基于蛋白质组学的紫茎泽兰种子衰老的研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.025

草地学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (5): 1075-1079.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.025

基于蛋白质组学的紫茎泽兰种子衰老的研究

王霞霞^1,2, 曹坳程¹, 李³, 吴篆芳¹

1. 中国农业科学院植物保护研究所, 北京 100193;
2. 安徽农业科学院, 安徽合肥 230031;
3. 贵州省中国科学院天然产物化学重点实验室, 贵州贵阳 550002

收稿日期:2013-11-21 修回日期:2014-01-24 出版日期:2014-10-15 发布日期:2014-09-30
通讯作者: 曹坳程
作者简介:王霞霞（1977-），女，甘肃庆阳人，助理研究员，博士，研究方向为植物生态生理的研究，E-mail：wangxiaxia1029@sina.com;
基金资助:
公益性行业（农业）科研专项“入侵植物综合防控技术研究与示范推广”（201103027）资助

Analysis of Eupatorium adenophorum Seed Aging by Comparative Proteome Approach

WANG Xia-xia^1,2, CAO Ao-cheng¹, LI Yan³, WU Zhuan-fang¹

1. Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural sciences, Beijing 100193, China;
2. Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei, Anhui Province 230031, China;
3. The key Laboratory of Chemistry for Natural Products of Guizhou Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou Province 550002, China

Received:2013-11-21 Revised:2014-01-24 Online:2014-10-15 Published:2014-09-30

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为探析紫茎泽兰（Eupatorium adenophorum）种子衰老的分子机制，采用二维凝胶电泳结合质谱法分析了种龄为0.58年和2.58年的紫茎泽兰种子蛋白质表达变化。结果表明：随着种子储存时间延长，紫茎泽兰种子蛋白质组分和含量发生了改变。凝胶电泳中检测到14个蛋白质点变化显著，经质谱分析和数据库搜索，4个蛋白点被鉴定为Os11g0234200、COP1互作蛋白和2个未知蛋白。

关键词: 紫茎泽兰, 蛋白质组, 种子, 衰老

Abstract:

To explore the molecular mechanism of Eupatorium adenophorum seed aging, the changes of protein expression were detected using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with mass spectrometry in the E. adenophorum seeds of 0.58 and 2.58 years old, respectively. Results showed that the protein composition and content of seed were changed along with seed storage time. Fourteen changed protein spots on the gels were detected by the analyses of electrophoresis and further mass spectrometry. Four proteins were identified as Os11g0234200, COP1-interacting protein, and two unknown proteins by searching protein database. The vigor of E. adenophorum seed is likely to associate with these changed proteins.

Key words: Eupatorium adenophorum, Proteome, Seed, Aging

中图分类号:

王霞霞, 曹坳程, 李, 吴篆芳. 基于蛋白质组学的紫茎泽兰种子衰老的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(5): 1075-1079.

WANG Xia-xia, CAO Ao-cheng, LI Yan, WU Zhuan-fang. Analysis of Eupatorium adenophorum Seed Aging by Comparative Proteome Approach[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(5): 1075-1079.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.05.025

