青藏高原3种主要植被类型的表观量子效率和最大光合速率的比较

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.008

›› 2007, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (5): 442-448.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.008

青藏高原3种主要植被类型的表观量子效率和最大光合速率的比较

张法伟^1,2, 李英年¹, 李红琴³, 王勤学⁴, 杜明远⁵, 赵亮¹, 汪诗平¹

1. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所, 青海, 西宁, 810001;
2. 中国科学院研究生院, 北京, 100049;
3. 青海大学研究生部, 青海, 西宁, 810016;
4. 日本国立环境研究所, 日本, 筑波, 3050053;
5. 日本农业环境技术研究所, 日本, 筑波, 3058604

收稿日期:2006-09-12 修回日期:2007-06-25 出版日期:2007-10-15 发布日期:2007-10-15
通讯作者: 李英年,E-mail:ynli@nwipb.ac.cn
作者简介:张法伟(1981- ),男,河南人,硕士研究生,研究方向为植物生态
基金资助:
中国科学院知识创新工程重大项目(KZCX1-SW-01-01A);国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(2002CB412501);“21世纪亚洲陆地生态系统碳管理为目标的综合碳收支研究”以及中日合作“亚太地区环境创新战略计划(APEIS)”

The Comparative Study of the Apparent Quantum Yield and Maximum Photosynthesis Rates of 3 Typical Vegetation Types on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

ZHANG Fa-wei^1,2, LI Ying-nian¹, LI Hong-qin³, WANG Qin-xue⁴, DU Ming-yuan⁵, ZHAO Liang¹, WANG Shi-ping¹

1. Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining, Qinghai Province 810001, China
2. Graduate School, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, china;
3. Graduate school, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
4. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, 3050053, Japan;
5. National Institute of Agro-environmental Sciences, Tsukuba, 3058604, Japan

Received:2006-09-12 Revised:2007-06-25 Online:2007-10-15 Published:2007-10-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以海北高寒草甸生态系统定位站的涡度相关系统连续观测的CO₂通量数据为基础,分析了青藏高原的高寒矮嵩草(Kobresia humilis)草甸、高寒金露梅(Potentilla fruticosa)灌丛草甸和高寒藏嵩草(Kobresia tibetica)沼泽化草甸等3种主要植被类型在2005年植物生长季(6-9月)的表观量子产额(a)、最大光合速率(P_max)和呼吸速率(R_eco)的变化特征。结果表明:3种植被类型白天的净生态系统CO₂交换量(NEE)和光量子通量密度(PPFD)存在明显的直角双曲线关系(P<0.05),其a、P_max和R_eco呈现出相似的季节变化趋势,在生长季初期(6月)最小,在7月或8月份达到最大;高寒矮嵩草草甸的a、P_max和R_eco大于灌丛草甸和沼泽化草甸,而后两者差别不大。

Abstract: Based on the continuous CO₂ flux data monitored by Eddy Covariance Method at Haibei Station, the variations of apparent quantum yield(a), maximum photosynthesis rate (P_max), and ecosystem respiration rate (R_eco) were analyzed for three vegetation types (alpine Kobresia humilis(C. A. Mey) Serg. meadow, alpine Potentilla fruticosa L. shrubland, and alpine K.tibetica Maxim. wetland) in growing season (from June to September) on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. The results show that the daytime net ecosystem exchange (NEE) fitted very well with Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) in a rectangular hyperbola equation in three types of vegetation ecosystems. Their a, P_max, and R_eco showed the similar seasonal changing pattern, the minimum was appeared in June and maximum in July or August; the a, P_max and R_eco of the alpine K. humilis meadow was higher than that of the other two vegetation types and no significant differences of a, P_max, and R_eco between alpine P.fruticosa shrubland and alpine K.tibetica wetland were detected.

Key words: Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Eddy Covariance Method, Apparent quantum yield, Maximum photosynthesis rate, Ecosystem respiration rate

中图分类号:

张法伟, 李英年, 李红琴, 王勤学, 杜明远, 赵亮, 汪诗平. 青藏高原3种主要植被类型的表观量子效率和最大光合速率的比较[J]. , 2007, 15(5): 442-448.

