青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.06.007

›› 2012, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (6): 1026-1032.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.06.007

青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制

许岳飞¹, 益西措姆², 付娟娟¹, 陈浩¹, 苗彦军², 陈俊¹, 呼天明¹, 镡建国³

1. 西北农林科技大学动物科技学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西藏农牧学院植物科学学院, 西藏林芝 860000;
3. 内蒙古草原工作站, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2012-05-16 修回日期:2012-09-24 出版日期:2012-12-15 发布日期:2012-12-28
通讯作者: 呼天明
作者简介:许岳飞(1980-),男,内蒙古乌兰察布人,博士,讲师,主要从事青藏高原高寒草甸群落生态学研究,E-mail: xuyfgrass@gmail.com;
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAD17B05);国家公益性行业(农业)科技项目(200903060);西北农林科技大学基本科研业务费专项基金项目(QN2011100)资助

Response of Plant Diversity and Soil Nutrient to Grazing Intensity in Kobresia pygmaea Meadow of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

XU Yue-fei¹, Yixi-cuomu², FU Juan-juan¹, CHEN Hao¹, MIAO Yan-jun², CHEN Jun¹, HU Tian-ming¹, SHAN Jian-guo³

1. Department of Grassland Science, College of Animal Science and Technology, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. College of Plant Science, Tibet Agriculture and Animal Husbandry College, Linzhi, Tibet 860000, China;
3. Inner Mongolia Grassland Workstation, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010020, China

Received:2012-05-16 Revised:2012-09-24 Online:2012-12-15 Published:2012-12-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以青藏高原高山嵩草(Kobresia pygmaea)草甸为对象,研究不同放牧强度对草甸群落植物多样性、土壤化学性状及土壤有效态微量元素的影响,旨在为高山嵩草草甸生态系统保护和恢复提供科学依据。结果表明:随着放牧牦牛强度的增加,高山嵩草草甸群落的盖度、群落物种数、物种多样性、地上生物量均显著降低,重度放牧与对照间差异显著(P<0.05),而适度放牧与对照间差异不显著;放牧对土壤化学性状的影响主要表现为,随着放牧强度增加,0~30 cm土层中有机质、速效氮、全磷和速效磷含量减少,而适度放牧全氮含量与对照间差异不显著。适度放牧下10~20 cm土层中全磷和速效磷含量显著增加,与对照和重度放牧相比差异显著(P<0.05)。不同放牧强度下土壤有效态微量元素Fe,Mn,Cu和Zn的含量差异显著(P<0.05)。不同放牧强度对高山嵩草草甸的土壤有效态微量元素含量影响不同,从高到低依次为Fe>Mn>Zn>Cu。因此,适度放牧是保护高山嵩草草甸植物多样性、维护土壤养分以及提高草地生产力的有效途径。

关键词: 青藏高原, 高寒草甸, 植物多样性, 放牧强度, 土壤养分

Abstract: The effect of grazing intensity disturbance on plant diversity, soil chemical properties, and soil available microelements characteristics of Kobresia pygmaea meadow community in Qinghai-Tibet plateau was studied to provide scientific basis for Kobresia pygmaea meadow ecosystem protection and restoration. Results showed that vegetation coverage, number of species, plant diversity and aboveground biomass were significantly decreased along with the increasing of grazing intensity. There was significant difference between heavy grazing and control (P<0.05), while no significant difference between moderate grazing and control. The influence of grazing disturbance on soil chemical properties decreased soil organic matter, available nitrogen, total phosphorus and available phosphorus in 0~30 cm soil layers, but there was no significant difference between moderate grazing and control. Total phosphorus and available phosphorus contents of soil under moderate grazing was significantly increased in 10~20 cm soil layers. The contents of soil available microelements were obviously increased with the increasing of grazing intensity (P<0.05). The contents of soil available trace elements was ordered as Fe>Mn>Zn>Cu. These results suggested that moderate grazing was an effective way to protect plant biodiversity and improve grass productivity of Kobresia pygmaea meadow.

Key words: Qinghai-Tibet plateau, Alpine meadow, Plant diversity, Grazing intensity, Soil nutrient

中图分类号:

S158.3
S812

许岳飞, 益西措姆, 付娟娟, 陈浩, 苗彦军, 陈俊, 呼天明, 镡建国. 青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 1026-1032.

XU Yue-fei, Yixi-cuomu, FU Juan-juan, CHEN Hao, MIAO Yan-jun, CHEN Jun, HU Tian-ming, SHAN Jian-guo. Response of Plant Diversity and Soil Nutrient to Grazing Intensity in Kobresia pygmaea Meadow of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 1026-1032.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2012.06.007

