放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.03.018

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (3): 563-571.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.03.018

放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响

孙一梅¹, 田青¹, 郭爱霞^2,3, 张森溪², 吕朋^3,4, 左小安^2,4

1. 甘肃农业大学林学院, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院, 乌拉特荒漠草原研究站, 甘肃兰州 730000;
3. 中国科学院大学, 北京 100049;
4. 中国科学院西北生态环境资源研究院奈曼沙漠化研究站, 甘肃兰州 730000

收稿日期:2020-09-03 修回日期:2020-10-24 出版日期:2021-03-15 发布日期:2021-04-02
通讯作者: 田青
作者简介:孙一梅(1995-),女,甘肃张掖人,硕士研究生,主要从事植物功能性状方面的研究,E-mail:1142309846@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（41622103，41571106）资助；中科院青年创新促进会项目（1100000036）资助；中国科学院大学生创新实践训练计划资助

Effects of Grazing and Nitrogen Addition on Functional Traits of Dominant Species Cleistogenes squarrosa and Community in Semi-arid Sandy Grassland

SUN Yi-mei¹, TIAN Qing¹, GUO Ai-xia^2,3, ZHANG Sen-xi², LV Peng^3,4, ZUO Xiao-an^2,4

1. College of Forestry, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. Urat Desert-grassland Research Station, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China;
3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China;
4. Naiman Desertification Research Station, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resource, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730000, China

Received:2020-09-03 Revised:2020-10-24 Online:2021-03-15 Published:2021-04-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究氮沉降背景下放牧对半干旱沙质草地植物功能性状的影响，本试验探究了放牧和短期氮添加(20 g·m^-2·a^-1)对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草(Cleistogenes squarrosa)和群落功能性状的影响。结果表明：放牧和氮添加增加了糙隐子草的重要值，放牧降低了糙隐子草叶面积，氮添加显著降低了围封草地中糙隐子草叶干物质含量，增加了围封和放牧草地中糙隐子草叶氮含量(P<0.05)；相同氮素水平下放牧降低了植物群落高度，氮添加增加了围封样地植物叶面积和叶氮含量，增加了放牧样地植物比叶面积和叶氮含量，降低了叶干物质含量(P<0.05)；回归分析表明，糙隐子草叶面积和叶氮含量能较好地解释群落水平植物叶面积和叶氮含量的变化。半干旱沙质草地植物群落通过改变植株大小和主要叶性状来响应放牧和氮沉降，对预测未来草地生态系统结构与功能具有重要意义。

关键词: 功能性状, 放牧, 氮添加, 糙隐子草(Cleistogenes squarrosa), 科尔沁沙地

Abstract: To explore the effects of grazing on plant functional traits of semi-arid sandy grassland under the background of nitrogen deposition,we studied the effects of grazing and short-term nitrogen addition (20 g·m^-2·a^-1) on functional traits of the dominant species Cleistogenes squarrosa and community in semi-arid sandy grassland. The results showed that grazing and nitrogen addition increased the important value of C. squarrosa,while grazing reduced leaf area of C. squarrosa,and nitrogen addition significantly reduced C. squarrosa leaf dry matter content in enclosed grassland and increased leaf nitrogen content in enclosed and grazing grassland (P<0.05). Grazing significantly reduced height of the plant community at the same nitrogen level. Nitrogen addition significantly increased leaf area and leaf nitrogen content of plant community in enclosed grassland,and nitrogen addition significantly increased specific leaf area and leaf nitrogen content and decreased leaf dry matter content in grazing grassland (P<0.05). Regression analysis showed that the leaf area and leaf nitrogen content of C. squarrosa could better explain the changes of leaf area and leaf nitrogen content of community. The plants in semi-arid sandy grassland respond to grazing disturbance and nitrogen deposition by changing plant size and main leaf traits,which is of great significance for predicting the structure and function of grassland ecosystems in the future.

Key words: Functional traits, Grazing, Nitrogen addition, Cleistogenes squarrosa, Horqin Sandy grassland

中图分类号:

Q948.1

孙一梅, 田青, 郭爱霞, 张森溪, 吕朋, 左小安. 放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.

