栽培柳枝稷不同生长时期对伴生杂草生物量及密度的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.04.010

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (4): 689-696.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.04.010

栽培柳枝稷不同生长时期对伴生杂草生物量及密度的影响

安雨¹, 马永清^1,2, 税军峰², 钟雯瑾¹

1. 西北农林科技大学资源环境学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学水土保持研究所黄土高原土壤侵蚀与旱地农业国家重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2013-01-11 修回日期:2013-03-11 出版日期:2013-08-15 发布日期:2013-08-14
通讯作者: 马永清
作者简介:安雨(1984- ),男,吉林长春人,博士研究生,主要从事植物生态学研究,E-mail: anyu04151205@sina.com
基金资助:
国家"十二五"农村领域国家科技计划课题"黄土丘陵沟壑区水土保持与高效农业关键技术集成与示范"(2011BAD31B05)资助

Effect of Cultivated Switchgrass on the Growth of Associated Weed Biomass and Density at Different Growth Stages

AN Yu¹, MA Yong-qing^1,2, SHUI Jun-feng², ZHONG Wen-jin¹

1. College of Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2013-01-11 Revised:2013-03-11 Online:2013-08-15 Published:2013-08-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以陕西定边县引种的8个柳枝稷(Panicum virgatum L.)品种(Blackwell, Cave-in-Rock, Dakota, Forestberg, Illinois USA, Nebraska 28, Pathfinder和Sunburst)及行间杂草作为研究对象,通过计算柳枝稷对杂草的抑制率(RI),分析其生长指标与杂草生长指标的相关关系,判定不同柳枝稷品种在不同生育期对杂草生长的抑制效应,为其引种及田间杂草管理提供依据。结果表明:在生长初期(6月30日),Illinois USA杂草抑制率仅为3.4%,Cave-in-Rock 和Forestberg对杂草生长抑制率分别为86.0%和74.9%;经过2次人工除草后(8月30日),Cave-in-Rock和Forestberg的杂草抑制率分别为85.7%和95.7%;生长后期(10月13日),仅Cave-in-Rock对杂草生长有88.5%的抑制率。回归分析显示,生长中后期(8月30日),柳枝稷地上部及根系生物量显著影响对杂草的抑制率(R²=0.31, 0.54; P<0.05)。Pearson相关分析发现,Cave-in-Rock的株高、地上及根系生物量均显著降低杂草单株生物量(r=-0.97,-0.99,-0.99; P<0.05);Forestberg的植高与杂草密度显著负相关(r=-0.97, P<0.05)。

关键词: 柳枝稷, 杂草, 生物量, 竞争, 相关性

Abstract: Eight switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) varieties (Blackwell, Cave-in-Rock, Dakota, Forestberg, Illinois USA, Nebraska 28, Pathfinder and Sunburst) and their associated weeds were tested in this study. The inhibition rate (IR) and correlation were analyzed to identify the effects of switchgrass on the associated weed growth. Results indicated that most tested switchgrass varieties could suppress weed growth at the earlier growth season. Illinois USA was relatively lower IR (3.4%). Cave-in-Rock and Forestberg suppressed weed growth significantly as IR were 86.0% and 74.9%, respectively. After twice hand hoeing, Cave-in-Rock and Forestberg still suppressed the weed growth significantly (30^th August), as IR were 85.7% and 95.7%, respectively. At the end of growth season (13^th October), only Cave-in-Rock could suppress weed growth, the IR was 88.5%. In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between switchgrass aboveground biomass or root biomass and IR at 30^th August (R² =0.31, 0.54; P<0.05). However, the height, aboveground and root biomass of Cave-in-Rock significantly suppressed the individual weed biomass (r=-0.97,-0.99,-0.99, P<0.05), and the Forestberg mainly suppressed the weed density (r=-0.97, P<0.05).

