荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿灌丛土壤线虫群落研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.06.004

草地学报 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (6): 1305-1312.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.06.004

荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿灌丛土壤线虫群落研究

王跃棠, 梅续芳, 解李娜, 张国刚, 李清芳, 马成仓

天津师范大学生命科学学院, 天津市动植物抗性重点实验室, 天津 300387

收稿日期:2018-05-17 修回日期:2018-09-26 出版日期:2018-12-15 发布日期:2019-01-28
通讯作者: 李清芳
作者简介:王跃棠(1993-),女,汉族,新疆库尔勒人,硕士研究生,主要从事植物生态研究,E-mail:657328199@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（31570453；31170381）资助

Study on Soil Nematode Community Characteristics Associated with Caragana microphylla Shrubs in Desert Steppe

WANG Yue-tang, MEI Xu-fang, XIE Li-na, ZHANG Guo-gang, LI Qing-fang, MA Cheng-cang

Tianjin Key Laboratory of Animal and Plant Resistance, College of Life Sciences, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China

Received:2018-05-17 Revised:2018-09-26 Online:2018-12-15 Published:2019-01-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究比较了小叶锦鸡儿灌丛内外部及不同土层土壤线虫群落特征。结果表明：灌丛内土壤线虫数量和多样性高于灌丛外，且随土壤深度增加均呈下降趋势，土壤线虫群落垂直分布具有明显表聚性。灌丛内表层土自由生线虫成熟度指数最低，这说明灌丛内表层土具有相对稳定的土壤环境；随土壤深度的增加，灌丛内外植物寄生线虫成熟度指数均呈下降趋势。表层土自由生活线虫丰富度最大，富集指数相对较高，结构指数最大，说明灌丛内表层土环境稳定，受干扰程度较低；灌丛内表层土土壤线虫通道指数小于50，其余处理通道指数均大于50，说明灌丛内表层土土壤线虫分解有机物以细菌通道为主。灌丛内食微线虫丰富度明显大于灌丛外，捕食杂食类线虫比例没有显著变化，说明灌丛并未影响土壤食物网的复杂性。小叶锦鸡儿灌丛通过影响灌丛土壤资源影响土壤线虫的群落组成、多样性和功能性。

关键词: 小叶锦鸡儿, 土壤线虫, 垂直分布, 多样性, 功能性

Abstract: We studied the nematode community characteristics at different soil depths under Caragana microphylla shrub canopies versus in open areas. The results showed that the quantity and diversity of soil nematodes under shrub canopies were higher than those in open areas. There were decreasing trends for both quantity and diversity of soil nematodes as soil depth increased,which indicated obvious surface aggregation patterns for the vertical distributions of soil nematode communities. Under shrub canopies,the mature index (MI) at the top layer of soil (0-10 cm) was the lowest,which indicated that there was a relatively stable soil environment in this soil layer. For both the maturity index of plant parasitic nematodes (PPI) under shrub canopies and in open areas,there were decreasing trends as soil depth increased. At the top layer of soil under shrub canopies,the abundance of free-living nematodes was the highest;the enrichment index (EI) was relatively high;the structure index (SI) was the largest,which indicated that there was a stable environment with low levels of disturbances. The channel index (CI) at the top layer of soil under shrub canopies was less than 50. In contrast,the CI values in other treatments were all greater than 50,which indicated that the decomposition pathways of organic matters for nematodes at the top layer of soil under shrub canopies were mainly bacterial channels. The abundance of microbivorous nematodes under shrub canopies was significantly greater than that in open areas. The proportion of predatory omnivorous nematodes under shrub canopies was not significantly different from that in open areas,suggesting that shrub canopies did not affect the complexity of soil food webs. In conclusion,C. microphylla shrub canopies affected the composition,diversity and functionality of soil nematode communities in the desert steppe via influencing soil recourses.

Key words: Caragana microphylla, Soil nematodes, Vertical distribution, Diversity, Functionality

中图分类号:

S154.5

王跃棠, 梅续芳, 解李娜, 张国刚, 李清芳, 马成仓. 荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿灌丛土壤线虫群落研究[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(6): 1305-1312.

