干旱胁迫下Cp2-EPS种子包衣对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长及光合生理的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.07.035

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 2741-2752.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.07.035

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

干旱胁迫下Cp2-EPS种子包衣对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长及光合生理的影响

金旭^1,2, 黄荣^1,2, 左妍妍^1,2, 刘雪梅^1,2, 雷杰^1,2, 兰添雅^1,2, 张振粉¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 草业生态系统教育部重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730070

收稿日期:2025-11-27 修回日期:2026-01-14 发布日期:2026-07-02
通讯作者: 张振粉，E-mail:zhangzf@gsau.edu.cn
作者简介:金旭（2001-），男，汉族，陕西宝鸡人，硕士研究生，主要从事牧草病理学方向研究，E-mail:79924172@qq.com
基金资助:
甘肃省陇原青年英才专项（LYYC-2025-03）；甘肃农业大学伏羲杰出人才培育计划（Gaufx-05J01）；甘肃省林业与草原局草原生态修复治理项目（LCJ20240172）；甘肃省教育厅青年博士入企入园项目（2025QB-051）和国家自然科学基金（32060396）共同资助

Effects of Cp2-EPS Seed Coating on Alfalfa Seedling Growth and Photosynthetic Physiology under Drought Stress

JIN Xu^1,2, HUANG Rong^1,2, ZUO Yan-yan^1,2, LIU Xue-mei^1,2, LEI Jie^1,2, LAN Tian-ya^1,2, ZHANG Zhen-fen¹

1. Pratacultural College, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education, Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2025-11-27 Revised:2026-01-14 Published:2026-07-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 细菌胞外多糖（EPS）在提升植物抗逆性方面潜力显著，但其对紫花苜蓿抗旱性的影响机制尚不明确。本研究以紫花苜蓿‘巨能551’为材料，采用种子包衣技术，探究桃色欧文氏菌胞外多糖Cp2-EPS的抗旱效果。设置未包衣对照（CK）、包衣基质对照（T1）及4个Cp2-EPS浓度处理（0.5，1.0，1.5，2.0 g·L^-1，记为T2~T5），于苗期生长21d后进行持续14 d的干旱胁迫（土壤相对含水量40%），并测定相关生理生长指标。结果表明，Cp2-EPS包衣显著缓解了干旱对紫花苜蓿生长的抑制，其中1.0 g·L^-1（T3）效果最好。与CK相比，T3处理下根长、苗长、鲜重和干重分别增加17.87%，17.87%，74.53%和46.34%；叶片光化学量子产量Y（Ⅱ）、PSⅡ最大光化学效率和总叶绿素含量也显著提升。综上，Cp2-EPS种子包衣可通过增强光合性能减轻干旱氧化损伤，1.0 g·L^-1为最佳浓度。本研究为开发环保抗旱包衣剂及紫花苜蓿可持续生产提供了理论与技术参考。

关键词: 紫花苜蓿, 胞外多糖, 种子包衣, 干旱胁迫

Abstract: Bacterial extracellular polysaccharides （EPS） show great potential in enhancing plant stress resistance， but their mechanism of action on drought resistance in alfalfa （Medicago sativa） remains unclear. In this study， Alfalfa ‘Juneng 551’ was used as the experimental material， and seed coating technology was employed to investigate the drought resistance effect of Cp2-EPS from Erwinia persicina. Treatments included an uncoated control （CK）， a coating matrix control （T1）， and four Cp2-EPS concentration treatments （0.5， 1.0， 1.5， 2.0 g·L^-1， denoted as T2-T5）. Drought stress was applied after 21 days of seedling growth by maintaining soil relative water content at 40% for 14 days， and related physiological and growth indicators were measured. The results showed that Cp2-EPS coating significantly alleviated the growth inhibition caused by drought in alfalfa， with the 1.0 g·L^-1 （T3） treatment demonstrating the best effect. Compared with CK， the T3 treatment increased root length， shoot length， fresh weight， and dry weight by 17.87%， 17.87%， 74.53%， and 46.34%， respectively. Leaf photochemical quantum yield Y（II）， maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII， and total chlorophyll content were also significantly improved. In summary， Cp2-EPS seed coating can mitigate drought-induced oxidative damage by enhancing photosynthetic performance， and 1.0 g·L^-1 was identified as the optimal concentration. This study provides theoretical and technical references for developing eco-friendly drought-resistant coating agents and sustainable alfalfa production.

