载畜率对荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿邻近土壤速效养分含量的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.020

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (2): 464-470.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.020

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

载畜率对荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿邻近土壤速效养分含量的影响

王梓晗¹, 吕世杰¹, 李治国¹, 韩国栋¹, 侯东杰¹, 崔媛媛¹, 孙海莲², 王忠武¹

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特,010010;
2. 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特, 010010

收稿日期:2022-06-01 修回日期:2022-09-29 发布日期:2023-02-28
通讯作者: 王忠武,E-mail:wangzhongwu@imau.edu.cn
作者简介:王梓晗(1998-),女,汉族,硕士研究生,主要研究方向为草地生态与管理,E-mail:530919415@qq.com
基金资助:
内蒙古重大科技专项(2021ZD0044-03,ZDZX2018020)；内蒙古自治区科技成果转化项目(2020CG0013)；国家自然科学基金(31760143)；科技成果转化项目(2019CG069)，呼市科技项目(2022-成-重-1)资助

Effect of Stocking Rates on the Content of Available Nutrients in Adjacent Soil of Caragana microphylla Plants in Desert Steppe

WANG Zi-han¹, LV Shi-jie¹, LI Zhi-guo¹, HAN Guo-dong¹, HOU Dong-jie¹, CUI Yuan-yuan¹, SUN Hai-lian², WANG Zhong-wu¹

1. College of Grassland, Resources and Environmental Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Science, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China

Received:2022-06-01 Revised:2022-09-29 Published:2023-02-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 放牧是人类利用草原最主要的方式，可影响土壤的理化性质。小叶锦鸡儿(Caragana microphylla)作为豆科灌木，其邻近土壤养分的变化对会对草地生态系统的结构和功能产生重要的影响。为研究载畜率对荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿邻近土壤速效养分含量的影响，在内蒙古短花针茅荒漠草原进行放牧实验，共4个载畜率处理(对照CK (0羊单位·hm^-2·a^-1、轻度放牧LG (0.93羊单位·hm^-2·a^-1)、中度放牧MG (1.82羊单位·hm^-2·a^-1)和重度放牧HG (2.71羊单位·hm^-2·a^-1)，在每个小区中选定大小相近的小叶锦鸡儿植株，分为东南西北4个方向，测定植株邻近土壤碱解氮、速效磷和速效钾含量，分析这些参数之间的变化。结果表明：随载畜率增大，土壤碱解氮含量先升高后降低，速效磷先下降后上升，速效钾含量呈下降趋势。小叶锦鸡儿邻近土壤碱解氮和速效钾含量的平衡点对应的速效磷在LG区呈最小值，土壤速效磷和速效钾含量的平衡点对应的碱解氮在MG区呈最大值。

关键词: 荒漠草原, 土壤速效养分, 载畜率, 小叶锦鸡儿

Abstract: Grazing is the most important way for human beings to use grassland and significantly affects the physical and chemical properties of grassland soil. Caragana microphylla,as a leguminous shrub,its adjacent soil nutrient changes will have important effects on the structure and function of the graasland ecosystem. In order to study the effect of stocking rate on the nutrients content of the soil adjacent to Caragana microphylla in desert steppe,grazing experiments were carried out in Stipa breviflora desert steppe in Inner Mongolia. A total of four stocking rate treatments were conducted,namely the control-check (CK,0 sheep·hm^-2·a^-1),light-grazing (LG,0.93 sheep·hm^-2·a^-1),moderate-grazing (MG,1.82 sheep·hm^-2·a^-1) and heavy-grazing (HG,2.71 sheep·hm^-2·a^-1). In each treatment of the stocking rate,Caragana microphylla plants with the same size were selected and the four points were setup adjacent to the plants in the directions of East,South,West and North for soil sampling. The contents of alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen,rapidly available phosphorus and rapidly available potassium of the soil were tested. The effect of stocking rate on the contents of soil nutrients in desert steppe was analyzed. The results showed that with the increase of stocking rate,the content of soil alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen first increased then decreased;the content of soil available phosphorus first decreased then increased;and the content of soil available potassium content had been in a downward state. In LG treatment,the rapidly available phosphorus content of soil around the equilibrium point between the alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen and the rapidly available potassium showed the lowest value. In MG treatment,the content of alkaline hydrolysis nitrogen corresponding to the equilibrium point between the rapidly available phosphorus and the rapidly available potassium of soil adjacent to Caragana microphylla plants showed the highest value. The soil nutrients near Caragana microphylla plants vary with the change of stocking rate,which helps to improve the soil environment and optimize the resources management.

Key words: Desert steppe, Soil available nutrients, Stocking rate, Caragana microphylla

中图分类号:

S812

王梓晗, 吕世杰, 李治国, 韩国栋, 侯东杰, 崔媛媛, 孙海莲, 王忠武. 载畜率对荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿邻近土壤速效养分含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 464-470.