WANG Yue-tang, MEI Xu-fang, XIE Li-na, ZHANG Guo-gang, LI Qing-fang, MA Cheng-cang. Study on Soil Nematode Community Characteristics Associated with Caragana microphylla Shrubs in Desert Steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(6): 1305-1312.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.06.004

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2018/V26/I6/1305

参考文献

[1] Pen-Mouratov S,Rakhimbaev M,Barness G,et al.Spatial and temporal dynamics of nematode populations under Zygophyllum dumosum in arid environments[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2004,40(1):31-46
[2] Salamon J A,Wolters V. Nematoda response to forest conversion[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2009,45(2):184-191
[3] Viketoft M,Palmborg C,Sohlenius B,et al. Plant species effects on soil nematode communities in experimental grasslands[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2005,30(2):90-103
[4] Su Y Z,Wang X F,Yang R,et al. Soil fertility,salinity and nematode diversity influenced by Tamarix ramosissima in different habitats in an arid desert oasis[J]. Environmental Management,2012,50(2):226-236
[5] Zhang P J,Yang J,Zhao L Q,et al. Effect of Caragana Tibetica Nebkhas on sand entrapment and fertile islands in steppe-desert ecotones on the Inner Mongolia Plateau,China[J]. Plant and Soil,2011,347(1-2):79-90
[6] 熊小刚,韩兴国. 内蒙古半干旱草原灌丛化过程中小叶锦鸡儿引起的土壤碳、氮资源空间异质性分布[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(7):1678-1683
[7] 王冰冰,曲来叶,宋成军等. 岷江干旱河谷优势灌丛对土壤微生物群落组成的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(8):2481-2493
[8] 赵一之. 中国锦鸡儿属的分类学研究[J]. 内蒙古大学学报,1993,4(6):631-653
[9] 董锡文. 科尔沁沙地沙丘植物恢复进程中土壤肥力变化及线虫群落空间分布特征研究[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2010:62-78
[10] 张爱林,赵建宁,洪杰等. 贝加尔针茅草原土壤线虫与微生物群落特征及其相互作用[J].草地学报,2018,26(1):77-84
[11] Steinberger Y,Liang W,Savkina E,et al. Nematode community composition and diversity associated with a topoclimatic transect in a rain shadow desert[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2001,37(4):315-320
[12] Ferris H,Bongers T,Rgmde G. A framework for soil food web diagnostics:extension of the nematode faunal analysis concept[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2001,18(1):13-29
[13] 毛伟,李玉霖,赵学勇等. 科尔沁沙地灌丛内外草本植物狗尾草叶性状的比较研究[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(6):144-150
[14] Blagodatskaya E,Blagodatsky S,Dorodnikov M,et al. Elevated atmospheric CO₂ increases microbial growth rates in soil:results of three CO₂ enrichment experiments[J]. Global Change Biology,2010,16(2):836-848
[15] Drigo B,Pijl A S,Duyts H,et al. Shifting carbon flow from roots into associated microbial communities in response to elevated atmospheric CO₂[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America,2010,107(24):10938-10942
[16] Martius C,H?fer H,Garcia M V B,et al. Microclimate in agroforestry systems in central Amazonia:does canopy closure matter to soil organisms?[J]. Agroforestry Systems,2004,60(3):291-304
[17] Viketoft M,Bengtsson J,Sohlenius B,et al. Long-term effects of plant diversity and composition on soil nematode communities in model grasslands[J]. Ecology,2009,90(1):90-99
[18] Scherber C,Eisenhauer N,Weisser W W,et al. Bottom-up effects of plant diversity on multitrophic interactions in a biodiversity experiment[J]. Nature,2010,468(7323):553-556
[19] 陈璟,杨宁. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地植被恢复过程中土壤质量评价[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(1):160-167
[20] García P P,Maestre F T,Kattge J,et al. Climate and litter quality differently modulate the effects of soil fauna on litter decomposition across biomes[J]. Ecology Letters,2013,16(8):1045-1053
[21] Neher D A. Ecology of plant and free-living nematodes in natural and agricultural soil[J]. Annual Review of Phytopathology,2010,48(x):371-394
[22] Sorley M R,Frederick J J. Effect of subsurface clay on nematode communities in a sandy soil[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2002,19(1):1-11
[23] Liang W J,Steinberger Y. Temporal changes in nematode community structure in a desert ecosystem[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2001,48(3):267-280
[24] 余卫,张莉,王启兰. 青藏高原金露梅灌丛草甸土壤质量的微生物学特征[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(6):1248-1253
[25] Kardol P,Bezemer T M,Wal A V D,et al. Successional trajectories of soil nematode and plant communities in a chronosequence of ex-arable lands[J]. Biological Conservation,2005,126(3):317-327
[26] Song M,Li X,Jing S,et al. Responses of soil nematodes to water and nitrogen additions in an old-field grassland[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2016,102(6):53-60
[27] Prewett P N. Temperature-and moisture-induced changes in the structure of the nematode fauna of a semiarid grassland-patterns and mechanisms[J]. Global Change Biology,2000,6(6):697-707
[28] Yeates G W. Nematodes as soil indicators:Functional and biodiversity aspects[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,2003,37(4):199-210
[29] Bongers T,Hvander M,Korthals G. Inverse relationship between the nematode maturity index and plant parasite index under enriched nutrient conditions[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,1997,6(2):195-199
[30] Zhao J,Wang X,Wang X,et al. Legume-soil interactions:legume addition enhances the complexity of the soil food web[J]. Plant and Soil,2014,385(1-2):273-286

荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿灌丛土壤线虫群落研究

Study on Soil Nematode Community Characteristics Associated with Caragana microphylla Shrubs in Desert Steppe

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 邓晔, 范月君, 周华坤, 党宁, 王英成, 张海娟, 颜珲璘. 模拟增温对高寒草地土壤原核生物群落组成及多样性影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 27-34.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	吕婷, 刘玉萍, 亢俊铧, 刘涛, 梁瑞芳, 苏旭. 德令哈-哈拉湖沿线不同生境下群落的物种组成及其多样性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 146-155.
[4]	晏和飘, 李文龙, 梁天刚, 周华坤, 曹亚鹏, 廖元成. 青藏高原退化高寒草地恢复对不同措施响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[5]	张中华, 马丽, 周秉荣, 宋明华, 徐文华, 邓艳芳, 王芳, 佘延娣, 张骞, 姚步青, 马真, 周华坤. 高寒草甸优势种功能多样性对增温和模拟放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 225-232.
[6]	马骢毓, 韩重阳, 马赛男, 李旭旭, 蔡家邦, 汪阳, 张新全, 聂刚. 基于SSR分子标记的13个白三叶(Trifolium repens L.)品种指纹图谱构建[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1892-1899.
[7]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[8]	罗铭欣, 刘凤民, 陈纪言, 崔均涛, 张伟丽. ⁶⁰Coγ辐射柱花草M₃代的农艺性状及遗传多样性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1992-2000.
[9]	梁小玉, 季杨, 胡远彬, 易军, 白史且, 张靓, 张新全. 菊苣EST-SSR分子标记开发及通用性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2081-2090.
[10]	孙宇, 张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 赵萌莉, 张彬. 刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原物种多样性及地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1859-1864.
[11]	刘博文, 黎桂阳, 常媛飞, 金美燕, 刘芳, 高秋, 刘万良, 哈斯塔米尔, 王显国. 野豌豆属种子形态多样性与种子分类鉴定方法的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1375-1385.
[12]	孙彩彩, 冯斌, 董全民, 刘文亭, 时光, 刘玉祯, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 杨晓霞. 牦牛藏羊混合放牧对高寒草地紫花针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[13]	刘凌云, 范希峰, 滕珂, 岳跃森, 常智慧, 武菊英. 苔草属植物遗传多样性研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1148-1157.
[14]	刘玉祯, 刘文亭, 冯斌, 时光, 孙彩彩, 李彩弟, 张小芳, 董全民. 坡向和海拔对高寒山地草甸植被分布格局特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1166-1173.
[15]	常明. 火烧后亚高山草甸恢复过程中物种组成和群落特征变化规律的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.