西藏纳木错高寒草原、高寒草甸和沼泽化草甸主要温室气体通量对比研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.03.010

草地学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (3): 493-501.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.03.010

西藏纳木错高寒草原、高寒草甸和沼泽化草甸主要温室气体通量对比研究

旦增塔庆¹, 旭日², 魏学红¹, 魏达², 刘永稳², 王迎红³

1. 西藏大学农牧学院, 西藏林芝 860000;
2. 中国科学院青藏高原研究所, 北京 100101;
3. 中国科学院大气物理研究所, 北京 100029

收稿日期:2013-08-19 修回日期:2013-10-21 出版日期:2014-06-15 发布日期:2014-06-04
通讯作者: 旭日
作者简介:旦增塔庆（1989- ），男，藏族，西藏拉萨人，硕士研究生，从事高寒草地生态学研究，E-mail：tarchentenzin@gmail.com；
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（40975096）（41175128）；中国科学院科技先导专项（XDA05020402）（XDA05050404-3-2）资助

Research on Key Greenhouse Gas Fluxes across Alpine Steppe, Alpine Meadow and Swamp Meadow in Nam Co, Tibetan Plateau

Tenzin-tarchen¹, Xuri², WEI Xue-hong¹, WEI Da², LIU Yong-wen², WANG Ying-hong³

1. Agricultural and Animal Husbandry College of Tibet University, Nyingchi, Tibet 860000, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Tibetan Environment Changes and Land Surface Processes, Institute of Tibetan Plateau Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
3. Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China

Received:2013-08-19 Revised:2013-10-21 Online:2014-06-15 Published:2014-06-04

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

青藏高原高寒草地占我国天然草地的40%，研究其温室气体源汇强度及驱动因子具有重要意义。采用静态箱-气相色谱法，在西藏纳木错地区开展高寒草原、高寒草甸和沼泽化草甸的生态系统呼吸、CH₄和N₂O通量观测，生长季内的观测表明：高寒草原和高寒草甸生态系统呼吸分别为（283.7±14.4） mg·m^-2·h^-1和（275.7±20.6） mg·m^-2·h^-1，低于有机质丰富的沼泽化草甸，为（591.6±53.2） mg·m^-2·h^-1。高寒草原和高寒草甸均是CH₄的汇，其生长季均值分别为（-84.9±7.6） μg·m^-2·h^-1和（-39.2±4.6） μg·m^-2·h^-1；而沼泽化草甸是CH₄的源其均值为（149.2±34.2） μg·m^-2·h^-1。高寒草原、高寒草甸和沼泽化草甸均为N₂O的源，生长季排放量分别为（7.3±2.8），（3.0±1.1）和（2.2±4.3） μg·m^-2·h^-1。土壤水分总体控制着高寒草地CH₄通量的时空变化，在土壤水分含量约大于30%的沼泽化草甸表现为CH₄的排放源，而在土壤水分含量低于30%的高寒草原和草甸表现为CH₄的汇；生长季水分含量越高，对CH₄的吸收越弱。

关键词: 高寒草原, 高寒草甸, 沼泽化草甸, 生态系统呼吸, CH₄通量, N₂O通量

Abstract:

The alpine grassland of Tibetan Plateau accounts for 40% of natural grassland in China. It is, therefore, important to qualify the greenhouse gas fluxes of the alpine grassland and their driving factors. Observations of ecosystem respiration, CH₄ and N₂O fluxes across alpine steppe, alpine meadow and swamp meadow were conducted using static chamber and gas chromatograph method in the Nam Co region of Tibetan Plateau. One growing season's measurement showed that the ecosystem respiration of alpine steppe and meadow were 283.7±14.4 mg·m^-2·h^-1 and 275.7±20.6 mg·m^-2·h^-1, respectively, and both were significantly lower than that of swamp meadow (591.6±53.2 mg·m^-2·h^-1), which was rich in soil organic carbon. Both alpine steppe and meadow were sinks of CH₄ (-84.9±7.6 and -39.2±4.6 μg·m^-2·h^-1, respectively), while the swamp meadow was a resource of CH₄ (149.2±34.2 μg·m^-2·h^-1). All three ecosystems were a resource of N₂O. The emissions of N₂O during growing season were 7.3±2.8, 3.0±1.1 and 2.2±4.3 μg·m^-2·h^-1, respectively. Comparison of CH₄ flux among three grassland types indicated that the spatial-temporal variation of CH₄ flux depended on the soil moisture. The swamp meadow with more than 30% soil moisture contents was a resource of CH₄, while both alpine steppe and meadow with less than 30% soil moisture contents were the sinks of CH₄ and the strength of the sink decreased with soil moisture increasing during growing season.

Key words: Alpine steppe, Alpine meadow, Swamp meadow, Ecosystem respiration, CH₄ flux, N₂O flux

中图分类号:

Q948

旦增塔庆, 旭日, 魏学红, 魏达, 刘永稳, 王迎红. 西藏纳木错高寒草原、高寒草甸和沼泽化草甸主要温室气体通量对比研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(3): 493-501.

