生草对滇中苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.02.010

草地学报 ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (2): 419-428.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.02.010

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

生草对滇中苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响

杨金鹏^1,2, 牟兰³, 仇嘉悦^1,2, 吴宗烨^1,2, 张鑫亮^1,2, 张美艳², 蔡明², 黄必志²

1. 云南农业大学动物科学技术学院, 云南昆明 650201;
2. 云南省草地动物科学研究院, 云南昆明 650212;
3. 西南林业大学园林园艺学院, 云南昆明 650224

收稿日期:2024-06-04 修回日期:2024-09-13 发布日期:2025-03-01
通讯作者: 蔡明,E-mail:mingcaiok@163.com;黄必志,E-mail:hbz@ynbp.cn
作者简介:杨金鹏（1998-）,男,满族,河北承德人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地管理与利用方面研究,E-mail:yangjinpeng314159@163.com
基金资助:
云南省院士专家工作站（202305AF150154）;兴滇英才支持计划（云人社通〔2022〕51号）;云南省乡村振兴科技专项（202304BI090032-46）项目共同资助

Effects of Grass Cultivation on Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Diversity of Apple Orchards in Dianzhong Area of China

YANG Jin-peng^1,2, MU Lan³, QIU Jia-yue^1,2, WU Zong-ye^1,2, ZHANG Xin-liang^1,2, ZHANG Mei-yan², CAI Ming², HUANG Bi-zhi²

1. Faculty of Animal Science and Technology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650201, China;
2. Academy of Grassland and Animal Science, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650212, China;
3. College of Landscape and Horticulture, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan Province 650224, China

Received:2024-06-04 Revised:2024-09-13 Published:2025-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究不同生草处理对滇中苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响。本研究选取南方果园常见的光叶紫花苕（Vicia villosa）,菊苣（Cichorium intybus）和鼠茅草（Vulpia myuros）3种牧草,以自然生草（CK1）和清耕（每月人工除草一次,CK2）处理为对照,测定0~30 cm耕层土壤酶活性及微生物群落多样性。结果表明,与清耕相比,人工生草改善了土壤理化性状。光叶紫花苕处理土壤过氧化氢酶,蔗糖酶和脲酶活性显著提高,增幅分别为12.70%,45.30%,45.45%。土壤微生物群落数量以菊苣处理提升显著,细菌数量增幅为42.76%（较CK1）,49.02%（较CK2）；真菌数量增幅为49.76%（较CK1）,42.28%（较CK2）。土壤微生物中变形菌门（Proteobacteria）和子囊菌门（Ascomycota）占据主导地位,放线菌门（Actinobacteria）和酸杆菌门（Acidobacteriota）主导了酶活性对土壤酸碱度的响应。此外,土壤含水量、pH、全氮及全钾含量是影响滇中苹果园土壤养分及酶活性的重要因子。

关键词: 果园生草, 土壤理化性状, 土壤酶活性, 土壤微生物, 相关性分析

Abstract: To investigate the impacts of different grass cultivation treatments on soil enzyme activities and microbial community diversity of apple orchards in Dianzhong area, we selected three common forage species in southern China, including Vicia villosa, Cichorium intybus, and Vulpia myuros, with natural grass （CK1） and clean tillage （with monthly manual weeding, CK2） as controls. Soil enzyme activities and microbial community diversity were assessed in the 0-30 cm soil layer. The results showed that compared with CK2, artificial grass improved the soil physicochemical properties. The Vicia villosa treatment showed the most significant increase in soil catalase, sucrase, and urease activities by 12.70%, 45.30%, and 45.45%, respectively. Moreover, The population size of soil microbial communities significantly increased in Cichorium intybus treatment, and the number of bacteria increased by 42.76% （compared with CK1） and 49.02% （compared with CK2）, and the number of fungi increased by 49.76% （compared with CK1） and 42.28% （compared with CK2）. In conclusion, Proteobacteria and Ascomycota dominated soil microorganisms, while Actinobacteria and Acidobacteriota dominated the responses of enzyme activity to soil pH. Additionally, soil moisture content, pH, total nitrogen and total potassium content were important factors affecting soil nutrient and enzyme activities in apple orchards in Dianzhong area.

Key words: Orchard grass cultivation, Soil physicochemical properties, Soil enzyme activity, Soil microbe, Correlation analysis

中图分类号:

S154.3

杨金鹏, 牟兰, 仇嘉悦, 吴宗烨, 张鑫亮, 张美艳, 蔡明, 黄必志. 生草对滇中苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(2): 419-428.