Key words: Alfalfa, Exopolysaccharides, Seed coating, Drought stress

中图分类号:

S963.22+3.3

金旭, 黄荣, 左妍妍, 刘雪梅, 雷杰, 兰添雅, 张振粉. 干旱胁迫下Cp2-EPS种子包衣对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长及光合生理的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(7): 2741-2752.

JIN Xu, HUANG Rong, ZUO Yan-yan, LIU Xue-mei, LEI Jie, LAN Tian-ya, ZHANG Zhen-fen. Effects of Cp2-EPS Seed Coating on Alfalfa Seedling Growth and Photosynthetic Physiology under Drought Stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(7): 2741-2752.

参考文献

[1] CHEN Y N, LI Y P, LI Z, et al. Analysis of the impact of global climate change on dryland areas[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2022, 37(2): 111-119 陈亚宁, 李玉朋, 李稚, 等. 全球气候变化对干旱区影响分析[J]. 地球科学进展, 2022, 37(2): 111-119
[2] GENG H Z, Chinese alfalfa[M]. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1995: 2-6 耿华珠. 中国苜蓿[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1995: 2-6
[3] YANG Q C, KANG J M, ZHANG T J, et al. Distribution, breeding and utilization of alfalfa germplasm resources[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2016, 61(2):261-270 杨青川, 康俊梅, 张铁军, 等. 苜蓿种质资源的分布、育种与利用[J]. 科学通报, 2016, 61(2):261-270
[4] DEMİRKOL G. The role of BADH gene in oxidative, salt, and drought stress tolerances of white clover[J]. Turkish Journal of Botany, 2020, 44(3):214-221
[5] PENG L, YANG B Y, ZHANG G, et al. Seed germination and seedling growth physiological characteristics of Polygala tenuifolia Willd. under drought stress[J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2018, 38(4):741-749 彭亮, 杨冰月, 张岗, 等. 干旱胁迫对远志种子萌发及幼苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报, 2018, 38(4):741-749
[6] SHA B P, XIE Y Z, GAO X Q, et al. Effects of coupling of drip irrigation water and fertilizer on yield and quality of alfalfa in the Yellow River irrigation district[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2021, 30(2):102-114 沙栢平, 谢应忠, 高雪芹, 等. 地下滴灌水肥耦合对紫花苜蓿草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2021, 30(2):102-114
[7] SHI X P. The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer on different growing year alfalfa aboveground biomass, soil nutrients and soil water in the semi-arid area[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2018:34-40 史晓鹏. 施氮磷肥对半干旱区不同生长年限紫花苜蓿地上生物量及土壤养分和水分的影响[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2018:34-40
[8] JIANG X Q, YANG Q C, KANG J M. Research progress on yield loss under drought stress and drought resistance genetics of alfalfa[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2025, 34(7): 219-234 蒋学乾, 杨青川, 康俊梅.紫花苜蓿在干旱胁迫下的产量损失与抗旱性遗传研究进展[J].草业学报, 2025, 34(7):219-234
[9] KIESSLING P, SENCHENKOVA S N, RAMM M, et al. Structural studies on the exopolysaccharide from Erwinia persicina[J]. Carbohydrate Research, 2005, 340(11):1761-1765
[10] CHEN H Y, HUANG R, ZHAO L, et al. Effects of Cp2-EPS on seedling morphology and photosynthetic characteristics of alfalfa under salt stress[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1): 229-238 陈海雁, 黄荣, 赵亮, 等. Cp2-EPS对盐胁迫下紫花苜蓿苗期形态及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1): 229-238
[11] TAHIR M, KHALID U, KHAN M B, et al. Auxin and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase activity exhibiting rhizobacteria improved maize quality and productivity under drought conditions[J]. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 2019(21):943-954
[12] DRIRA M, ELLEUCH J, HLIMA H BEN, et al. Optimization of exopolysaccharides production by Porphyridium sordidum and their potential to induce defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana against Fusarium oxysporum[J]. Biomolecules, 2021, 11(2):282
[13] NASEEM H, BANO A. Role of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and their exopolysaccharide in drought tolerance of maize[J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2014, 9(1):689-701
