生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.027

草地学报 ›› 2020, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (2): 509-520.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.027

生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响

孙华方¹, 李希来^1,2, 金立群¹, 李成一¹, 张静^1,2

1. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016;
2. 青海大学"青海-广东自然资源监测与评价联合重点实验室", 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2019-11-01 修回日期:2020-01-01 出版日期:2020-04-15 发布日期:2020-04-11
通讯作者: 李希来
作者简介:孙华方(1991-),女,山东东明人,博士研究生,主要从事草地生态与环境保护方面的研究,E-mail:1219493914@qq.com
基金资助:
青海省科技厅项目（2017-HZ-802，2018-ZJ-781）；国家重点研发计划项目（2016YFC0501903）；青海省“高端创新人才千人计划”；高等学校学科创新引智计划资助（D18013）项目和教育部长江学者和创新团队发展计划（IRT_17R62）共同资助

Effects of Biological Soil Crusts on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Vegetation of Artificial Grassland in the Yellow River Source Zone

SUN Hua-fang¹, LI Xi-lai^1,2, JIN Li-qun¹, LI Cheng-yi¹, ZHANG Jing^1,2

1. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China;
2. Qinghia-Guangdong Joint Key Laboratory of Natural Resources Monitoring and Evaluation, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2019-11-01 Revised:2020-01-01 Online:2020-04-15 Published:2020-04-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨高寒地区生物土壤结皮（Biological Soil Crusts，BSCs）在人工草地演替中的生态作用，揭示其对人工草地植被与土壤养分恢复的影响规律。本研究选择在青海省玛沁县5个建植年限（18，14，11，4，和1年）的人工草地，调查各年限草地中BSCs的分布情况，以及BSCs的特征与植被分布特征和土壤理化性质的关系。结果表明：不同建植年限人工草地中BSCs的类型、盖度、厚度各不相同，较长建植年限人工草地中BSCs的多样性大、种类多，主要包括苔藓、地衣以及藻类，而建植年限短的人工草地中仅分布少量的苔藓，但厚度较大。BSCs盖度与禾本科（Gramineae）植物盖度、密度以及地上生物量显著正相关（P<0.05），但与植被平均高度以及0~10 cm地下生物量显著负相关（P<0.05）。BSCs能调节pH，对累积土壤养分有明显作用，能显著增加建植年限长（14和18年）的人工草地中表层（0~5 cm）土壤速效养分以及建植年限短（1和4年）的人工草地中的全效养分含量（P<0.05）；在建植年限短的草地中，BSCs可减小（P<0.05）土壤粒径，增加（P<0.05）土壤细颗粒（细砂粒、黏粉粒）含量。本研究揭示，建立人工草地有利于增加BSCs盖度、厚度以及多样性，同时BSCs对人工草地地上生物量的增加和土壤结构和养分的恢复具有重要意义。

关键词: 生物土壤结皮, 土壤理化性质, 植被特征, 人工草地, 黄河源区

Abstract: In order to explore the ecological functions of biological soil crusts (BSCs) and reveal BSCs-triggered soil nutrient changes in artificially restored grasslands,BSCs properties in artificial grasslands of five restoration periods (18,14,11,4 years and 1 year) were studied in relation to plant distribution,soil physical and chemical properties in Maqin County,Qinghai Province. The main results were as follows:The species,coverage and thickness of BSCs were different in grasslands of different restoration years. There was a high diversity of BSCs such as mosses,lichens and algaes in the grasslands of a long restoration period,but the proportion of mosses was lower in the grasslands of a short recovery period. BSCs coverage was positively correlated with grass coverage,density and aboveground biomass (P<0.05),but negatively correlated with average height of vegetation and 0~10 cm underground biomass (P<0.05). BSCs exerted a significant effect on cumulative soil nutrient and regulating soil pH. They could increase the content of soil available nutrients significantly in the surface layer (0~5 cm) in the artificial grasslands of a long recovery period,and the total nutrients in the artificial grassland of a short restoration period (<4 years) (P<0.05);They could reduce the soil particle size and significantly increase the content of soil fine particles (fine sand,clay powder),especially in artificial grasslands of short restoration lengths (eg.1 and 4 years). Therefore,the establishment of artificial grassland is conducive to the recovery of BSCs coverage,thickness and diversity,and BSCs can also promote the productivity and improve soil quality of restored artificial grasslands.