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2014/V22/I5/1075

参考文献

[1] Ross M A, Harper J L. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment [J]. Journal of Ecology,1972,60(1):77-88
[2] Fowler N. The role of competition in plant communities in arid and semi-arid regions [J]. Annual Review of Ecological Systematics,1986,17:89-110
[3] 沈有信,刘文耀. 长久性紫茎泽兰土壤种子库[J]. 植物生态学,2004,28(6):768-772
[4] 王瑾芳,高贤明,党伟光. 不同生境条件下紫茎泽兰实生幼苗的生存特性比较[J]. 生物多样性,2008,16(4):346-352
[5] Bewley J D. Seed germination and dormancy [J]. Plant Cell,1997,9(7):1055-1066
[6] Sheoran I S, Olson D J, Ross A R, et al. Proteome analysis of embryo and endosperm from germinating tomato seeds [J]. Proteomics,2005,5(14):3752-3764
[7] Hurkman W J, Tanaka C K. Extraction of wheat endosperm proteins for proteome analysis [J]. Journal of Chromatography B-Analytical Technologies in the Biomedical and Life Sciences,2007,849(1/2):344-350
[8] 席湘媛,叶宝兴. 大麦胚和胚乳发育的相关性及贮藏营养物质的积累[J]. 植物学报,1997,39(10):905-913
[9] 王霞霞,柴守玺,常磊,等. 燕麦种子蛋白质组的GeLC-MS/MS分析[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(1):108-115
[10] 杨玉珍,李生平,吴青霞,等. 银杏种子萌发过程中蛋白质及3种氮代谢酶活性的变化[J]. 南京林业大学学报:自然科学版,2006,30(4):119-122
[11] 王霞霞,曹坳程,柴守玺,等. 基于双向电泳结合质谱分析燕麦种子萌发过程蛋白的变化[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(4):729-734
[12] 周丽慧,刘巧泉,张昌泉,等. 水稻种子蛋白质含量及组分在品种间的变异与分布[J]. 作物学报,2009,35(5):884-891
[13] Xie Z, Wang J, Cao M, et al. Pedigree analysis of an elite rice hybrid using proteomic approach [J]. Proteomics,2006,6(2):474-486
[14] 李春梅,杨守萍,盖钧镒,等. 野生大豆与栽培大豆种子差异蛋白质组学研究[J]. 生物化学与生物物理进展,2007,34(12):1296-1302
[15] 王鸣刚,陈睦传,沈明山,等. 小麦耐盐突变体筛选及生理生化特性分析[J]. 厦门大学学报:自然科学版,2000,39(1):111-114
[16] Zheng M, Wang Y, Liu K, et al. Protein expression changes during cotton fiber elongation in response to low temperature stress [J]. Plant Physiology,2012,169(4):399-409
[17] 宋文武,丁红,陈殿绪,等. 土壤水分胁迫对不同花生种子蛋白质组成类型的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2011,13(6):118-125
[18] 周瑞莲,王仲礼,侯月利,等. 温度对大豆(Glycine max)种子发育过程中蛋白质、脂肪和淀粉积累过程的影响[J]. 生态学报,2008,28(10):4635-4644
[19] 黄锦文,林争春,陈冬梅,等. 沟叶结缕草应答高温和低温胁迫的蛋白质表达差异分析[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(5):636-650
[20] Rajjou L, Lovigny Y, Groot S P C, et al. Proteome-wide characterization of seed ageing in arabidopsis: a comparison between artificial and natural aging protocols [J]. Plant Physiology,2008,148(1):620-641
[21] Terskikh V V, Zeng Y, Feurtad J A, et al. Deterioration of western redcedar (Thuja plicata Donn ex D. Don) seeds: Protein oxidation and in vivoNMR monitoring of storage oils [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany,2008,59(40):765-777
[22] 李卓杰,夏伟,傅家瑞. 不同活力花生种子蛋白质的研究[J]. 中山大学学报,1994,33(3):81-85
[23] 王继红,陈绍宁,白冰,等. 人工老化对玉米种子蛋白质组的影响[J]. 河南农业大学学报,2009,43(3):232-235
[24] Deng X W, Caspar T, Quail P H. COP1: A regulatory locus involved in light_controlled development and gene expression in Arabidopsis [J]. Genes & Development,1991,5(7):1172-1178
[25] Tsuge T, Inagaki N, Yoshizumi T, et al. Phytochromemediated control of COP1 gene expression in rice plants [J]. Molecular Genetics and Genomics,2001,265(1):43-50
[26] 孙梅,周波,王宇,等. "津田"芜菁光形态建成抑制因子COP1蛋白cDNA的克隆及表达分析[J]. 园艺学报,2013,40(1):79-88
[27] Von Arnim A G, Osterlund M T, Kwok S F, et al. Genetic and developmental control of nuclear accumulation of COP1,a repressor of photomorphogesis in Arabidopsis [J]. Plant Physiology,1997,114(3):779-788
[28] Stacey M G, Hicks S N, Von Arnim A G. Discrete domains mediate the lightresponsive nuclear and cytoplasmic localization of Arabidopsis COP1 [J]. Plant Cell,1999,11(3):349-363
[29] Kim B C, Tennessen D J, Last R. UV-B-induced photomorphogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Plant Journal,1998,15(5):667-674
[30] Osterlund M T, Deng X W. Multiple photoreceptors mediate the lightinduced reduction of GUSCOP1 from Arabidopsis hypocotyl nuclei [J]. Plant Journal,1998,16(2):201-208
[31] McNellis T W, Von Arnim A G, Deng X W. Overexpression of Arabidopsis thaliana COP1 results in partial suppression mediated development: Evidence for a light-inactivable repressor of photomorphogenesis [J]. Plant Cell,1994,6(10):1391-1400
[32] Itoh T, Tanaka T, Barrero R A, et al. Curated genome annotation of Oryza sativa ssp. japonica and comparative genome analysis with Arabidopsis thaliana [J]. Genome Research,2007,17(2):175-183
[33] Tanaka T, Antonio B A, Kikuchi S, et al. The rice annotation project database (RAP-DB): 2008 update [J]. Nucleic Acids Research,2008,36:1028-1033

