高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.Z1.024

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (S1): 208-217.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.Z1.024

高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应

姚喜喜¹, 肖锋², 祁守忠³, 陈国明⁴, 王立亚⁵, 严振英⁵, 张文娟⁵, 孙海群¹

1. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 青海省湿地保护中心, 青海西宁 810008;
3. 互助土族自治县畜牧兽医站, 青海海东 810500;
4. 青海省草原改良试验站, 青海西宁 810008;
5. 青海省自然资源综合调查监测院, 青海西宁 810001

收稿日期:2021-03-10 修回日期:2021-04-27 出版日期:2021-10-30 发布日期:2021-11-17
通讯作者: 孙海群,E-mail:haiqunsun@163.com
作者简介:姚喜喜(1989-),男,甘肃庆阳人,博士,讲师,主要从事反刍动物营养学与草地生态学交叉学科相关的研究,E-mail:18993075304@163.com
基金资助:
青海大学科研启动费资金项目（41510406）资助

Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow

YAO Xi-xi¹, XIAO Feng², QI Shou-zhong³, CHEN Guo-ming⁴, WANG Li-ya⁵, YAN Zhen-ying⁵, ZHANG Wen-juan⁵, SUN Hai-qun¹

1. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
2. Qinghai Province Wetland Protection Center, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810008, China;
3. Huzhu Tu Autonomous County of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Station, Haidong, Qinghai Province 810500, China;
4. Qinghai grassland improvement experimental station, Xining, Qinghai Province 810008, China;
5. Natural Resources Comprehensive Investigation and Monitoring Institute of Qinghai Province, Xining, Qinghai Province 810001, China

Received:2021-03-10 Revised:2021-04-27 Online:2021-10-30 Published:2021-11-17

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究长期封育对高寒草甸植被功能群落特征和营养品质年际动态的影响，本研究以围封11年和连续放牧高寒草甸为研究对象，采用3年连续野外群落调查和室内牧草营养品质分析相结合的方法，比较了长期围封和连续放牧2种草地管理措施对5个植被功能群特征和营养品质的影响。结果表明：围封样地禾本科（Grass group，GG）、莎草科（Sedge group，SG）、豆科（Leguminous group，LG）和杂类草（Forbs group，FG）4个功能群盖度和地上生物量显著高于放牧样地（P<0.05），功能群密度、物种丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、粗蛋白（Crude protein，CP）和体外干物质消化率（In vitro dry matter digestibility，IVDMD）显著低于放牧样地（P<0.05）；围封样地4个功能群的密度、群物种丰富度指数、Shannon-Wiener指数、CP和IVDMD表现出不受年际降雨量影响而逐渐下降的趋势。研究建议对围封11年的高寒草甸可进行适当的放牧以增加植被功能群物种多样性和牧草营养品质。

关键词: 长期围封, 高寒草甸, 植被功能群落, 群落特征, 营养品质

Abstract: In order to explore the effects of long-term fencing on inter-annual dynamics of plant functional group traits and nutrientional quality in an alpine meadow, we took 11-year fenced and continuously grazed alpine meadow as the study area by combining 3-year continuous field investigation and indoor forage nutritional quality analysis. The effects of long-term fencing and continuous grazing on 5 plant functional group traits and nutritional quality were compared, and then. The results showed that, the coverage and aboveground biomass of Grass group (GG), Sedge group (SG), Leguminous group (LG) and Forbs group (FG) in the fenced area were significantly higher than those in the grazing plot (P<0.05), while functional group density, species richness index, Shannon-Wiener index, Crude protein (CP) and In vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) were significantly lower than those of the grazing plots (P<0.05). The density, species richness index, Shannon-Wiener index, CP and IVDMD of 4 functional groups were not affected by inter-annual rainfall without a gradually decreased trend in the fenced plot. Thus, it suggested that the appropriate grazing should be carried out in the 11-year fenced field to increase the species diversity and nutritional quality of herbage in the alpine meadow.

Key words: Long-term fencing, Alpine meadow, Plant functional group, Community characteristics, Nutritional quality

中图分类号:

Q948.15

姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.

YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.Z1.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/IS1/208

参考文献

[1] 李静鹏, 郑志荣, 赵念席, 等. 刈割、围封、放牧三种利用方式下草原生态系统的多功能性与植物物种多样性之间的关系[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(8):735-747
[2] DU M Y, KAWASHIMA S, YONEMURA S, et al. Mutual influence between human activities and climate change in the Tibetan Plateau during recent years[J]. Global and Planetary Change, 2004, 41(3-4):241-249
[3] 韩炳宏, 牛得草, 袁晓波, 等. 围封与放牧措施下生物土壤结皮发育及其微生境土壤养分特征[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6):1218-1225
[4] SUN J, LIU M, FU B, et al. Reconsidering the efficiency of grazing exclusion using fences on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science Bulletin, 2020, 65(16):1405-1414
[5] KEMP D R, HAN G D, HOU X Y, et al. Innovative grassland management systems for environmental and livelihood benefits[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(21):8369-8374
[6] ORMEROD S J, MARSHALL E J P, KERBY G, et al. Meeting the ecological challenges of agricultural change:editors' introduction[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 40(6):939-946
[7] 李文, 曹文侠, 徐长林, 等. 不同休牧模式对东祁连山高寒草甸草原植被特征变化的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2014, 34(11):2339-2345
[8] 赵盼盼, 李国旗, 邵文山, 等. 围封对荒漠草原区沙芦草群落土壤种子库及地上植被的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2018, 27(1):42-52
[9] REN H, HAN G, LAN Z, et al. Grazing effects on herbage nutritive values depend on precipitation and growing season in Inner Mongolian grassland[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 9(6):712-723
[10] CUEVAS J G, LE QUESNE C. Low vegetation recovery after short-term cattle exclusion on Robinson Crusoe Island[J]. Plant Ecology, 2006, 183(1):105-124
[11] MYSTERUD A, LANGVATN R, YOCCOZ N G, et al. Plant phenology, migration and geographical variation in body weight of a large herbivore:the effect of a variable topography[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology, 2001, 70(6):915-923
[12] FANSELOW N, SCHÖNBACH P, GONG X Y, et al. Short-term regrowth responses of four steppe grassland species to grazing intensity, water and nitrogen in Inner Mongolia[J]. Plant and Soil, 2011, 340(1-2):279-289
[13] LI R R, KAN S S, ZHU M K, et al. Effect of different vegetation restoration types on fundamental parameters, structural characteristics and the soil quality index of artificial soil[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2018(184):11-23
[14] MYSTERUD A, HESSEN D O, MOBæK R, et al. Plant quality, seasonality and sheep grazing in an alpine ecosystem[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2011, 12(3):195-206
[15] 姚喜喜, 宫旭胤, 张利平, 等. 不同强度放牧对祁连山高寒草甸优势种牧草营养价值的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(5):1159-1167
[16] LIU M, ZHANG Z C, SUN J, et al. One-year grazing exclusion remarkably restores degraded alpine meadow at Zoige, eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2020(22):e00951
[17] KEMP D R, DOWLING P M. Towards sustainable temperate perennial pastures[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 2000, 40(2):125-132
[18] ČOP J, LAVRENČiČ A, KOŠMELJ K. Morphological development and nutritive value of herbage in five temperate grass species during primary growth:analysis of time dynamics[J]. Grass and forage science, 2009, 64(2):122-131
[19] RIDLEY E J, TODD G W. Anatomical variations in the wheat leaf following internal water stress[J]. Botanical Gazette, 1966, 127(4):235-238
[20] MORETTO A S, DISTEL R A. Soil nitrogen availability under grasses of different palatability in a temperate semi-arid rangeland of central Argentina[J]. Austral Ecology, 2002, 27(5):509-514
[21] GALLEGO L, DISTEL R A, CAMINA R, et al. Soil phytoliths as evidence for species replacement in grazed rangelands of central Argentina[J]. Ecography, 2004, 27(6):725-732
[22] LOREAU M, NAEEM S, INCHAUSTI P, et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning:current knowledge and future challenges[J]. Science, 2001, 294(5543):804-808
[23] 王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 等. 甘南"黑土滩"型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2):220-227
[24] OBA G, VETAAS O R, STENSETH N C. Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2001, 38(4):836-845
[25] Inderjit. Plant invasions:habitat invasibility and dominance of invasive plant species[J]. Plant and Soil, 2005, 277(1):1-5
