不同类型侧柏人工林下优势草本生态位及种间关系研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.027

草地学报 ›› 2024, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 261-274.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.027

不同类型侧柏人工林下优势草本生态位及种间关系研究

唐颖, 齐实, 张林, 李鹏, 赖金林, 廖瑞恩, 张岩, 张岱

北京林业大学水土保持学院, 北京 100083

收稿日期:2023-07-14 修回日期:2023-09-05 出版日期:2024-01-15 发布日期:2024-01-30
通讯作者: 齐实,E-mail:qishi@bjfu.edu.cn
作者简介:唐颖(1998-),女,汉族,湖北十堰人,硕士研究生,主要从事水土保持与生物多样性保护研究,E-mail:tangying@bjfu.edu.cn
基金资助:
北京市京津风沙源治理二期工程2021年项目林业和人工种草工程监测与评价（2021-syz-01-23GC14）资助

Niches and Interspecific Associations of Dominant Herbaceous Species under Different Types of Platyladus orientalis Plantations

TANG Ying, QI Shi, ZHANG Lin, LI Peng, LAI Jin-lin, LIAO Rui-en, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Dai

School of Soil and Water Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China

Received:2023-07-14 Revised:2023-09-05 Online:2024-01-15 Published:2024-01-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 探究北京山区不同类型侧柏人工林下优势草本的生态位和种间关联性，为京津风沙源工程人工林营造与管理提供参考，本研究以侧柏（Platycladus orientalis）纯林（C1）、侧柏-油松（Pinus tabuliformis）混交林（C2）和侧柏-黄栌（Cotinus coggygria var. cinereus）混交林（C3）为研究对象，对不同类型林下优势草本生态位宽度、生态位重叠度、总体关联性和种间联结性进行研究。结果表明：生态位宽度排序与重要值排序无显著定性关系；茜草（Rubia cordifolia）是3种林分类型共有的优势草本，与其他草本的生态位重叠程度大于0.90；总体关联性检验表明，C2为显著正关联，C3为显著负关联，C1为不显著正关联；此外，C2林下优势草本种间正联结性强，而C3林下优势草本种间负联结强。黄花蒿（Artemisia annua）-唐松草（Thalictrum aquilegiifolium var. sibiricum）、茜草-萝藦（Cynanchum rostellatum）等种对联结性强、生态位重叠值大，在北京山区侧柏人工林下具有较强的生境适应性。

关键词: 北京山区, 侧柏人工林, 优势草本, 生态位, 种间联结性

Abstract: Exploring the ecological niches and interspecific associations of dominant herbaceous species under different types of Platyladus orientalis plantations in Beijing mountain area would help to provide scientific references for the establishment and management of artificial forests in the Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Control Project. In this study, the examination was carried out on the niche width, niche overlap, overall association and interspecific association of dominant herbaceous species in the understory of different types of Platyladus orientalis plantations as the pure Platyladus orientalis forest (C1), the mixed Platyladus orientalis-Pinus tabuliformis forest (C2) and the mixed Platyladus orientalis-Cotinus coggygria var. cinereus forest (C3). The findings included the following:There was no significant qualitative relationship for the orderings on the niche widths and the importance values among all studied herbaceous species. Rubia cordifolia was the dominant herb co-existed in those three forest types, and the degree of ecological niche overlap with other herbs was >0.90. The overall association test showed that the herbaceous species in C2 forest were significantly positively correlated, the herbaceous species in C3 forest were significantly negatively correlated, and those in C1 forest was not significantly positively correlated. Additionally, there was a strong positive association between the dominant herbaceous species in the understorey of C2 forest, whereas a strong negative association was observed among dominant herbaceous species in the understorey of C3. Artemisia annua-Thalictrum aquilegiifolium var. sibiricum, Rubia cordifolia-Cynanchum rostellatum, etc. showed a strong connectivity and had large ecological niche overlap values, indicating their robust habitat adaptability within Platyladus orientalis forests in Beijing mountain area.

