黔西北铅锌矿废渣场优势草本植物种群生态位及种间关系

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.027

草地学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (10): 2764-2771.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.027

• • 上一篇

黔西北铅锌矿废渣场优势草本植物种群生态位及种间关系

宋红艳¹, 孙彩丽^2,3, 柴宗政¹

1. 贵州大学林学院, 贵州贵阳 550025;
2. 贵州大学资源与环境工程学院, 贵州贵阳 550025;
3. 贵州民族大学生态环境工程学院, 贵州贵阳 550025

收稿日期:2022-04-12 修回日期:2022-05-31 发布日期:2022-11-05
通讯作者: 柴宗政,E-mail:zhangchaolynn@163.com
作者简介:宋红艳(1998-),女,汉族,贵州黔南长顺人,硕士研究生,主要从事林业生态研究,E-mail:shy18798434382@126.com
基金资助:
中国博士后科学基金项目(2020M683373)“根系分泌物介导下植物对重金属Cd的吸收和稳定机制研究”；贵州省科技计划项目(黔科合基础[2020]1Y192)“草海湖水陆交错带植物-土壤协同演变规律及微生物作用机制研究”资助

Niche and Interspecific Relationships of Dominant Herbaceous Plant Populations in the Waste Slag Field of A Lead-Zinc Mine in Northwestern Guizhou

SONG Hong-yan¹, SUN Cai-li^2,3, CHAI Zong-zheng¹

1. College of Forestry, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550025, China;
2. College of Resource and Environmental Engineering, Guizhou University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550025, China;
3. College of Eco-Environmental Engineering, Guizhou Minzu University, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550025, China

Received:2022-04-12 Revised:2022-05-31 Published:2022-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以黔西北铅锌矿废渣场为研究区，对矿渣堆及周边区域16种优势草本植物共有种生态位与种间联结性进行对比分析，以期为矿区生态恢复提供科学依据。结果表明：知风草(Eragrostis ferruginea)、狗尾草(Setaria viridis)、细柄黍(Panicum psilopodium)、鼠尾粟(Sporobolus fertilis)和牛筋草(Eleusine indica)等禾本科和艾蒿(Artemisia argyi)等菊科植物有较高的重要值和生态位宽度，分布相对广泛；禾本科植物如知风草、狗尾草、细柄黍、鼠尾粟和牛筋草等，因生态位相似且对重金属适应能力强，故生态位重叠度较高；矿渣堆和周边区域优势草本植物共有种总体均呈显著正联结，但种对间却以负联结为主，表明该矿渣场植物群落演替总体呈现进展演替，但演替进程缓慢，仍处于演替初期阶段。综上，矿渣堆因富集重金属而影响着区域植物群落构建；生态治理中，应将禾本科知风草、狗尾草、细柄黍等植物作为先锋植物，促进植被恢复。

关键词: 铅锌矿, 生态位宽度, 生态位重叠, 种间联结性

Abstract: A typical lead-zinc mine waste slag field in northwestern Guizhou was taken as the research area,and the ecological niche and interspecific relationship of 16 dominant herbaceous plant species in the slag heap and the surrounding area were compared,to provide a scientific basis for ecological restoration. The results showed that:Gramineae species,such as Eragrostis ferruginea,Setaria viridis,Panicum psilopodium,Sporobolus fertilis, and Eleusine indica,and Compositae species,such as Artemisia argyi,have relatively high importance values and niche widths,are relatively widely distributed,and have strong adaptations;The abovementioned gramineae species have the same ecological niche and strong adaptability to the heavy metal environment and therefore have a high degree of niche overlap;The common species of dominant herbs in the slag heap and the surrounding area showed a significant positive association,but the negative association between species pairs was mainly,indicating that the plant community in the slag field evolved. There is a progress of succession overall,but the process is slow and is still in the primary stage of succession. In conclusion,the common species of dominant herbs in the slag heap and the surrounding areas are quite different in terms of the ecological niche and interspecific relationship. The slag heap is enriched with high levels of heavy metals,which seriously affect and restrict the construction of regional plant communities and species composition. In the process of ecological management,we should consider the use of gramineae plants (specifically Eragrostis ferruginea,Setaria viridis,P. psilopodium) as pioneer plant species to adjust the interspecific relationship,thereby accelerating vegetation restoration.

Key words: Lead-zinc ore, Niche breadth, Niche overlap, Interspecific association

中图分类号:

宋红艳, 孙彩丽, 柴宗政. 黔西北铅锌矿废渣场优势草本植物种群生态位及种间关系[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2764-2771.

