不同粗饲料日粮对泌乳牛产奶性能及经济效益的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.036

草地学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (6): 1375-1380.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.036

不同粗饲料日粮对泌乳牛产奶性能及经济效益的影响

李冰¹, 崔国文¹, 胡国富¹, 冀国旭¹, 王彦庆¹, 牛壮¹, 刘守江², 齐永生², 李芳¹, 李佶恺¹

1. 东北农业大学动物科技学院, 黑龙江哈尔滨 150030;
2. 大庆市银浪牧场, 黑龙江大庆 163000

收稿日期:2014-01-03 修回日期:2014-05-31 出版日期:2014-12-15 发布日期:2014-12-01
通讯作者: 崔国文
作者简介:李冰(1987-),男,吉林榆树人,硕士研究生,研究方向为牧草生产与加工,E-mail: libing253661949@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技支撑计划“东北粮食主产区优质紫花苜蓿高效生产利用技术研究与示范”(2011BAD17B04-2)资助

Effects of Different Roughage Diets on the Growth Performance and Economic Benefits of Dairy Cows

LI Bing¹, CUI Guo-wen¹, HU Guo-fu¹, JI Guo-xu¹, WANG Yan-qing¹, NIU Zhuang¹, LIU Shou-jiang², QI Yong-sheng², LI Fang¹, LI Ji-kai¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology, Northeast Agriculture University, Harbin, Heilongjiang Province 150030, China;
2. Silver Waves Ranch of Daqing City, Daqing, Heilongjiang Province 163000, China

Received:2014-01-03 Revised:2014-05-31 Online:2014-12-15 Published:2014-12-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为研究不同粗饲料日粮对奶牛产奶量、乳成分和经济效益的影响,选取体重、年龄、胎次、泌乳日龄相近的荷斯坦奶牛25头,分别饲喂玉米(Zea mays)秸秆(100%)、玉米秸秆(70%)+苜蓿(Medicago sativa)干草(30%)、羊草(Leymus chinensis) (70%)+苜蓿干草(30%)、全株玉米青贮(70%)+苜蓿干草(30%)和全株玉米青贮(50%)+羊草(30%)+苜蓿干草(20%),精粗比50:50.结果表明:与粗饲料单纯饲喂玉米秸秆相比,全株玉米青贮+苜蓿干草组可提高产奶量26.52%,提高乳脂率6.03%,增收3.87 元·头^-1·d^-1;其次为全株玉米青贮+羊草+苜蓿干草组,可提高产奶量21.20%,提高乳脂率4.6%,增收2.83 元·头^-1·d^-1;再次为玉米秸秆+苜蓿干草组可提高产奶量10.05%,提高乳脂率2.59%,增收2.46 元·头^-1·d^-1;羊草+苜蓿干草组可提高产奶量11.85%,提高乳脂率2.01%,增收不明显.表明全株玉米青贮+苜蓿干草组饲喂效果最好.

关键词: 粗饲料, 奶牛, 生产性能, 经济效益

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different roughage diets on the growth performance and economic benefits of dairy cows, 25 Holstein cows, which were similar in body weight, age, parity and lactation age, were divided into five groups randomly fed maize stalk (100%), maize stalk (70%)+alfalfa hay (30%), Leymus chinensis (70%) + alfalfa hay (30%), whole-plant corn silage (70%) + alfalfa hay (30%) and whole-plant corn silage(50%) + Leymus chinensis (30%) + alfalfa hay (20%), respectively. The ratio of concentrate to roughage was 50:50. The results showed that milk yield increased by 26.52%, milk fat increased by 6.03% and economic benefits increased by 3.87 yuan·head ^-1·d^-1 in whole-plant corn silage+alfalfa hay group compared to maize stalk group. Milk yield increased by 21.20%, milk fat increased by 4.6% and economic benefits increased 2.83 yuan·head ^-1·d^-1 in whole-plant corn silage+Leymus chinensis+alfalfa hay group. Milk yield increased by 10.05%, milk fat increased by 2.59% and economic benefits increased 2.46 yuan·head ^-1·d^-1 in maize stalk+alfalfa hay group. Milk yield increased by 1.85%, milk fat increased by 2.01%, but the economic benefits did not obvious increase in Leymus chinensis+alfalfa hay group. In a word, the feeding effects of whole-plant corn silage+alfalfa hay group were the best.