Key words: Beijing mountain area, Platyladus orientalis artificial forest, Dominant herbaceous species, Niche, Interspecific association

中图分类号:

Q948.12+2.1

唐颖, 齐实, 张林, 李鹏, 赖金林, 廖瑞恩, 张岩, 张岱. 不同类型侧柏人工林下优势草本生态位及种间关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 261-274.

TANG Ying, QI Shi, ZHANG Lin, LI Peng, LAI Jin-lin, LIAO Rui-en, ZHANG Yan, ZHANG Dai. Niches and Interspecific Associations of Dominant Herbaceous Species under Different Types of Platyladus orientalis Plantations[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 261-274.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2024.01.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2024/V32/I1/261

参考文献

[1] GILLIAM F S. The ecological significance of the herbaceous layer in temperate forest ecosystems[J]. BioScience, 2007, 57(10):845-858
[2] WU H F, GAO T, ZHANG W, et al. Understory vegetation composition and stand are mainly limited by soil moisture in black locust plantations of Loess Plateau[J]. Forests, 2021, 12(2):195
[3] LIU Y, SHANG Q, WANG L, et al. Effects of understory shrub biomass on variation of soil respiration in a temperate-subtropical transitional oak forest[J]. Forests, 2019, 10(2):88
[4] TIAN K, CHAI P, WANG Y, et al. Species diversity pattern and its drivers of the understory herbaceous plants in a Chinese subtropical forest[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2023, 10:1113742
[5] LANDUYT D, DE LOMBAERDE E, PERRING M P, et al. The functional role of temperate forest understorey vegetation in a changing world[J]. Global Change Biology, 2019, 25(11):3625-3641
[6] 徐雪蕾, 孙玉军, 周华, 等. 间伐强度对杉木人工林林下植被和土壤性质的影响[J]. 林业科学, 2019, 55(3):1-12
[7] CARR C A, KRUEGER W C. Understory vegetation and ponderosa pine abundance in eastern Oregon[J]. Rangeland Ecology and Management, 2011, 64(5):533-542
[8] CHASE J M, LEIBOLD M A. Ecological niches:Linking classical and contemporary approaches[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press, 2009:144-174
[9] ZHANG L, ZHANG H L, CHEN Y, et al. Analyses of community stability and inter-specific associations between a plant species with extremely small populations (Hopea hainanensis) and its associated species[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 10:922829
[10] TIMILSINA N, JR W P C, ESCOBEDO F J, et al. Predicting understory species richness from stand and management characteristics using regression trees[J]. Forests, 2013, 4(1):122-136
[11] GLICK M D, MATLACK G R. Tree-base microsites contribute to physical heterogeneity and herb community structure in a temperate deciduous forest[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2021, 32(1):e12943
[12] ALI A, DAI D, AKHTAR K, et al. Response of understory vegetation, tree regeneration, and soil quality to manipulated stand density in a Pinus massoniana plantation[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2019, 20:e00775
[13] LESSER J S, JAMES W R, STALLINGS C D, et al. Trophic niche size and overlap decreases with increasing ecosystem productivity[J]. Oikos, 2020, 129(9):1303-1313
[14] MARTÍNEZ-MEYER E, DÍAZ-PORRAS D, PETERSON A T, et al. Ecological niche structure and range wide abundance patterns of species[J]. Biology Letters, 2013, 9(1):20120637
[15] 孙建财, 杨沙, 武玉坤, 等. 高寒混播草地优势草种生态位与种间竞争力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5):1273-1279
[16] 郄亚栋, 滕德雄, 吕光辉. 干旱荒漠区植物生态位对水盐的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(8):2899-2910
[17] JUAN W, JUNJIE L, CHAO L, et al. Species niche and interspecific associations alter flora structure along a fertilization gradient in an alpine meadow of Tianshan Mountain, Xinjiang[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2023, 147:109953
[18] KERMAVNAR J, KUTNAR L, MARINŠEK A, et al. Are ecological niche optimum and width of forest plant species related to their functional traits?[J]. Flora, 2023, 301:152247
[19] HU Y, WANG H, JIA H, et al. Ecological niche and interspecific association of plant communities in alpine desertification grasslands:A case study of Qinghai Lake basin[J]. Plants, 2022, 11(20):2724
[20] ADLER P B, SMULL D, BEARD K H, et al. Competition and coexistence in plant communities:intraspecific competition is stronger than interspecific competition[J]. Ecology Letters, 2018, 21(9):1319-1329