Key words: Switchgrass, Weed, Biomass, Competition, Correlation analysis

中图分类号:

Q148
Q948.12

安雨, 马永清, 税军峰, 钟雯瑾. 栽培柳枝稷不同生长时期对伴生杂草生物量及密度的影响[J]. , 2013, 21(4): 689-696.

AN Yu, MA Yong-qing, SHUI Jun-feng, ZHONG Wen-jin. Effect of Cultivated Switchgrass on the Growth of Associated Weed Biomass and Density at Different Growth Stages[J]. , 2013, 21(4): 689-696.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.04.010

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2013/V21/I4/689

参考文献

[1] Wolf D D, Fiske D A. Planting and managing switchgrass for forage, wildlife, and conservation. Blacksburg[M]//VA: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Virginia Cooperative Extension. Publication Number,1995:418-013
[2] Nielsen E L. Analysis of variation in Panicum virgatum[J]. Journal of Agricultrue Research,1944,69(4):327-353
[3] Hulquist S J, Vogel K P, Lee D J, et al. Chloroplast DNA content and nuclear DNA content variations among cultivars of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.)[J]. Crop Science,1996,36(4):1049-1052
[4] Moser L E, Vogel K P. Switchgrass, big bluestem, and Indian grass[C]//Barnes R F, Miller D A, Nelson C J, eds. Forages, an introduction to grassland agriculture, Vol. 1, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA,1995:409-420
[5] Sharma N, Piscioneri I, Pignatelli V. An evaluation of biomass yield stability of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars[J]. Energy Conversion and Management,2003,44(18):2953-2958
[6] Samson R A, Omielan J A. Switchgrass: A potential biomass energy crop for ethanol production[C]//The thirteenth North American Prairie conference. Windsor, Ontario,1992:253-258
[7] Kim S, Dale B E. Cumulative energy and global warming impact from the production of biomass for biobased products[J]. Journal of Industrial Ecology,2003,7(4):147-162
[8] Ma Y Q, An Y, Shui J F, et al. Adaptability evaluation of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) cultivars on the Loess Plateau of China[J]. Plant Science,2011,181(6):638-643
[9] Thomas F C, Peter A. Lack of public awareness of biological invasions by plants[J]. Natural Areas Journal,1998,18(3):262-266
[10] Reichard S H, White P. Horticulture as a pathway of invasive plant introductions in the United States[J]. Bioscience,2001,51(2):103-113
[11] Gill H S, Sandhu K S, Mehra S P, et al. Efficacy of some herbicides for control of weeds in Indian mustard[J]. Indian Journal of Weed Science,1984,10(7):171-175
[12] Yadav R P. Effect of herbicides alone and in combination with cultural methods on weed control in Indian mustard (Brassica napus)[J]. Indian Journal of Agronomy,2004,49(4):268-270
[13] Chauhan Y S, Bhargava M K, Jain V K. Weed management in Indian mustard (Brassica juncea)[J]. Indian Journal of Agronomy,2005,50(2):149-151
[14] Seavers G P, Wright K J. Crop canopy development and structure influences weed suppression[J]. Weed Research,1999,39(4):319-328
[15] Abouziena H F, Sharara Faida A A, El-desoki E R. Efficacy of cultivar selectivity and weed control treatments on wheat yield and associated weeds in sandy soils[J]. World Journal of Agricultural Science,2008,4(3):384-389
[16] Weiner J, Grienpentrog H, Kristensen L. Suppression of weeds by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum) increases with crop density spatial uniformity[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,38(4):784-790
[17] Whytok G P, Bingham I J, Naylor R E L. Developing cost-effective strategies for weed control in winter oilseed rape[C]//Weeds. Proceeding of Brighton Crop Protection Conference,1995:883-888
[18] Jat R, Giri G. Influence of nitrogen and weed-control measures on weed growth, and seed and oil yields of sunflower (Helianthus annuus)[J]. Indian Journal of Agronomy,2000,45(1):193-198
[19] Gooding M J, Thompson A J, Davies W P. Interception of photosynthetically active radiation, competitive ability and yield of organically grown wheat varieties[J]. Aspects of Applied Biology,1993,34(4):355-362
[20] Lemerle D, Verbeek B, Cousens R D, et al. The potential for selecting wheat varieties strongly competitive against weeds[J]. Weed Research,1996,36(6):505-513
[21] Huel D G, Hucl P. Genotype variation for competitive ability in spring wheat[J]. Plant Breeding,1996,115(5):325-329
[22] Acciaresi H A, Chidichimo H O, Sarondon S J. Traits related to competitive ability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) varieties against Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum)[J]. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture,2001,19(3):275-286