Tenzin-tarchen, Xuri, WEI Xue-hong, WEI Da, LIU Yong-wen, WANG Ying-hong. Research on Key Greenhouse Gas Fluxes across Alpine Steppe, Alpine Meadow and Swamp Meadow in Nam Co, Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(3): 493-501.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.03.010

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2014/V22/I3/493

参考文献

[1] National oceanic and atmospheric administration[R]. 2013. http://www.researchmatters.noaa.gov
[2] World neteorological organization[R]. 2012. http://www.wmo.int
[3] Conrad R. Soil microorganisms as controllers of atmospheric trace gases (H₂,CO,CH₄,OCS,N₂O and NO) [J].Microbiological Reviews,1996,60(4):609-640
[4] Conant R T, Paustian K. Potential soil carbon sequestration in overgrazed grassland ecosystems [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2002,16(4):1143-1151
[5] Kang L, Han X G, Zhang Z B, et al. Grassland ecosystems in China: Review of current knowledge and research advancement [J].Philosophical Transactions Series B:Biology Science,2007,362(1482):997-1008
[6] 中国科学院中国植被图编辑委员会. 中国植被图集1:1000000[M].北京:科学出版社,2001
[7] 中国科学院青藏高原综合科学考察队.西藏植被[M].北京:科学出版社,1988:182-199
[8] 孙鸿烈.青藏高原形成与演化[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,1996:1-383
[9] 吕宪国.中国湿地与湿地研究[M].石家庄:河北科学技术出版社,2008:660-669
[10] 金会军,吴杰,程国栋,等.青藏高原湿地CH₄排放评估[J].科学通报,1999,44(16):1758-1762
[11] Chen H, Yao S P, Wu N, et al. Determinants influencing seasonal variations of methane emissions from alpine wetlands in Zoige Plateau and their implications [J].Journal of Geophysical Research,2008,113(D12):D12303
[12] Hirota M, Tang Y H, Hu Q W, et al. Methane emissions from different vegetation zones in a Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau wetland [J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2004,36(5):737-748
[13] 游庆龙,康世昌,李潮流,等.青藏高原纳木错气象要素变化特征[J].气象,2007,33(3):54-60
[14] 王迎红.陆地生态系统温室气体排放观测方法研究、应用及结果对比分析[D].北京:中国科学院研究生院,2005:91-95
[15] 赵景学.当雄县天然草地改良及牧户饲草平衡供给模式研究[D].兰州:兰州大学,2011:11-14
[16] 赵亮,李英年,赵新全,等.青藏高原3种植被类型经生态系统CO₂交换量的比较[J].科学通报,2005,50(9):926-932
[17] 魏达.西藏纳木错高寒草地生态系统呼吸、CH₄和N₂O通量及其对氮沉降和围栏禁牧的响应[D].北京:中国科学院大学,2012:39-41
[18] Sikora L J, McCoy J L. Attempts to determine available carbon in soils [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soil,1990,9(1):19-24
[19] 柳敏,宇万太,姜子绍,等.土壤活性有机碳[J].生态学杂志,2006,25(11):1412-1417
[20] Kelting D L, Burger J A, Edwards G S. Estimating root respiration, microbial respiration in the rhizosphree, and root free soil respiration in forest soil [J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1998,30(7):961-968
[21] Cao G, Tang Y, Mo W, et al. Grazing intensity alters soil respiration in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan plateau [J].Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2004,36(2):237-243
[22] 张法伟,刘安花,李英年,等.青藏高原高寒湿地生态系统CO₂通量[J].生态学报,2008,28(2):453-462
[23] 王德宣,宋长春,王毅勇,等. 若尔盖高原沼泽湿地与草地二氧化碳通量的比较[J]. 应用生态学报,2008,19(2):285-289
[24] 董云社,章申,齐玉春,等. 内蒙古典型草地CO₂,N₂O,CH₄通量的同时观测及其日变化[J].科学通报,2000,45(3):318-322
[25] 范学霞,褚海燕,林先贵.土壤微生物量和呼吸强度大气CO₂浓度升高的响应[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2005,11(4):564-567
[26] Castro M, Steudler P, Melillo J, et al. Factors controlling atmospheric methane consumption by temperate forest soils [J].Global Biogeochemical Cycles,1995,9(1):1-10
[27] 杨继松,刘景双,王金达,等.三江平原生长季沼泽湿地CH₄、N₂O排放及其影响因素[J].植物生态学报,2006,30(3):432-440
[28] Saarnio S, Alm J, Silvola J, et al. Seasonal variation in CH₄ emissions and production and oxidation potentials at microsite on an oligotrophic pine fen [J]. Oecologia,1997,110(3):414-422
[29] Curry C L. Modeling the soil consumption of atmospheric methane at the global scale [J]. Global Biogeochemical Cycles,2007,21(4):GB4012
[30] Wang S P, Yang X X, Lin X W, et al. Methane emission by plant communities in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau: A new experimental study of alpine meadows and oat pasture [J].Biology Letters,2009,5(4):535-538
[31] 孔郑. 黄河源区“黑土型”退化高寒草地CO₂、CH₄排放特征研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2007:33-35
