人工增温条件下不同氮素形态比对重齿风毛菊气体交换及其群落生物量的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.06.001

草地学报 ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 1129-1135.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.06.001

• 专论与综述 • 下一篇

人工增温条件下不同氮素形态比对重齿风毛菊气体交换及其群落生物量的影响

吴楚¹, 芦光新², 德科加³, 张明³, 王军邦⁴

1. 长江大学园艺园林学院, 湖北荆州 434025;
2. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016;
3. 青海省畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016;
4. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101

收稿日期:2014-07-17 修回日期:2014-12-08 出版日期:2015-12-15 发布日期:2016-02-01
通讯作者: 王军邦
作者简介:吴楚(1965-),男,湖北天门人,博士,教授,主要从事植物生理生态学研究,E-mail:wuchuchu2001@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金“退化高寒草甸碳吸收和释放对气候变化的响应对比研究”(31270520);“青藏高原草地耐低温纤维素分解真菌多样性研究”(41261064)资助

Effects of Different Ratios of Nitrogen Forms on Gas Exchange of Saussurea katochaete Maxim and Total Biomass of the Community Under the Experimental Warming

WU Chu¹, LU Guang-xin², DE Ke-jia³, ZHANG Ming³, WANG Jun-bang⁴

1. College of Horticulture & Gardening, Yangtze University, Jingzhou, Hubei Province 434025, China;
2. Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
3. Qinghai Academy of Animal and Veterinary Science, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
4. Institute of Geographic Sciences and Nature Resources Research, CAS, Beijing 100094, China

Received:2014-07-17 Revised:2014-12-08 Online:2015-12-15 Published:2016-02-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

在青藏高原三江源区草地上,以开顶式温棚模拟增温,在其内部施用不同形态氮素(硝态氮和氨态氮)比例的氮肥,对重齿风毛菊(Saussurea katochaete)的光合速率、叶绿素荧光及其群落总生物量进行研究,旨在为人工管理草场施肥提供指导。结果表明:重齿风毛菊的光合速率随硝态氮比例增加而下降,气孔导度则增加。其他气体交换参数没有规律性变化。光系统II(PSII)光化学量子产量(Φ_PSII)在硝态氮比例为0%时最大,非光化学瘁灭(NPQ)则随硝态氮比例增大而增大。重齿风毛菊所在群落的总生物量在硝态氮和氨态氮比例平衡时达到最大。结果表明不同比例氮素施肥会对青藏高原草甸植物的净光合速率和群落总生物量产生影响。

关键词: 人工模拟增温, 气体交换, 氮素形态比例, 重齿风毛菊, 青藏高原

Abstract:

The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau is the region where is sensitive to the global warming. The climate changes affect all aspects of plants in the region and thus affect the productivity of alpine meadow. The open-top chambers were used to simulate the increasing temperature, and the fertilizers with different ratios of nitrate to ammonium were applied in the plots. The gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of Saussurea katochaete Maxim and total biomass of the community were determined. The results showed that net photosynthetic rate of S. katochaete decreased as the ratios of nitrate to ammonium increased, but stomatal conductance increased. Other parameters of gas exchange showed irregular changes.Φ_PSII reached the peak when the ratio of nitrate to ammonium was 0%. Non-photosynthesis quenching increased as the ratios of nitrate to ammonium increased. In the community containing S. katochaete, the total biomass reached the peak when nitrate and ammonium was equal. All the results suggested that nitrogen fertilizers of different ratios of nitrate to ammonium might affect net photosynthetic rate of S. katochaete and the community biomass. Nitrogen fertilizer application is of significance to increase productivity of alpine meadow in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.

Key words: Simulation of temperature increasing, Gas exchange, Nitrogen forms ratio, Saussurea katochaete Maxim., The Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

中图分类号:

Q945.11

吴楚, 芦光新, 德科加, 张明, 王军邦. 人工增温条件下不同氮素形态比对重齿风毛菊气体交换及其群落生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(6): 1129-1135.

