不同沙生植被土壤易氧化有机碳组分及其含量的差异

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.011

›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (5): 863-869.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.011

不同沙生植被土壤易氧化有机碳组分及其含量的差异

孙彩丽¹, 刘国彬², 马海龙¹, 薛萐³, 张超³

1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 中国科学院水利部水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2012-03-16 修回日期:2012-05-28 出版日期:2012-10-15 发布日期:2012-11-01
通讯作者: 薛萐,E-mail:xuesha100@163.com
作者简介:孙彩丽(1989-),女,河南平顶山人,硕士研究生,主要从事应用生态学等方面的研究,E-mail:suncaili2007@126.com
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项"退耕还林(草)工程固碳速率和潜力研究"(XDA05060300);西北农林科技大学青年项目"生态恢复过程土壤微生物根际效应及其多样性研究"(QN2009080)资助

Variation Characteristics and Fractions of Oxidizable Organic Carbon in Different Sandy Vegetation Soil

SUN Cai-li¹, LIU Guo-bin², MA Hai-long¹, XUE Sha³, ZHANG Chao³

1. College of Resources and Enviroment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shanxi Province 712100, China;
2. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Science and Ministry of Water Resources, Yangling, Shanxi Province 712100, China;
3. Institute of Soil and Water Conservation Northwest A&F university, Yangling, Shanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2012-03-16 Revised:2012-05-28 Online:2012-10-15 Published:2012-11-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以9种沙生植被为研究对象,沙裸地为对照,采用野外调查与室内分析相结合的方法,分析不同沙生植被土壤易氧化有机碳(C_oc)各组分的变化特征,并在此基础上提出土壤有机碳活性系数和敏感指数,探讨不同沙生植被对改善土壤质量的影响。结果表明:沙裸地种植植被后,C_oc各组分和总有机碳(C_toc)含量显著增加,但C_oc各组分占C_toc的比例无明显变化;与其他沙生植被相比,刺槐林(Robinia pseudoacacia)、花棒(Hedysarum scoparium)、臭柏(Sabina vulgaris)和樟子松(Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica)对改善土壤质量,提高土壤有机碳活性的作用更加显著。敏感指数表明C_oc中第1部分(C_frac1)和第2部分(C_frac2)活性较强,其中C_frac1对土壤质量变化更加敏感,可以作为衡量土壤质量状况的良好指标。相关性分析表明C_frac1,C_frac2,C_frac3,C_frac4,C_oc与C_toc之间极显著相关 (P<0.01),与碱解氮和全氮成显著或极显著正相关(P<0.05或P<0.01),与全磷和速效磷之间的相关关系不显著,C_frac4和C_toc与速效钾之间极显著正相关(P<0.01),C_frac1,C_frac2,C_frac4,C_oc,C_toc与pH成显著或极显著负相关(P<0.05或P<0.01)。综上所述,C_frac1可作为衡量土壤质量状况的良好指标,刺槐、花棒、臭柏和樟子松这4种植物可作为毛乌素沙地改善土壤质量的优先考虑植被。

关键词: 沙生植被, 易氧化有机碳组分, 活性系数, 敏感指数

Abstract: The variation and fractions of oxidizable organic carbon (C_oc) from nine psammophytes were studied through field investigation and laboratory analysis. Soil sensitive index and the influence of different vegetations on soil quality improvement were also discussed. Results showed that the contents of C_oc and total organic carbon (C_toc) increased significantly by planting on bare sand, whereas the percentage of C_oc to C_toc had no change. Robinia pseudoacacia (RP), Hedysarum scoparium (HS), Sabina vulgaris (SV) and Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica (PS) improved soil quality and carbon activity more significantly compared with other vegetations. Sensitive index showed that the first (C_frac1) and second fraction (C_frac2) of C_oc had high activity, C_frac1 was more labile than C_frac2 and can be used to evaluate soil quality. Correlation analysis showed that there was a significant relationship among C_frac1, C_frac2, C_frac3, C_frac4, C_oc and C_toc (P<0.01), and they were positively correlated with available N and total N (P<0.05), but not correlated with total P and available P. Additionally, C_frac4 and C_toc were positively correlated with available P (P<0.01). There was a negative correlation between C_frac1, C_frac2, C_frac4, C_oc, C_toc and pH value (P<0.01 or P<0.05). In conclusion, C_frac1 can be used as a favorable indicator for soil quality evaluation. Robinia pseudoacacia (RP), Hedysarum scoparium (HS), Sabina vulgaris (SV), and Pinus sylvestris var.mongolica (PS) can be considered as preferential choice for soil quality restoration in Muus sandland.

Key words: Psammophyte, Oxidizable organic carbon fractions, Activity index, Sensitive index

中图分类号:

S153.62

孙彩丽, 刘国彬, 马海龙, 薛萐, 张超. 不同沙生植被土壤易氧化有机碳组分及其含量的差异[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 863-869.

