围栏封育对伊犁绢蒿种群构件生长和生物量分配的影响

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (1): 42-49.

围栏封育对伊犁绢蒿种群构件生长和生物量分配的影响

郑伟^1,2, 于辉¹

1. 新疆农业大学草业与环境科学学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 新疆维吾尔自治区草地资源与生态重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2012-07-16 修回日期:2012-09-18 出版日期:2013-02-15 发布日期:2013-02-27
作者简介:郑伟(1978-),男,湖北武汉人,博士,副教授,研究方向为草地资源与生态,E-mail:zw065@126.com
基金资助:
新疆草地资源与生态自治区重点实验室开放课题(XJDX0209-2008-04);新疆维吾尔自治区科技支疆项目计划(引导性)项目(201191224);国家自然基金项目"不同牧压下伊犁绢蒿种群表型适应机制及其遗传基础研究"(31160477)资助

Effects of Enclosure on Growth and Biomass Allocation of Seriphidium transiliense Modules in a Sagebrush Desert Grassland

ZHENG Wei^1,2, YU Hui¹

1. College of Pratacultural and Environmental Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
2. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2012-07-16 Revised:2012-09-18 Online:2013-02-15 Published:2013-02-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了解围栏封育对放牧采食目标植物资源分配格局和生态策略的影响,以新疆伊犁绢蒿(Seriphidium transiliense)荒漠草地建群种伊犁绢蒿种群为研究对象,从构件的数量特征、形态可塑性、生物量及其分配格局进行分析。结果表明:围栏封育后伊犁绢蒿构件大小和构件数量显著增加(P<0.05),地上同化构件和生殖构件分配增加,种群的更新能力和可利用性得到改善;围栏封育后伊犁绢蒿种群采用了生殖投资增加、营养生长减少和储藏分配不改变的生物量分配对策,在围栏封育和发育时期改变后均存在生物量分配的权衡,营养生长和生殖之间存在负相关关系;伊犁绢蒿可以在放牧压力下通过增加其形态性状和生物量分配的可塑性来适应变劣的环境,而围栏封育后,则通过增加生殖生长投资提高其适合度。因此,围栏封育是伊犁绢蒿维持其种群持续更新能力和恢复其在群落中地位的有效手段。

关键词: 围栏封育, 伊犁绢蒿, 构件, 生长特征, 生物量分配

Abstract: Environmental pressure or gradients show significant effects on morphological and demographic performances of plant modules. To understand the effects of grazing exclusion on the resource allocation pattern and the ecological strategy of targeted plants for grazing, the effects of enclosure on phenotypic plasticity, demographic performance, biomass and allocation pattern were studied for the modules of Seriphidium transiliense Poljak. in the sagebrush desert grassland of Xinjiang during May, August and September for three years (2009-2011). Results showed that morphological size (height, circumference and root crown diameter) and demographic performance (numbers of first shoots, second shoots and leaves) of S. transiliense modules in an enclosure plot with moderate degradation were significantly higher than outside plot (P<0.05). Biomass allocation of assimilative and reproductive modules also increased in the enclosure. These results demonstrated that the regeneration ability and availability of S. transiliense were improved by enclosure. Ecological strategies were that reproductive investment increased, vegetative growth decreased and storage module allocation remained constant after enclosure. A trade-off of biomass allocation between vegetative growth and reproduction was found after enclosure. Also, biomass in the enclosure shifted from the vegetative period to the reproductive period. The adaptation abilities to increased grazing pressure and a poorer environment were improved by means of phenotypic plasticity increasing and biomass allocation changed. After enclosure, fitness increased through increased reproductive investment. This study supports the conclusion that enclosure is an effective method of ecological restoration for this population of S. transiliense to maintain sustainable regeneration ability and to restore its role in the community.

Key words: Enclosure, Seriphidium transiliense, Module, Growth performance, Biomass allocation

中图分类号:

Q945.79

郑伟, 于辉. 围栏封育对伊犁绢蒿种群构件生长和生物量分配的影响[J]. , 2013, 21(1): 42-49.

ZHENG Wei, YU Hui. Effects of Enclosure on Growth and Biomass Allocation of Seriphidium transiliense Modules in a Sagebrush Desert Grassland[J]. , 2013, 21(1): 42-49.