[14] WANG D C, JIANG C H, ZHANG L N, et al. Biofilms positively contribute to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens 54-induced drought tolerance in tomato plants[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(24):6271
[15] ROCHA I, MA Y, SOUZA-ALONSO P, et al. Seed coating: a tool for delivering beneficial microbes to agricultural crops[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2019, 10:1357
[16] MA Y. Seed coating with beneficial microorganisms for precision agriculture[J]. Biotechnology Advances, 2019, 37(7):107423
[17] LI Y J. Effects of microbial seed coating on physiological characteristics and rhizosphere community structure of maize under drought stress[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2024:35-51 李宇家. 微生物种子包衣对干旱胁迫下玉米生理特性及根际群落结构的调控效应研究[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2024:35-51
[18] JIA Q Y, ZHU H, LI Y J, et al. Optimization of the method for determining exopolysaccharides and culture conditions of Erwinia persicina Cp2[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2024, 44(1):138-149 贾倩英, 朱环, 李宜娟, 等. 桃色欧文氏菌Cp2胞外多糖测定方法及培养条件的优化[J]. 草原与草坪, 2024, 44(1):138-149
[19] LI H Z. Study on the pelletized coating of Elymus nutans seeds[D]. Urumqi:Xinjiang Agricultural University, 2021:11-18 李会周. 垂穗披碱草种子丸粒化包衣研究[D]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆农业大学, 2021:11-18
[20] JI L H, HE A L, HE F, et al. Screening of alfalfa seed coating materials and theirs effect on seed germination[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(8):2728-2736 吉凌鹤, 何傲蕾, 何峰, 等. 紫花苜蓿种子包衣材料筛选及其对种子萌发影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8):2728-2736
[21] YANG Y Q, GUO Y. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms mediating plant salt-stress responses[J]. The New Phytologist, 2018, 217(2): 523-539
[22] LIN Z, LI Y, ZHANG Z J, et al. A RAF-SnRK2 kinase cascade mediates early osmotic stress signaling in higher plants[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11:613
[23] EL-SHABRAWI H, KUMAR B, KAUL T, et al. Redox homeostasis, antioxidant defense, and methylglyoxal detoxification as markers for salt tolerance in Pokkali rice[J]. Protoplasma, 2010, 245(1):85-96
[24] ZHENG X L, WANG R J, ZHAO Q F, et al. Ecophysiological mechanisms of plant growth under the influence of rhizosphere oxygen con-centration: A review[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2017, 41(7):805-814 郑小兰, 王瑞娇, 赵群法, 等. 根际氧含量影响植物生长的生理生态机制研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2017, 41(7):805-814
[25] MA F L, MA Y H. Effect of drought stress on plants and their response mechanism[J]. Journal of Ningxia University (Natural Science Edition), 2022, 43(4):391-399 马福林, 马玉花. 干旱胁迫对植物的影响及植物的响应机制[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 43(4):391-399
[26] RUKHSAR-UL-HAQ, KAUSAR A, HUSSAIN S, et al. Zinc oxide nanoparticles as potential hallmarks for enhancing drought stress tolerance in wheat seedlings[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2023, 195:341-350
[27] AKHTAR S S, AMBY D B, HEGELUND J N, et al. Bacillus licheniformis FMCH001 increases water use efficiency via growth stimulation in both normal and drought conditions[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2020, 11:297
[28] PIRI R, MORADI A, BALOUCHI H, et al. Improvement of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) seed performance under drought stress by seed coating and biopriming[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2019, 257:108667
[29] HURA T, HURA K, OSTROWSKA A. Drought-stress induced physiological and molecular changes in plants[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(9):4698
[30] COSTA O Y A, RAAIJMAKERS J M, KURAMAE E E. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances: ecological function and impact on soil aggregation[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018(9): 1636-1648
