全生态系统增温对高寒泥炭地生态系统碳通量的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.09.027

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (9): 3434-3445.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.09.027

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

全生态系统增温对高寒泥炭地生态系统碳通量的影响

刘梦洁^1,2,3, 王睿发⁴, 史晶晶¹, 张惠晨⁵, 汪金松^1,2

1. 中国科学院生态系统网络观测与模拟重点实验室/中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所, 北京 100101;
2. 四川若尔盖高寒湿地生态系统国家野外科学观测研究站, 四川成都 610041;
3. 中国科学院大学资源与环境学院, 北京 100101;
4. 西南科技大学生命科学与工程学院, 四川绵阳 621010;
5. 中国科学院教育部水土保持与生态环境研究中心, 水土保持与荒漠化整治全国重点实验室, 陕西杨凌 712100

收稿日期:2025-09-28 修回日期:2026-02-05 发布日期:2026-09-11
通讯作者: 汪金松, E-mail: wangjinsong@igsnrr.ac.cn
作者简介:刘梦洁(2000-),女,汉族,河南信阳人,硕士研究生,主要从事全球变化生态学研究,E-mail:liumengjie23@mails.ucas.ac.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（32241035）资助

Influence of Whole-ecosystem Warming on Carbon Fluxes of Alpine Peatland Ecosystem

LIU Meng-jie^1,2,3, WANG Rui-fa⁴, SHI Jing-jing¹, ZHANG Hui-chen⁵, WANG Jin-song^1,2

1. Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
2. National Field Observation and Research Station(Sichuan Zoige) for Alpine Wetland Ecosystem, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610041, China;
3. College of Resources and Environment, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
4. School of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology, Mianyang, Sichuan Province 621010, China;
5. State Key Laboratory of Soil and Water Conservation and Desertification Control, The Research Center of Soil and Water Conservation and Ecological Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China

Received:2025-09-28 Revised:2026-02-05 Published:2026-09-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以往原位增温研究多采用地上开顶式增温和红外辐射增温，难以模拟对深层土壤（>30 cm）的增温效应。全生态系统增温对地上植被和土壤剖面同步升温，更贴近实际变暖情景。泥炭地是全球单位面积有机碳密度最高的陆地生态系统，但在气候变暖情景下其固碳功能如何变化仍没有明确结论。本研究以四川省红原县若尔盖高寒泥炭地为研究对象，设置对照（CK）、地上增温（AW）、土壤剖面增温（BW）和全生态系统增温（EW）四种处理，探讨不同增温方式对泥炭地生态系统碳通量的影响及其机制。结果表明，土壤温度升高与土壤剖面含水量下降均为调控生态系统碳通量的关键因子。BW和EW均显著促进生态系统呼吸，而AW无显著影响。EW显著降低土壤剖面含水量并促进土壤蒸发，显著降低净生态系统生产力。尽管EW促进植被生长并增加碳输入，但呼吸增强效应超过增温对光合作用的促进效应，导致生态系统固碳能力显著减弱。本研究为准确评估气候变暖背景下高寒泥炭地固碳功能提供了科学依据。

关键词: 生态系统碳通量, 高寒泥炭地, 气候变暖, 全生态系统增温

Abstract: Previous in situ warming experiments have predominantly employed open-top chamber and infrared radiation for aboveground warming， which fail to adequately simulate the warming process in deeper soil （>30 cm）. In contrast， the whole-ecosystem warming， warming both aboveground vegetation and soil profile， represents the most realistic field-scale warming method. Peatland ecosystems are the terrestrial ecosystems with the highest organic carbon density per unit area globally. However， how their carbon sequestration function respond under climate warming remains inconclusive. This study focused on the Zoige alpine peatlands in Hongyuan County， Sichuan Province， China. A field experiment was established with four warming treatments， including control （CK）， above-ground warming （AW）， whole-soil profile warming （BW） and whole-ecosystem warming （EW）. This research analyzed the effects of different warming treatments on ecosystem carbon fluxes in the peatland ecosystem and the regulatory mechanisms. The results showed that elevating soil temperature and decreasing soil profile moisture content were key regulators of ecosystem carbon fluxes. BW and EW all promoted ecosystem respiration （ER）， while AW had no significant effect on ER. EW significantly reduced both soil profile water content and promoted soil evaporation， leading to a notable decrease in net ecosystem productivity （NEP）. Although EW stimulated plant growth and increased carbon inputs， the enhanced respiration effect outweighed the warming-induced stimulation of photosynthesis， resulting in a significant weakened carbon sink. This study provides a scientific basis for accurately assessing the carbon sequestration function of alpine peatlands under climate warming.

