荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.04.003

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (4): 655-663.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.04.003

荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性

卞莹莹^*, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟

宁夏大学农学院, 宁夏银川 750021

收稿日期:2020-10-09 修回日期:2020-11-16 发布日期:2021-06-02
作者简介:卞莹莹(1984-),女,蒙古族,吉林吉林人,副教授,博士,从事荒漠草原区植被恢复与重建方面的相关研究,E-mail:bianyy@nxu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71904093):宁夏农牧交错带贫困农户生计策略时空规律、发生机制及优化调控;宁夏回族自治区高等学校科学研究项目(NGY2017012):不同林龄人工柠条林对土壤氮素转化的影响;宁夏自然科学基金(2020AAC031112):干旱半干旱区地标能量交换过程及生态需水研究资助

Distribution Characteristics of Soil Microbial Communities of Different Vegetation Restoration Models and Their Correlation with Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Desert Steppe

BIAN Ying-ying^*, ZHANG Zhi-min, FU Zhen, LIU Wen-juan

Agricultural College,Ningxia University, Yinchuan, Ningxia 750021,China

Received:2020-10-09 Revised:2020-11-16 Published:2021-06-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 研究土壤微生物菌落变化对土壤肥力的影响,对荒漠草原区草地的恢复管理具有重要的意义。本文以宁夏典型荒漠草原区的天然草地为对照,以平茬人工柠条林地、人工柠条林地、天然柠条林地为研究对象,采用稀释平板法估算各样地0~5,5~10,10~20,20~40 cm土层中微生物菌落数量,并测定对应土层的土壤理化性质及6种可溶性氮组分。通过分析样地内土壤微生物菌落数量变化特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性可知:人工植被恢复加速土壤微生物菌落结构变化;人工柠条林地下土壤微生物群落数量较多、土壤结构及肥力较好;平茬措施可增加人工柠条林地微生物菌落数量,但微生物菌落总数仍低于未平茬前。综上所述,人工种植柠条更有利于荒漠草原区植被恢复。

关键词: 荒漠草原区, 植被恢复, 柠条林地, 土壤微生物, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: It is of great significance for the restoration and management of grassland in desert steppe to study the effects of microbial colony changes on soil fertility. In this study,a typical desert steppe in Ningxia was selected as research area,with the natural grassland (NG) as control and pruned artificial Caragana Intermedia (PACI),artificial Caragana Intermedia (ACI) and natural Caragana Intermedia (NCI) as research objects. Soil from different soil layers were collected to estimate the amount of microbial community in various soil layers of 0~5,5~10,10~20 and 20~40 cm by the dilution plate method. Soil physical and chemical properties and 6 soluble organic nitrogen components of the corresponding soil layer were measured at the same time. The quantity variation characteristics of soil microbial communities in different sample plots and their correlation between soil physical and chemical properties were analyzed. The results showed that:the restoration process of artificial vegetation might accelerate the optimization of soil microbial colony structures. The number of microbial colonies of artificial C. intermedia forest was more and its soil microbial colony structures and fertility were better.Pruning could increase the umber of microbial colonies in artificial C. Intermedia forest,but it was still lower than that before pruned. In conclusion,planting C. Intermedia was more conducive to vegetation restoration in desert steppe.

Key words: Desert steppe, Vegetation restoration, Caragana Intermedia forest, Soil microbial communities, Soil physical and chemical properties

中图分类号:

S154.3

卞莹莹, 张志敏, 付镇, 刘文娟. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.

BIAN Ying-ying, ZHANG Zhi-min, FU Zhen, LIU Wen-juan. Distribution Characteristics of Soil Microbial Communities of Different Vegetation Restoration Models and Their Correlation with Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Desert Steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 655-663.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.04.003