Key words: Roughage, Dairy cow, Growth performance, Economic benefits

中图分类号:

S816.5

李冰, 崔国文, 胡国富, 冀国旭, 王彦庆, 牛壮, 刘守江, 齐永生, 李芳, 李佶恺. 不同粗饲料日粮对泌乳牛产奶性能及经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(6): 1375-1380.

LI Bing, CUI Guo-wen, HU Guo-fu, JI Guo-xu, WANG Yan-qing, NIU Zhuang, LIU Shou-jiang, QI Yong-sheng, LI Fang, LI Ji-kai. Effects of Different Roughage Diets on the Growth Performance and Economic Benefits of Dairy Cows[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2014, 22(6): 1375-1380.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.06.036

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2014/V22/I6/1375

参考文献

[1] 李胜利. 2012年中国奶业回顾与展望[J]. 中国畜牧杂志,2013,49(2):31-36
[2] 张子仪. 我国跨世纪畜牧业对饲料资源的需求分析与对策[J]. 国外畜牧科技,1999(1):2-4
[3] 李志强,韩建国,李胜利,等. 苜蓿干草在高产奶牛日粮中适宜添加量的研究[J]. 中国农业科学,2003,36(8):950-954
[4] 马玉霞,高腾云. 苜蓿的加工调制及其在奶牛日粮中的应用[J]. 中国乳业,2004(6):30-31
[5] Haddad S G. Associative effects of supplementing barley straw diets with alfalfa hay on rumen environment and nutrient intake and digestibility for ewes [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology,2000,87(3/4):163-171
[6] Preston T R. Associated effect and interaction among feed ingredients [C]//Sansoucy R, Preston T R, Leng R A, eds. Proceedings of the FAO Expert Consultation on the Substitution of Imported Concentrate Feeds in Animal Production Systems in Developing Countries. Bangkok:FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific,1987:142-146
[7] Abdulrazak S, Muinga R, Thorpe W, et al. Supplementation with Gliricidia sepium and Leucaena leucocephala on voluntary food intake, digestibility, rumen fermentation and live weight of crossbred steers offered Zea mays stover [J]. Livestock Production Science,1997,49(1):53-62
[8] 王庆红,娜仁花,吴彦颋,等. 日粮及粗料类型对奶牛产奶性能的影响[J]. 中国奶牛,2013(3):24-27
[9] 张吉鹍,刘建新. 玉米秸秆与苜蓿之间组合效应的综合评定研究[J]. 饲料博览,2007(5):5-10
[10] Bernal E, Ruiz T, Staples C R. Incorporation of alfalfa hay into five different roughage-based diets for lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(1):210
[11] Holden L A, Glenn B P, Erdman R A, et al. Effect of alfalfa and orchardgrass on digestion by dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1994,77(9):2580-2594
[12] West J W, Hill G M, Gates R N, et al. Effects of dietary forage source and amount of forage addition on intake, milk yield and digestion for lactating dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1997,80(8):1656-1665
[13] 刘稼芳,李杰. 秸秆资源作为饲料的开发利用[J]. 饲料博览,1998,10(2):20-21
[14] 李胜利. 优质粗饲料:苜蓿干草和鲁梅克斯对奶牛产奶性能的影响[J]. 中国乳业,2002(1):23-25
[15] 马美蓉. 苜蓿在奶牛生产中的应用价值[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2005(2):15-16
[16] 王晓光,贾玉山. 苜蓿与玉米秸秆不同比例混合草颗粒营养价值评价[J]. 中国草地学报,2011,35(1):90-96
[17] Bergman E N. Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species [J]. Physiological Reviews,1990,70(2):567-572
[18] 姜军,赵德兵,雒自全,等. 使用全株玉米青贮养牛的效果[J]. 中国草食动物,2011,31(5):81-82
[19] 汪水平,王文娟,王加启,等. 日粮精粗比对奶牛瘤胃发酵及泌乳性能的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报:自然科学版,2007,35(6):44-50
[20] Perry W C, Louis E A. Replacement of alfalfa neutral detergent fiber with a combination of nonforage fiber sources [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1997,80(4):675-680
[21] Beauchemin K A, Rode L M. Minimum versus optimum concentrations of fiber in dairy cow diets based on barley silage and concentrates of barley or corn [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1997,80(8):1629-1639
[22] Mertens D R. Creating a system for meeting the fiber requirements of dairy cows [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1997,80(7):1463-1481
[23] 李志强,李新胜. 苜蓿干草的碳水化合物营养特性[J]. 中国奶牛,2005(1):34-36
[24] 李志强. 苜蓿干草日粮的高产奶牛瘤胃消化规律及饲养效果的研究[D]. 北京:中国农业大学,2003:49
[25] 刘峰. 不同品质粗饲料(GI)与精料给量对奶牛生产性能及营养物质消化代谢影响的研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2012:56
[26] Sutton J D. Altering milk composition by feeding [J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1989,72(10):2801-2814