YANG Jin-peng, MU Lan, QIU Jia-yue, WU Zong-ye, ZHANG Xin-liang, ZHANG Mei-yan, CAI Ming, HUANG Bi-zhi. Effects of Grass Cultivation on Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Diversity of Apple Orchards in Dianzhong Area of China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(2): 419-428.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.02.010

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2025/V33/I2/419

参考文献

[1] 寇建村,杨文权,韩明玉,等.我国果园生草研究进展[J].草业科学,2010,27(7):154-159
[2] 曹铨,沈禹颖,王自奎,等.生草对果园土壤理化性状的影响研究进展[J].草业学报,2016,25(8):180-188
[3] 韦鑫,张朝权,谢彩云,等.生草对梨园温度和果实产量与品质的影响[J].贵州农业科学,2023,51(10):108-114
[4] GUO Z, LIU H, ZHOU W, et al. Characteristics of phosphorus losses due to surface runoff in a peach orchard and the effects of inter-planting white clover (Trifolium repens L.) on fruit yield and quality[J]. Feb-Fresenius Environmental Bulletin,2016,25(12):5516-5527
[5] 李会科,张广军,赵政阳,等.生草对黄土高原旱地苹果园土壤性状的影响[J].草业学报,2007,16(2):32-39
[6] 刘伟,罗玲,钟奇,等.生草和地布覆盖对攀枝花地区芒果园土壤性质及果实品质的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报,2021,27(2):261-270
[7] 王依,陈成,马拦妮,等.行间生草对秦岭北麓猕猴桃园土壤养分、pH值的影响[J].中国农学通报,2019,35(15):59-65
[8] 秦秦,宋科,孙丽娟,等.猕猴桃园行间生草对土壤养分的影响及有效性评价[J].果树学报,2020,37(1):68-76
[9] 葛永申,岳绪国,万春雁,等.果园不同生草方式对土壤养分及微生物的影响[J].扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2024,45(2):42-50
[10] 刘善江,夏雪,陈桂梅,等.土壤酶的研究进展[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(21):1-7
[11] 井赵斌,李腾飞,龙明秀,等.生草对猕猴桃果园土壤酶活性和土壤微生物的影响[J].草业科学,2020,37(9):1710-1718
[12] 左玉环,刘高远,杨莉莉,等.陕西渭北柿子园种植白三叶草对土壤养分和生物学性质的影响[J].应用生态学报,2019,30(2):518-524
[13] WHITELAW-WECKERT M A, RAHMAN L, HUTTON R J, et al. Permanent swards increase soil microbial counts in two Australian vineyards[J]. Applied soil ecology,2007,36(2/3):224-232
[14] 钱雅丽,王先之,来兴发,等.多年生牧草种植对苹果园土壤真菌群落特征的影响[J].草业学报,2019,28(11):124-132
[15] 谭华,靳旭妹,蔡明明,等.生草对关中地区有机猕猴桃园土壤理化性质及细菌群落的影响[J].草地学报,2024,32(3):667-676
[16] 包涵,吕丹丹,施赟,等.豫西黄土高原果园生草对土壤线虫群落及结构的影响[J].草地学报,2024,32(1):96-104
[17] ZHOU X G, GAO D M, LIU J, et al. Changes in rhizosphere soil microbial communities in a continuously monocropped cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) system[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2014,60:1-8
[18] 沈良英.狼尾草属3种高禾草营养动态及消化特性研究[D].昆明:云南农业大学,2023:14
[19] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社,2000:30-112
[20] BOLYEN E, RIDEOUT J R, DILLON M R, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME2[J]. Nature Biotechnology,2019,37(8):852-857
[21] 杜欣然,王晶晶,冉柒,等.黏细菌资源及其系统分类[J].微生物学通报,2023,50(7):3104-3121
[22] 王迅,黎媛,赖永辉,等.果园生草对柑桔果园土壤性质与微生物群落的影响[J].草学,2021(2):61-65,69
[23] MELVILLE N, MORGAN R P C. The influence of grass density on effectiveness of contour grass strips control of soil erosion on Low angle slops[J]. Soil Use and Management,2001,(17):278-281
[24] 王爱玲,段国琪,田时敏,等.不同生草种类对苹果果园土壤含水量及土壤肥力的影响[J].草学,2023(5):29-34,42
[25] 封帆,谢开云,艾比布拉·伊马木,等.果园生草对苹果园杂草控制、土壤养分及果树营养状况的影响[J].新疆农业科学,2023,60(4):982-991
[26] 付学琴,杨星鹏,陈登云,等.南丰蜜橘果园生草栽培对土壤团聚体和有机碳特征及果实品质的影响[J].园艺学报,2020,47(10):1905-1916
[27] 邓丰产,安贵阳,郁俊谊,等.渭北旱塬苹果园的生草效应[J].果树学报,2003(6):506-508
[28] 李惟婕,王立,马景永,等.黄土旱塬区苹果园生草覆盖对深层土壤水分和根系分布特征的影响[J].草业学报,2023,32(1):63-74
[29] WANG Z K, WU Y H, CAO Q, et al. Modeling the coupling processes of evapotranspiration and soil water balance in agroforestry systems[J]. Agricultural Water Management,2021,250(1):106839
[30] 焦润安,张舒涵,李毅,等.生草影响果树生长发育及果园环境的研究进展[J].果树学报,2017,34(12):1610-1623
