封育对蒿类荒漠草地植被地上生物量时间稳定性的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.026

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (4): 1163-1172.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.026

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

封育对蒿类荒漠草地植被地上生物量时间稳定性的影响

冶华薇¹, 孙宗玖^1,2,3, 刘慧霞¹, 于冰洁¹, 李思媛¹

1. 新疆农业大学草业学院, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
2. 西部干旱区草地资源与生态教育部重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052;
3. 新疆草地资源与生态自治区重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2022-07-05 修回日期:2023-01-16 发布日期:2023-04-28
通讯作者: 孙宗玖,E-mail:nmszj@21cn.com
作者简介:冶华薇(1996-),女,回族,新疆乌鲁木齐人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地资源生态与利用研究,E-mail:1091882048@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(32060408)；新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2020D01A60)资助

Effects of Grazing Exclusion on the Temporal Stability of Aboveground Biomass of Sagebrush Desert Grassland

YE Hua-wei¹, SUN Zong-jiu^1,2,3, LIU Hui-xia¹, Yu Bing-jie¹, LI Si-yuan¹

1. College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology of Western Arid Region, Ministry of Education, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China;
3. Xinjiang Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2022-07-05 Revised:2023-01-16 Published:2023-04-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确退化草地恢复过程中草地植被地上生物量时间稳定性变化及影响因素，以天山北坡中段蒿类荒漠草地为对象，采用野外取样和室内分析的方法，测算了封育年限间(2,4,6 a)群落地上生物量时间稳定性及物种异步性等，结果表明：封育2，4，6 a蒿类荒漠草地地上生物量较对照依次提高38.83%，136.26%，87.21%(P<0.05)。封育2 a蒿类荒漠草地群落地上生物量时间稳定性较对照增加38.36%(P<0.05)，而封育4，6 a则变化不显著；封育4，6 a蒿类荒漠草地物种丰富度较对照分别降低46.15%，15.93%(P<0.05)，物种异步性降低20.13%，17.52%(P<0.05)。物种丰富度与地上生物量时间稳定性无显著相关，但物种异步性及优势种时间稳定性对群落地上生物量时间稳定性有正向促进作用。因此，封育有利于退化蒿类荒漠草地植物地上生物量的恢复，物种异步性和优势物种时间稳定性是驱动群落地上生物量时间稳定性的重要因子。

关键词: 封育, 蒿类荒漠, 时间稳定性, 物种异步性

Abstract: To identify the temporal stability changes of aboveground biomass of grassland vegetation during the restoration of degraded grassland and the influencing factors,we measured the temporal stability of aboveground biomass and the asynchrony of species in the enclosure duration (2 a,4 a and 6 a),by using field sampling and indoor analysis on sagebrush desert grassland in the middle part of the northern slope of Tianshan Mountain. The results showed that the belowground biomass of sagebrush desert grassland did not change significantly after grazing exclusion,while the aboveground biomass increased 38.83%,136.26% and 87.21% (P<0.05) in 2 a,4 a and 6 a respectively,compared with the control. The abovegeround biomass temporal stability of community of sagebrush desert grassland communities increased by 38.36% (P<0.05) compared to the control in enclosure 2 a,while the changes were not significant in enclosure 4 a and 6 a;the species richness decreased by 46.15% and 15.93% (P<0.05) and species asynchrony decreased by 20.13% and 17.52% in enclosure 4 a and 6 a,respectively,compared to the control (P<0.05). Species richness was not significantly correlated with aboveground biomass temporal stability,but species asynchrony and dominant species temporal stability positively contributed to aboveground biomass temporal stability of community. Thus,grazing exclusion was beneficial to the aboveground biomass recovery of degraded sagebrush desert grassland,where species asynchrony and temporal stability of dominant species were key factors driving the aboveground biomass temporal stability of community.

