贝加尔针茅草原土壤酶活性及微生物量碳氮对养分添加的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.007

草地学报 ›› 2016, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (1): 47-53.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2016.01.007

贝加尔针茅草原土壤酶活性及微生物量碳氮对养分添加的响应

赵晓琛^1,2,3, 皇甫超河^2,3, 刘红梅^2,3, 修伟明^2,3, 赵建宁^2,3, 杨殿林^1,2,3

1. 沈阳农业大学园艺学院, 沈阳辽宁 110866;
2. 农业部环境保护科研监测所, 天津 300191;
3. 农业部产地环境质量重点实验室, 天津 300191

收稿日期:2014-05-08 修回日期:2014-09-05 出版日期:2016-02-15 发布日期:2016-04-26
通讯作者: 杨殿林
作者简介:赵晓琛(1989-),男,河南灵宝人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态恢复建设与保护研究,E-mail:zhxc925@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(31170435);"十二五"国家科技计划项目(2012BAD13B07);农业科技成果转化资金项目(2013GB23260579)资助

Response of Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen to the Nutrient Addition of Stipa Baicalensis Steppe in Inner Mongolia

ZHAO Xiao-chen^1,2,3, HUANGFU Chao-he^2,3, LIU Hong-mei^2,3, XIU Wei-ming^2,3, ZHAO Jian-ning^2,3, YANG Dian-lin^1,2,3

1. College of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang, Liaoning Province 110866, China;
2. Environmental Protection and Monitoring Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Tianjin 300191, China;
3. Key Laboratory of Original Agro-environment Quality of Ministry of Agriculture, Tianjin 300191, China

Received:2014-05-08 Revised:2014-09-05 Online:2016-02-15 Published:2016-04-26

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

通过草地养分添加控制试验,研究了贝加尔针茅(Stipa Baicalensis)草原在CK,K,P,N,PK,NK,NP,NPK不同养分添加方式下土壤酶活性、土壤微生物量碳氮的变化以及他们与土壤养分间的相互关系。结果表明:土壤蔗糖酶在含磷养分添加条件(NP,NPK,P,PK)下活性显著高于CK,脲酶活性在氮磷组合添加条件下(NP,NPK)下有显著提高,碱性磷酸酶活性在NP,NPK和NK处理下有显著的提高,过氧化氢酶在不同养分添加条件下活性与CK无显著差异;NP,NPK,N和PK处理下微生物量碳显著高于其他处理,NP处理下微生物量氮显著高于CK;过氧化氢酶、蔗糖酶活性与速效磷含量呈显著正相关,微生物量碳与脲酶和碱性磷酸酶活性呈显著正相关,与蔗糖酶活性呈极显著正相关,微生物量氮与速效磷、过氧化氢酶、蔗糖酶和脲酶活性呈显著正相关。综合分析表明,氮磷养分组合添加可以提高贝加尔针茅草原土壤酶活性和微生物量碳氮含量,有利于土壤肥力状况改良。

关键词: 贝加尔针茅草原, 养分添加, 土壤酶活性, 土壤微生物量碳, 土壤微生物量氮

Abstract:

Effects of different nutrient addition methods on the carbon and nitrogen of soil microbial biomass, and enzyme activity in Stipa baicalensis steppe were studied in the field experiment. Nutrient addition methods included seven types of N, P, K-fertilizer treatments (CK, K, P, N, PK, NK, NP, NPK) at the site. The results showed that the invertase activities of NP, NPK, P, PK treatments were significantly higher than that of CK, urease activities in both nitrogen and phosphorus addition treatments (NP, NPK) as well as the alkaline phosphatase activities of NP, NPK and NK treatments improved significantly, the catalase activities of all treatments had no significant difference. The microbial biomass carbon contents of NP, NPK, N, PK treatments were significantly higher than others and the microbial biomass nitrogen contents of NP treatments were significantly higher than that of CK. Soil available phosphorus was positively correlated with catalase and invertase activity, the microbial biomass carbon was positively correlated with urease activity and alkaline phosphatase activity, and extremely significant correlation with invertase activity. The microbial biomass nitrogen was positively correlated with soil available phosphorus, catalase, invertase and urease activity. These results implied that nitrogen and phosphorus addition together could be useful to increase the soil enzyme activity, microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen contents of Stipa Baicalensis Steppe, and to improve the soil fertility of Stipa Baicalensis Steppe.

