不同放牧方式对祁连山高寒草甸有机碳、氮库的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.028

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (5): 1412-1420.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.028

不同放牧方式对祁连山高寒草甸有机碳、氮库的影响

杜凯^1,2, 康宇坤^1,2, 张德罡^1,2, 苏军虎^1,2

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/甘肃省草业工程实验室/中美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃农业大学-新西兰梅西大学草地生物多样性研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2020-03-30 修回日期:2020-05-03 发布日期:2020-09-19
通讯作者: 张德罡, 苏军虎
作者简介:杜凯(1990-),男,甘肃天祝人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草地生态保护,E-mail:1072138684@qq.com
基金资助:
陇原青年创新创业人才（团队）项目（LYRC2019-5）；甘肃农业大学“伏羲杰出人才”培育项目（Ganfx-02J03）共同资助

Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Pools in Alpine Meadow in the Qilian Mountains

DU Kai^1,2, KANG Yu-kun^1,2, ZHANG De-gang^1,2, SU Jun-hu^1,2

1. College of Grassland Science, Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem(Ministry of Education), Pratacultural Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province, Sino-U. S. Centers for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Gansu Agricultural University-Massey University Research Centre for Grassland Biodiversity, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2020-03-30 Revised:2020-05-03 Published:2020-09-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明晰不同放牧方式对祁连山高寒草甸有机碳、氮库的影响，本试验以祁连山东缘全年连续放牧（Continuous grazing，CG）、冷季重度放牧（Heavily grazing in cold season，HG）、冷季轻度放牧（Lightly grazing in cold season，LG）、划区轮牧（Rotational grazing，RG）和全年禁牧（Non-grazing，NG）的高寒草甸为研究对象，系统研究地上植物层、凋落物层、土壤层和根系层有机碳、氮库的变化。试验结果表明：HG，LG，RG和NG较CG均能显著（P<0.05）提高地上植物层、凋落物层、根系层和土壤层有机碳、氮储量，但土-草系统总有机碳、氮储量均在RG样地最高，其次是NG样地，再次是LG样地，在CG样地最低。RG较CG样地土-草系统有机碳储量提高了8 748 g C·m^-2，氮储量提高了785 g N·m^-2。可见，通过改变放牧方式能够有效提高高寒草甸土-草系统有机碳、氮储量，实现碳、氮增汇的目的。综合考虑草地土-草系统有机碳、氮储量及草地资源的有效利用，高寒草甸的最佳放牧方式为划区轮牧。

关键词: 祁连山, 高寒草甸, 放牧方式, 有机碳库, 氮库

Abstract: Grazing management strategy has significant effects on grassland ecosystem carbon and nitrogen pools,but the effects of different grazing patterns on grassland carbon and nitrogen storage remain unclear. Here,we evaluated the organic carbon and total nitrogen storage in plant,litter,root and soil in alpine meadow under different grazing patterns (continuous grazing (CG),heavily grazing in cold season (HG),lightly grazing in cold season (LG),rotational grazing (RG) and non-grazing (NG)) in the Qilian Mountains. The results showed that the HG,LG,RG and NG sites all significantly increased the organic carbon and total nitrogen storage in plant,litter,root and soil,when compared to the CG site. The highest value of soil-vegetation system organic carbon and nitrogen storage was found in the RG site,and the lowest was found in the CG site. The results indicated that the RG was the most beneficial strategy to accumulation of organic carbon and nitrogen storage in alpine meadow ecosystem. The organic carbon and nitrogen storage in RG site increased by 8 748 g C·m^-2 and 785 g N·m^-2,respectively,compared to the CG site. Therefore,the change of grazing pattern can effectively promote the organic carbon and nitrogen storage in alpine meadow ecosystem. Considering the carbon and nitrogen pools,use and update of grassland resources,the rotational grazing could be the best grazing strategy for the alpine meadow in the Qilian Mountains.

Key words: Qilian Mountains, Alpine meadow, Grazing pattern, Organic carbon pool, Nitrogen pool

中图分类号:

S153

杜凯, 康宇坤, 张德罡, 苏军虎. 不同放牧方式对祁连山高寒草甸有机碳、氮库的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1412-1420.

DU Kai, KANG Yu-kun, ZHANG De-gang, SU Jun-hu. Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Pools in Alpine Meadow in the Qilian Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1412-1420.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.05.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I5/1412