Key words: Ecosystem carbon fluxes, Alpine peatlands, Climate warming, Whole-ecosystem warming

中图分类号:

X171.7

刘梦洁, 王睿发, 史晶晶, 张惠晨, 汪金松. 全生态系统增温对高寒泥炭地生态系统碳通量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(9): 3434-3445.

LIU Meng-jie, WANG Rui-fa, SHI Jing-jing, ZHANG Hui-chen, WANG Jin-song. Influence of Whole-ecosystem Warming on Carbon Fluxes of Alpine Peatland Ecosystem[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(9): 3434-3445.

参考文献

[1] HICKS PRIES C E，CASTANHA C，PORRAS R C，et al. The whole-soil carbon flux in response to warming[J]. Science，2017，355（6332）：1420-1423
[2] CIAIS P，SABINE C，BALA G，et al. Carbon and other biogeochemical cycles. Climate change 2013： the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M]. Cambridge：Cambridge University Press，2013：465-570
[3] DAVIDSON E A，JANSSENS I A. Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change[J]. Nature，2006，440（7081）：165-173
[4] WENZEL S，COX P M，EYRING V，et al. Emergent constraints on climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks in the CMIP5 Earth system models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research：Biogeosciences，2014，119（5）：794-807
[5] ARORA V K，KATAVOUTA A，WILLIAMS R G，et al. Carbon-concentration and carbon-climate feedbacks in CMIP6 models， and their comparison to CMIP5 models[J]. Biogeosciences，2020，17：4173–4222
[6] LUO Y Q，WAN S Q，HUI D F，et al. Acclimatization of soil respiration to warming in a tall grass prairie[J]. Nature，2001，413（6856）：622-625
[7] MELILLO J M，STEUDLER P A，ABER J D，et al. Soil warming and carbon-cycle feedbacks to the climate system[J]. Science，2002，298（5601）：2173-2176
[8] MALLAPATY S. How China could be carbon neutral by mid-century[J]. Nature，2020，586（7830）：482-483
[9] ZHANG HUI，GUO ZHENGTANG，ZHAO YAN. Peatland carbon cycling and its contribution to carbon peak and carbon neutrality[J]. Quaternary Sciences，2023，43（2）：324-335 张卉，郭正堂，赵艳. 泥炭地碳源汇功能与“双碳”目标[J]. 第四纪研究，2023，43（2）：324-335
[10] CHANG SHUNLI，YANG HONGXIAO，GE JIANPING. Advance and questions in net ecosystem production[J]. Journal of Beijing Normal University （Natural Science），2005（5）：517-521 常顺利，杨洪晓，葛剑平. 净生态系统生产力研究进展与问题[J]. 北京师范大学学报（自然科学版），2005（5）：517-521
[11] DARGIE G C，LEWIS S L，LAWSON I T，et al. Age， extent and carbon storage of the central Congo Basin peatland complex[J]. Nature，2017，542（7639）：86-90
[12] INUBUSHI K， FURUKAWA Y， HADI A，et al. Seasonal changes of CO₂， CH₄ and N₂O fluxes in relation to land-use change in tropical peatlands located in coastal area of South Kalimantan[J]. Chemosphere，2003，52（3）：603-608.
[13] CAREY J C，TANG J，TEMPLER P H，et al. Temperature response of soil respiration largely unaltered with experimental warming[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences，2016，113（48）：13797-13802
[14] LI Q，LEROY F，ZOCATELLI R，et al. Abiotic and biotic drivers of microbial respiration in peat and its sensitivity to temperature change[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2021，153：108077
[15] CHAPIN F S，SHAVER G R，GIBLIN A E，et al. Responses of arctic tundra to experimental and observed changes in climate[J]. Ecology，1995，76（3）：694-711
[16] HELBIG M，CHASMER L E，DESAI A R，et al. Direct and indirect climate change effects on carbon dioxide fluxes in a thawing boreal forest–wetland landscape[J]. Global Change Biology，2017，23（8）：3231-3248
[17] MÄKIRANTA P，LAIHO R，MEHTÄTALO L，et al. Responses of phenology and biomass production of boreal fens to climate warming under different water‐table level regimes[J]. Global Change Biology，2018，24（3）：944-956
[18] CLARK D B，MERCADO L M，SITCH S，et al. The Joint UK Land Environment Simulator （JULES），model description-Part 2： carbon fluxes and vegetation dynamics[J]. Geoscientific Model Development，2011，4（3）：701-722