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2012/V20/I6/1026

参考文献

[1] 于格,鲁春霞,谢高地.青藏高原北缘地区高寒草甸土壤保持功能及其价值的实验研究[J].北京林业大学学报,2006,28(4):57-61
[2] Reeder J D, Schuman G E. Influence of livestock grazing on C sequestration in semi-arid mixed-grass and short-grass rangelands[J]. Environmental Pollution,2002,116(3):87-93
[3] Rossignol N, Bonis A, Bouzillé J B. Consequence of grazing pattern and vegetation structure on the spatial variations of net N mineralization in a wet grassland[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2006,31(1/2):62-70
[4] Liang Y, Han G D, Zhou H, et al. Grazing intensity on vegetation dynamics of a typical steppe in Northeast Inner Mongolia[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management,2009,62(4):328-336
[5] 范国艳,张静妮,张永生,等.放牧对贝加尔针茅草原植被根系分布和土壤理化特征的影响[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(9):1715-1721
[6] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 2版.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000:180-192
[7] Wu G L, Du G Z, Liu Z H, et al. Effect of fencing and grazing on a Kobresia-dominated meadow in Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Plant Soil,2009,319(1/2):115-126
[8] Tilman D, Downing J A. Biodiversity and stability in grass lands[J]. Nature,1994,367(6461):363-365
[9] 江小蕾,张卫国,杨振宇,等.不同干扰类型对高寒草甸群落结构和植物多样性的影响[J].西北植物学报,2003,23(9):1479-1485
[10] 董全民,赵新全,马玉寿,等.放牧强度对高寒混播人工草地群落特征及地上现存量的影响[J].草地学报,2012,20(1):10-16
[11] Garcia F, Carrere P, Soussana J F, et al. How do severity and frequency of grazing affect sward characteristics and the choices of sheep during the grazing season?[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2003,58(2):138-150
[12] 董全民,马玉寿,李青云,等. 牦牛放牧率对小嵩草高寒草甸暖季草场植物群落组成和植物多样性的影响[J]. 西北植物学报,2005,25(1):94-10
[13] Su Y, Li Y, Cui J, et al. Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland, Inner Mongolia, northern China[J]. Catena,2005,59(3):267-278
[14] Snyman H A. Rangeland degradation in a semi-arid South Africa. I: influence on seasonal root distribution, root/shoot ratios and water-use efficiency[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2005,60(3):457-481
[15] Han G D, Hao X Y, Zhao M L, et al. Effect of grazing intensity on carbon and nitrogen in soil and vegetation in a meadow steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2008,125(1/4):21-32
[16] Li C L, Hao X Y, Zhao M L, et al. Influence of historic sheep grazing on vegetation and soil properties of a Desert Steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment,2008,128(1/2):109-116
[17] Greenwood K L, Ckenzie B M. Grazing effects on soil physical properties and the consequences for pastures: a review[J]. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture,2001,41(8):1231-1250
[18] 王明君,赵萌莉,崔国文,等. 放牧对草甸草原植被和土壤的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(6):758-762
[19] Wang R Z. Responses of Leymus chinensis (Poaceae) to long-term grazing disturbance in the Songnen grasslands of north-eastern China[J]. Grass and Forage Science,2004,59(2):191-195
[20] Tongway D J, Sparrow A D, Friedel M H. Degradation and recovery processes in arid grazing lands of central Australia[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2003,55(2):302-326
[21] 刘任涛,赵哈林,赵学勇. 放牧后自然恢复沙质草地土壤节肢动物群落结构与多样性[J]. 应用生态学报,2010,21(11):2849-2855
[22] 苟文平,刘世全,张世熔,等. 西藏土壤有效铁含量及其影响因素[J].山地学报,2007,25(3):359-363
[23] 吴彩霞,傅华,裴世芳,等.不同草地类型土壤有效态微量元素含量特征[J].干旱区研究,2008,25(1):137-144
[24] 杨红善,常根柱,周学辉,等. 放牧对肃南山地草原土-草-畜养分及有效态微量元素的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2010,24(4):103-107
[25] 蒲玉琳,龙高飞,苟文平,等. 西藏土壤有效锰含量及其影响因子分析[J]. 西南师范大学学报,2010,35(6):163-168

青藏高原高山嵩草草甸植物多样性和土壤养分对放牧的响应机制

Response of Plant Diversity and Soil Nutrient to Grazing Intensity in Kobresia pygmaea Meadow of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	李若玮, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 韩国栋, 孙建. 基于InVEST模型的青藏高原碳储量估算及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 43-51.
[3]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[4]	兰翔宇, 叶冲冲, 王毅, 曾涛, 孙建. 1995—2014年青藏高原水源涵养功能时空演变特征及其驱动力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 80-92.
[5]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 李泉林, 王有彬, 马秉云, 雷延民, 周睿, 谢久祥. 青藏高原典型草地牧草营养品质和消化率特征及其相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[6]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[7]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[8]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[9]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[10]	晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[11]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[12]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 周华坤, 张海娟, 颜珲璘, 王军邦. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[13]	张中华, 马丽, 周秉荣, 宋明华, 徐文华, 邓艳芳, 王芳, 佘延娣, 张骞, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 高寒草甸优势种功能多样性对增温和模拟放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[14]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[15]	王谭国艳, 马志远, 李沛洋, 郭俊宏, 张嘉懿, 蒋胜竞. 短期增温对青藏高原高寒草甸不同植物根际丛枝菌根真菌的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1959-1966.