SUN Yi-mei, TIAN Qing, GUO Ai-xia, ZHANG Sen-xi, LV Peng, ZUO Xiao-an. Effects of Grazing and Nitrogen Addition on Functional Traits of Dominant Species Cleistogenes squarrosa and Community in Semi-arid Sandy Grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.03.018

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/I3/563

参考文献

[1] 白永飞,黄建辉,郑淑霞,等. 草地和荒漠生态系统服务功能的形成与调控机制[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(2):93-102
[2] 赵哈林,周瑞莲,张铜会,等. 我国北方农牧交错带的草地植被类型、特征及其生态问题[J]. 中国草地,2003,25(3):2-9
[3] 罗黎鸣,苗彦军,潘影,等. 不同干扰强度对拉萨河谷草甸草原群落特征和功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(6):1161-1166
[4] Diaz S,Lavorel S,Mcintyre S,et al. Plant trait responses to grazing-a global synthesis[J]. Global Change Biology,2007,13(2):313-341
[5] 王奇,王金枝,姜丽丽,等. 氮和磷添加对草原群落特征及有关生态过程的影响[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(5):914-920
[6] Hodgkinson K C,Müller W J. Death model for tussock perennial grasses:a rainfall threshold for survival and evidence for landscape control of death in drought[J]. Rangeland Journal,2005,27(2):105-115
[7] Gao Y,Wang D,Ba L,et al. Interactions between herbivory and resource availability on grazing tolerance of Leymus chinensis[J]. Environmental & Experimental Botany,2008,63(1-3):113-122
[8] 刘思洋,李雪华,骆永明,等. 围封和放牧草地植物多样性对氮添加的响应差异[J]. 生态学杂志,2019,38(12):3635-3641
[9] 刘晓娟,马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学:生命科学,2015,45(4):325-339
[10] 何桂萍,田青,李宗杰,等. 摩天岭北坡森林木本植物叶性状在物种和群落水平沿海拔梯度的变化[J]. 西北植物学报,2018,38(3):553-563
[11] 银晓瑞,梁存柱,王立新,等. 内蒙古典型草原不同恢复演替阶段植物养分化学计量学[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(1):39-47
[12] Eric G,Sandra L,Pauline A,et al. Assessing the effects of land-use change on plant traits,communities and ecosystem functioning in grasslands:a standardized methodology and lessons from an application to 11 European sites[J]. Oxford University Press,2007,99(5):967-985
[13] Venn S E,Green K,Pickering C M,et al. Using plant functional traits to explain community composition across a strong environmental filter in Australian alpine snowpatches[J]. Springer Netherlands,2011,212(9):1491-1499
[14] 杨浩,罗亚晨. 糙隐子草功能性状对氮添加和干旱的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2015,39(1):32-42
[15] 邢小青,张璐,宝音陶格涛,等. 放牧对糙隐子草地上个体功能性状的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(6):116-122
[16] 贾丽欣,杨阳,张峰,等. 短花针茅种群功能性状对载畜率的响应[J]. 中国草地学报,2019,41(4):94-100
[17] 张晶,左小安,杨阳,等. 科尔沁沙地草地植物群落功能性状对封育和放牧的响应[J]. 农业工程学报,2017,33(24):261-268
[18] Mao R,Zhang X H,Song C C. Effects of nitrogen addition on plant functional traits in freshwater wetland of Sanjiang Plain,Northeast China[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2014,24(6):674-681
[19] 赵哈林,张铜会,崔建垣,等. 近40a我国北方农牧交错区气候变化及其与土地沙漠化的关系[J]. 中国沙漠,2000,20(增刊):1-6
[20] 吕朋,左小安,张婧,等. 放牧强度对科尔沁沙地沙质草地植被的影响[J]. 中国沙漠,2016,36(1):34-39
[21] Bai Y F,Wu J G,Clark C M,et al. Tradeoffs and thresholds in the effects of nitrogen addition on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning:evidence from inner Mongolia Grasslands[J]. Global Change Biology,2010,16(1):358-372
[22] Cornelissen J H C,Lavorel S,Garnier E,et al. A handbook of protocols for standardised and easy measurement of plant functional traits worldwide[J]. Australian Journal of Botany,2003,51(4):335-380
[23] Naeem S,Li S. Biodiversity enhances ecosystem reliability[J]. Nature International Weekly Journal of Science,1997,390(6659):507-509
[24] 贾乐,赵萌莉,韩国栋,等. 载畜率对荒漠草原植物群落影响的研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2011,33(4):111-116
[25] Louault F,Pillar V D,Aufrère J,et al. Plant traits and functional types in response to reduced disturbance in a semi-natural grassland[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science,2005,16(2):151-160
[26] 李西良,侯向阳,吴新宏,等. 草甸草原羊草茎叶功能性状对长期过度放牧的可塑性响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2014,38(5):440-451
[27] Zheng S X,Lan Z C,Li W H,et al. Differential responses of plant functional trait to grazing between two contrasting dominant C3 and C4 species in a typical steppe of Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Plant Soil,2011,340(1-2):141-155
[28] 万宏伟,杨阳,白世勤,等. 羊草草原群落6种植物叶片功能特性对氮素添加的响应[J]. 植物生态学报,2008(3):611-621
[29] 高阳,赵力兴,朱铁霞,等. 施氮量对科尔沁沙地燕麦生物量及物质分配规律的影响[J]. 草地学报,2018,26(5):1168-1172
[30] Westoby M,Falster D S,Moles A T,et al. Plant ecological strategies:some leading dimensions of variation between species[J]. Annual Review of Ecology Systematics,2002,01(33):125-159
[31] Wilson P J,Thompson K,Hodgson J G. Specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content as alternative predictors of plant strategies[J]. New Phytologist,1999,143(1):155-162
[32] Bai Y F,Han X G,Wu J G,et al. Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the Inner Mongolia grassland[J]. Nature,2004,431(7005):181-184
[33] 孟婷婷,倪健,王国宏. 植物功能性状与环境和生态系统功能[J]. 植物生态学报,2007,31(1):150-165
[34] 常运华,刘学军,李凯辉,等. 大气氮沉降研究进展[J]. 干旱区研究,2012,29(6):972-979
[35] 周晓兵,张元明,王莎莎,等. 模拟氮沉降和干旱对准噶尔盆地两种一年生荒漠植物生长和光合生理的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2010,34(12):1394-1403
[36] 赵娜,赵新全,赵亮,等. 植物功能性状对放牧干扰的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2016,35(7):1916-1926
[37] Feng Y L,Fu G L,Zheng Y L. Specific leaf area relates to the differences in leaf construction cost,photosynthesis,nitrogen allocation,and use efficiencies between invasive and noninvasive alien congeners[J]. Planta,2008,228(3):383-39
[38] 岳喜元,左小安,庾强,等. 降水量和短期极端干旱对典型草原植物群落及优势种羊草(Leymus chinensis)叶性状的影响[J]. 中国沙漠,2018,38(5):1009-1016
[39] 张晶,左小安,吕朋,等. 科尔沁沙地典型草地植物功能性状及其相互关系[J]. 干旱区研究,2018,35(1):137-143