WANG Zi-han, LV Shi-jie, LI Zhi-guo, HAN Guo-dong, HOU Dong-jie, CUI Yuan-yuan, SUN Hai-lian, WANG Zhong-wu. Effect of Stocking Rates on the Content of Available Nutrients in Adjacent Soil of Caragana microphylla Plants in Desert Steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(2): 464-470.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.02.020

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I2/464

参考文献

[1] 蔡育蓉. 灌丛化草原土壤功能空间异质性及其对放牧的响应[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2021:12-14
[2] 王德利,王岭. 草食动物与草地植物多样性的互作关系研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2011(4):699-704
[3] 闫宝龙. 不同载畜率下的荒漠草原灌木-草本植物相互关系[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2019:15-16
[4] 郭璞,解李娜,满良,等. 荒漠化草原锦鸡儿属灌丛扩增对牧草产量和植物多样性的影响[J]. 草业科学,2019,36(5):1215-1223
[5] 苏日古嘎,通嘎拉,刘素军. 西乌珠穆沁旗草原灌丛化群落对土壤粒径的响应研究[J]. 内蒙古师范大学学报(自然科学汉文版),2020,49(4):320-326+332
[6] 何兴东,周启星. 生态系统氮磷比化学计量特征研究进展[J]. 中国沙漠,2010,30(2):296-302
[7] ABRIL A.,E. H. BUCHER. Overgrazing and soil carbon dynamics in the western Chaco of Argentina[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2001,16(3):243-249
[8] 王晓朦,乌云娜,宋彦涛,等. 放牧对克氏针茅(Stipa krylovii)草原土壤物理、化学及微生物性状的影响[J]. 中国沙漠,2015,35(5):1193-1199
[9] XIONG D P,SHI P L,ZHANG X Z,et al. Effects of grazing exclusion on plant productivity and soil carbon,nitrogen storage in alpine meadows in Northern Tibet,China [J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2014,24(4):488-498
[10] 徐浩然,俞富洋,贾聪慧,等. 两种灌丛化草原小叶锦鸡儿的叶片化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(10):2191-2199
[11] 蒋嘉瑜,刘任涛,张安宁. 干旱与半干旱荒漠草原区柠条灌丛土壤分形维数与理化性质对比分析[J]. 水土保持研究,2021,28(4):54-61，69
[12] 闫宝龙,赵清格,张波,等. 不同植被类型对土壤理化性质和土壤呼吸的影响[J]. 生态环境学报,2017,26(2):189-195
[13] ZENG Q C,LIU Y,FANG Y,MA R T,et al. Impact of vegetation restoration on plants and soil C:N:P stoichiometry on the Yunwu Mountain Reserve of China[J]. Ecological Engineering,2017,109:92-100
[14] 程滨,赵永军,张文广,等. 生态化学计量学研究进展[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(6):1628-1637
[15] 曲安然,巩闪闪,冯二朋,等. 3种土地利用方式对济源石质山区土壤速效养分季节变化的影响[J/OL].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/41.1112.S.20211207.1727.004.html,2021-12-08/2022-06-01
[16] DORAN J W,JONES A J,ARSHAD M A,et al. Determinants of soil quality and soil health [M]. CRC press,1999:17-36
[17] 董云中,张强,郜春花,等. 定植年限对小叶锦鸡儿灌丛及根际土壤养分与酶活力的影响[J]. 农学学报,2014,4(1):29-32，93
[18] 徐巧峰,白冰,董宽虎. 不同生育期对柠条青贮品质的影响[J]. 山西农业科学,2021,49(7):892-897
[19] 张欢,朱鸿福,闫艳红,等. 米糠和乳酸菌制剂对柠条锦鸡儿青贮发酵品质及微生物多样性的影响[J/OL].https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2022.03.040.html,2021-12-22/2022-6-1
[20] 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M].(第三版)北京:中国农业出版社,2013:61-131
[21] TIAN H Q,CHEN G S,ZHANG C,et al. Pattern and variation of C:N:P ratios in China's soils:a synthesis of observational data [J]. Biogeochemistry,2010,98(1/3):139-151
[22] 李少华,王学会,包岩峰. 高寒沙区人工柠条林对土壤养分影响的时效性[J]. 东北林业大学学报,2015,43(11):70-74
[23] YAN Y C,XU D W,XU X L,et al. Shrub patches capture tumble plants:potential evidence for a self-reinforcing pattern in a semiarid shrub encroached grassland[J]. Plant and Soil,2019,422(1-2):311-321
[24] 贺山峰,王娟,邱兰兰,等. 科尔沁沙地小叶锦鸡儿群落保育土壤作用的研究[J]. 水土保持通报,2009,29(3):73-77
[25] 孙宗玖,朱进忠,张鲜花,等. 放牧强度对昭苏草甸草原土壤有机质及速效养分的影响[J]. 草业科学,2013,30(7):987-993
[26] 李耀. 不同草地类型土壤理化性状对放牧制度的响应[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2010:61-62
[27] 陈凯. 黄土高原不同乔灌树种人工纯林生态系统的养分循环研究[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2011:49-50
[28] 李浩. 长期围封与放牧对典型草原群落和土壤空间异质性的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古大学,2021:73-77
[29] 刘佳. 放牧强度对荒漠草原主要植物种群与土壤及其化学计量特征的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2020:43-45
[30] 常帅,于红博,张巧凤,等. 锡林郭勒草原土壤速效氮空间变异分析[J]. 草业学报,2021,30(7):11-21
[31] SCHENK J H,MAHALL B E. Positive and negative plant interactions contribute to a north-south-patterned association between two desert shrub species [J]. Oecologia,2002,132(3):402-410
[32] LOPEZ-PINTOR A,SAL A,BENAYAS J. Shrubs as a source of spatial heterogeneity-the case of Retama sphaerocarpa in Mediterranean pastures of central Spain [J]. Acta Oecologica,2006,29(3):247-255
[33] 徐薇薇,乔木. 干旱区土壤有机碳含量与土壤理化性质相关分析[J]. 中国沙漠,2014,34(6):1558-1561
[34] 杨红善,那·巴特尔,周学辉,等. 不同放牧强度对肃北高寒草原土壤肥力的影响[J]. 水土保持学报,2009,23(1):150-153