Key words: BSCs, Soil Physical and Chemical Properties, Vegetation Characteristics, Artificial Grassland, The Source of the Yellow River

中图分类号:

S812.2

孙华方, 李希来, 金立群, 李成一, 张静. 生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 509-520.

SUN Hua-fang, LI Xi-lai, JIN Li-qun, LI Cheng-yi, ZHANG Jing. Effects of Biological Soil Crusts on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Vegetation of Artificial Grassland in the Yellow River Source Zone[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(2): 509-520.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2020.02.027

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2020/V28/I2/509

参考文献

[1] Bu C,Wu S,Xie Y,et al. The Study of Biological Soil Crusts:Hotspots and Prospects[J]. Clean—Soil Air Water,2013,41(9):899-906
[2] Belnap J,Lange D H C O L. Biological Soil Crusts:Structure,Function,and Management[J]. Biological Conservation,2003,108:129-130
[3] Eldridge D J,Greene R. Microbiotic soil crusts-a review of their roles in soil and ecological processes in the rangelands of Australia[J]. Soil Research,1994,32(3):389-415
[4] Kurina L M. Controls over the accumulation and decline of a nitrogen-fixed lichen,Stereocaulon vulcani,on young Hawaiian lava flows[J]. Journal of Ecology,1999,87(5):784-799
[5] Lukešová A. Soil algae in brown coal and lignite post-mining areas in central Europe (Czech Republic and Germany) [J]. Restoration Ecology,2001,09(4):341-350
[6] Schaub I,Baum C,Schumann R,et al. Effects of an early successional biological soil crust from a temperate coastal sand dune (NE Germany) on soil elemental stoichiometry and phosphatase activity[J]. Microbial ecology,2019,77(1):217-229
[7] 吴玉环,高谦,程国栋. 生物土壤结皮的生态功能[J]. 生态学杂志,2002,21(4):41-45
[8] Adessi A,Ricardo C D C,Roberto D P,et al. Microbial extracellular polymeric substances improve water retention in dryland biological soil crusts[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2018,116:67-69
[9] Yang Y,Bu C,Mu X,et al. Interactive Effects of Moss-Dominated Crusts and Artemisia ordosica on Wind Erosion and Soil Moisture in Mu Us Sandland,China[J]. The Scientific World Journal,2014,4(4):649-816
[10] Bu C F,Zhang P,Jing Y E,et al. Spatial Characteristics of Moss-Dominated Soil Crust and Its Impact Factors in Small Watershed in Wind-Water Erosion Crisscross Region,Northern Shaanxi Province,China[J]. Journal of Natural Resources,2014,29(3):490-499
[11] 闫德仁,薛英英,赵春光. 沙漠地区生物土壤结皮层腐殖质特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2007,26(12):2017-2020
[12] Rodríguez-Caballero E,Escudero A. Soil Loss and Runoff in Semiarid Ecosystems:A Complex Interaction Between Biological Soil Crusts,Micro-topography,and Hydrological Drivers[J]. Ecosystems,2013,16(4):529-546
[13] Felde V J M N L,Peth S,Uteau-Puschmann D,et al. Soil microstructure as an under-explored feature of biological soil crust hydrological properties:case study from the NW Negev Desert[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation,2014,23(7):1687-1708
[14] 麻云霞,王月林,李钢铁,等. 生物地毯治沙工程—生物结皮现状的研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(03):531-538
[15] 宋光,李新荣,回嵘,等. 沙区生物土壤结皮对外来植物种子萌发的影响[J]. 兰州大学学报(自然科学版),2017(4):99-111
[16] Langhans T M,Storm C,Schwabe A. Regeneration processes of biological soil crusts,macro-cryptogams and vascular plant species after fine-scale disturbance in a temperate region:Recolonization or successional replacement[J]. Flora-Morphology,Distribution,Functional Ecology of Plants,2010,205(1):46-60
[17] 李雪华,李晓兰,蒋德明,等. 干旱半干旱荒漠地区一年生植物研究综述[J]. 生态学杂志,2006,25(7):851-856
[18] 李新荣,张景光. 干旱沙漠区土壤微生物结皮及其对固沙植被影响的研究[J]. 植物学报,2000,42(9):965-970
[19] Rivera-Aguilar V,Godínez-Alvarez H,Manuell-Cacheux I,et al. Physical effects of biological soil crusts on seed germination of two desert plants under laboratory conditions[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2005,63(1):344-352
[20] Bowker M A. Biological Soil Crust Rehabilitation in Theory and Practice:An Underexploited Opportunity[J]. Restoration Ecology,2007,15(1):13-23