[31] 张朋朋,胡雯,管增辉,等.生草对苹果园土壤养分、酶活性及细菌群落的影响[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(9):86-96
[32] 陈燕.自然生草对梨园土壤理化性质、采前采后果实品质及糖代谢影响研究[D].阿拉尔:塔里木大学,2024:22
[33] 杨露,毛云飞,胡艳丽,等.生草改善果园土壤肥力和苹果树体营养的效果[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2020,26(2):325-337
[34] 吉爽秋,李旭娇,张弛,等.生草不同处理方式对果园土壤温度、含水量及养分的影响[J].草学,2021,(6):58-65,70
[35] 韦鑫,张朝权,谢彩云,等.果园生草对梨园土壤理化性质和微生物的影响[J].北方园艺,2023(18):79-86
[36] 孙瑶,马金昭,傅国海,等.土壤调理剂和生草互作对果园酸化土壤化学性质及产量的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料,2021,(2):61-68
[37] 刘晗,王萍,孙鲁沅,等.种植冬绿肥对红壤幼龄橘园土壤微生物量碳、氮和酶活的影响[J].生态环境学报,2023,32(9):1623-1631
[38] SUN L, ZHANG J, ZHAO J, et al. Effects of Cinnamomum camphora coppice planting on soil fertility, microbial community structure and enzyme activity in subtropical China[J]. Frontiers in Microbiology,2023,14:1104077
[39] 惠竹梅,李华,龙妍,等.葡萄园行间生草体系中土壤微生物数量的变化及其与土壤养分的关系[J].园艺学报,2010,37(9):1395-1402
[40] 侯宇辉.果园生草对柑橘园杂草防控及土壤环境的影响[D].成都:四川农业大学,2023:1
[41] ZHANG Z, CHEN Q, YIN C, et al. The effects of organic matter on the physiological features of Malus hupehensis seedlings and soil properties under replant conditions[J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2012,146:52-58
[42] 王延,杨浩,张雯娜,等.果园生草模式对黄土高原苹果园土壤温度的缓冲效应[J].中国草地学报,2023,45(6):117-125
[43] 张承,王秋萍,周开拓,等.猕猴桃园套种吉祥草对土壤酶活性及果实产量、品质的影响[J].中国农业科学,2018,51(8):1556-1567
[44] GREG D, TILSTON E L, JULIE B, et al. Spatial structuring of soil microbial communities in commercial apple orchards[J]. Applied Soil Ecology, 2018,130:1-12
[45] 温晓霞,殷瑞敬,高茂盛,等.不同覆盖模式下旱作苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物数量时空动态研究[J].西北农业学报,2011,20(11):82-88
[46] SIMPSON R M, MASON K, ROBERTSON K, et al. Relationship between soil properties and enzyme activities with soil water repellency[J]. Soil Research,2019,57(6):689-702
[47] ZHENG W, GONG Q, ZHAO Z, et al. Changes in the soil bacterial community structure and enzyme activities after intercrop mulch with cover crop for eight years in an orchard[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology,2018,86:34-41
[48] ACOSTA-MARTINZE V, CRUZ L, SOTOMAYOR-RAMIREZ D, et al. Enzyme activities as affected by soil properties and land use in a tropical watershed[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2007,35(1):35-45
[49] 李昱龙,韩正敏.嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌在环保和农业生产上的应用[J].生物技术通报,2015,31(8):35-43
[50] 梁博文,刘成连,王永章,等.黄河三角洲梨园自然生草对土壤pH的影响[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(1):143-148
[51] 赵海洲,王如刚,李克磊,等.丘陵地苹果园生草对根际土壤理化性状及微生物的影响[J].北方园艺,2024(6):79-85
[52] 钱雅丽,梁志婷,曹铨,等.陇东旱作果园生草对土壤细菌群落组成的影响[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(10):3010-3017
[53] 刘业萍,毛云飞,胡艳丽,等.苹果园生草对土壤微生物多样性、酶活性及碳组分的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2021,27(10):1792-1805
[54] 赵璇.中国北方主要草地类型土壤放线菌多样性和群落结构的比较研究[D].长春:东北师范大学,2016:29
[55] MENG H, LI K, NIE M, et al. Responses of bacterial and fungal communities to an elevation gradient in a subtropical montane forest of China[J]. Applied Microbiology& Biotechnology, 2013,97(5):2219-2230
[56] 姜莉莉,孙瑞红,张甘雨,等.连续3 a生草对苹果园土壤理化性质及微生物群落的影响[J].西北农业学报,2023,32(9):1456-1465
[57] 王莹莹.渭北旱塬苹果园行间生草及树盘覆盖对土壤理化性质和微生物群落的影响[D].杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2023:47
[58] ZHONG Y, YAN W, WANG R, et al. Decreased occurrence of carbon cycle functions in microbial communities along with long-term secondary succession[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2018,123:207-217