ZHANG Fa-wei, LI Ying-nian, LI Hong-qin, WANG Qin-xue, DU Ming-yuan, ZHAO Liang, WANG Shi-ping. The Comparative Study of the Apparent Quantum Yield and Maximum Photosynthesis Rates of 3 Typical Vegetation Types on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. , 2007, 15(5): 442-448.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2007.05.008

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2007/V15/I5/442

参考文献

[1] Adams J M,Faure H,Farue-Denand L,et al.Increases in terrestrial carbon storage from the Last Glacial Maximum to the present[J].Nature,1990,348:711-714
[2] Scurlock J M O,Hall D O.The global carbon sink:a grassland percpective[J].Global Change Biology,1998,4:229-233
[3] 李英年,赵亮,王勤学,等.高寒金露梅灌丛生物量及年周转量[J].草地学报,2006,14(1):72-76.
[4] 郑度.青藏高原自然地域系统研究[J].中国科学(D辑),1998,26(4):336-341
[5] Zheng D,Zhang Q S,Wu S H.Mountain geo-ecology and sustainable development of the Tibetan Plateau[M].Dordrecht,the Netherlands:Kluwer Academic Publisher.2000
[6] Sun H.Formation and evolution of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[M].Shanghai:Shanghai Science and Technology Press.1996
[7] 赵亮,徐世晓,李英年,等.青藏高原两种草甸地表通量季节变化特征[J].草地学报,2006,14(3):248-253
[8] 蒲继延,李英年,赵亮,等.矮松蒿草草甸生物量季节动态及其与气候因子的关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(3):231-241
[9] Gu S,Tang Y H,Du M Y,et al.Short-term variation of CO₂ flux in relation to environmental controls in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Geophysical research,2003,108:4670-4679
[10] Kato T,Tang Y,Gu S,et al.Carbon dioxide exchange between the atmosphere and an alpine meadow ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,China[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2004,124:121-134
[11] Kato T,Tang Y,Gu S,et al.Seasonal patterns of gross primary production and ecosystem respiration in an alpine meadow ecosystem on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Geophysical research,2004,109:109-118
[12] Zhao L,Li Y N,Gu S,et al.Carbon dioxide exchange between the atmosphere and alpine shrubland meadow during the Growing season on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Journal of Interative plant biology,2005,47 (3):271-282
[13] Zhao L,Li Y N,Zhao X Q,et al.Comparative study of net exchange ecosystem of CO₂ in 3 types vegetation ecosystems on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J].Chinese Science Bulletin,2005,50:1767-1774
[14] Xu L L,Zhang X Z,Shi P L,et al.Establishment for apparent quantum yield and maximum ecosystm assimilation on Tibetan Plateau alpine meadow ecosystem[J].Science in China Series D:Earth Science,2005,48 (Supply):141-147
[15] Ruimy A,Javis P G,Baldocchi D D,et al.CO₂ fluxes over plant canopies and solar radiation:a review[J].Advance in Ecological Research,1995,26:1-69
[16] Schulze E D,Caldwell M M.Ecophysiology of photosynthesis[M].Beilin,Heidelberg,Germany:Springer-Verlag.1994
[17] 刘允芬,张宪洲,周允华,等.西藏高原田间冬小麦的表观光合量子效率[J].生态学报,2000,20(1):35-38
[18] 易现峰,贲桂英,师生波,等.高寒草甸矮嵩草种群光合作用及群落生长季节变化[J].中国草地,2000,1:12-15
[19] 张树源,陆国泉,武海,等.青海高原主要C3植物的光合作用[J].植物学报,1992,34(3):176-184
[20] 师声波,贲桂英,韩发.矮嵩草草甸植物群落的光合特性研究[J].植物生态学报,1996,20:225-234
[21] 周兴民.中国嵩草草甸[M].北京:科学出版社.2001
[22] Baldocchi D D,Hicks B B,Meyers T P.Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchange of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods[J].Ecology,1988,69 (5):1331-1340
[23] Andrew E S,Shashi B,Verma.Year-round observations of the net ecosystem exchange of carbon dioxide in a native tallgrass prairie[J].Global Change Biology,2001,7:279-289
[24] Duglas W A,Heuer M L,Mayeux H S.Carbon dioxide fluxes over bermudagrass native prairie and sorghum[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,1999,93:121-139
[25] Kim J,Verma S B.Carbon dioxide exchange in a temperate grassland ecosystem[J].Bound Layer Meteorology,1990,52:135-149
[26] 李英年,赵新全,曹广民,等.海北高寒草甸生态系统定位站气候、植被生产力背景分析[J].高原气象,2004,23(4):558-568
[27] Webb E K,Pearman G,Leuning R.Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water transfer[J].Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society,1980,106:85-100
[28] Falge E,Baldocchi D D,Olson R,et al.Gap filling strategies for defensible and annual sums of net ecosystem exchange[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2001,107:43-69
[29] 周兴民,吴珍兰.植被与植物检索表[M].西宁:青海人民出版社.2006
[30] 卢存福,贲桂英,韩发,等.矮嵩草光合作用与环境因素关系的比较研究[J].植物生态学报,1995,19:72-78
[31] Zhang L M,Yu G R,Sun X M,et al.Seasonal variations of ecosystem apparent quantum yield and maximum photosynthesis rate of different forest ecosystem in China[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2006:176-187