[21] Vies H. Understanding Dryland Landscape Dynamics:Do Biological Crusts Hold the Key[J]. Geography Compass,2008,02(3):899-919
[22] Karsten U,Holzinger A. Green algae in alpine biological soil crust communities:acclimation strategies against ultraviolet radiation and dehydration[J]. Biodiversity & Conservation,2014,23(7):1845-1858
[23] Kitzing C,Prschold T,Karsten U. UV-induced effects on growth,photosynthetic performance and sunscreen contents in different populations of the green alga Klebsormidium fluitans (Streptophyta) from alpine soil crusts[J]. Microbial Ecology,2014,67(2):327-340
[24] 李以康,欧阳经政,林丽,等. 高寒草甸植被退化过程中生物土壤结皮演变特征[J]. 生态学杂志,2015,34(8):2238-2244
[25] 徐杰,宁远英. 科尔沁沙地持续放牧和不同强度放牧后封育草场中生物结皮生物量和土壤因子的变化[J]. 中国沙漠,2010,30(4):824-830
[26] 秦福雯,康濒月,姜凤岩,等. 生物土壤结皮演替对高寒草原植被结构和土壤养分的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2019,28(6):1100-1107
[27] 柴林荣,孙义,王宏,等. 牦牛放牧强度对甘南高寒草甸群落特征与牧草品质的影响[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(1):18-26
[28] 李文,曹文侠,师尚礼,等. 放牧管理模式对高寒草甸生态系统有机碳、氮储量特征的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(11):25-33
[29] 张卫红,苗彦军,赵玉红,等. 高原鼠兔对西藏邦杰塘高寒草甸的影响[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(1):115-122
[30] 马玉寿,施建军,董全民,等. 人工调控措施对“黑土型”退化草地垂穗披碱草人工植被的影响[J]. 青海畜牧兽医杂志,2006(02):1-3
[31] 景增春,王启基,史惠兰,等. D型肉毒杀鼠素防治高原鼠兔灭效试验[J]. 草业科学,2006,23(3):89-91
[32] 张万儒. 森林土壤分析方法[M]. 北京:中国标准出版社,1999:1210-1275
[33] Song Y,Shu W,Wang A.Characters of soil algae during primary succession on copper mine dumps[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments,2014,14(3):577-583
[34] 程军回,张元明. 影响生物土壤结皮分布的环境因子[J]. 生态学杂志,2010,29(01):133-141
[35] 赵芸,贾荣亮,高艳红,等. 腾格里沙漠人工固沙植被演替过程中生物土壤结皮归一化植被指数的变化特征[J]. 植物生态学报,2017,41(09):972-984
[36] 吉雪花,张元明,陶冶,等. 藓类结皮斑块面积与环境因子的关系[J]. 中国沙漠,2013,33(6):1803-1809
[37] 孙华方,李希来,金立群,等. 黄河源区建植17年栽培草地退化响应因子分析[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(5):1240-1248
[38] Bao T L,Zhao Y G,Yang X Q,et al. Effects of disturbance on soil microbial abundance in biological soil crusts on the Loess Plateau,China[J]. Journal of Arid Environments,2019,163:59-67
[39] 孙华方,赵之重,金立群,等. 高寒草甸植被特征与土壤全效养分对放牧与高原鼠兔扰动的响应[J]. 青海大学学报,2019,37(02):1-8
[40] Song G,Li X R,Hui R,et al. Effect of biological soil crusts on seed germination and growth of an exotic and two native plant species in an arid ecosystem[J]. PLOS ONE,2017,12(10):1-16
[41] Kakeha J,Gorji M,Sohrabi M,et al. Effects of biological soil crusts on some physicochemical characteristics of rangeland soils of Alagol,Turkmen Sahra,NE Iran[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2018,181:152-159
[42] Jiang Z Y,Li X A,Wei J Q,et al. Contrasting surface soil hydrology regulated by biological and physical soil crusts for patchy grass in the high-altitude alpine steppe ecosystem[J]. Geoderma,2018,326:201-209
[43] 戴黎聪,柯浔,曹莹芳,等. 关于生态功能与管理的生物土壤结皮研究[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(01):22-29
[44] 都军,李宜轩,杨晓霞,等. 腾格里沙漠东南缘生物土壤结皮对土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 中国沙漠,2018,38(1):111-116
[45] 孙华方,李希来,金立群,等. 黄河源区人工草地植被群落和土壤养分变化[J]. 水土保持通报,2019,39(03):25-30,38
[46] Zhang Q Y,Wang Q,Ouyang H L,et al. Pyrosequencing Reveals Significant Changes in Microbial Communities Along the Ecological Succession of Biological Soil Crusts in the Tengger Desert of China[J]. Pedosphere,2018,28(2):350-362
[47] Miralles I,Ladrón D G M,Chamizo S,et al. Soil CO₂,exchange controlled by the interaction of biocrust successional stage and environmental variables in two semiarid ecosystems[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2018,124:11-23
[48] 秦福雯,康濒月,姜风岩,等. 生物结皮演替对高寒草原土壤微生物群落的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(04):832-840
[49] 秦福雯,徐恒康,刘晓丽,等. 生物结皮对高寒草地植物群落和土壤化学性质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2019,27(02):285-290
[50] 蒋婧,宋明华. 植物与土壤微生物在调控生态系统养分循环中的作用[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(8):979-988
[51] 王学霞,董世魁,高清竹,等. 青藏高原退化高寒草地土壤氮矿化特征以及影响因素研究[J]. 草业学报,2018,27(6):1-9
[52] 伍星,李辉霞,傅伯杰,等. 三江源地区高寒草地不同退化程度土壤特征研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2013,35(3):77-84
[53] 彭景涛,李国胜,傅瓦利,等. 青海三江源地区退化草地土壤全氮的时空分异特征[J]. 环境科学,2012,33(07):2490-2496