[19] FERNÁNDEZ-MARTÍNEZ M，VICCA S，JANSSENS I A，et al. Nutrient availability as the key regulator of global forest carbon balance[J]. Nature Climate Change，2014，4（6）：471-476
[20] ZHANG B W，TAN X R，WANG S S，et al. Asymmetric sensitivity of ecosystem carbon and water processes in response to precipitation change in a semi‐arid steppe[J]. Functional Ecology，2017，31（6）：1301-1311
[21] NIU S L，WU M Y，HAN Y，et al. Water‐mediated responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to climatic change in a temperate steppe[J]. New Phytologist，2008，177（1）：209-219
[22] DORREPAAL E，TOET S，VAN LOGTESTIJN R S P，et al. Carbon respiration from subsurface peat accelerated by climate warming in the subarctic[J]. Nature，2009，460（7255）：616-619
[23] GIARDINA C P，LITTON C M，CROW S E，et al. Warming-related increases in soil CO₂ efflux are explained by increased below-ground carbon flux[J]. Nature Climate Change，2014，4（9）：822-827
[24] PEÑUELAS J，GORDON C，LLORENS L，et al. Nonintrusive field experiments show different plant responses to warming and drought among sites， seasons， and species in a north-south European gradient[J]. Ecosystems，2004，7（6）：598-612
[25] NIU SHULI，AN XINGGUO，MA KEPING，et al. Field facilities in global warming and terrestrial ecosystem research[J]. Journal of Plant Ecology，2007（2）：262-271 牛书丽，韩兴国，马克平，等. 全球变暖与陆地生态系统研究中的野外增温装置[J]. 植物生态学报，2007（2）：262-271
[26] YANG Y H，FANG J Y，TANG Y H，et al. Storage， patterns and controls of soil organic carbon in the Tibetan grasslands[J]. Global Change Biology，2008，14（7）：1592-1599
[27] JACKSON R B，LAJTHA K，CROW S E，et al. The ecology of soil carbon： pools， vulnerabilities， and biotic and abiotic controls[J]. Annual Review of Ecology， Evolution， and Systematics，2017，48（1）：419-445
[28] CHEN Y，QIN W K，ZHANG Q F，et al. Whole-soil warming leads to substantial soil carbon emission in an alpine grassland[J]. Nature Communications，2024，15（1）：4489
[29] HANSON P J，GRIFFITHS N A，IVERSEN C M，et al. Rapid net carbon loss from a whole‐ecosystem warmed peatland[J]. AGU Advances，2020，1（3）：e2020AV000163
[30] BAI Y X，PENG Y F，ZHOU W，et al. SWAMP： A new experiment for simulating permafrost warming and active layer deepening on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Methods in Ecology and Evolution，2023，14（7）：1732-1746
[31] OFITI N O E，SCHMIDT M W I，ABIVEN S，et al. Climate warming and elevated CO₂ alter peatland soil carbon sources and stability[J]. Nature Communications，2023，14（1）：7533
[32] KIRSCHBAUM M U F. The temperature dependence of soil organic matter decomposition， and the effect of global warming on soil organic C storage[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry，1995，27（6）：753-760
[33] EHLERS T A，CHEN D L，APPEL E，et al. Past， present， and future geo-biosphere interactions on the Tibetan Plateau and implications for permafrost[J]. Earth-Science Reviews，2022，234：104197
[34] CHEN Y，HAN M G，YUAN X，et al. Warming has a minor effect on surface soil organic carbon in alpine meadow ecosystems on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Global Change Biology，2022，28（4）：1618-1629
[35] WANG M，CHEN H，WU N，et al. Carbon dynamics of peatlands in China during the Holocene[J]. Quaternary Science Reviews，2014，99：34-41
[36] CHEN JIANWEI，OUYANG KAIHUA，QU SICHAO. A preliminary view on the water ecological protection plan for Talin Section of Waqie Town along the Baihe River in Hongyuan County[J]. Sichuan Hydropower，2024，43（4）：51-53，65 陈建伟，欧阳凯华，屈思潮. 红原县白河瓦切镇塔林段水生态保护方案之浅见[J]. 四川水力发电，2024，43（4）：51-53，65
[37] LIGANG DAO，ZHANG HONGXUAN，SHI CHANGGAUNG，et al. Quantitative analysis of grassland landscape pattern of Waqie Town Hongyuan County[J]. Journal of Grassland and Forage Science，2017（6）：52-56 道里刚，张洪轩，史长光，等. 红原县瓦切镇景观格局定量分析[J]. 草学，2017（6）：52-56
[38] GANJURJAV H，GAO Q Z，ZHANG W N，et al. Effects of warming on CO₂ fluxes in an alpine meadow ecosystem on the central Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Public Library of Science One，2015，10（7）：e0132044