青藏高原3种主要植被类型的表观量子效率和最大光合速率的比较

The Comparative Study of the Apparent Quantum Yield and Maximum Photosynthesis Rates of 3 Typical Vegetation Types on Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李若玮, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 韩国栋, 孙建. 基于InVEST模型的青藏高原碳储量估算及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 43-51.
[2]	兰翔宇, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 曾涛, 孙建. 1995—2014年青藏高原水源涵养功能时空演变特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[3]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[4]	张中华, 马丽, 周秉荣, 宋明华, 徐文华, 邓艳芳, 王芳, 佘延娣, 张骞, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 高寒草甸优势种功能多样性对增温和模拟放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[5]	王谭国艳, 马志远, 李沛洋, 郭俊宏, 张嘉懿, 蒋胜竞. 短期增温对青藏高原高寒草甸不同植物根际丛枝菌根真菌的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1959-1966.
[6]	郭文章, 井长青, 王公鑫, 侯志雄, 赵苇康. 天山北坡荒漠草原土壤呼吸和生态系统呼吸对降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
[7]	魏星星, 吴江琪, 李广, 王海燕, 刘帅楠, 张世康, 张娟. 青藏高原湿草甸土壤氮组分对氮添加浓度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 677-683.
[8]	马小林, 侯庆丰, 杨鼎. 退耕还草对青海省农牧民家庭收入的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 772-779.
[9]	韩梦丽, 白史且, 孙盛楠, 鄢家俊, 张传杰, 张昌兵, 张靖雪, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 严学兵. 基于MaxEnt模型青藏高原老芒麦适生区模拟预测[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.
[10]	张力天, 刘炜, 刘德梅, 董瑞珍, 王晓丽, 张敏, 仁增曲扎, 边巴普尺, 杨时海, 马玉寿. 青藏高原白草生殖生长期植株器官生物量分配特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2694-2702.
[11]	陆永祥, 赵嫚, 陈良寅, 成启明, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 白史且, 李平. 布氏乳杆菌和甲酸对青藏高原不同物候期燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1736-1743.
[12]	姜翠霞, 胡长胜, 魏海燕, 王宪举, 丁路明. 夏季模拟放牧对青藏高原冬春草场牧草品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1473-1477.
[13]	秦金萍, 刘颖, 马玉寿, 王彦龙, 施建军. 返青期休牧对退化高寒草甸植被生长及其优势植物垂穗披碱草光合作用的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1068-1075.
[14]	张小芳, 张春平, 董全民, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 俞旸, 杨增增, 魏琳娜, 张艳芬, 褚晖, 李彩弟, 冯斌. 三江源区高寒混播草地群落结构特征的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1090-1099.
[15]	张艳芬, 杨晓霞, 董全民, 张春平, 俞旸, 杨增增, 冯斌, 褚晖, 魏琳娜, 张小芳. 牦牛和藏羊混合放牧对放牧家畜采食量和植物补偿性生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1607-1614.