生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响

Effects of Biological Soil Crusts on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Vegetation of Artificial Grassland in the Yellow River Source Zone

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨冲, 王文颖, 刘攀, 毛旭峰, 董世魁, 周华坤, 陈哲, 索南吉, 靳磊, 马华清. 黄河源区高寒草地植物营养成分含量特征及营养价值评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 72-79.
[2]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[4]	曲艳, 宋倩, 杨合龙, 赵坤, 赵敏, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 戎郁萍. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[5]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[6]	李兰平, 张慧敏, 李宏林, 梁德飞, 武学霞, 李希来. 不同功能群及先锋种在高寒人工草地建植初期的作用[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1513-1521.
[7]	孙华方, 李希来, 李成一, 张静, 林春英, 金立群, 杨鑫光. 黄河源区建植19年人工草地生物结皮CO₂通量与叶绿素荧光参数的变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 894-903.
[8]	车昭碧, 徐鹏飞, 郭亚亚, 曹佳敏, 黄星宇, 杨寒珺, 鲁为华, 姜莉. 不同草地类型的北方蚁蚁巢及周围土壤理化性质特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 982-990.
[9]	杨阳, 章妮, 蒋莉莉, 陈克龙. 青海湖高寒草地土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征对模拟降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[10]	卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.
[11]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[12]	苏贝贝, 张英, 道日娜. 4种豆科栽培牧草根际土壤细菌群落分布特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 250-258.
[13]	陈白洁, 樊博, 汪新川, 张振华. 不同材质可降解无纺布覆盖种植对高寒人工草地土壤碳氮磷化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2752-2762.
[14]	任卓然, 邵新庆, 李金升, 李慧, 何宜璇, 古维娜, 王茹颖, 杨灵婧, 刘克思. 微生物菌肥对退化高寒草甸地上生物量和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2265-2273.
[15]	陈银萍, 李晓辉, 罗永清, 王旭洋, 牛亚毅. 科尔沁不同沙地类型植被动态特征及其与凋落物的关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 114-120.