WU Chu, LU Guang-xin, DE Ke-jia, ZHANG Ming, WANG Jun-bang. Effects of Different Ratios of Nitrogen Forms on Gas Exchange of Saussurea katochaete Maxim and Total Biomass of the Community Under the Experimental Warming[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(6): 1129-1135.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.06.001

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2015/V23/I6/1129

参考文献

[1] Yu C,Zhang Y,Claus H,et al. Ecological and environmental issues faced by a developing Tibet[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2012,46(4):1979-1980
[2] Bai L,Cirendunzhu,Pengcuociren,et al. Rapid warming in Tibet, China: public perception, response and coping resources in urban Lhasa[J/OL]. Environ Health,2013,12(1):71.doi:10.1186/1476-069X-12-71
[3] Yu H,Xu J,Okuto E,et al. Seasonal response of grasslands to climate change on the Tibetan Plateau[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2012,7(11):e49230. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049230
[4] Hao Z,Ju Q,Jiang W,et al. Characteristics and Scenarios Projection of Climate Change on the Tibetan Plateau [J/OL]. The Scientific World Journal,2013,129793.doi:10.1155/2013/129793
[5] Gao J,Li X-L,Cheung A,et al. Degradation of wetlands on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau: A comparison of the effectiveness of three indicators[J]. Journal of Mountain Science,2013,10(4):658-667
[6] Harris R B. Rangeland degradation on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau: A review of the evidence of its magnitude and causes[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2010,74(1):1-12
[7] Wen L,Dong S,Li Y,et al. Effect of degradation intensity on grassland ecosystem services in the alpine region of Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China[J/OL]. PLOS One,2013,8(3):e58432.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058432
[8] Yang Z,Guo H,Zhang J,et al. Stochastic and deterministic processes together determine alpine meadow plant community composition on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Oecologia,2013,171(4):495-504
[9] Wen L,Dong S,Li Y,et al. The impact of land degradation on the C pools in alpine grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Plant Soil,2013,368(1-2):329-340
[10] Liu Y,Mu J,Niklas KJ,et al. Global warming reduces plant reproductive output for temperate multi-inflorescence species on the Tibetan plateau[J]. New Phytology,2012,195(2):427-436
[11] Yu H,Luedeling E,Xu J. Winter and spring warming result in delayed spring phenology on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,07(51):22151-22156
[12] Chen G,Wu T. Responses of permafrost to climate change and their environmental significance,Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J/OL]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface,2007,112:F02S03.doi:10.1029/2006JF000631
[13] Du M, Kawashima S,Yonemura S, et al. Mutual influence between human activities and climate change in the Tibetan Plateau during recent years[J]. Global and Planetary Change,2004,41(3-4):241-249
[14] Xin H. China's environmental challenges. A green fervor sweeps the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science,2008,321(5889):663-665
[15] Wang H,Zhou X,Wan C,et al. Eco-environmental degradation in the northeastern margin of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau and comprehensive ecological protection planning[J]. Environmental Geology,2008,55(5):1135-1147
[16] Chen X W, Zhang X S, Li B L. The possible response of life zones in China under global climate change[J]. Global and Planetary Change,2003,38(3-4):327-337
[17] Menzel A, Sparks T H,Estrella N,et al. European phonological response to climate change matches the warming pattern [J]. Global Change Biology,2006,12(10):1969-1976
[18] Gao Y,Zhou X,Wang Q,et al. Vegetation net primary productivity and its response to climate change during 2001-2008 in the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science of Total Environment,2013,444:356-362
[19] Zhao D,Wu S,Yin Y. Responses of terrestrial ecosystems' net primary productivity to future regional climate change in China[J/OL]. PLOS One,2013,8(4):e60849.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0060849
[20] Gao Q Z,Wan YF,Li Y E,et al. Grassland net primary productivity and its spatiotemporal distribution in northern Tibet: a study with CASA model[J]. Chinese Journal Applied Ecology,2007,18(11):2526-2532
[21] Fan J W,Shao Q Q,Liu JY,et al. Assessment of effects of climate change and grazing activity on grassland yield in the Three Rivers Headwaters Region of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2010, 70(1-4):571-584
[22] 侯宪宽,芦光新,董全民,等. 施肥对环青海湖地区草甸群落生长的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(3):488-493
[23] Henry G H R,Molau U. Tundra plants and climate change: the International Tundra Experiment (ITEX)[J]. Global Change Biology,1997,3(Suppl.1):1-9
[24] Kitajima M,Butler W L. Quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence and primary photochemistry in chloroplasts by dibromothymoquinone[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,1975,376(1):105-115
[25] Genty B,Briantais J-M,Baker N R. The relationship between the quantum yield of photosynthetic electron transport and quenching of chlorophyll fluorescence[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta,1989,990(1):87-92
[26] Schreiber U,Schliwa U,Bilger W. Continuous recording of photochemical and non-photochemical chlorophyll fluorescence quenching with a new type of modulation fluorometer[J]. Photosynthesis Research,1986,10(1):51-62
[27] Kramer D M,Johnson G, Kiirats O,et al. New fluorescence parameters for the determination of QA redox state and excitation fluxes[J]. Photosynthesis Research,2004,79(2):209-218
[28] 张守仁. 叶绿素荧光动力学参数的意义及讨论[J]. 植物学通报,1999,16(4):444-448
[29] Boxman A W,Roelofs J G M. Some effects of nitrate versus ammonium nutrition on the nutrient fluxes in Pinus sylvestris seedlings. Effects of mycorrhizal infection[J]. Canadian Journal of Botany,1988,66(6):1091-1097
[30] Bassirirad H,Griffin K L, Reynolds J F, et al. Changes in root NH₄⁺ and NO₃^- absorption rates of loblolly and pondero sapine in response to CO₂ enrichment[J]. Plant and Soil,1997,190(1):1-9
[31] Scherer H W,MacKown C T. Dry matter accumulation, uptake and chemical composition of tobacco grown with different N sources at two levels of K[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrtion,1987,10(1):10-14
[32] Marshner H. Mineral nutrition of higher plants[M]. New York:Academic Press,1990:211
[33] Sunderhaus S,Dudkina N V,Jnsch L,et al. Carbonic anhydrase subunits form a matrix-exposed domain attached to the membrane arm of mitochondrial complex I in plants[J]. Journal of Biological Chemistry,2006,281(10):6482-6488

