青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.005

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (1): 33-41.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.01.005

青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征

米琦^1,2, 王毅^1,2, 秦小静³, 孙建², 叶冲冲^2,4

1. 成都理工大学, 四川成都 610059;
2. 中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所生态网络观测与模拟重点实验室, 北京 100101;
3. 河南理工大学测绘与国土信息工程学院, 河南焦作, 454000;
4. 西南石油大学土木工程与建筑学院, 四川成都, 610500

收稿日期:2020-06-15 修回日期:2020-07-26 发布日期:2021-01-08
通讯作者: 孙建
作者简介:米琦(1995-),男,四川广安人,硕士研究生,主要从事高原生态学研究,E-mail:mqyx1995@163.com
基金资助:
第二次青藏高原综合科学考察研究项目“生态安全屏障功能与优化体系”项（2019QZKK0405-05）资助

Response of Soil Enzyme Stoichiometry to Different Enclosure Durations in Alpine Meadow,Tibetan Plateau

MI Qi^1,2, WANG Yi^1,2, QIN Xiao-jing³, SUN Jian², YE Chong-chong^2,4

1. Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610059, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Observation and Simulation of Ecological Networks, Institute of Geographical Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
3. School of Surveying and Land Information Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Henan Province 454000, China;
4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610500, China

Received:2020-06-15 Revised:2020-07-26 Published:2021-01-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究土壤酶活性和酶计量比的变化特征及影响机制，本试验以青藏高原若尔盖高寒草甸为对象，研究了围栏2，4，6，8和10年自然恢复条件下土壤理化性质和酶活性差异性规律。结果表明：随着恢复年限的增加，与碳（carbon，C）循环密切相关的β-葡萄糖苷酶、与氮（nitrogen，N）循环密切相关的N-乙酰-β-D-葡萄糖苷酶和亮氨酸氨基肽酶以及与磷（phosphorus，P）循环密切相关的碱性磷酸酶活性均呈现增加趋势；围栏8年时，土壤C：N酶活性比特征值下降，C：P酶活性比特征值上升，前者与土壤含水量和pH值呈显著负、正相关关系（P<0.05），后者与土壤有机碳显著负相关（P<0.05）。整体而言，严重沙化的高寒草甸，在围栏封育过程中受N养分限制，在围栏6~8年时，与养分循环相关的酶活性对植被特征和土壤属性的响应敏感。

关键词: 高寒草甸, 围栏封育, 土壤酶活性, 酶化学计量比, 环境因子

Abstract: Soil enzymes play an important role in the process of community succession and nutrient conversion. With the implementation of fencing measures,it is vital to explore the driving mechanism of soil enzyme activity in the process of grassland restoration. We conducted a manipulative grazing exclusion experiment with fences lasting 2,4,6,8,and 10 years in alpine meadow,Tibetan Plateau. We investigated soil properties,soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry,and their drivers. The results showed that β-1,4-glucosidase closely related to C cycle,N-acetyl-β-D-glucosidase and leucine aminopeptidase related to N cycle and alkaline phosphatase related to P cycle,expressed an increasing trend with increasing the duration of fences. When the duration of fence reached 8 years,the ratio of soil C to N enzyme activities decreased,and was significantly negatively and positively correlated with soil water content and pH,respectively,while the ratio of soil C to P enzyme activities increased,which was significantly negative and positive correlated with soil organic carbon. In summary,soil enzyme activities and stoichiometry remarkablely varied with the different durations of fence,and the nutrients of alpine meadow was limited by the lack of nitrogen,and the sensitive responses of soil enzyme activity to the vegetation characteristics and soil properties were observed in the duration of 6 to 8 years fences.

Key words: Alpine meadow, Enclosure, Soil enzyme activity, Enzyme stoichiometry, Environmental factor

中图分类号:

S154.1

米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.

MI Qi, WANG Yi, QIN Xiao-jing, SUN Jian, YE Chong-chong. Response of Soil Enzyme Stoichiometry to Different Enclosure Durations in Alpine Meadow,Tibetan Plateau[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.