不同粗饲料日粮对泌乳牛产奶性能及经济效益的影响

Effects of Different Roughage Diets on the Growth Performance and Economic Benefits of Dairy Cows

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	王静, 刘晓静, 程甜甜, 童长春, 汪雪. 不同氮效率紫花苜蓿叶特征及其产量效应研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1941-1949.
[2]	吴海艳, 曲珍, 刘昭明, 拉巴顿珠, 同桑措姆, 曲尼, 尼玛卓嘎, 马玉寿. 基于主成分分析的燕麦品种生产性能的比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[3]	宋建超, 鱼小军, 魏孔涛, 汪鹏斌, 童永尚, 李珍, 贺有龙, 汪海波. 施氮对高寒区垂穗披碱草饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.
[4]	童永尚, 鱼小军, 徐长林, 汪鹏斌, 宋建超, 李珍, 李颖. 天祝高寒区播期对7个燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[5]	张荟荟, 张学洲, 阿斯娅, 曼力克, 梁维维, 朱昊, 王璐, 李学森, 靳俊鹏. 北疆平原荒漠区粮草轮作模式经济效益分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1107-1112.
[6]	李满有, 马忠仁, 王斌, 杨雨琦, 沈笑天, 曹立娟, 李小云, 兰剑. 宁夏引黄灌区2个苜蓿品种不同行比混播模式研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 798-804.
[7]	李思达, 刘文辉, 张永超, 秦燕, 李文. 青海扁茎早熟禾混播草地生产性能与种间关系的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2827-2837.
[8]	游永亮, 李源, 赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 李建明, 刘贵波, 杨志敏. 播期和种植密度对青贮玉米生产性能和饲用品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2615-2624.
[9]	侯湃, 陈彩锦, 张静妮, 范龙, 丁旺. 宁夏固原地区不同青贮玉米品种生产性能及营养品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2346-2354.
[10]	谢楠, 刘振宇, 冯伟, 智健飞, 李梦, 杜姿璇, 刘忠宽. 饲用谷子在环渤海盐碱旱地的生产性能及饲用品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 60-71.
[11]	南铭, 景芳, 边芳, 任生兰, 刘彦明. 6个裸燕麦品种在甘肃中部引洮灌区的生产性能及饲用价值比较[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1635-1642.
[12]	陈立强, 白小明, 蔺胜权. 阿拉尔野生一年生草木樨资源的生产性能和营养品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1643-1649.
[13]	王运涛, 杨志敏, 刘建成, 李峰, 于林清, 远婷, 梁潇, 周文秀. 冀西北地区21个燕麦品种生产性能与营养品质综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1311-1318.
[14]	李源, 游永亮, 赵海明, 武瑞鑫, 宋凤阁, 刘贵波. 调整株行距及覆膜对春播高丹草生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1379-1385.
[15]	刘建宁, 石永红, 吴欣明, 方志红, 贾会丽, 王运琦, 张燕, 郭璞, 池惠武, 李莲芬. 晋中盆地15个青贮玉米品种生产性能及营养价值评价[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1043-1049.