基于蛋白质组学的紫茎泽兰种子衰老的研究

Analysis of Eupatorium adenophorum Seed Aging by Comparative Proteome Approach

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	左郎, 王树森, 马迎梅, 温苏雅勒图, 白刚, 郁鑫明. 火炬树浸提液对两种草坪草种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1927-1933.
[3]	马银山, 常妍, 王含睿, 贾云凤, 李文英, 漆瑞强. 天仙子种子浸提液对黑麦草种子萌发和幼苗生长的化感作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1697-1703.
[4]	张金花, 何静, 张小彦, 张树衡, 张恒, 李彦湘. 除草剂胁迫下3种牧草浸提液对受体植物种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1719-1728.
[5]	李善魁, 孟焕文, 李宇晨, 张海青, 白雪, 张宇宽, 周洪友, 王千军, 张笑宇. 圆柏对几种农田杂草及作物的化感潜力分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1769-1778.
[6]	马鹏程, 谢全刚, 赵祥, 董其军, 张吉宇. 不同处理对牛枝子种子萌发和宿存萼片的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1828-1834.
[7]	刘博文, 黎桂阳, 常媛飞, 金美燕, 刘芳, 高秋, 刘万良, 哈斯塔米尔, 王显国. 野豌豆属种子形态多样性与种子分类鉴定方法的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1375-1385.
[8]	李兰平, 张慧敏, 李宏林, 梁德飞, 武学霞, 李希来. 不同功能群及先锋种在高寒人工草地建植初期的作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1513-1521.
[9]	黄荣, 姚博, 张玉娟, 贾倩英, 李向阳, 张宏, 张振粉. 成团泛菌CQ10脂多糖对紫花苜蓿种子萌发及苗期生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 965-971.
[10]	牛瑞芳, 吴铁航, 柴宝峰. 黄土高原亚高山草地退化对土壤种子库的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 972-981.
[11]	陈立强, 白小明. 成熟过程中细齿草木樨种子结构及产量和质量的变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 465-471.
[12]	夏方山, 王聪聪, 李红玉, 刘曼, 郑川, 张耀丹, 范华芳. 硒引发对紫花苜蓿种子抗氧化性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 472-477.
[13]	梁佳, 马依努·吾斯曼, 方志刚. 外源生长物质对干旱胁迫条件下甜高粱种子萌发的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[14]	刘备, 宋玉梅, 孙铭, 毛培胜. 燕麦劣变种子吸胀过程中线粒体AsA-GSH循环的生理响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[15]	贾志锋, 马祥, 琚泽亮, 刘凯强, 赵桂琴. 施氮量和播种量对燕麦光合特性、激素含量及种子产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 293-302.