[39] XIA J Y，WAN S Q. The effects of warming-shifted plant phenology on ecosystem carbon exchange are regulated by precipitation in a semi-arid grassland[J]. Public Library of Science ONE，2012，7（2）：e32088
[40] FU G，SHEN Z X，ZHANG X Z，et al. Response of ecosystem respiration to experimental warming and clipping at daily time scale in an alpine meadow of Tibet[J]. Journal of Mountain Science，2013，10（3）：455-463
[41] JÄRVEOJA J，NILSSON M B，GAŽOVIČ M，et al. Partitioning of the net CO₂ exchange using an automated chamber system reveals plant phenology as key control of production and respiration fluxes in a boreal peatland[J]. Global Change Biology，2018，24（8）：3436-3451
[42] DING J Z，CHEN L Y，JI C J，et al. Decadal soil carbon accumulation across Tibetan permafrost regions[J]. Nature Geoscience，2017，10（6）：420-424
[43] SULMAN B N，DESAI A R，COOK B D，et al. Contrasting carbon dioxide fluxes between a drying shrub wetland in Northern Wisconsin， USA， and nearby forests[J]. Biogeosciences，2009，6（6）：1115-1126
[44] AURELA M，RIUTTA T，LAURILA T，et al. CO₂ exchange of a sedge fen in southern Finland—the impact of a drought period[J]. Tellus B：Chemical and Physical Meteorology，2007，59（5）：826
[45] LAINE A M，MÄKIRANTA P，LAIHO R，et al. Warming impacts on boreal fen CO₂ exchange under wet and dry conditions[J]. Global Change Biology，2019，25（6）：1995-2008
[46] BELAY-TEDLA A，ZHOU X H，SU B，et al. Labile， recalcitrant， and microbial carbon and nitrogen pools of a tallgrass prairie soil in the US Great Plains subjected to experimental warming and clipping[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2009，41（1）：110-116
[47] SHEIK C S，BEASLEY W H，ELSHAHED M S，et al. Effect of warming and drought on grassland microbial communities[J]. The ISME Journal，2011，5（10）：1692-1700
[48] HELBIG M，HUMPHREYS E R，TODD A. Contrasting temperature sensitivity of CO₂ exchange in peatlands of the Hudson Bay Lowlands， Canada[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research：Biogeosciences，2019，124（7）：2126-2143
[49] WU J H，ROULET N T. Climate change reduces the capacity of northern peatlands to absorb the atmospheric carbon dioxide： The different responses of bogs and fens[J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles，2014，28（10）：1005-1024
[50] ISE T，DUNN A L，WOFSY S C，et al. High sensitivity of peat decomposition to climate change through water-table feedback[J]. Nature Geoscience，2008，1（11）：763-766
[51] XU X，SHI Z，LI D J，et al. Plant community structure regulates responses of prairie soil respiration to decadal experimental warming[J]. Global Change Biology，2015，21（10）：3846-3853
[52] GILL A L，GIASSON M A，YU R，et al. Deep peat warming increases surface methane and carbon dioxide emissions in a black spruce‐dominated ombrotrophic bog[J]. Global Change Biology，2017，23（12）：5398-5411
[53] LUND M，LAFLEUR P M，ROULET N T，et al. Variability in exchange of CO₂ across 12 northern peatland and tundra sites[J]. Global Change Biology，2010，16（9）：2436-2448
[54] HELFTER C，CAMPBELL C，DINSMORE K J，et al. Drivers of long-term variability in CO₂ net ecosystem exchange in a temperate peatland[J]. Biogeosciences，2015，12（6）：1799-1811
[55] TRETTIN C C，LAIHO R，MINKKINEN K，et al. Influence of climate change factors on carbon dynamics in northern forested peatlands[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science，2006，86（Special Issue）：269-280

全生态系统增温对高寒泥炭地生态系统碳通量的影响

Influence of Whole-ecosystem Warming on Carbon Fluxes of Alpine Peatland Ecosystem

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈哲, 金艳霞, 孙建, 邵新庆, 王英典, 赵新全, 王文颖, 谢惠春, 张振华, 张莉, 杜岩功, 周华坤. 全球变暖对高寒冻土区温室气体通量影响研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 929-942.
[2]	王谭国艳, 马志远, 李沛洋, 郭俊宏, 张嘉懿, 蒋胜竞. 短期增温对青藏高原高寒草甸不同植物根际丛枝菌根真菌的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1959-1966.