SONG Hong-yan, SUN Cai-li, CHAI Zong-zheng. Niche and Interspecific Relationships of Dominant Herbaceous Plant Populations in the Waste Slag Field of A Lead-Zinc Mine in Northwestern Guizhou[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(10): 2764-2771.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.10.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2022/V30/I10/2764

参考文献

[1] 江洪,何斌,骆强,等.土法冶炼铅锌矿废弃地重金属污染及优势植物相关分析[J].湖北农业科学,2016,55(15):3875-3879,3882
[2] 彭德海,吴攀,曹振兴,等.赫章土法炼锌区水-沉积物重金属污染的时空变化特征[J].农业环境科学学报,2011,30(5):979-985
[3] 武艺,林文杰,敖子强.黔西北土法炼锌区Pb、Cd污染与生态修复[J].环保科技,2008(50):34-36,42
[4] KAHW C A,NAHY C L,SANGU G,et al. Assessing phytoremediation potentials of selected plant species in restoration of environments contaminated by heavy metals in gold mining areas of Tanzania[J]. Heliyon,2021,7(9):e07979
[5] 春风,那仁满都拉,张卫青,等.白音华矿区土壤重金属含量的空间异质性[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(2):601-608
[6] LU N,LI G,SUN Y Y,et al. Phytoremediation Potential of Four Native Plants in Soils Contaminated with Lead in a Mining Area[J]. Land,2021,10(11):1129-1129
[7] 徐选美,叶武,朱华藏,等.庆元铅锌矿土壤及优势植物重金属特征评价[J].现代矿业,2020,36(4):238-241,244
[8] 马丰丰,潘高,李锡泉,等.桂西南喀斯特山地木本植物群落种间关系及CCA排序[J].北京林业大学学报,2017,39(6):32-44
[9] 张明霞,王得祥,康冰,等.秦岭华山松天然次生林优势种群的种间联结性[J].林业科学,2015,51(1):12-21
[10] HOPKINS B,GREIG S P. Quantitative Plant Ecology[J]. Ecology,1966,47(1):166-166
[11] BROOKER R W. Plant-plant interactions and environmental change[J]. The New phytologist,2006,171(2):271-284
[12] OLIVER L P,PERCV N V,ABEL L M,et al. Habitat association among Amazonian tree species:a landscape-scale approach[J]. Journal of Ecology,2003,91(5):757-775
[13] 郭俊兵,狄晓艳,李素清.山西大同矿区煤矸石山自然定居植物群落优势种种间关系[J].生态学杂志,2015,34(12):3327-3332
[14] 春风,赵萌莉,赛西亚拉图,等.内蒙古巴音华矿区自然定居植物群落优势种种间关系研究[J].中国草地学报,2017,39(5):90-95
[15] 董家龙.黔西北地区铅锌矿矿床成矿规律与找矿研究[D].昆明:昆明理工大学,2008:10-30
[16] 林孝先,侯中健.试论中国铅锌矿矿床类型划分[J].桂林理工大学学报,2014,34(1):8-14
[17] 王华云.贵州铅锌矿的地球化学特征[J].贵州地质,1993(4):272-290
[18] 杨元根,刘丛强,张国平,等.铅锌矿山开发导致的重金属在环境介质中的积累[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2003,22(4):305-309
[19] 符志友,杨元根,吴丰昌,等.铅锌矿区地表环境中重金属元素的时空动态变化及生物有效性探讨[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2008(1):89-97
[20] 冯乾伟,王兵,马先杰,等.黔西北典型铅锌矿区土壤重金属污染特征及其来源分析[J].矿物岩石地球化学通报,2020,39(4):863-870
[21] 孙航.修复植物-炼锌废渣系统中砷、锑的迁移转化特征研究[D].贵阳:贵州大学,2020:1-7
[22] 邢丹,刘鸿雁.铅锌矿区重金属耐性植物与超富集植物筛选研究进展[J].安徽农业科学,2009,37(7):3208-3209,3329
[23] 周佳佳,罗有发,马李蓉,等.黔西北土法炼锌废渣堆场修复植物叶片和废渣的生态化学计量特征[J].地球与环境,2019,47(4):419-428
[24] 张富运,陈永华,吴晓芙,等.铅锌超富集植物及耐性植物筛选研究进展[J].中南林业科技大学学报,2012,32(12):92-96
[25] 周威,陈进,韩润生,等.黔西北青山铅锌矿床赋矿灰岩的地球化学分带规律及其指示意义[J].矿产与地质,2021,35(2):222-236
[26] 春风,包钢,张卫青,等.白音华矿区草地群落主要物种组成及空间分布[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(10):3395-3403
[27] JIANG P,YE J,DENG H B,et al. Variations of population structure and important value of the main edificators along the elevation gradient on the northern slope of Changbai Mountain[J]. Journal of Forestry Research,2003,14(2):117-121
[28] 池森,王从军,黎庆菊,等.喀斯特次生林幼树更新空间分布格局及种间关联性[J].应用生态学报,2020,31(12):3989-3996
[29] 金山,武帅楷.太行山南段油松林火烧迹地优势草本生态位及种间关系[J].北京林业大学学报,2021,43(4):35-46
[30] PIANKA E R. The Structure of Lizard Communities[J]. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics,1973,4:53-74
[31] 李雅男,张峰,史世斌,等.刈割留茬高度对大针茅草原群落组成及种间关系的影响[J].草地学报,2022,30(6):1336-1342
[32] 简小枚,税伟,陈毅萍,等.云南中度退化的喀斯特天坑草地植物群落优势种种间关系[J].应用生态学报,2018,29(2):492-500
[33] LEE R D. Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species[J]. Ecology,1945,26(3):297-302
[34] 胡理乐,闫伯前,刘琪璟,等.南方丘陵人工林林下植物种间关系分析[J].应用生态学报,2005,16(11):15-20
[35] THOMAS AS,JERRY FF,MARK K. Canopy gaps in Douglas-fir forests of the Cascade Mountains[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research,1990,20(5):649-658
[36] 孙建财,杨沙,武玉坤,等.高寒混播草地优势草种生态位与种间竞争力分析[J].草地学报,2022,30(5):1273-1279
[37] 吕世杰,刘红梅,吴艳玲,等.放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原建群种与优势种空间分布关系的影响[J].应用生态学报,2014,25(12):3469-3479
[38] 韩安霞,邱婧,何春梅,等.秦岭皇冠优势灌木苦糖果的空间分布格局及种内种间关联[J].应用生态学报,2022,33(8):2027-2034
[39] 沈佳怡,高铭晶,刘钰,等.典型草本植物对镉锌铜污染河道底泥的修复[J].上海大学学报(自然科学版),2022,28(1):40-48
[40] 邢丹,刘鸿雁,于萍萍,等.黔西北铅锌矿区植物群落分布及其对重金属的迁移特征[J].生态学报,2012,32(3):796-804
[41] 蒋巧丽,许永久,郑基,等.浙江披山海域主要虾蟹类时空生态位及种间联结性[J].应用生态学报,2021,32(7):2604-2614
[42] 孙建财,杨沙,武玉坤,等.高寒混播草地优势草种生态位与种间竞争力分析[J].草地学报,2022,30(5):1273-1279
[43] CHRISTIANE R,JENS S,MARIEN G,et al. Interspecific trait differences rather than intraspecific trait variation increase the extent and filling of community trait space with increasing plant diversity in experimental grasslands[J]. Perspectives in Plant Ecology,Evolution and Systematics,2018(33):492-502
[44] 吕世杰,吴艳玲,刘红梅,等.春季休牧后放牧强度变化对短花针茅草原植物种群种间关系的影响[J].草地学报,2016,24(2):302-308