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/I4/655

参考文献

[1] Jiang Q,Li S B,Pan Z B,et al. Evaluations on construction of artificial Caragana intermedia to improved effects of degenerated sand land[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2006,20(4):23-27
[2] 马千虎,周玉蓉,徐金鹏,等. 宁夏东部荒漠草原不同植被恢复模式的土壤响应特征[J]. 中国草地学报,2018,40(5):50-56
[3] 陈林,杨新国,翟德苹,等. 柠条秸秆和地膜覆盖对土壤水分和玉米产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(2):108-116
[4] 李欣玫,左易灵,薛子可,等. 不同荒漠植物根际土壤微生物菌落结构特征[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(8):2855-2863
[5] Six J,Frey S D,Thiet R K,et al. Bacterial and fungal contributions to carbon sequestration in agroecosystems [J]. Soil Science Society of American Journal,2006,70(2):555-569
[6] Marschiner P,Yang C H,Lieberei R,et al. Soil and plant specific effects on bacterial community composition in the rhizosphere[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2001,33(11):1437-1445
[7] Shao K W,Xue Y Z,Hao Q,et al. Effects of shrub litter addition on dune soil microbial community in Horqin sandy land,Northern China[J]. Arid Land Research&Management,2011,25(3):203-216
[8] Bais H P,Weir T L,Perry L G,et al. The role of root exudates in rhizosphere interactions with plants and other organisms [J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology,2006,57(1):233-266
[9] 吴海燕,范作伟,陈帅民,等. 吉林省不同黑土土壤微生物学肥力指标差异[J]. 玉米科学,2020,28(2):163-168
[10] 李新荣,刘新民. 试论鄂尔多斯高原灌木多样性的若干特点[J]. 资源学报,2000,22(3):54-59
[11] 栗文玉,刘小芳,赵勇钢,等. 黄土丘陵区人工柠条恢复为主小流域土壤有机碳空间变异性及其影响因素[J]. 水土保持研究,2020,27(2):15-22
[12] Schlesinger W H,Reynolds J F,Cunningham G L,et al. Biological feedbacks in global desertification[J]. Science,1990,247(4946):1043-1048
[13] 熊小刚,韩兴国. 内蒙古半干旱草原灌丛化过程中小叶锦鸡儿引起的土壤碳、氮资源空间异质性分布[J]. 生态学报,2005,25(7):1678-1683
[14] 王冰冰,曲来叶,宋成军,等. 岷江干旱河谷优势灌丛对土壤微生物群落组成的影响[J]. 生态学报,2015,35(8):2481-2493
[15] 卞莹莹,陈林,柳博文,等. 荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式下土壤可溶性氮组分特征[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(5):94-103
[16] 蔡国军,杨磊,柴春山,等. 半干旱黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型植物物种多样性研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报,2020,40(1):95-104
[17] 牛宋芳. 荒漠草原不同土壤类型人工柠条林根际微生物菌落结构及多样性特征研究[D]. 宁夏:宁夏大学,2018:49-50
[18] 舒维花,蒋齐,王占军,等. 宁夏盐池沙地不同密度人工柠条林对土壤微生物的影响[J]. 宁夏大学学报(自然科学版),2012,33(2):205-209
[19] 杜雅仙,康扬眉,牛玉斌,等. 宁夏荒漠草原不同植物菌落微斑块内土壤微生物区系特征. 应用生态学报,2019,30(9):3057-3065
[20] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析(第三版)[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,2013:30-34,81-82,22-24
[21] Anderson J P E,Domsch K H. A physiological method for the quantitative measurement of microbial biomass in soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1978,10(3):215-221
[22] Brookes P C,Powlscin D S,Jenkinson D S. Phosphorus in the soil microbial biomass[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,1984,16(2):169-175
[23] 林先贵. 土壤微生物研究原理与方法[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社,2010:37
[24] 李雪萍,李建宏,刘永刚,等. 甘南草原不同退化草地植被和土壤微生物特性[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(5):1252-1259
[25] 邓娜. 黄土丘陵区退耕地植被恢复过程中土壤氮转化过程及机制研究——以反硝化和矿化过程为例[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学:2019:19-21
[26] 刘艳萍,马驰,莫保儒,等. 柠条人工林下草本植被特征与土壤特性相关性研究[J]. 草地学报,2020,28(2):468-473
[27] 张义凡,刘学东,陈林,等. 荒漠草原3种典型菌落类型的土壤微生物量碳氮研究[J]. 西北植物学报,2017,37(2):363-371
[28] 蒲洁,雁冰,王茵茵,等. 农牧交错带不同植被菌落对土壤微生物量碳氮磷的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2015,33(4):279-285
[29] 卞莹莹,陈林,王建明,等. 平茬对荒漠草原区人工柠条林地土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(6):1347-1353
[30] 闫宝龙,吕世杰,王忠武,等. 草地灌丛化成因及其对生态系统的影响研究进展[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(2):95-101
[31] 赵路红,李昌珍,康迪,等. 黄土丘陵区退耕地土壤可溶性氮组分季节变化与水热关系[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(10):3533-3542
[32] 黄懿梅. 黄土丘陵区植被自然恢复过程中土壤微生物指标的演变[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2008:54-58
[33] Steenwerth K L,Jackson L E,Calderon F J,et al. Soil microbial community composition and land use history in cultivated and grassland ecosystems of coastal California[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2002,34(11):1599-1611
[34] Nie X D,Li Z W,Huang J Q,et al. Thermal stability of organic carbon in soil aggregates as affected by soil erosion and deposition[J]. Soil & Tillage Research,2018,175:82-90
[35] Huang J Q,Li Z W,Zeng G M,et al. Microbial responses to simulated water erosion in relation to organic carbon dynamics on a hilly cropland in subtropical China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2013,60(40):67-75
[36] 张宇婷,肖海兵,聂小东,等. 基于文献计量分析的近30年国内外土壤侵蚀研究进展[J]. 土壤学报,2020,57(4):97-810
[37] Li C H,Ma B L,Zhang T Q. Soil bulk density effects on microbial populations and enzyme activities during the growth of Maize (Zea Mays L) planted in large pots under field exposure[J]. Canadian Journal of Soil Science,2002,82(2):1024-1032
[38] Rasanen N,Kankaala P,Tahvanainen T,et al. Changes in dissolved organic matter and microbial activity in runoff waters of boreal mires after restoration[J]. Aquatic Sciences,2018,80:20-34
[39] Sergio A,Luisella C,Ruby J,et al. Effect of long-term soil management on the mutual interaction among soil organic matter,microbial activity and aggregate stability in a vineyard[J]. Pedosphere,2018,28(2):288-298
[40] 朱世硕,夏彬,郝旺林,等. 黄土区侵蚀坡面土壤微生物菌落功能多样性研究[J]. 中国环境科学,2020,40(9):4099-4105
[41] De Vries F T,Hoffland E,van Eekeren N,et al. Fungal/bacterial ratios in grasslands with contrasting nitrogen management[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2006,38:2092-2103
[42] Cwalina-Ambroziak B,Bowszys T. Changes in fungal communities in organically fertilized soil[J]. Plant Soil Environment,2009,55(1):25-32
[43] Wardle D A,Bardgett R D,Klironomos J N,et al. Ecological linkages between aboveground and belowground biota[J]. Science,2014(304):1629-1633