参考文献

[1] Burns R G,Deforest J L,Marxsen J,et al. Soil enzymes in a changing environment:Current knowledge and future directions[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2013,58:216-234
[2] 杨成德,龙瑞军,陈秀蓉,等. 东祁连山高寒草甸土壤微生物量及其与土壤物理因子相关性特征[J]. 草业学报,2007,16(4):62-68
[3] 高海宁,张勇,秦嘉海,等. 祁连山黑河上游不同退化草地有机碳和酶活性分布特征[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(2):283-290
[4] 岳中辉,王博文,庞健,等. 松嫩盐碱草地主要植物群落土壤酶活性研究[J]. 水土保持学报,2009,23(6):160-163,172
[5] 赵帅,张静妮,赖欣,等. 放牧与围封对呼伦贝尔针茅草原土壤酶活性及理化性质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2011,33(1):71-76
[6] Liu Y,Ge T,Zhu Z,et al. Carbon input and allocation by rice into paddy soils:A review[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2019,133:97-107
[7] Fontaine S,Henault C,Aamor A,et al. Fungi mediate long term sequestration of carbon and nitrogen in soil through their priming effect[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry,2011,43:86-96
[8] Cheng W,Parton W J,Gonzalezmeler M A,et al. Synthesis and modeling perspectives of rhizosphere priming[J]. New Phytologist,2014,201(1):31-44
[9] 许淼平,任成杰,张伟,等. 土壤微生物生物量碳氮磷与土壤酶化学计量对气候变化的响应机制[J]. 应用生态学报,2018,29(7):369-378
[10] 王冰冰,曲来叶,马克明,等. 岷江上游干旱河谷优势灌丛群落土壤生态酶化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2015,6078-6088
[11] 黄海莉,宗宁,何念鹏,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同海拔土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(11):3689-3696
[12] Allison S D,Vitousek P M. Responses of extracellular enzymes to simple and complex nutrient inputs[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2005,37(5):937-944
[13] Kaiser C,Franklin O,Dieckmann U,et al. Microbial community dynamics alleviate stoichiometric constraints during litter decay[J]. Ecology Letters,2014,17(6):680-690
[14] Moorhead D L,Rinkes Z L,Sinsabaugh R L,et al. Dynamic relationships between microbial biomass,respiration,inorganic nutrients and enzyme activities:informing enzyme-based decomposition models[J]. Front Microbiology,2013,4:223
[15] Hill B H,Elonen C M,Jicha T M,et al. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry and microbial processing of organic matter in northern bogs and fens reveals a common P-limitation between peatland types[J]. Biogeochemistry,2014,120(1-3):203-224
[16] Sinsabaugh R L,Lauber C L,Weintraub M N,et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale[J]. Ecology Letters,2008,11(11):1252-1264.
[17] 王毅,刘碧颖,刘苗,等. 若尔盖地区沙化草地土壤酶协同和抑制效应[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(4):939-951
[18] 赵吉. 不同放牧率对冷蒿小禾草草原土壤微生物数量和生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报,1999,7(3):223-227
[19] 李茜,孙亚男,林丽,等. 放牧高寒嵩草草地不同演替阶段土壤酶活性及养分演变特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2019,30(7):2267-2274
[20] 李国旗,赵盼盼,邵文山,等. 围封条件下荒漠草原两种植物群落土壤理化性状与酶活性的研究[J]. 草业学报,2019,28(7):49-59
[21] 牛得草,江世高,秦燕,等. 围封与放牧对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响[J]. 草业科学,2013,030(4):528-534
[22] Gai N,Pan J,Tang H,et al. Organochlorine pesticides and polychlorinated biphenyls in surface soils from Ruoergai high altitude prairie,east edge of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2014,478:90-97
[23] 魏振海,逯军峰,颜长珍,等. 近30a来若尔盖盆地沙漠化时空演变过程及成因分析[J]. 地球科学进展,2009,24(8):908-916
[24] 胡光印,董治宝,魏振海,等.近30年来若尔盖盆地沙漠化时空演变过程及成因分析[J].地球科学进展,2009,24(8):908-916
[25] Liu M,Zhang Z C,Sun J,et al. One-year grazing exclusion remarkably restores degraded alpine meadow at Zoige,eastern Tibetan Plateau[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation,2020,22(2020) e00951
[26] Liu M,Zhang Z C,Sun J,et al. The Response of Vegetation Biomass to Soil Properties along Degradation Gradients of Alpine Meadow at Zoige Plateau[J]. Chinese Geographical Science.2020,30(3),446-455
[27] Liu M,Zhang Z C,Sun J,et al. Restoration efficiency of short-term grazing exclusion is the highest at the stage shifting from light to moderate degradation at Zoige,Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Indicators,2020,114(2020):106323
[28] 王长庭.人工草地建设对退化草地恢复及持续利用的重要性-《草地生态学》授课中的一些体会[J]. 成功(教育),2010,9:258-259
[29] 秦小静,孙建,王海明.三江源土壤养分分布特征及其对主要气候要素的响应.生态环境学报[J].2015,24(8):1295-1301
[30] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000:263-270
[31] 许光辉,郑洪元.土壤微生物分析方法手册[M].北京:农业出版社,1986:102-287
[32] Moorhead D L,Sinsabaugh R L,Hill B H,et al. Vector analysis of ecoenzyme activities reveal constraints on coupled C,N and P dynamics.[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2016,93:1-7
