三种土地利用方式下南方高山土壤温室气体通量特征及其影响因子研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.10.021

草地学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (10): 2294-2302.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.10.021

三种土地利用方式下南方高山土壤温室气体通量特征及其影响因子研究

庄媛^1,2, 闫瑞瑞¹, 熊军波³, 刘洋³, 陈亚男², 杨培志², 呼天明², 辛晓平¹

1. 中国农业科学院农业资源与农业区划研究所, 北京 100081;
2. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 湖北省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所, 湖北武汉 430000

收稿日期:2021-06-30 出版日期:2021-10-15 发布日期:2021-11-05
通讯作者: 辛晓平,E-mail:xinxiaoping@caas.cn
作者简介:庄媛(1995-),女,汉,陕西榆林人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态研究,E-mail:2019056073@nwafu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目：草地碳收支监测评估技术合作研究（2017YFE0104500）资助；国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0500600）资助；国家自然科学基金“基于全生命周期分析的多尺度草甸草原经营景观碳收支研究”（41771205）资助；财政部和农业农村部：国家现代农业产业技术体系；草地农业生态系统国家重点实验室开放课题（SKLGAE-2019-07）资助

Research on the Characteristics and Impact Factors of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Alpine Soils of Southern China under Three Land Use Patterns

ZHUANG Yuan^1,2, YAN Rui-rui¹, XIONG Jun-bo³, LIU Yang³, CHEN Ya-nan², YANG Pei-zhi², HU Tian-ming², XIN Xiao-ping¹

1. Institute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China;
2. College of Prataculture and Grassland, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Provience 712100, China;
3. Institute of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei Provience 430000, China

Received:2021-06-30 Online:2021-10-15 Published:2021-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨湖北火烧坪三种土地利用方式下土壤温室气体排放的特征及其影响因子，以研究区农田、草地和天然林地为研究对象，采用野外原位静态箱-气相色谱法对其土壤温室气体通量动态变化进行监测，并对环境因子进行分析。结果表明：三种土地利用方式下土壤CO₂均表现为排放，农田土壤CH₄和N₂O表现为排放，草地表现为吸收，林地不一致；土壤含水量抑制土壤CO₂，促进土壤CH₄产生，过氧化氢酶活性与土壤CO₂和CH₄的排放具有显著相关性，有机肥的施用影响土壤N₂O的排放；全球增温潜势（Global warming potential，GWP）由大到小表现为草地 > 林地 > 农田，但草地由于生物量高光合呼吸作用强，向大气排放CO₂的总量则较低。因此，人工草地的建造有利于降低研究区土壤温室气体的排放。

关键词: 利用方式, 温室气体, 影响因子, 全球增温潜势

Abstract: To investigate the characteristics and impact factors of soil greenhouse gas emission under three land use patterns in Huohuping, Hubei Province, the farmland, grassland and natural forest land were taken as the research objects, static chamber-gas chromatographic techniques was used to monitor the soil greenhouse gas flux, and the environmental factors were analyzed in three land use patterns of Huoshaoping, Hubei. The results showed that:soil CO₂ emissions was observed under the three land use patterns, CH₄ and N₂O were emitted in farmland, were absorbed in grassland, and were inconsistent in woodland. Soil water content inhibits CO₂ and promotes CH₄ emissions. Catalase activity had a significant correlation with CO₂ and CH₄ emissions. The application of organic fertilizers affects N₂O emissions. The Global warming potential (GWP) from large to small showed (grassland > woodland > farmland). However, grassland has high photosynthetic respiration due to high biomass, the total amount of net CO₂ emissions in grassland was lower. Therefore, the construction of artificial grassland is conducive to reduce soil greenhouse gas emissions in the study area.

Key words: Land use pattern, Greenhouse gas, Impact factor, Global warming potential

中图分类号:

S154.1

庄媛, 闫瑞瑞, 熊军波, 刘洋, 陈亚男, 杨培志, 呼天明, 辛晓平. 三种土地利用方式下南方高山土壤温室气体通量特征及其影响因子研究[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2294-2302.

ZHUANG Yuan, YAN Rui-rui, XIONG Jun-bo, LIU Yang, CHEN Ya-nan, YANG Pei-zhi, HU Tian-ming, XIN Xiao-ping. Research on the Characteristics and Impact Factors of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Alpine Soils of Southern China under Three Land Use Patterns[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2294-2302.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.10.021