[32] 王艳芬,马秀枝,季宝明,等.内蒙古草甸草原CH₄和N₂O排放通量的时间变异[J].植物生态学报,2003,27(6):792-796
[33] Wang Y, Xue M, Zheng X, et al. Effects of environmental factors on N₂O emission from and CH₄ uptake by the typical grassland in the Inner Mongolia [J]. Chemosphere,2005,58(2):205-215
[34] Jiang C, Yu G, Fang H, et al. Short-term effect of increasing nitrogen deposition on CO₂, CH₄and N₂O fluxes in an alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau [J]. Atmospheric Environment,2010,44(24): 2920-2926
[35] 王德宣,吕宪国,丁维新,等.若尔盖高原沼泽湿地CH₄排放研究[J].地球科学进展,2002,17(6):877-880
[36] 王智平,曾江海,张玉铭.农田土壤N₂O排放的影响因素[J].农业环境保护,1994,13(1):40-42
[37] 宋长春,王毅勇,王跃思,等.季节性冻融期沼泽湿地CO₂, CH₄和N₂O排放动态[J].环境科学,2005,26(4):7-12
[38] 王德宣,宋长春,王跃思,等.若尔盖高原沼泽湿地N₂O排放通量研究[J].生态科学,2005,24(3):193-196
[39] William H S. An estimate of the global sink for nitrous oxide in soils [J]. Global Change Biology,2013,19(10):2929-2931
[40] Wei D, Xu-Ri, Wang Y, et al. Responses of CO₂, CH₄ and N₂O fluxes to livestock exclosure in an alpine steppe on the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Plant and Soil,2012,359(1/2):45-55
[41] Lydie C, Nicole W, Aurelie M, et al. Soils, a sink for N₂O? A review [J].Global Change Biology,2007,13(1):1-17
[42] 陈全胜,李凌浩,韩兴国,等. 水分对土壤呼吸的影响及机理[J].生态学报,2003,23(5):972-978
[43] De Jong E, Schappert H J, Macdonald K B. Carbon dioxide evolution from virgin and cultivated soil as affected by management practices and climate [J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science,1974,54(3):299-307
[44] Joabsson A, Christensen T R. Methane emissions from wetlands and their relationship with vascular plants: An Arctic example [J]. Global Change Biology,2001,7(8):919-932
[45] Striegl R G, Mcconnaughey T A, Thorstenson D C, et al. Consumption of atmospheric methane by desert soil [J]. Nature,1992,356(6374):145-147
[46] 陈全胜,李凌浩,韩兴国,等.典型温带草原群落土壤呼吸温度敏感性与土壤水分的关系[J]. 生态学报,2004,24(4):831-836
[47] Sheppard S K, Lloyd D. Diurnal oscillations in gas production (O₂, CO₂, CH₄, and N₂) in soil monoliths[J]. Biological Rhythm Research,2002,33(5):577-591
[48] Yue J, Shi Y, Ligang W, et al. Methane and nitrous oxide emissions from rice field and related microorganism in black soil, northeastern China [J]. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystem,2005,73(2/3):293-301
[49] 徐华,邢光熹,蔡祖聪,等. 土壤水分状况和指导对稻田N₂O排放的影响[J].土壤学报,2000,37(4):499-505
[50] 郑循华,王明星,王跃思,等. 华东稻麦轮作生态系统的N₂O的排放研究[J].应用生态学报,1997,8(5):495-499
[51] 颜晓元,施书莲,杜丽娟,等. 水分状况对水田土壤N₂O排放的影响[J].土壤学报,2000,37(4):482-487
[52] Ma W K, Bedard-Haughn A, Siciliano S D, et al. Relationship between nitrifier and denitrifier community composition and abundance in predicting nitrous oxide emissions from ephemeral wetland soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2008,40(5):1114-1123
[53] Ciarlo E, Conti M, Bartoloni N, et al. The effect of moisture on nitrous oxide emissions from soil and the N₂O/(N₂O+N₂) ratio under laboratory conditions [J].Biology and Fertility of Soils,2007,43(6):675-681

西藏纳木错高寒草原、高寒草甸和沼泽化草甸主要温室气体通量对比研究

Research on Key Greenhouse Gas Fluxes across Alpine Steppe, Alpine Meadow and Swamp Meadow in Nam Co, Tibetan Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[4]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[5]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[6]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[7]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[8]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 周华坤, 张海娟, 颜珲璘, 王军邦. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[9]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[10]	王晓芬, 吴玉鑫, 肖海龙, 张格非, 陈建纲, 张德罡. 三江源退化高寒草原植物种间亲和性和土壤团聚体特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2001-2009.
[11]	向雪梅, 德科加, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体. 三江源区高寒草甸草场植被和土壤对外源氮素输入的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[12]	郭文章, 井长青, 王公鑫, 侯志雄, 赵苇康. 天山北坡荒漠草原土壤呼吸和生态系统呼吸对降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
[13]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[14]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[15]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.