Key words: Grazing exclusion, Sagebrush desert, Temporal stability, Species asynchrony

中图分类号:

S821.4+3

冶华薇, 孙宗玖, 刘慧霞, 于冰洁, 李思媛. 封育对蒿类荒漠草地植被地上生物量时间稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1163-1172.

YE Hua-wei, SUN Zong-jiu, LIU Hui-xia, Yu Bing-jie, LI Si-yuan. Effects of Grazing Exclusion on the Temporal Stability of Aboveground Biomass of Sagebrush Desert Grassland[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(4): 1163-1172.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.04.026

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I4/1163

参考文献

[1] HOUGHTON R A. The worldwide extent of land-use change[J]. BioScience,1994,44(5):305-313
[2] EBRAHIMI M,KHOSRAVI H,RIGI M. Short-term grazing exclusion from heavy livestock rangelands affects vegetation cover and soil properties in natural ecosystems of southeastern Iran[J]. Ecological Engineering,2016,95:10-18
[3] TILMAN D,ISBELL F,COWLES J M. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning[J]. Annual review of ecology,evolution,systematics,2014,45:471-493
[4] SONG M H,YU F H. Reduced compensatory effects explain the nitrogen-mediated reduction in stability of an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. New Phytologist,2015,207(1):70-77
[5] WILSEY B J,DANESHGAR P P,HOFMOCKEL K,et al. Invaded grassland communities have altered stability‐maintenance mechanisms but equal stability compared to native communities[J]. Ecology Letters,2014,17(1):92-100
[6] QIN J,REN H,HAN G,et al. Grazing reduces the temporal stability of temperate grasslands in northern China[J]. Flora,2019,259:151450
[7] OLIVER T H,HEARD M S,ISAAC N,et al. Biodiversity and Resilience of Ecosystem Functions[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution,2015,30(11):673-684
[8] TILMAN D. The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity:a search for general principles[J]. Ecology,1999,80(5):1455-1474
[9] GRMAN E,LAU J A,SCHOOLMASTER D R,et al. Mechanisms contributing to stability in ecosystem function depend on the environmental context[J]. Ecology letters,2010,13(11):1400-1410
[10] GOLLUSCIO R A,AUSTIN A T,MARTÍNEZ G C G,et al. Sheep Grazing Decreases Organic Carbon and Nitrogen Pools in the Patagonian Steppe:Combination of Direct and Indirect Effects[J]. Ecosystems,2009,12(4):686-697
[11] ZHANG J,HUANG Y,CHEN H,et al. Effects of grassland management on the community structure,aboveground biomass and stability of a temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2016,8(3):422-433
[12] LIU J,YANG X,GHANIZADEH H,et al. Long-term enclosure can benefit grassland community stability on the loess plateau of China[J]. Sustainability,2020,13(1):213
[13] SONG S,ZHU J,ZHENG T,et al. Long-term grazing exclusion reduces species diversity but increases community heterogeneity in an alpine grassland[J]. Frontiers in Ecology,2020:66
[14] 许鹏. 新疆草地资源及其利用[M]. 乌鲁木齐:新疆科技卫生出版社,1993:10-100
[15] 哈里·阿力腾别克,崔雨萱,刘慧霞,等. 短期封育对伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤氮及其粒径组成的影响[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(1):134-143
[16] 杨合龙,孙宗玖,陈玉萍. 封育年限对伊犁绢蒿荒漠群落特征及草场质量的影响[J]. 草地学报,2015,23(2):252-257
[17] 孙宗玖,安沙舟,段娇娇. 围栏封育对新疆蒿类荒漠草地植被及土壤养分的影响[J]. 干旱区研究,2009,26(6):877-882
[18] 靳茜,董乙强,安沙舟. 禁牧对博乐绢蒿种群和荒漠群落特征的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2018,55(4):746-753
[19] 董乙强,安沙舟,孙宗玖,等. 禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠植被特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2016,38(1):93-99
[20] 陶利波,于双,王国会,等. 封育对宁夏东部风沙区荒漠草原植物群落特征及其稳定性的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2018,40(2):67-74
[21] 阿依谢姆·约麦尔,董乙强,安沙舟,等. 短期围封对伊犁绢蒿荒漠群落特征及植被多样性的影响[J]. 新疆农业科学,2018,55(1):175-182