[33] 文都日乐,张静妮,李刚,等.放牧干扰对贝加尔针茅草原土壤微生物与土壤酶活性的影响[J].草地学报,2010,18(4):517-522
[34] Wallenius K,Rita H,Mikkonen A,et al. Effects of land use on the level,variation and spatial structure of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2011,43(7):1464-1473
[35] Rousk J,Brookes P C,Baath E,et al. Contrasting Soil pH Effects on Fungal and Bacterial Growth Suggest Functional Redundancy in Carbon Mineralization[J]. Applied & Environmental Microbiology,2009,75(6):1589-1596
[36] Stephan A,Meyer A H,Schmid B,et al. Plant diversity affects culturable soil bacteria in experimental grassland communities[J]. Journal of Ecology,2000,88:988-998
[37] 郝建朝,吴沿友,连宾,等. 土壤多酚氧化酶性质研究及意义[J]. 土壤通报,2006,37(3):470-474
[38] 袁萍,周嘉聪,张秋芳,等. 中亚热带不同森林更新方式生态酶化学计量特征[J]. 生态学报,2018,38(18):6741-6748
[39] 邵新庆,石永红,韩建国,等. 典型草原自然演替过程中土壤理化性质动态变化[J]. 草地学报,2008,16(6):25-30
[40] 单贵莲,徐柱,宁发,等. 围封年限对典型草原植被与土壤特征的影响[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(2):5-12
[41] 李中林,秦卫华,周守标,等. 短期围栏封育对红松洼自然保护区群落数量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(1):21-26
[42] Wu G,Liu Z,Zhang L,et al. Long-term fencing improved soil properties and soil organic carbon storage in an alpine swamp meadow of western China[J]. Plant & Soil,2010,332(s1-2):331-337
[43] 郑伟,董全民,李世雄,等. 禁牧后环青海湖高寒草原植物群落特征动态[J]. 草业科学,2014,31(6):1126-1130
[44] 罗久富,周金星,赵文霞,等. 围栏措施对青藏高原高寒草甸群落结构和稳定性的影响[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(3):565-574
[45] 毛绍娟,吴启华,祝景彬,等. 藏北高寒草原群落维持性能对封育年限的响应[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(1):21-30
[46] 李玉强,赵哈林,赵学勇,等. 不同强度放牧后自然恢复的沙质草地土壤呼吸、碳平衡与碳储量[J]. 草业学报,2006,15(5):27-33
[47] Shi X M,Li X G,Li C T,et al. Grazing exclusion decreases soil organic C storage at an alpine grassland of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2013,57:183-187
[48] Du C,Jing J,Shen Y,et al. Short-term grazing exclusion improved topsoil conditions and plant characteristics in degraded alpine grasslands[J]. Ecological Indicators,2018,108:105680
[49] Deng L,Shangguan Z,Wu G,et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on carbon sequestration in China's grassland[J]. Earth-Science Reviews,2017,173:84-95
[50] Luan J W,Cui L J,Xiang C H,et al.,Different grazing removal exclosures effects on soil C stocks among alpine ecosystems in east Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2014,64:262-268
[51] 焦婷,常根柱,周学辉,等. 高寒草甸草场不同载畜量下土壤酶与土壤肥力的关系研究[J]. 草业学报,2009,18(6):100-106
[52] Sinsabaugh R L,Moorhead D L. Resource allocation to extracellular enzyme production:A model for nitrogen and phosphorus control of litter decomposition[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,1994,26(10):1305-1311
[53] Sinsabaugh R L,Hill B H,Shah J J,et al. Ecoenzymatic stoichiometry of microbial organic nutrient acquisition in soil and sediment[J]. Nature,2010,468(7320):122-122
[54] Adamczyk B,Kilpelainen P,Kitunen V,et al. Potential activities of enzymes involved in N,C,P and S cycling in boreal forest soil under different tree species[J]. Pedobiologia,2014,57(2):97-102
[55] Sinsabaugh R L,Lauber C L,Weintraub M N,et al. Stoichiometry of soil enzyme activity at global scale[J]. Ecology Letters,2008,11(11):1252-1264
[56] Rothstein D E,Zak D R,Pregitzer K S,et al. Nitrate Deposition in Northern Hardwood Forests and the Nitrogen Metabolism of Acer saccharum Marsh[J]. Oecologia,1996,108(2):338-344
[57] Castle S C,Sullivan B W,Knelman J E,et al. Nutrient limitation of soil microbial activity during the earliest stages of ecosystem development[J]. Oecologia,2017,185(3):513-524
[58] 仲波,孙庚,陈冬明,等. 不同恢复措施对若尔盖沙化退化草地恢复过程中土壤微生物生物量碳氮及土壤酶的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2017,26(3):392-399
[59] De Araujo A S,Cesarz S,Leite L F,et al. Soil microbial properties and temporal stability in degraded and restored lands of Northeast Brazil[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2013,66:175-181
[60] Li J,Zheng Y,Yan J,et al. Succession of plant and soil microbial communities with restoration of abandoned land in the Loess Plateau[J]. China. Journal of Soils & Sediments,2013,13(4):760-769
[61] Castro H,Fortunel C,Freitas H,et al. Effects of land abandonment on plant litter decomposition in a Montado system:relation to litter chemistry and community functional parameters[J]. Plant & Soil,2010,333(1-2):181-190