黔西北铅锌矿废渣场优势草本植物种群生态位及种间关系

Niche and Interspecific Relationships of Dominant Herbaceous Plant Populations in the Waste Slag Field of A Lead-Zinc Mine in Northwestern Guizhou

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 11

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	宋志萍, 王晓丽, 王彦龙, 周选博, 谢乐乐. 三江源区高寒草甸植物种群生态位对返青期休牧时间的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(7): 1651-1658.
[2]	吴姣姣, 向明学, 拉多, 武俊喜. 不同放牧强度对拉萨河谷温性草原主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 513-522.
[3]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[4]	胡雪峰, 张峰, 张彬, 史世斌, 杨阳, 乔荠瑢, 赵天启, 赵萌莉. 内蒙古7种针茅属植物生态位研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2778-2784.
[5]	李中林, 秦卫华, 周守标, 张纪兵, 汪贞, 王运静. 围栏封育下华北半干旱草原植物生态位研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1186-1193.
[6]	王伟伟, 杨海龙, 贺康宁, 胡兴波, 王辉, 董梅, 谢增武. 祁连山青海云杉人工林草本层生态位及生态响应研究[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 626-630.
[7]	王晓, 张克斌, 王岩, 程中秋, 苏鹏飞, 顾岚. 生态位理论在天然草场群落演替及健康状况评价中的应用[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 904-909.
[8]	陈子萱, 田福平, 郑阳. 施肥对玛曲高寒沙化草地主要植物种生态位的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 884-888.
[9]	吴东丽, 张金屯, 王春乙, 薛红喜. 野生大豆群落主要种群生态位特征研究[J]. , 2009, 17(2): 166-173.
[10]	陈子萱, 田福平, 牛俊义, 王军强, 轩春香. 玛曲高寒沙化草地植物生态位特征研究[J]. , 2007, 15(6): 525-530.
[11]	韩苑鸿, 汪诗平, 陈佐忠. 以放牧率梯度研究内蒙古典型草原主要植物种群的生态位[J]. , 1999, 7(3): 204-210.