[31] ZHANG M, CAI P, WU Y C, et al. Bacterial extracellular polymeric substances: from the perspective of soil ecological functions[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2022, 59(2):308-323 张铭, 蔡鹏, 吴一超, 等. 细菌胞外聚合物:基于土壤生态功能的视角[J]. 土壤学报, 2022, 59(2):308-323
[32] YE Z P. A review on modeling of responses of photosynthesis to light and CO₂[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(6):727-740 叶子飘. 光合作用对光和CO₂响应模型的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(6):727-740
[33] LI Q, WANG M, WANG W W, et al. Response of photosynthetic characteristics of Psathyrostachys huashanica Keng to drought stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(13):4278-4284 李倩, 王明, 王雯雯, 等. 华山新麦草光合特性对干旱胁迫的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(13):4278-4284
[34] ABDELAAL K, ALKAHTANI M, ATTIA K, et al. The role of plant growth-promoting bacteria in alleviating the adverse effects of drought on plants[J]. Biology, 2021, 10(6):520
[35] SHI S B, LIU K B, ZHANG Y H, et al. Convergent adaptation of PS H photochemical characteristics of four spruce species growing in Minqin Desert Botanical Garden[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2017, 37(15):5039-5048 师生波, 刘克彪, 张莹花, 等. 民勤沙生植物园4种云杉属植物光化学特性的趋同适应[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37(15):5039-5048
[36] QIAN Y Q, ZHOU X X, HAN L, et al. Rapid light-response curves of PSⅡ chlorophyll fluorescence parameters in leaves of Salix leucopithecia subjected to cadmium-ion stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(20):6134-6142 钱永强, 周晓星, 韩蕾, 等. Cd₂⁺胁迫对银芽柳PSⅡ叶绿素荧光光响应曲线的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(20):6134-6142
[37] GUO C F, SUN Y, TANG Y H, et al. Effect of water stress on chlorophyll fluorescence in leaves of tea plant (Camellia sinensis)[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(3):560-564 郭春芳, 孙云, 唐玉海, 等. 水分胁迫对茶树叶片叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(3):560-564
[38] YUAN X K, YANG Z Q, LI Y X, et al. Effects of different levels of water stress on leaf photosynthetic characteristics and antioxidant enzyme activities of greenhouse tomato[J]. Photosynthetica, 2016, 54(1):28-39
[39] JIN Y T, LIU W H, LIU K Q, et al. Effect of water deficit stress on the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No.1’ over the whole crop growth period[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(6):112-126 金祎婷, 刘文辉, 刘凯强, 等. 全生育期干旱胁迫对'青燕1号'燕麦叶绿素荧光参数的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(6):112-126
[40] QIANG X J. Mechanisms underlying the effects of endophytic fungi isolated from Elymus dahuricus on the drought resistance of wheat[D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2019:45-64 强晓晶. 披碱草内生真菌对小麦抗旱性的影响机制[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院, 2019:45-64
[41] YUAN Y M, LIU J Y, GAO X L, et al. Root traits of seven Stipa species and their relations with environmental factors in temperate grasslands[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(21):8784-8794 袁野梅, 柳隽瑶, 高秀丽, 等. 温带草原7种针茅植物根系特征及其对环境因子变化的适应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(21):8784-8794
[42] CAO Y Y, YANG W B, MA J, et al. An integrated framework for drought stress in plants[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2024, 25(17):9347
[43] BI Y L, TAN H, ZHANG S S, et al. Response mechanism of extracellular polymeric substances synthesized by Alternaria sp. on drought stress in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2024, 72(30):16812-16824
[44] NYAUPANE S, POUDEL M R, PANTHI B, et al. Drought stress effect, tolerance, and management in wheat-a review[J]. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 2024, 10(1):2296094
[45] WANG J H, LIU H X, XU T. The role of superoxide dismutase (SOD) in stress physiology and senescence physiology of plant[J]. Plant Physiology Communications, 1989(1):1-7 王建华, 刘鸿先, 徐同. 超氧物歧化酶(SOD)在植物逆境和衰老生理中的作用[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 1989(1):1-7