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2021/V29/I10/2294

参考文献

[1] SOLOMON,SUSAN. Climate change 2007:the physical science basis:contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007:996
[2] P. H G,R. M A,R. M A,et al. Climate Change and the Integrity of Science[J]. Science.2010,328:689-690
[3] Agustín,Merino,Pilar,et al. Responses of soil organic matter and greenhouse gas fluxes to soil management and land use changes in a humid temperate region of southern Europe[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry.2004,36(6):917-925
[4] 陈广生,田汉勤. 土地利用/覆盖变化对陆地生态系统碳循环的影响[J]. 植物生态学报,2007(2):21-36
[5] MERINO A,P PÉREZ-BATALLÓN,AS F. Responses of soil organic matter and greenhouse gas fluxes to soil management and land use changes in a humid temperate region of southern Europe[J]. Soil Biology & Biochemistry,2004,36(6):917-925
[6] Monti A,Barbanti L,Zatta A,et al. The contribution of switchgrass in reducing GHG emissions[J]. GCB Bioenergy,2012,4(4):420-434
[7] 徐丽,李成旭,张军辉,等. 多年冻土退化地区湿地土壤温室气体排放及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志,2020,v.39;No.322(5):68-77
[8] Metz,Bert. Climate change 2007:mitigation of climate change:contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2007:851
[9] 颜青,赖睿特,张克强,等. 土壤化学反硝化及N₂O产生机理研究进展[J]. 环境科学研究.2020,33(3):736-743
[10] 郭腾飞,梁国庆,周卫,等. 施肥对稻田温室气体排放及土壤养分的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报.2016,22(2):337-345
[11] 赵国庆,刘梦云,杨静涵,等. 黄土台塬不同土地利用土壤温室气体通量空间变异及其环境解释[J]. 土壤通报.2018,49(2):461-468
[12] 孙文浩,杨世伟,高晓东,等. 黄土丘陵区不同土地利用类型土壤CO₂,N₂O通量特征[J]. 水土保持研究.2017,24(1):68-74
[13] 王海飞,贾兴永,高兵,等. 不同土地利用方式土壤温室气体排放对碳氮添加的响应[J]. 土壤学报.2013,50(6):1172-1182
[14] 桑文秀,杨华蕾,唐剑武. 不同土地利用类型土壤温室气体排放对温湿度的响应[J/OL]. 华东师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021(4):1-12
[15] 李海防,夏汉平,熊燕梅,等. 土壤温室气体产生与排放影响因素研究进展[J]. 生态环境,2007,16(6):1781-1788.
[16] 陈中云,闵航,吴伟祥,等. 土壤中甲烷氧化菌种群数量及其与甲烷氧化活性的关系[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版),2001,27(5):546-550
[17] 王胜,樊军,王建国,等. 水蚀风蚀交错区土壤呼吸特征及其对水热因子的响应[J]. 农业环境科学学报.2014,33(9):1770-1781
[18] EDENHOFER,PICHSMADRUGA R,SOKONA Y,et al. IPCC,2014:Climate Change 2014:Mitigation of Climate Change.Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change[J].2014
[19] 李兰平,张慧敏,李宏林,等. 不同功能群及先锋种在高寒人工草地建植初期的作用[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(7):1513-1521
[20] 李媛媛,董世魁,李小艳,等. 围栏封育对三江源区退化高寒草地植物光合作用及生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2012,20(4):621-625
[21] W R J,A T. Vegetation and soil respiration:Correlations and controls[J]. Biogeochemistry.2000,48(1):71-90
[22] 吴建国,张小全,徐德应. 六盘山林区几种土地利用方式土壤呼吸时间格局[J]. 环境科学.2003,24(6):23-32
[23] LARIONOVA A A,YERMOLAYEV A M,BLAGODATSKY S A,et al. Soil respiration and carbon balance of gray forest soils as affected by land use[J]. Biology & Fertility of Soils,1998,27(3):251-257.
[24] 石洪艾,李禄军,尤孟阳,等. 不同土地利用方式下土壤温度与土壤水分对黑土N₂O排放的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报.2013,32(11):2286-2292
[25] 林杉,冯明磊,阮雷雷,等. 三峡库区不同土地利用方式下土壤氧化亚氮排放及其影响因素[J]. 应用生态学报.2008,19(6):1269-1276
[26] GU J X,YUAN M X,LIU J X,et al. Trade-off between soil organic carbon sequestration and nitrous oxide emissions from winter wheatsummer maize rotations:Implications of a 25-year fertilization experiment in Northwestern China[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2017(595):371-379
[27] ZHOU M H,ZHU B,WANG S J,et al. Stimulation of N₂O emission by manure application to agricultural soils may largely offset carbon benefits:a global meta-analysis[J]. Global Change Biology,2017,23(10):4068-4083
[28] ZHENGJUN F,LIZHONG Z. Impact of biochar on soil N₂O emissions under different biochar-carbon/fertilizer-nitrogen ratios at a constant moisture condition on a silt loam soil[J]. Science of the Total Environment.2017,584-585:776-782
[29] JIAN X,DEYAN L,WEIXIN D,et al. Effects of biochar on nitrous oxide and nitric oxide emissions from paddy field during the wheat growth season[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production.2015,104:52-58
[30] 胡文同,杨志超,郑心洁,等. 加气条件下土壤CO₂排放对土壤过氧化氢酶活性及番茄生长的响应[J]. 节水灌溉.2018(12):12-16+13
[31] 邓长芳,罗珠珠,李玲玲,等. 黄土高原雨养农业区不同种植模式土壤温室气体排放特征[J]. 草业学报.2018,27(9):1-13
[32] 朱晓晴. 秸秆不同还田深度下土壤温室气体排放特征及其影响因素[D]. 沈阳:沈阳农业大学.2020:33
[33] DAVIDSON,A E,BELK, BOONE R D,et al. Soil water content and temperature as independent or confounded factors controlling soil respiration in a temperate mixed hardwood forest[J]. Global Change Biology,2010,4(2):217-227
[34] 徐丽,李成旭,张军辉,等. 多年冻土退化地区湿地土壤温室气体排放及其影响因子[J]. 生态学杂志.2020,39(5):1464-1473
[35] 刘欢,刘梦云,刘丽雯,等. 黄土台塬不同土地利用方式土壤CH₄通量特征及主控因子分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报.2018,26(7):937-947
[36] 沈庄,杨继松,袁晓敏,等. 盐水入侵下辽河口芦苇沼泽土壤甲烷排放的室内模拟研究[J]. 湿地科学.2019,17(1):100-105
[37] 涂纯,李发东. 模拟增温条件下翻耕免耕农田土壤CH₄通量响应[J]. 农业环境科学学报.2016,35(9):1788-1796
[38] 梁东丽,方日尧,李生秀,等. 硝、铵态氮肥对旱地土壤氧化亚氮排放的影响[J]. 干旱地区农业研究.2007,25(1):67-72
[39] 伍延正,张苗苗,秦红灵,等. 不同土地利用方式下冬季N₂O排放及其影响因素[J]. 环境科学.2013,34(8):2968-2974
[40] S D G,R L,S V. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizers on Soil Air Concentration of N₂O and Corn Growth in a Greenhous Study[J]. Journal of Crop Improvement.2015,29(1):95-105