生草对滇中苹果园土壤酶活性和微生物群落多样性的影响

Effects of Grass Cultivation on Soil Enzyme Activity and Microbial Community Diversity of Apple Orchards in Dianzhong Area of China

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	段蕊, 罗钦, 肖雪, 牛琼梅, 刘洋, 杨雪, 陆嘉琪, 初晓辉, 单贵莲. 大狼毒主要化感物质对山地草甸土壤微生物物种多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(1): 10-20.
[2]	陈炜昊, 张国瑞, 许驭丹, 杨韦轲, 李佳成, 李帅, 严师节, 赵祥. 干扰对亚高山草甸和冻胀丘植物、土壤和微生物的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(1): 107-118.
[3]	韩玲娟, 范乐, 马峥, 李懿璇, 胡乐乐, 韩佳校, 高鹏, 梁银萍, 赵祥. 干旱胁迫下土壤微生物对白羊草生长及生理生化特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2816-2823.
[4]	周清格, 李邵宇, 白梅, 李雅男, 杨立山, 王文琼, 邢佳庆, 乌云嘎, 赵萌莉. 内蒙古两种草地类型土壤微生物量氮、磷分布特征及影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2854-2861.
[5]	冯晓云, 李媛, 张鹏, 刘文辉, 鲍根生, 李春刚. 10份豌豆种质在青海半干旱和高寒地区适应性评价的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(9): 2910-2918.
[6]	亓琳, 王晓凌, 赵威, 包云. 稳定性铯对土壤养分、酶活性与微生物群落功能多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2478-2483.
[7]	徐文印, 马昀峤, 柴瑜, 段成伟, 把熠晨, 张静, 李希来. 商品有机肥对不同坡向退化高寒草甸土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2638-2647.
[8]	乔千洛, 武燕茹, 李钦瑶, 张阳灿, 寇伟良, 何欣婷, 李希来, 寇建村, 杨文权. 商品有机肥和羊板粪对高寒矿区人工草地和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(8): 2659-2669.
[9]	刘荣贵, 邓茂桦, 张瀚文, 郑蓉, 唐仲龙, 王超, 王剑峰. 内生真菌对醉马草不同生长期土壤酶活性和养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1770-1778.
[10]	安海涛, 孙彩彩, 董全民, 杨晓霞, 张春辉, 赵新全. 青藏高原土壤微生物生物量对放牧强度响应的Meta分析[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(6): 1913-1922.
[11]	任梓欢, 王忠武, 康慧, 付净瑶, 孟浦嘉, 韩国栋. 模拟降水对内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1339-1347.
[12]	张晓玉, 张定海, 宁婷, 马玉婧. 古尔班通古特沙漠土壤水分-地形-植被关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5): 1548-1557.
[13]	谭华, 靳旭妹, 蔡明明, 陈慧敏, 陈嘉轩, 龙明秀. 生草对关中地区有机猕猴桃园土壤理化性质及细菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(3): 667-676.
[14]	甄云楠, 薛荟, 刘倩, 虞道耿. 间作崖州硬皮豆对荔枝园土壤及其土壤微生物的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3706-3714.
[15]	王雪莹, 包新光, 张峰, 谭兵兵, 王钰煐, 种培芳. 荒漠植物红砂根际土壤细菌群落特征及土壤酶活性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(12): 3764-3773.