[22] 赵凌平,白欣,谭世图,等. 不同年限封育对黄土高原典型草原地上植被的影响[J]. 草业科学,2018,35(1):27-35
[23] 聂莹莹,辛晓平,徐丽君,等. 封育措施对呼伦贝尔草甸草原区草地生产力的影响[J]. 中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(8):74-82
[24] OBA G,VETAAS O R,STENSETH N C. Relationships between biomass and plant species richness in arid-zone grazing lands[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology,2001:836-845
[25] OSEM Y,PEREVOLOTSKY A,KIGEL J. Grazing effect on diversity of annual plant communities in a semi‐arid rangeland:interactions with small-scale spatial and temporal variation in primary productivity[J]. Journal of Ecology,2002,90(6):936-946
[26] 董乙强,孙宗玖,安沙舟,等. 禁牧对中度退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤养分的影响[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(8):1460-1468
[27] 刘凤婵,李红丽,董智,等. 封育对退化草原植被恢复及土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水土保持科学,2012,10(5):116-122
[28] 许鹏. 草地调查规划学[M]. 北京:中国农业出版社,1994,10:30-31
[29] 宋磊,董全民,李世雄,等. 放牧对青海湖北岸高寒草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草业科学,2016,33(8):1625-1632
[30] 崔雨萱,孙宗玖,刘慧霞,等. 短期封育对蒿类荒漠草地现存生物量及植物群落多样性的影响[J]. 草业学报,2020,29(12):17-26
[31] LOREAU M,DE MAZANCOURT C. Species synchrony and its drivers:neutral and nonneutral community dynamics in fluctuating environments[J]. The American Naturalist,2008,172(2):E48-E66
[32] 袁小强,王敏,张鲜花,等. 乌鲁木齐周边典型荒漠草地群落物种多样性及生物量关系研究[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(5):1253-1262
[33] ZHANG X,CHEN X,TIAN M,et al. An evaluation model for aboveground biomass based on hyperspectral data from field and TM8 in Khorchin grassland,China[J]. Plos one,2020,15(2):e0223934
[34] 陈芙蓉,程积民,于鲁宁,等. 封育和放牧对黄土高原典型草原生物量的影响[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(6):1079-1084
[35] SU Y Z,LI L LY,CUI J Y,et al. Influences of continuous grazing and livestock exclusion on soil properties in a degraded sandy grassland,Inner Mongolia,northern China[J]. Catena,2005,59(3):267-278
[36] CAMPANA S,TOGNETTI P M,YAHDJIAN L. Livestock exclusion reduces the temporal stability of grassland productivity regardless of eutrophication[J]. Science of the Total Environment,2022,817:152707
[37] 刘小丹,张克斌,王晓,等. 围封年限对沙化草地群落结构及物种多样性的影响[J]. 水土保持通报,2015,35(3):39-43
[38] CRAVEN D,NICO EISENHAUER N,PEARSE W D,et al. Multiple facets of biodiversity drive the diversity-stability relationship[J]. Nature ecology & evolution,2018,2(10):1579-1587
[39] YAN Y,LU X. Is grazing exclusion effective in restoring vegetation in degraded alpine grasslands in Tibet,China?[J]. PeerJ,2015,3:e1020
[40] MA F,ZHANG F,QUAN Q,et al. Common species stability and species asynchrony rather than richness determine ecosystem stability under nitrogen enrichment[J]. Ecosystems,2021,24(3):686-698
[41] HAUTIER Y,SEABLOOM E W,BORER E T,et al. Eutrophication weakens stabilizing effects of diversity in natural grasslands[J]. Nature,2014,508(7497):521-525
[42] 彭文涛. 高寒草甸种群时间稳定性和群落时间稳定性关系的研究[D].西安:陕西师范大学,2018:3-4
[43] 张峰,郑佳华,赵萌莉,等. 刈割强度对大针茅草原地上生物量时间稳定性的影响[J]. 生物多样性,2020,28(7):779-786
[44] MURAINA T O,XU C,YU Q,et al. Species asynchrony stabilises productivity under extreme drought across Northern China grasslands[J]. Journal of Ecology,2021,109(4):1665-1675
[45] GRIME J. Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems:immediate,filter and founder effects[J]. Journal of Ecology,1998,86(6):902-910
[46] SASAKI T,LAUENROTH W K. Dominant species,rather than diversity,regulates temporal stability of plant communities[J]. Oecologia,2011,166(3):761-768
[47] JINGHUI Z,YONGMEI H,HUIYING C,et al. Effects of grassland management on the community structure,aboveground biomass and stability of a temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia,China[J]. Journal of Arid Land,2015,8(3):422-433