三种土地利用方式下南方高山土壤温室气体通量特征及其影响因子研究

Research on the Characteristics and Impact Factors of Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Alpine Soils of Southern China under Three Land Use Patterns

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	杨满元, 杨宁. 紫色土丘陵坡地5种土地利用方式土壤腐殖物质特征比较[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2303-2308.
[2]	朱鸣鸣, 徐镀涵, 陈光燕, 李平, 成启明, 陈超. 基于最小数据集的喀斯特不同利用方式下土壤质量评价[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(10): 2323-2331.
[3]	李超, 常馨, 闫卫东, 董宽虎. 刈割对晋西北赖草草地温室气体通量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 17-24.
[4]	杨满元, 杨宁, 刘慧娟, 黄雯. 衡阳紫色土丘陵坡地不同土地利用方式对球囊霉素相关土壤蛋白分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(5): 1260-1265.
[5]	张苗苗, 陈伟, 赵军, 林丽, 张德罡. 利用方式对青海省高寒草甸土壤可溶性有机质光谱学特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(1): 71-79.
[6]	张钊, 辛晓平. 生物地球化学模型DNDC的研究进展与碳动态模拟应用[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(3): 445-452.
[7]	管光玉, 范燕敏, 武红旗, 闫德智. 不同利用方式土壤颗粒分形特征及其与土壤有机碳库稳定性的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(2): 258-262.
[8]	马红梅, 邵新庆, 张建全, 钟梦莹, 柴琦, 余群, 魏佳宁. 玉树高寒草甸不同利用方式下土壤微生物的特征[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(1): 75-81.
[9]	陈超, 黄顶, 王堃, 张卫华, 孙增慧, 陈龙. 北方农牧交错带草木犀属外来植物沿公路分布和扩展的影响因素探讨[J]. 草地学报, 2014, 22(4): 722-727.
[10]	刘云鹏, 申卫博, 张社奇, 解迎革, 郑纪勇. 黄河中游湿地土壤养分与酶活性特征及相关性研究[J]. , 2013, 21(3): 474-479,484.
[11]	曹巍, 邵全琴, 喻小勇, 樊江文. 内蒙古不同利用方式温性草原植被光谱特征分析[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 243-252.
[12]	李亚娟, 曹广民, 龙瑞军. 青海省海北州不同草地利用方式土壤基本理化性状研究[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 1039-1043,1050.
[13]	郭明英, 朝克图, 尤金成, 徐丽君, 王丽娟, 贾淑杰, 辛晓平. 不同利用方式下草地土壤微生物及土壤呼吸特性[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 42-48.
[14]	魏达, 旭日, 王迎红, 姚檀栋. 青藏高原纳木错高寒草原温室气体通量及与环境因子关系研究[J]. , 2011, 19(3): 412-419.
[15]	张荣华, 王万林, 安沙舟, 李海. 4种利用方式下鸭茅生物量和贮藏性营养物质的变化[J]. , 2010, 18(6): 792-797.