参考文献

[1] 孙吉雄. 草地培育学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:28
[2] 朱志红,孙尚奇. 高寒草甸矮嵩草种群的放牧中构件种群的反应特性[J]. 植物学报,1996,38(8):653-660
[3] Schmid B. Clonal growth in grassland perennialsⅡ.Growth forms and fine scale colonizing ability[J]. Journal of Ecology,1985,73(3):808-818
[4] Rautiainen P, Koivula K, Hyvarinen M. The effect of within-genet and between-genet competition on sexual reproduction and vegetative spread in Potentilla anserina ssp. egedii[J]. Journal of Ecology,2004,92(3):505-511
[5] Arenas F, Viejo R M, Fernandez C. Density-dependent regulation in an invasive seaweed:Responses at plant and modular levels[J]. Journal of Ecology,2002,90(5):820-829
[6] López F, Fungairiño S, de las Heras P, et al. Age changes in the vegetative vs. reproductive allocation by module demographic strategies in a perennial plant[J]. Plant Ecology,2001,157(1):13-21
[7] Ågren J, Ehrlén J, Solbreck C. Spatio-temporal variation in fruit production and seed predation in a perennial herb influenced by habitat quality and population size[J]. Journal of Ecology,2008,96(2):334-345
[8] Elberse I A M, Van Damme J M M, Van Tienderen P H. Plasticity of growth characteristics in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) in response to nutrient limitation[J]. Journal of Ecology,2003,91(3):371-382
[9] Corradini P, Clément B. Growth pattern and modular reiteration of a hardy coloniser Polytrichum commune Hedw.[J]. Plant Ecology,1999,143(1):67-76
[10] Maillette L, Emery R J N, Chinnappa C C, et al. Module demography does not mirror differentiation among populations of Stellaria longipes along an elevational gradient[J]. Plant Ecology,2000,149(2):143-156
[11] 孙宗玖,安沙舟,许鹏. 伊犁绢蒿构件动态变化研究[J]. 草地学报,2007,15(5):454-459
[12] 侯钰荣,安沙舟. 不同生境下伊犁绢蒿构件生物量特征的研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2010,30(7):1449-1457
[13] 侯钰荣,安沙舟,张永娟. 刈割强度对伊犁绢蒿叶功能性状及构件的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(3):333-338
[14] 许鹏. 新疆草地资源及其利用[M]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,1993
[15] 冯缨,潘伯荣. 新疆蒿类半灌木牧草资源分布及其饲用价值[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2007,21(3):158-161
[16] 鲁为华,朱进忠,王东江,等. 天山北坡围栏封育条件下伊犁绢蒿幼苗分布格局及数量动态变化规律研究[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(4):17-26
[17] 赵万羽. 新疆荒漠草地退化与治理建设方略[J]. 中国草地,2002,24(3):68-72
[18] 靳瑰丽,朱进忠,陈乐宁,等. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠受损草地植物群落春季演变趋势分析[J]. 草业科学,2007,24(10):26-30
[19] 王彩虹,朱进忠,范燕敏,等. 不同退化阶段伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤养分动态[J]. 草业科学,2008,25(2):16-20
[20] 范燕敏,朱进忠,武红旗,等. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠退化草地土壤微生物和酶活性的研究[J]. 新疆农业科学,2009,46(6):1288-1293
[21] Liu H L, Zhu J Z, Jin G L, et al. Characteristic analysis of Seriphidium transillense(Poljak.) Poljak. desert grasslands at different degraded stages in the northern Tianshan Mountains[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica(草地学报),2009,17(4):419-427
[22] 鲁为华,朱进忠,王东江,等. 天山北坡两种退化梯度下伊犁绢蒿种群空间分布的点格局分析[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(4):142-149
[23] 刘洪来,朱进忠,靳瑰丽,等. 伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地退化演替序列的划分[J]. 新疆农业科学,2007,44(2):137-141
[24] 任海彦,郑淑霞,白永飞. 放牧对内蒙古锡林河流域草地群落植物茎叶生物量资源分配的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2009,33 (6):1065-1074
[25] McConnaughay K D M, Coleman J S. Biomass allocation in plants:ontogeny or optimality? A test along three resource gradients[J]. Ecology,1999,80(8):2581-2593
[26] Weiner J. The influence of competition on plant reproduction[M]//Doust L L, ed. Plant reproductive ecology, patterns and strategies. Oxford:Oxford University Press,1988:228-245
[27] 杜国祯,孙国均,包永清. 垂穗披碱草(Elymus nutans)的繁殖对策与磷肥的关系[J]. 兰州大学学报:自然科学版,1998,34(2):146-153
[28] 刘忠宽,汪诗平,陈佐忠,等. 不同放牧强度草原休牧后土壤养分和植物群落变化特征[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(6):2048-2056
[29] Hosseinzadeh G, Jalilvand H, Tamartash R. Short time impact of enclosure on vegetation cover, productivity and some physical and chemical soil properties[J]. Journal of Applied Sciences,2010,10(18):2001-2009
[30] 刘振国,李镇清. 退化草原冷蒿群落13 年不同放牧强度后的植物多样性[J]. 生态学报,2006,26(2):475-482
[31] Rahlaoa S J, Hoffmana M T, Todda S W, et al. Long-term vegetation change in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa following 67 years of rest from grazing[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2008,72(5):808-819
[32] Diaz S, Noy-meir I, Cabido M. Can grazing response of herbaceous plants be predicted from simple vegetative traits? [J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2001,38(3):497-508
[33] Diaz S, Lavorel S, Ntyre S, et al. Plant trait responses to grazing- a global synthesis[J]. Global Change Biology,2007,13(2):313-341
[34] 孟婷婷,倪健,王国宏. 植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能[J]. 植物生态学报,2007,31(1):150-165
[35] 王静,杨持,王铁娟. 放牧退化群落中冷蒿种群生物量资源分配的变化[J]. 应用生态学报,2005,16(12):2316-2320
[36] 武高林,陈敏,杜国祯. 三种高寒植物幼苗生物量分配及性状特征对光照和养分的响应[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(1):60-66
[37] 马维玲,石培礼,李文华,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸植株性状和生物量分配的海拔梯度变异[J]. 中国科学:生命科学,2010,40(6):533-543
[38] Bazzaz F A, Grace J. Plant resource allocation[M]. New York:Academic Press, 1997
[39] 赵彬彬,牛克昌,杜国祯. 放牧对青藏高原东缘高寒草甸群落27种植物地上生物量分配的影响[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(3): 1596-1606
[40] Sultan S E. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history[J]. Trends in Plant Science,2000,5(12):537-542