[23] Cousens R D, Barnett A G, Barry G C. Dynamics of competition between wheat and oats: I. Effects of changing the time of phenological events[J]. Agronomy Journal,2003,95(5):1293-1304
[24] Didon U M E, Hansson M L. Competition between six spring barley (Hordeum vulgare ssp. vulgare L.) cultivars and two weed flora in relation to interception of photosyn-thetic active radiation[J]. Biological Agriculture & Horticulture,2002,20(3):257-273
[25] Bertholdsson N O. Early vigour and allelopathy-two useful traits for enhanced barley and wheat competitiveness against weeds[J]. Weed Research,2005,45(2):94-102
[26] Shui J F, An Y, Ma Y Q, et al. Allelopathic potential of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) on perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)[J]. Environmental Management,2010,46(4): 590-598
[27] 安雨,税军峰,马永清. 引种牧草柳枝稷对生菜化感作用初探[J]. 西北农业学报,2011,20(2):143-149
[28] Weston L A. History and current trends in the use of allelopathy for weed management[J]. HortTechnology,2005,13(3):529-534
[29] Keddy P A, Fraser L H, Wisheu I. A comparative approach to examine competitive response of 48 wetland plant species[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,1998,9(6):777-786
[30] Cousens R. An empirical model relating crop yield to weed and crop density and a statistical comparison with other models[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science,1985,105(3):513-521
[31] Wilson B J, Wright K J, Brain P, et al. Predicting the competitive effects of weed and crop density on weed biomass, weed seed production and crop yield in wheat[J]. Weed Research,1995,35(4):265-278
[32] Fukami T, Morin P J. Productivity-biodiversity relationships depend on the history of community assembly[J]. Nature,2003,424(6947):423-426
[33] Connell J H. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs[J]. Science,1978,199(4332):1302-1310
[34] Huston M A. A general hypothesis of species diversity[J]. American Naturalist,1979,113(1):81-101
[35] Muir J P, Sanderson M A, Ocumpaugh W R, et al. Biomass production of 'Alamo' switchgrass in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and row spacing[J], Agronomy Journal,2001,93(4):896-901
[36] Weidenhamer J D, Hartnett D C, Romeo J T. Density-dependent phytotoxicity: Distinguishing resource competition and allelopathic interference in plants[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,1989,26(2):613-624
[37] Einhellig F A, Rasmussen J A. Prior cropping with grain sorghum inhibits weeds[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,1989,15(3):951-960
[38] Creamer N G, Bennett M A, Stinner B R, et al. Mechanisms of weed suppression in cover crop-based production systems[J]. HortScience,1996,31(3):410-413
[39] Widmer T L, Abawi G S. Mechanism of suppression of Meloidogyne hapla and its damage by a green manure of sudan grass[J]. Plant Disease,2000,84(5):562-568
[40] Doohan F M, Mentebab A, Nicholson P. Antifungal activity toward Fusarium culmorum in soluble wheat extracts[J]. Phytopathology,2000,90(6):666-671
[41] Del Moral R. Allelopathy: A milestone monograph[J]. Ecology,1975,56(5):1231-1233
[42] Ben-Hammouda M, Kremer R J, Minor H C. Phytotoxicity of extracts from sorghum plant components on wheat seedlings[J]. Crop Science,1995,35(6):1652-1656
[43] Davis J R, Huisman O C, Westermann D T, et al. Effects of green manures on Verticillium wilt of potato[J]. Phytopathology,1996,86(5):444-453
[44] Bussan A J, Burnside O C, Orf J H, et al. Field evaluation of soybean (Glycine max) genotype for weed competitiveness[J]. Weed Science,1997,45(1):31-37
[45] Kruidhof H M, Bastiaans L, Kropff M J. Cover crop residue management for optimizing weed control[J]. Plant and Soil,2009,318(2):169-184
[46] Rietveld W J. Allelopathic effects of juglone on germination and growth of several herbaceous and woody species[J]. Journal of Chemical Ecology,1983,9(2):295-307
[47] Duke S O, Vaughn K C, Croom E M, et al. Artemisinin, a constituent of annual wormwood (Artemisia annua) is a selective phytotoxin[J]. Weed Science,1987,35(4):499-505
[48] Zhao D L, Atlin G N, Bastiaans L, et al. Cultivar weed-competitiveness in aerobic rice: Heritability, correlated traits, and the potential for indirect selection in weed-free environments[J]. Crop Science,2006,46(1):372-380
[49] Hoad S P, Davies D H K, Topp C F E. Designing crops for low input and organic systems: Enhancing wheat competitive ability against weeds[C]//Proceedings of crop protection in Northern Britain,2006:157-162