人工增温条件下不同氮素形态比对重齿风毛菊气体交换及其群落生物量的影响

Effects of Different Ratios of Nitrogen Forms on Gas Exchange of Saussurea katochaete Maxim and Total Biomass of the Community Under the Experimental Warming

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	李若玮, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 韩国栋, 孙建. 基于InVEST模型的青藏高原碳储量估算及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 43-51.
[2]	兰翔宇, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 曾涛, 孙建. 1995—2014年青藏高原水源涵养功能时空演变特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[3]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[4]	张中华, 马丽, 周秉荣, 宋明华, 徐文华, 邓艳芳, 王芳, 佘延娣, 张骞, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 高寒草甸优势种功能多样性对增温和模拟放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[5]	王谭国艳, 马志远, 李沛洋, 郭俊宏, 张嘉懿, 蒋胜竞. 短期增温对青藏高原高寒草甸不同植物根际丛枝菌根真菌的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1959-1966.
[6]	魏星星, 吴江琪, 李广, 王海燕, 刘帅楠, 张世康, 张娟. 青藏高原湿草甸土壤氮组分对氮添加浓度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 677-683.
[7]	马小林, 侯庆丰, 杨鼎. 退耕还草对青海省农牧民家庭收入的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 772-779.
[8]	韩梦丽, 白史且, 孙盛楠, 鄢家俊, 张传杰, 张昌兵, 张靖雪, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 严学兵. 基于MaxEnt模型青藏高原老芒麦适生区模拟预测[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 374-382.
[9]	张力天, 刘炜, 刘德梅, 董瑞珍, 王晓丽, 张敏, 仁增曲扎, 边巴普尺, 杨时海, 马玉寿. 青藏高原白草生殖生长期植株器官生物量分配特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2694-2702.
[10]	陆永祥, 赵嫚, 陈良寅, 成启明, 游明鸿, 李达旭, 陈仕勇, 白史且, 李平. 布氏乳杆菌和甲酸对青藏高原不同物候期燕麦青贮饲料发酵品质和细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1736-1743.
[11]	姜翠霞, 胡长胜, 魏海燕, 王宪举, 丁路明. 夏季模拟放牧对青藏高原冬春草场牧草品质和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1473-1477.
[12]	王军, 赵桂琴, 柴继宽, 王苗苗, 贾雪洁, 郭志飞, 孙雷雷, 聂秀美. 大麦黄矮病毒侵染对燕麦光合及叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 923-931.
[13]	张小芳, 张春平, 董全民, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 俞旸, 杨增增, 魏琳娜, 张艳芬, 褚晖, 李彩弟, 冯斌. 三江源区高寒混播草地群落结构特征的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1090-1099.
[14]	张艳芬, 杨晓霞, 董全民, 张春平, 俞旸, 杨增增, 冯斌, 褚晖, 魏琳娜, 张小芳. 牦牛和藏羊混合放牧对放牧家畜采食量和植物补偿性生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1607-1614.
[15]	韩炳宏, 周秉荣, 颜玉倩, 石明明, 苏淑兰, 赵恒和, 牛得草, 傅华. 2000-2018年间青藏高原植被覆盖变化及其与气候因素的关系分析[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6): 1651-1658.