参考文献

[1] Orwin K H,Ostle N,Wilby A,et al. Effects of species evenness and dominant species identity on multiple ecosystem functions in model grassland communities[J]. Oecologia,2014,174(3):979-992
[2] Dlamini P,Chivenge P,Chaplot V. Overgrazing decreases soil organic carbon stocks the most under dry climates and low soil pH:A meta-analysis shows[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment,2016,221:258-269
[3] Samuel E,Palmer S M,Chapman P J. Soil organic carbon stock in grasslands:Effects of inorganic fertilizers,liming and grazing in different climate settings[J]. Journal of Environmental Management,2018,223:74-84
[4] Cheng J,Wu G L,Zhao L P. Cumulative effects of 20-year exclusion of livestock grazing on above-and belowground biomass of typical steppe communities in arid areas of the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Plant Soil & Environment,2011,57(1):40-44
[5] Post W M,Kwon K C. Soil carbon sequestration and land-use change:processes and potential[J]. Global Change Biology,2000,6(3):317-327
[6] 杜宝红,高翠萍,哈达朝鲁. 不同放牧强度对锡林郭勒典型草原生产力及碳储量的影响[J]. 水土保持研究,2018,25(1):139-146
[7] Bond-Lamberty B,Thomson A. Temperature-associated increases in the global soil respiration record[J]. Nature,2010,464:579-582
[8] Dou X,Deng Q,Li M, et al. Reforestation of Pinus massoniana alters soil organic carbon and nitrogen dynamics in eroded soil in south China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2013,52:154-160
[9] Srinivasarao C H,Venkateswarlu B,Lal R, et al. Long-term manuring and fertilizer effects on depletion of soil organic stocks under Pearl millet-cluster vean-castor rotation in Western India[J]. Land Degradation and Development,2014,25(2):173-183
[10] 张建贵,王理德,姚拓,等. 祁连山高寒草地不同退化程度植物群落结构与物种多样性研究[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(5):15-25
[11] Gong J R,Wang Y,Liu M,et al. Effects of land use on soil respiration in the temperate steppe of Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2014,144:20-31
[12] Li W,Cao W X,Wang J L,et al. Effects of grazing regime on vegetation structure,productivity,soil quality,carbon and nitrogen storage of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2017,98:123-133
[13] Zhou G,Luo Q,Chen Y,et al. Effects of livestock grazing on grassland carbon storage and release override impacts associated with global climate change[J]. Global Change Biology,2019,25(3):1119
[14] 胡向敏,侯向阳,陈海军,等. 不同放牧制度下短花针茅荒漠草原土壤碳储量动态[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(12):2205-2211
[15] Fan Y,Hou X,Shi H,et al. Effects of grazing and fencing on carbon and nitrogen reserves in plants and soils of alpine meadow in the three headwater resource regions[J]. Russian Journal of Ecology,2013,44(1):80-88
[16] Piñeiro G,Paruelo,José M,et al. Pathways of Grazing Effects on Soil Organic Carbon and Nitrogen[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2010,63(1):109-119
[17] 张世珍. 祁连山生态系统保护与治理[M]. 兰州:甘肃科技出版社,2012:20-27
[18] Brandt J S,Haynes M A,Kuemmerle T,et al. Regime shift on the roof of the world:Alpine meadows converting to shrublands in the southern Himalayas[J]. Biological Conservation,2013,158:116-127
[19] 马海霞,张德罡,陈瑾,等. 祁连山东段高寒草甸模拟放牧下的坡面土壤水蚀特征[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(5):1347-1354
[20] 姚喜喜,宫旭胤,张利平,等. 不同强度放牧对祁连山高寒草甸优势种牧草营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(5):1159-1167
[21] Li W,Liu Y Z,Wang J L,et al. Six years of grazing exclusion is the optimum duration in the alpine meadow-steppe of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Scientific Reports,2018,8(1):17269
[22] Rytter,R M. Stone and gravel contents of arable soils influence estimates of C and N stocks[J]. Catena,2012,95:153-159
[23] 李文,曹文侠,师尚礼,等. 放牧管理模式对高寒草甸生态系统有机碳、氮储量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(11):25-33
[24] Li W,Huang H,Zhang Z,et al. Effects of grazing on the soil properties and C and N storage in relation to biomass allocation in an alpine meadow[J]. Journal of Soil Science & Plant Nutrition,2011,11(4):27-39
[25] 赵威,李琳. 不同草地利用方式对暖性(灌)草丛类草地固碳能力的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(11):1-14
[26] Bi X,Li B,Fu Q,et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on the grassland ecosystems of mountain meadows and temperate typical steppe in a mountain-basin system in Central Asia's arid regions,China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2018,630:254-263
[27] Xiong D P,Shi P L,Sun Y L,et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on plant productivity and soil carbon,nitrogen storage in alpine meadows in northern Tibet,China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2014,24(4):488-498
[28] 李怡,韩国栋. 放牧强度对内蒙古大针茅典型草原地下生物量及其垂直分布的影响[J]. 内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版,2011,32(2):97-100
[29] 杨树晶,李涛,干友民,等. 阿坝高寒草甸土壤有机碳储量对不同利用方式与程度的响应[J]. 中国草地学报,2014,36(6):12-17

不同放牧方式对祁连山高寒草甸有机碳、氮库的影响

Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Pools in Alpine Meadow in the Qilian Mountains

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[4]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[5]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[6]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[7]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[8]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 周华坤, 张海娟, 颜珲璘, 王军邦. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[9]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[10]	向雪梅, 德科加, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体. 三江源区高寒草甸草场植被和土壤对外源氮素输入的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[11]	肖云飞, 陈文业, 王斌杰, 谈嫣蓉, 邴丹珲, 朱丽, 刘鸿源. 祁连山国家级自然保护区土地利用时空变化及与气候因子关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2049-2057.
[12]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[13]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[14]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[15]	张万通, 李超群, 于露, 邵新庆. 植物根际促生菌菌肥在高寒草甸替代化肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1423-1429.