[21] 李坚锋, 潘萍, 欧阳勋志, 等. 庐山常绿阔叶林种间联结性及物种共存机制[J]. 生态学杂志, 2022, 41(8):1474-1481
[22] ROUSSET O, LEPART J. Positive and negative interactions at different life stages of a colonizing species (Quercus humilis)[J]. Journal of Ecology, 2000, 88(3):401-412
[23] MAIHAITI M, ZHANG W J. A mini review on theories and measures of interspecific associations[J]. Selforganizology, 2014, 1(3-4):206-210
[24] WU S, WEN L, DONG S, et al. The plant interspecific association in the revegetated alpine grasslands determines the productivity stability of plant community across restoration time on Qinghai-Tibetan plateau[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2022, 13:850854
[25] 刘子赫, 贾国栋, 刘自强, 等. 北京山区侧柏用水来源随水分条件变化的多时间尺度[J]. 林业科学, 2022, 58(3):40-47
[26] WHITTAKER R H. Dominance and diversity in land plant communities:Numerical relations of species express the importance of competition in community function and evolution[J]. Science, 1965, 147(3655):250-260
[27] 张金屯. 数量生态学[M]. 第3版.北京:科学出版社, 2018:160-163
[28] SCHLUTER D. A variance test for detecting species associations, with some example applications[J]. Ecology, 1984, 65(3):998-1005
[29] 晏昕辉, 拓行行, 李美慧, 等. 宁夏云雾山典型草原半灌木扩张过程中植物种间联结性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1):230-238
[30] 金山, 武帅楷. 太行山南段油松林火烧迹地优势草本生态位及种间关系[J]. 北京林业大学学报, 2021, 43(4):35-46
[31] YUAN Z, WEI B, CHEN Y, et al. How do similarities in spatial distributions and interspecific associations affect the coexistence of Quercus species in the Baotianman National Nature Reserve, Henan, China[J]. Ecology and Evolution, 2018, 8(5):2580-2593
[32] 宋红艳, 孙彩丽, 柴宗政. 黔西北铅锌矿废渣场优势草本植物种群生态位及种间关系[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10):2764-2771
[33] INGRAM T, COSTA-PEREIRA R, ARAÚJO M S. The dimensionality of individual niche variation[J]. Ecology, 2018, 99(3):536-549
[34] ROSCHER C, SCHUMACHER J, GUBSCH M, et al. Interspecific trait differences rather than intraspecific trait variation increase the extent and filling of community trait space with increasing plant diversity in experimental grasslands[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics, 2018, 33:42-50
[34] TILMAN D. Causes, consequences and ethics of biodiversity[J]. Nature, 2000, 405(6783):208-211
[35] MA Y, LI Q, PAN S, et al. Niche and interspecific associations of Pseudoanabaena limnetica-Exploring the influencing factors of its succession stage[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2022, 138:108806
[37] 杨玉凤, 武利玉, 马永林, 等. 不同类型侧柏人工林下草本层植物多样性及其生物量研究[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2023, 38(2):61-68
[38] OOMMEN M A, SHANKER K. Elevational species richness patterns emerge from multiple local mechanisms in Himalayan woody plants[J]. Ecology, 2005, 86(11):3039-3047
[39] CAMARERO J J, GUTIÉRREZ E, FORTIN M J. Spatial patterns of plant richness across treeline ecotones in the Pyrenees reveal different locations for richness and tree cover boundaries[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2006, 15(2):182-191
[40] GÖTZENBERGER L, DE BELLO F, BRÅTHEN K A, et al. Ecological assembly rules in plant communities-approaches, patterns and prospects[J]. Biological Reviews, 2012, 87(1):111-127
[41] JIN S S, ZHANG Y Y, ZHOU M L, et al. Interspecific association and community stability of tree species in natural secondary forests at different altitude gradients in the Southern Taihang Mountains[J]. Forests, 2022, 13(3):373
[42] HOOPER D U, CHAPIN III F S, EWEL J J, et al. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning:a consensus of current knowledge[J]. Ecological Monographs, 2005, 75(1):3-35
[43] PASTORE A I, BARABÁS G, BIMLER M D, et al. The evolution of niche overlap and competitive differences[J]. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 2021, 5(3):330-337
[44] ARELLANO G, UMAÑA M N, MACÍA M J, et al. The role of niche overlap, environmental heterogeneity, landscape roughness and productivity in shaping species abundance distributions along the Amazon-Andes gradient[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 2017, 26(2):191-202
[45] 邓莉萍, 白雪娇, 李露露, 等. 辽东山区次生林优势木本植物种间联结与相关分析[J]. 生态学杂志, 2015, 34(6):1473-1479