荒漠草原区不同植被恢复模式土壤微生物菌落分布特征及其与土壤理化性质的相关性

Distribution Characteristics of Soil Microbial Communities of Different Vegetation Restoration Models and Their Correlation with Soil Physical and Chemical Properties in Desert Steppe

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[2]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[3]	曲艳, 宋倩, 杨合龙, 赵坤, 赵敏, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 戎郁萍. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[4]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.
[5]	常明. 火烧后亚高山草甸恢复过程中物种组成和群落特征变化规律的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(6): 1286-1293.
[6]	车昭碧, 徐鹏飞, 郭亚亚, 曹佳敏, 黄星宇, 杨寒珺, 鲁为华, 姜莉. 不同草地类型的北方蚁蚁巢及周围土壤理化性质特征分析[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 982-990.
[7]	杨阳, 章妮, 蒋莉莉, 陈克龙. 青海湖高寒草地土壤理化性质及微生物群落特征对模拟降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 1043-1052.
[8]	王小燕, 姚宝辉, 张彩军, 王缠, 孙小妹, 苏军虎. 甘南“黑土滩”型退化草甸土壤理化特性及酶活性季节变化[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 220-227.
[9]	苏贝贝, 张英, 道日娜. 4种豆科栽培牧草根际土壤细菌群落分布特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 250-258.
[10]	姚蒙蒙, 郭琛文, 赫凤彩, 张琦, 任国华. 晋北盐碱草地土壤化学计量特征及其与植物多样性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(12): 2800-2807.
[11]	任卓然, 邵新庆, 李金升, 李慧, 何宜璇, 古维娜, 王茹颖, 杨灵婧, 刘克思. 微生物菌肥对退化高寒草甸地上生物量和土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2265-2273.
[12]	姚玉娇, 梁婷, 马源, 周会程, 肖海龙, 孙斌, 张德罡, 陈建纲. 土壤微生物群落多样性对高寒草甸退化程度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(6): 1489-1497.
[13]	杨晶, 张倩, 姚宝辉, 蔡志远, 王缠, 郭怀亮, 苏军虎. 高原鼢鼠扰动对高寒草甸土壤理化特性及植物生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 492-499.
[14]	孙华方, 李希来, 金立群, 李成一, 张静. 生物土壤结皮对黄河源区人工草地植被与土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(2): 509-520.
[15]	罗艺岚, 赵东豪, 孙鹏越, 高金柱, 呼天明, 付娟娟. 遮阴胁迫对麦冬和多年生黑麦草根际土壤细菌群落结构和多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1204-1212.