干旱胁迫下Cp2-EPS种子包衣对紫花苜蓿幼苗生长及光合生理的影响

Effects of Cp2-EPS Seed Coating on Alfalfa Seedling Growth and Photosynthetic Physiology under Drought Stress

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘晓阳, 葛美娇, 李紫微, 海昕伟, 贾晨雪, 高凯. 刈割和施肥对紫花苜蓿叶片氮磷重吸收效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(7): 2472-2482.
[2]	刘帅, 王显国, 周立业, 王振国, 张玉霞, 单新河, 张智勇. 科尔沁沙地春播不同苜蓿品种建植当年生产性能及其与秋眠级之间关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(7): 2493-2502.
[3]	张浩, 董天宇, 郭定新, 杨高文, 张利平, 任波, 杨军卫, 霍延卫, 刘丹, 郭凯威, 张英俊. 灌溉和免耕补播修复榆阳区退化草原效果评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(7): 2677-2687.
[4]	何彩, 刘源, 晋敏, 吴媛, 王素桢, 胡芳. 沙木蓼MYB-related基因家族的鉴定及其响应干旱胁迫的表达模式研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2012-2021.
[5]	侯玉卓, 周沁盈, 高娅楠, 徐明志, 刘燕蓉, 刘亚玲, 张万军. 苗期筛选结合室内加代快速创制紫花苜蓿耐盐碱新种质[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2128-2137.
[6]	孙庆赢, 姚兴洁, 吕艳贞, 张昭, 闫慧芳. 紫花苜蓿种子萌发期耐镉性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2138-2146.
[7]	刘鹏, 贾晓怡, 何世佳, 徐洪雨, 杨轩. 基于APSIM模型评估山西中北部“苜蓿-玉米”轮作模式产量与降水的匹配度[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2173-2183.
[8]	李若鸿, 赵士强, 彭梦祝, 毛培胜. 贮藏不同年份紫花苜蓿种子吸胀萌发过程中的抗氧化生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1557-1567.
[9]	王清屿, 李陈建, 黄梦琪, 路璐, 蒋优, 王玉祥, 童爱香, 张英, 靳瑰丽. 101份无芒雀麦苗期耐旱性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1610-1621.
[10]	尹芊芊, 申小霞, 杨培志. 不同品种紫花苜蓿刈割再生性能差异及生理机制解析[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1632-1640.
[11]	杨金辉, 王晓彤, 马永龙, 余冬雯, 童玉花, 马梦凡, 李淑霞. 不同紫花苜蓿种质材料萌发期耐盐性评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1654-1663.
[12]	苏力合, 黄嵘峥, 胡天宇, 马春晖. 盐胁迫下不同紫花苜蓿品种萌发期和苗期的耐盐性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1664-1676.
[13]	李小娥. Pb胁迫对紫花苜蓿种子萌发生理及幼苗抗氧化系统和Pb积累的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1691-1700.
[14]	胡奕, 于辉, 管廷贤, 刘兴义, 杨合龙, 王文浩. 灌溉量与生物质炭施用对紫花苜蓿营养品质与经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1900-1909.
[15]	任孟雨, 南丽丽, 沙凤琴, 郭佳雨, 杜亮亮, 贠海持. 混合比例和贮藏时间对紫花苜蓿与油菜秸秆混贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1953-1962.