Key words: Stipa baicalensis steppe, Nutrient addition, Soil enzyme activity, Soil microbial biomass carbon, Soil microbial biomass nitrogen

中图分类号:

S812

赵晓琛, 皇甫超河, 刘红梅, 修伟明, 赵建宁, 杨殿林. 贝加尔针茅草原土壤酶活性及微生物量碳氮对养分添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1): 47-53.

ZHAO Xiao-chen, HUANGFU Chao-he, LIU Hong-mei, XIU Wei-ming, ZHAO Jian-ning, YANG Dian-lin. Response of Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen to the Nutrient Addition of Stipa Baicalensis Steppe in Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1): 47-53.

参考文献

[1] 杨殿林. 呼伦贝尔草原生物多样性与生态草业[M]. 北京:中国环境科学出版社,2012:1
[2] 杨殿林,韩国栋,胡跃高,等. 放牧对贝加尔针茅草原群落植物多样性和生产力的影响[J]. 生态学杂志,2006,25(12):1470-1475
[3] 文都日乐,张静妮,李刚,等. 放牧干扰对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报,2010,18(4):517-522
[4] 王继红,刘景双,于君宝,等. 氮磷肥对黑土玉米农田生态系统土壤微生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2004,18(1):35-38
[5] 何振立. 土壤微生物量及其在养分循环和环境质量评价中的意义[J]. 土壤,1997(2):61-69
[6] 周丽霞,丁明懋. 土壤微生物学特性对土壤健康的指示作用[J]. 生物多样性,2007,15(2):162-171
[7] 关松荫,孟昭鸥. 不同垦殖年限黑土农化性状与酶活性的变化[J]. 土壤通报,1986(4):157-159
[8] 曹慧,孙辉,杨浩,等. 土壤酶活性及其对土壤质量的指示研究进展[J]. 应用与环境生物学报,2003,9(1):105-109
[9] 浙江农业大学. 作物营养与施肥[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1987:3
[10] 王俊廷. 草原也要施肥[J]. 四川草原,1982(1):25-26
[11] 李楠,宋建国,刘伟,等. 草原施肥对牧草产量和质量的作用及其经济效益分析[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2001(2):16-18
[12] 郭萍,文庭池,董玲玲,等. 施肥对土壤养分含量、微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 农业现代化研究,2011,32(3):362-366
[13] 王俊华,尹睿,张华勇,等. 长期定位施肥对农田土壤酶活性及其相关因素的影响[J]. 生态环境,2007,16(1):191-196
[14] Anna P, Edward W. Effects of catch crops cultivated for green manure and mineral nitrogen fertilization on soil enzyme activity and chemical properties[J]. Geoderma,2012:189-190,72-80
[15] Dick R P, Rasmussen P E, Kerle E A. Influence of long-term residue management on soil enzyme activity in relation to soil chemical properties of a wheat-fallow system[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils,1988,6(2):159-164
[16] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30-83
[17] Brookes P C, Landman A, Pruden G, et al. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen:A rapid direct extrac tion method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1985,17(6):837-842
[18] 管松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1987:296-339
[19] 王娟. 施肥对土壤酶活性、土壤养分及春小麦产量的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2007:3-19
[20] 李慧杰,徐福利,林云,等. 施用氮磷钾对黄土丘陵区山地红枣林土壤酶与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(4):53-59
[21] 孙瑞莲,赵秉强,朱鲁生,等. 长期定位施肥对土壤酶活性的影响及其调控土壤肥力的作用[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报,2003,9(4):406-410
[22] 高瑞,吕家珑. 长期定位施肥土壤酶活性及其肥力变化研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2005,13(1):143-145
[23] Song Y Y, Song C C, Li Y C. Short-term effects of nitrogen addition and vegetation removalon soil chemical and biological properties in a freshwater marsh in Sanjiang Plain,Northeast China[J]. Catena,2013,104:265-271
[24] Polacco J C. Is nickel a universal component of plant ureases?[J]. Plant Science Letters,1977,10(3):249-255
[25] 张华勇,尹睿,黄锦法,等. 稻麦轮作田改为菜地后生化指标的变化[J]. 土壤,2005,37(2):182-186
[26] 张成峨,梁银丽. 不同氮磷施肥量对玉米生育期土壤微生物量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2001,9(2):72-74
[27] 芦思佳,韩晓增,张迪,等. 长期施肥对大豆根际微生物量碳、氮的影响[J]. 大豆科学,2009,28(3):495-498
[28] 李花. 长期施肥和管理对塿土微生物量碳氮和酶活性动态变化的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011:39-41
[29] Geisseler D, Horwath W R, Joergensen R G, et al. Pathways of nitrogen utilization by soil microorganisms-A review[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2010,42(12):2058-2067
[30] Sarathchandra S U, Ghani A, Yeates G W, et al. Effect of nitrogen and phosphate fertilisers on microbial and nematode diversity in pasture soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2001,33(7):953-964
[31] 苗玉红,韩燕来,王宜伦,等. 钾对不同超高产小麦品种产量及氮、磷吸收效应的影响[J]. 土壤通报,2007,38(5):1022-1024
[32] Qin S P, Hu C S, Oene O M. Differentiating Intracellular from Extracellular Alkaline Phosphatase Activity in Soil by Sonication[J]. PloS one,2013,8(3):e58691