载畜率对荒漠草原小叶锦鸡儿邻近土壤速效养分含量的影响

Effect of Stocking Rates on the Content of Available Nutrients in Adjacent Soil of Caragana microphylla Plants in Desert Steppe

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	沈婷婷, 谭瑶, 王悦骅, 韩国栋. 荒漠草原植物和土壤碳氮养分含量对不同载畜率的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(2): 441-447.
[2]	唐家琦, 王成杰. 荒漠草原区显热通量变化特征及源区分布[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 239-251.
[3]	李雅男, 李邵宇, 史世斌, 王占海, 张彬, 陈恒, 赵萌莉. 荒漠草原不同放牧强度下土壤酶化学计量特征的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2239-2248.
[4]	李雅男, 李邵宇, 孙宇, 胡雪峰, 贺启珅, 张彬, 赵萌莉. 荒漠草原土壤酶活性及化学计量特征对不同载畜率的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 2019-2026.
[5]	董海宾, 刘思博, 蒋奇伸, 白海花, 尹燕亭, Bolormaa DAMDINSUREN, 侯向阳. 外购干草是否缓解了天然草原的生态压力?——来自内蒙古的回顾性调查[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 771-777.
[6]	于志慧, 吕广一, 王新雅, 徐学宝, 贾东璇, 王成杰. 放牧强度对内蒙古荒漠草原土壤碳氮及其稳定同位素的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 544-552.
[7]	李丹, 图雅, 史超逸, 吴倩倩, 张晓, 时忠杰, 杨晓晖, 刘艳书. 氮添加对锡林郭勒灌丛草原羊草(Leymus chinensis)化学计量特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(3): 692-700.
[8]	张彬, 李邵宇, 古琛, 赵萌莉, 邹俊明, 段红梅, 刘浩杰, 李建国. 内蒙古荒漠草原4种优势植物生物量分配对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12): 3355-3363.
[9]	门欣洋, 吕世杰, 侯东杰, 王梓晗, 李治国, 韩国栋, 孙海莲, 王保林, 王忠武. 放牧强度对荒漠草原无芒隐子草密度及空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(11): 3106-3112.
[10]	陈彦硕, 王红梅, 郭天斗, 马彦平. 荒漠草原灌丛转变过程土壤呼吸动态变化及其影响因素研究[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2663-2674.
[11]	白柳, 崔媛媛, 王忠武, 侯东杰, 孙海莲. 模拟降水变化对荒漠草原优势植物叶片氮回收特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2745-2752.
[12]	焦越佳, 张佳雨, 黄馨慧, 刘风山, 孙振元, 钱永强. 内蒙古荒漠草原东部植被指标动态变化及其与气候变化的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 153-160.
[13]	姚喜喜, 王立亚, 严振英, 张文娟, 孙海群, 周睿. 放牧对温性荒漠草原植物群落特征与牧草营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[14]	郭文章, 井长青, 王公鑫, 侯志雄, 赵苇康. 天山北坡荒漠草原土壤呼吸和生态系统呼吸对降水的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(9): 2031-2039.
[15]	张峰, 郑佳华, 赵天启, 乔荠瑢, 赵萌莉, 张心玥, 吴建新. 放牧强度对荒漠草原一年生植物刺穗藜种群特征及空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7): 1507-1512.