不同类型侧柏人工林下优势草本生态位及种间关系研究

Niches and Interspecific Associations of Dominant Herbaceous Species under Different Types of Platyladus orientalis Plantations

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	尹正辉, 陈新丰, 拉多. 模拟增温和放牧对高寒草甸主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1302-1313.
[2]	方铧, 陈星彤, 刘明月, 张永彬, 苗正红, 满卫东, 张清文, 寇财垚, 李想. 基于Maxent模型的互花米草潜在生境适宜性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(11): 3514-3524.
[3]	宋志萍, 王晓丽, 王彦龙, 周选博, 谢乐乐. 三江源区高寒草甸植物种群生态位对返青期休牧时间的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1651-1658.
[4]	张彩军, 王小燕, 刘倩倩, 安康, 蒲强胜, 王志成, 苏军虎. 人为活动干扰对甘南高寒草甸喜马拉雅旱獭食性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1219-1226.
[5]	孙建财, 杨沙, 武玉坤, 李孟玉, 赵国丁, 肖国涛, 邓得婷, 史惠兰. 高寒混播草地优势草种生态位与种间竞争力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1273-1279.
[6]	吴姣姣, 向明学, 拉多, 武俊喜. 不同放牧强度对拉萨河谷温性草原主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 513-522.
[7]	王辛有, 曹文侠, 师尚礼, 王小军, 陈新栋, 白洁, 李文. 基于生态位理论的豆禾混播草地群落稳定性利用管理研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 456-463.
[8]	宋红艳, 孙彩丽, 柴宗政. 黔西北铅锌矿废渣场优势草本植物种群生态位及种间关系[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2764-2771.
[9]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[10]	张彩军, 王小燕, 姚宝辉, 王缠, 康宇坤, 张倩, 苏军虎. 甘南草原3种啮齿动物的食性及其营养生态位特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1484-1490.
[11]	赵文龙, 陈红刚, 袁永亚, 张娟, 杜弢, 晋玲. 气候变化对藏药独一味适生区分布格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 956-964.
[12]	胡雪峰, 张峰, 张彬, 史世斌, 杨阳, 乔荠瑢, 赵天启, 赵萌莉. 内蒙古7种针茅属植物生态位研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2778-2784.
[13]	刘涛, 刘玉萍, 吕婷, 梁瑞芳, 刘峰, 马子兰, 周勇辉, 陈志, 苏旭. 基于Biomod2组合模型预测青藏高原特有属扇穗茅属物种的潜在分布[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1650-1656.
[14]	徐松鹤, 尚占环. 三江源区“黑土滩”次生植被形成的三阶段物种生态位与毒杂草繁殖特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 949-955.
[15]	李中林, 秦卫华, 周守标, 张纪兵, 汪贞, 王运静. 围栏封育下华北半干旱草原植物生态位研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1186-1193.