[26] OESTERHELD M, SALA O E. Effects of grazing on seedling establishment:the role of seed and safe-site availability[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1990, 1(3):353-358
[27] SUN J, ZHAN T, LIU M, et al. Verification of the biomass transfer hypothesis under moderate grazing across the Tibetan plateau:a meta-analysis[J]. Plant and Soil, 2021, 458(3):139-150
[28] OLFF H, RITCHIE M E. Effects of herbivores on grassland plant diversity[J]. Trends in ecology & evolution, 1998, 13(7):261-265
[29] PIMM S L. The complexity and stability of ecosystems[J]. Nature, 1984(307):321-326
[30] SHEPPARD A W, HODGE P, PAYNTER Q, et al. Factors affecting invasion and persistence of broom Cytisus scoparius in Australia[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 39(5):721-734
[31] SCHIPPERS P, JOENJE W. Modelling the effect of fertiliser, mowing, disturbance and width on the biodiversity of plant communities of field boundaries[J]. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 2002, 93(1-3):351-365
[32] SUN J, MA B, LU X. Grazing enhances soil nutrient effects:Trade-offs between aboveground and belowground biomass in alpine grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Land Degradation & Development, 2017, 29(2):337-348
[33] 张紫薇, 高斌, 林长存, 等. 放牧强度对典型草原6个物种生物量分配格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1):149-155
[34] CUEVAS J G, LE QUESNE C. Low vegetation recovery after short-term cattle exclusion on Robinson Crusoe Island[J]. Plant Ecology, 2006, 183(1):105-124
[35] MYSTERUD A, HESSEN D O, MOBæK R, et al. Plant quality, seasonality and sheep grazing in an alpine ecosystem[J]. Basic and Applied Ecology, 2011, 12(3):195-206
[36] HEBBLEWHITE M, MERRILL E, MCDERMID G. A multi-scale test of the forage maturation hypothesis in a partially migratory ungulate population[J]. Ecological monographs, 2008, 78(2):141-166
[37] 张宇, 阿斯娅·曼力克, 辛晓平, 等. 禁牧与放牧对新疆温性草原群落结构、生物量及牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(3):815-821
[38] 姚喜喜, 宫旭胤, 白滨, 等. 祁连山高寒牧区不同类型草地植被特征与土壤养分及其相关性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2):371-379
[39] MIAO F, GUO Z, XUE R, et al. Effects of Grazing and Precipitation on Herbage Biomass, Herbage Nutritive Value, and Yak Performance in an Alpine Meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. PloS one, 2015, 10(6):e0127275
[40] 侯扶江, 扬中艺. 放牧对草地的作用[J]. 生态学报, 2006, 26(1):244-264
[41] ZHANA T Y, ZHANG Z C, SUN J, et al. Meta-analysis demonstrating that moderate grazing can improve the soil quality across China's grassland ecosystems[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2020(147):103438
[42] 李香真, 陈佐忠. 不同放牧率对草原植物与土壤C, N, P含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 1998, 6(2):90-98
[43] MVLLER K, DICKHOEFER U, LIN L, et al. Impact of grazing intensity on herbage quality, feed intake and live weight gain of sheep grazing on the steppe of Inner Mongolia[J]. The Journal of Agricultural Science, 2014, 152(1):153-165
[44] HRSTKA M, URBAN O, MAREK M V. Long-term effect of elevated CO₂ on spatial differentiation of ribulose-1, 5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase activity in Norway spruce canopy[J]. Photosynthetica, 2005, 43(2):211-216
[45] SCHÖNBACH P, WAN H, SCHIBORRA A, et al. Short-term management and stocking rate effects of grazing sheep on herbage quality and productivity of Inner Mongolia steppe[J]. Crop and Pasture Science, 2009, 60(10):963-974

高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应

Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[4]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[5]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[6]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[7]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[8]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[9]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 周华坤, 张海娟, 颜珲璘, 王军邦. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[10]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[11]	向雪梅, 德科加, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体. 三江源区高寒草甸草场植被和土壤对外源氮素输入的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[12]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[13]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[14]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[15]	张万通, 李超群, 于露, 邵新庆. 植物根际促生菌菌肥在高寒草甸替代化肥效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1423-1429.