贝加尔针茅草原土壤酶活性及微生物量碳氮对养分添加的响应

Response of Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Biomass Carbon and Nitrogen to the Nutrient Addition of Stipa Baicalensis Steppe in Inner Mongolia

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[2]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[3]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[4]	米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.
[5]	杜忠毓, 安慧, 王波, 文志林, 张雅柔, 吴秀芝, 李巧玲. 养分添加和降水变化对荒漠草原植物群落物种多样性和生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(4): 1100-1110.
[6]	赵思腾, 师尚礼, 陈建纲, 陈鑫, 何佳. 陇中旱作区不同轮作方式对土壤碳、氮含量及酶活性的影响特征[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 817-824.
[7]	李争艳, 徐智明, 师尚礼, 贺春贵. 江淮地区不同品种光敏型高丹草对土壤微生态环境的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(2): 326-335.
[8]	刘红梅, 张海芳, 秦洁, 杨殿林. 氮沉降对贝加尔针茅草原土壤真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 63-70.
[9]	许亚东, 王涛, 李慧, 杨改河, 韩新辉, 冯永忠, 任广鑫. 黄土丘陵区人工柠条林土壤酶活性与养分变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(2): 363-370.
[10]	张爱林, 赵建宁, 洪杰, 杨殿林. 贝加尔针茅草原土壤线虫与微生物群落特征及其相互作用[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(1): 77-84.
[11]	张金玲, 于丽, 赵建宁, 李刚, 杨殿林. 贝加尔针茅草原土壤无机氮含量对氮素添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 958-965.
[12]	石立媛, 张永亮, 高凯, 吴明浩, 邓波, 王显国. 科尔沁沙地苜蓿草地土壤酶活性的时空变化特征[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 310-314.
[13]	刘建, 邱莉萍, 程积民, 张金娥. 黄土高原水蚀风蚀交错区5种典型草地群落土壤酶活性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(1): 32-37.
[14]	文东新, 杨宁, 杨满元. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同植被恢复模式对土壤微生物量及酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(6): 1241-1247.
[15]	陈龙, 姚拓, 柴晓虹, 王理德, 马剑平, 孙广正, 安雅君, 李发明. 石羊河中下游不同退耕年限次生草地土壤无机氮、酶及微生物量冬季动态研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 330-336.