects of Sowing Method and Row Spacing on Production Performance and Interspecific Relationship of Oat/Forage Pea Mixed Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(9): 2483-2491.
[7]	ZHANG Dan-dan, ZHANG Yuan-qing, LIANG Yuan, CHENG Jing, WANG Dong-cai, LI Bo, SUN Rui-feng, JIN Guang, XU Fang. Evaluation of the Associative Effects of Concentrate、Broussonetia papyrifera and Whole Plant Corn Silage based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(7): 1909-1917.
[8]	SUN Yan-liang, LIU Xuan-shuai, LI Sheng-yi, ZHAO Jun-wei, MA Chun-hui, ZHANG Qian-bing. Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance with different Fall Dormancy Rates of Alfalfa in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(5): 1227-1236.
[9]	ZHENG Cheng-zhuo, CAO Ning, FU Xiao-yi, An-jia-ji-cai-rang, LIU Chang-zhong, QIAN Xiu-juan. Comparison of Male Genitalia Among Six Common Species of Grasshoppers from Sunan Area Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 1000-1006.
[10]	SONG Jian-chao, YANG Hang, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, ZHANG Xiao-juan, WANG Hai-bo, HE You-long. Effect of Combined Application of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer on the Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 731-742.
[11]	HAN Yan-long, LIU Xiao-jing, WANG Jing, WANG Xue, LI Jia-qi. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Root Characteristics and Productivity of Different Alfalfa Cultivars [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 379-384.
[12]	YAO Xi-xi, CHEN Yong-long, XU Cheng-ti, HAI Cun-xiu, LIU Hao-dong. Effects of Dietary Energy Level on Production Performance,Meat Quality and Rumen Microbes of Yak (Bos grunniens) [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 432-439.
[13]	LI Pei, ZHANG Hao, GUO Tong-tian, XU Heng-kang, WEI Bin, ZHANG Ying-jun, LIU Nan. Effects of Companion Crop on Weed Suppression and Forage Growth in the Early Establishment Stage of Legume-Grass Mixture in Hulunbuir Area [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3423-3432.
[14]	FENG Qin, WANG Bin, WANG Teng-fei, NI Wang, DENG Jian-qiang, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Sowing of Vetch and Oat on Production Performance and Nutrient Quality of Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12): 3439-3446.
[15]	WEI Xiao-li, XU Cheng-ti, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WANG Wei. Analysis of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Mixed Seeding of Triticale and Forage Peas in Haibei Prefecture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 236-244.