青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征

Response of Soil Enzyme Stoichiometry to Different Enclosure Durations in Alpine Meadow,Tibetan Plateau

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	许静, 李文龙, 吴鑫悦, 罗佳宁, 廖元成. 青藏高原高寒草甸种子萌发行为沿海拔梯度的分异特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 10-18.
[2]	佘延娣, 杨晓渊, 马丽, 张中华, 王党军, 黄小涛, 马真, 姚步青, 周华坤. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 62-71.
[3]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[4]	张振华, 刘振杰, 陈白洁, 李以康. 枯落物添加对三江源区退化高寒草甸土壤碳矿化的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 156-164.
[5]	黄彩霞, 芦光新, 李欣, 范月君, 周华坤, 王英成, 王志慧, 姚世庭. 产漆酶真菌对高寒草甸土壤有机质矿化特性的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 173-178.
[6]	石国玺, 王芳萍, 马丽, 张中华, 王弋博, 汪之波, 姚步青, 周华坤. 长期、短期增温对高寒草甸AM真菌群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 179-189.
[7]	姚喜喜, 肖锋, 祁守忠, 陈国明, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群. 高寒草甸植被群落特征及其营养品质对围栏封育的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[8]	姚世庭, 芦光新, 周华坤, 张海娟, 颜珲璘, 王军邦. 模拟增温对高寒草甸土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 218-224.
[9]	王占青, 张杰雪, 杨雪莲, 黄霞, 陈斯亮, 乔有明. 高寒草甸不同斑块草地土壤微生物多样性特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1916-1926.
[10]	向雪梅, 德科加, 冯廷旭, 魏希杰, 王伟, 徐成体. 三江源区高寒草甸草场植被和土壤对外源氮素输入的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2010-2016.
[11]	刘晶晶, 尹亚丽, 李世雄, 赵文, 董怡玲, 苏世锋. 不同调控措施对中度退化高寒草甸植被及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[12]	吴雪梅, 杨雪岩, 林媛媛, 代亦, 曹乐乐, 董文萱, 刘增文. 刺槐和油松枯落叶腐殖质化对气候温湿变化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1738-1747.
[13]	高志香, 李希来, 张静, 金立群, 周伟. 不同施肥处理对高寒矿区渣山改良土酶活性和理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1748-1756.
[14]	段丽辉, 刘晓丽, 韩冰, 位晓婷, 才仁措, 邵新庆. 乡土物种补播对青藏高原高寒草甸群落稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1793-1800.
[15]	王明涛, 方江平, 包赛很那, 苗彦军, 王向涛, 赵玉红, 谢文栋, 仓木德吉. 藏北燕麦草地持续利用与撂荒对高寒草甸土壤特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1801-1808.