栽培柳枝稷不同生长时期对伴生杂草生物量及密度的影响

Effect of Cultivated Switchgrass on the Growth of Associated Weed Biomass and Density at Different Growth Stages

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 邓晔, 范月君, 周华坤, 党宁, 王英成, 张海娟, 颜珲璘. 模拟增温对高寒草地土壤原核生物群落组成及多样性影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 27-34.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[4]	张中华, 马丽, 周秉荣, 宋明华, 徐文华, 邓艳芳, 王芳, 佘延娣, 张骞, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 高寒草甸优势种功能多样性对增温和模拟放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[5]	泰尔格力, 蔡金宏, 崔凤超, 杭楠, 浦心春, 孙彦, 王克华. 野牛草草坪除草剂安全施用策略[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1865-1876.
[6]	麻莹, 张洪嘉, 库都斯·阿布都沙拉木, 耿淑娟, 薛傲然, 赵翰韦, 菅柏涵. 盐碱胁迫对盐地碱蓬生长、有机酸等溶质积累及其生理功能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1934-1940.
[7]	黄家兴, 吴静, 李纯斌, 秦格霞, 钱娟冰, 李怀海. 基于Sentinel-2和Landsat 8数据的天祝县草地地上生物量遥感反演[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2023-2030.
[8]	高宏元, 侯蒙京, 葛静, 包旭莹, 李元春, 刘洁, 冯琦胜, 梁天刚, 贺金生, 钱大文. 基于随机森林的高寒草地地上生物量高光谱估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1757-1768.
[9]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[10]	孙宇, 张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 赵萌莉, 张彬. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原物种多样性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[11]	何振富, 贺春贵, 王斐, 陈平. 不同类型饲草高粱生产性能与饲用品质的差异分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[12]	沃野, 黄佳媛, 杨宁, 卢轩, 林志玲, 赵力兴, 李天琦, 高凯. 现蕾期磷添加对菊芋块茎产量及物质分配规律的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1594-1598.
[13]	李兴龙, 师尚礼, 黄宗昌, 李革革, 吴芳, 张辉辉. 黄土丘陵区不同饲草混播模式对种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1318-1326.
[14]	郭超凡, 陈泽威, 张志高. 基于最优模型选择的牧草地上生物量遥感估算研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 946-955.
[15]	丁成翔, 刘禹. 光伏园区建设对青藏高原高寒荒漠草地土壤原核微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1061-1069.