SUN Cai-li, LIU Guo-bin, MA Hai-long, XUE Sha, ZHANG Chao. Variation Characteristics and Fractions of Oxidizable Organic Carbon in Different Sandy Vegetation Soil[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 863-869.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.05.011

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2012/V20/I5/863

参考文献

[1] 蒋德明,宗文君,李雪华,等.科尔沁西部地区荒漠化土地植被恢复技术研究[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(3):243-248
[2] 赫晓慧,常庆瑞,温仲明,等.农牧交错带不同人工植被下荒漠化土壤肥力的变化[J].中国沙漠,2006,26(6):915-919
[3] Johnston A E, Stevenson F J. Soil organic matter, effects on soils and crops [J]. Soil Use and Management,1986,2(3):97-101
[4] Stevenson F J. Carbon balance of the soil and role of organic matter in soil fertility: cycles of soil-carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, sulphur, micronutrients [M].New York: John Wiley & Sons,1986:45-775
[5] Blair B J, Lefroy R D. Soil carbon fractions based on their degree of oxidation, and the developments of a carbon management index for agricultural systems [J]. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research,1995,46(7):1456-1466
[6] 王清奎,汪思龙,冯宗炜,等.土壤活性有机质及其与土壤质量的关系[J].生态学报,2005,25(3):513-519
[7] 沈宏,曹志洪,胡正义,等.土壤活性有机碳的表征及其生态意义[J].生态学杂志,1999,18(3):32-38
[8] 刘正刚,裴柏洋,王宪帅,等.岷江上游干旱河谷不同土地利用类型的土壤有机碳和易氧化态碳特征[J].水土保持研究,2011,18(3):24-27
[9] 朱志建,姜培坤,徐秋芳,等.不同森林植被下土壤微生物量碳和易氧化态碳的比较[J].林业科学研究,2006,19(4):523-526
[10] Wu T Y, Schoenau J J, Li F M, et al. Effect of tillage and rotation on organic carbon forms of chernozemic soils in Saskatchewan[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science,2003,166(3):328-335
[11] Mandal B, Majumder B, Bandopadhyay P K, et al. The potential of cropping systems and soil amendments for carbon sequestration in soils under long-term experiments in subtropical India[J]. Global Change Biology,2007,13(2):357-369
[12] Chan K Y, Bowman A, Oates A, et al. Oxidizable organic carbon fractions and soil quality changes in an oxic paleustaff under different pastures leys [J]. Soil Science,2001,166(1):61-67
[13] Majumder B, Mandal B, Bandyopadhyay P K, et al. Soil organic carbon pools and productivity relationships for a 34 year old rice-wheat-jute agroecosystem under different fertilizer treatments[J]. Plant and Soil,2007,297(1/2):53-67
[14] Majumder B, Mandal B, Bandyopadhyay P K, et al. Soil organic carbon pools and productivity in relation to nutrient management in a 20-year-old rice-berseem agro-ecosystem [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2008,44(3):451-461
[15] 曹成有,蒋德明,全贵静,等.科尔沁沙地小叶锦鸡儿人工固沙区土壤理化性质的变化[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(6):108- 111.
[16] 吴祥云,刘广,韩辉,等.不同类型樟子松人工固沙林土壤质量的研究[J].防护林科技,2001(4):15-17
[17] 贺山峰,蒋得明,阿拉木萨,等.科尔沁沙地小叶锦鸡儿灌木林固沙效应的研究[J].水土保持学报,2007,21(1):84-87
[18] 余娜,刘济民,张超,等.不同沙生植被土壤酶活性分异特征研究[J].水土保持研究,2010,17(1):77-81
[19] Eduard S. Methods for determination of labile soil organic matter: An overview[J]. Journal of Agrobiology,2010,27(2):49-60
[20] 刘光崧.中国生态系统研究网络观测与分析标准方法:土壤理化分析与剖面描述[M].北京:中国标准出版社,1996:31-40
[21] 中国土壤学会.土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京:中国农业科技出版社,1999:146-226
[22] Sherrod L A, Peterson G A, Westfall D G, et al. Soil organic carbon pools after 12 years in no-till dryland agro-ecosystems [J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal,2005,69(5):1600-1608
[23] Parton W J, McKeown B, Kirchner V, et al. Century user manual [M]. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO,1992
[24] 李新荣,贾晓红.腾格里沙漠东南缘荒漠植被格局与土壤资源的关系[J].草地学报,2005,13(S):37-43
[25] 单贵莲,陈功,宁发.典型草原恢复演替过程中土壤微生物及酶活性动态变化研究[J].草地学报,2012,20(2):291-297
[26] 李新荣.毛乌素沙地灌木资源区系特征及其保护对策[J].自然资源学报,1997,12(2):146-152
[27] 肖春旺.模拟降水量对毛乌素沙柳幼苗蒸发蒸腾的潜在影响[J].草地学报,2001,9(2):121-127
[28] 赵博光.荒漠化地区生态系统水分运行规律与荒漠化治理[J].南京林业大学学报,2000,24(1):69-72
[29] 曹成有,蒋德明,朱丽辉,等.山竹岩黄蓍固沙群落对土壤养分及生物活性的改良效应[J].应用生态学报,2007,18(8):1739-1744
[30] 徐恒,廖超英,李晓明,等.榆林沙区人工固沙林土壤微生物生态分布特征及酶活性研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2008,36(12):135-141
[31] Motavalli P P, Palm C A, Parton CA, et al. Soil pH and organic C dynamics in tropical forest soils: Evidence from laboratory and simulation studies [J]. Soil Biology& Biochemistry,1995,27(12):1589-1599
[32] Curtin D, Campbell C A, Jalil A. Effects of acidity on mineralization: pH dependence of organic matter mineralization in weakly acidic soils [J]. Soil Biology &Biochemistry,1998,30(1):57-64
[33] 戴万宏,黄耀,武丽,等.中国地带性土壤有机质含量与酸碱度的关系[J].土壤学报,2009,46(5):851-860
[34] Spain A V. Influence of environmental conditions and some soil chemical properties on the carbon and nitrogen contents of some tropical Australian rainforest soils [J]. Australian Journal of Soil Research,1990,28(6):825-839

不同沙生植被土壤易氧化有机碳组分及其含量的差异

Variation Characteristics and Fractions of Oxidizable Organic Carbon in Different Sandy Vegetation Soil

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 1

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价