放牧和氮添加对半干旱沙质草地优势种糙隐子草及群落功能性状的影响

Effects of Grazing and Nitrogen Addition on Functional Traits of Dominant Species Cleistogenes squarrosa and Community in Semi-arid Sandy Grassland

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[2]	侯路路, 王旭, 张翔, 闫玉春, 闫瑞瑞, 程利, 辛晓平. 放牧强度对肉牛行为的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1974-1982.
[3]	张博, 程杰, 王淑红, 刘晶, 杨雪, 晏昕辉, 李伟. 氮添加和放牧对云雾山草原优势种异速生长模式的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 1983-1991.
[4]	曲艳, 宋倩, 杨合龙, 赵坤, 赵敏, 刘玉玲, 王德平, 戎郁萍. 呼伦贝尔草原不同利用方式对土壤微生物群落结构的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[5]	张玉琪, 马源, 文铜, 吴玉鑫, 肖海龙, 张德罡, 陈建纲. 祁连山东缘高寒草甸植物及各部位对氮素添加的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(8): 1628-1636.
[6]	孙彩彩, 冯斌, 董全民, 刘文亭, 时光, 刘玉祯, 张小芳, 俞旸, 张春平, 杨晓霞. 牦牛藏羊混合放牧对高寒草地紫花针茅功能性状的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[7]	裴雯, 陈清, 张洛梓, 贾丽英. 放牧、水分和氮素对内蒙古草原土壤团聚体的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[8]	李娜娜, 杨九艳, 贾喆亭, 闫瑞玲, 陈琪. 不同放牧方式对阿拉善左旗主要草场类型群落特征和土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[9]	魏星星, 吴江琪, 李广, 王海燕, 刘帅楠, 张世康, 张娟. 青藏高原湿草甸土壤氮组分对氮添加浓度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4): 677-683.
[10]	张雅楠, 王成杰, 韩勇军, 红灵, 七十三, 王占义. 施肥和刈割处理模拟放牧对西北针茅生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(2): 317-323.
[11]	白玉婷, 代景忠, 夏江宝, 闫瑞瑞, 杨红军, 吕世杰, 卫智军. 施肥对割草地羊草功能性状和化学计量学的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2442-2453.
[12]	李宏林, 胡竞格, 肖锋, 梁德飞, 周华坤. 生长季封育和氮添加对退化高寒沼泽湿地土壤水分状况的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2523-2529.
[13]	李雯, 马昕昕, 马宁, 赵允格, 乔羽, 王鹏, 孙会. 放牧强度对黄土丘陵区生物结皮土壤化学计量学特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2547-2555.
[14]	李彤, 张宇, 赵晋灵, 闫瑞瑞, 辛晓平, 王旭, 陈金强, 吴冬秀, 李凌浩, 赵曼. 放牧对草甸草原土壤水热状况和地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(11): 2577-2582.
[15]	何源, 李星锐, 杨晓帆, 唐海萍. 内蒙古锡林郭勒盟典型草原固碳量及固碳潜力估算[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2274-2285.