封育对蒿类荒漠草地植被地上生物量时间稳定性的影响

Effects of Grazing Exclusion on the Temporal Stability of Aboveground Biomass of Sagebrush Desert Grassland

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	朱牛, 孙建, 石凝, 王金牛, 张林, 罗栋梁, 申承, 盖艾鸿. 短期围栏封育对高寒草甸植物群落及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 834-843.
[2]	苏洪烨, 张中华, 佘延娣, 马丽, 毛旭锋, 贾顺斌, 马真, 周华坤, 黄小涛. 不同管理措施对青海湖流域高寒草地土壤养分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(5): 1071-1076.
[3]	姜安静, 董乙强, 阿斯太肯·居力海提, 周时杰, 聂婷婷, 李彩英, 席伟, 安沙舟. 封育对不同草地类型土壤细菌群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(10): 2600-2608.
[4]	哈里·阿力腾别克, 崔雨萱, 刘慧霞, 董乙强, 孙强, 崔荷婷, 钱茹雪, 孙宗玖. 短期封育对伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地土壤氮及其粒径组成的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(1): 134-143.
[5]	姚喜喜, 才华, 李长慧. 封育和放牧对高寒草甸植被群落特征和土壤特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(S1): 128-136.
[6]	米琦, 王毅, 秦小静, 孙建, 叶冲冲. 青藏高原高寒草甸不同围栏年限土壤酶化学计量特征[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(1): 33-41.
[7]	田梦, 孙宗玖, 李培英, 汪洋. 增温对蒿类荒漠草地可萌发土壤种子库及其多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2020, 28(1): 141-148.
[8]	张永亮, 张丽娟, 于铁峰, 潘东. 禾豆组合与间作方式对牧草产量及产量稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5): 1410-1418.
[9]	吴婷, 宋乃平, 陈晓莹, 李敏岚, 陈娟. 围栏封育和放牧对盐池荒漠草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(3): 651-660.
[10]	张亮, 马维伟, 田青, 李广, 曹雪. 不同刈割强度对封育沙地植被生长状况的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 841-845.
[11]	武红旗, 范燕敏, 靳瑰丽, 夏小伟. 基于光谱指数的伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地恢复状况的判定[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(4): 853-858.
[12]	盛军, 朱瑶, 李海燕, 杨允菲. 长期刈割及围栏封育方式对大油芒种群构件特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 545-550.
[13]	李国旗, 赵盼盼, 邵文山, 靳长青. 封育对荒漠草原沙芦草群落土壤粒径分形维数及理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 551-558.
[14]	初晓辉, 谢勇, 单贵莲, 袁福锦, 陈功, 尹海燕. 放牧和封育对青藏高原南缘亚高山草甸群落结构及物种多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(5): 939-945.
[15]	靳瑰丽, 魏秀红, 范燕敏, 安沙舟, 朱习雯, 王惠宁. 退化伊犁绢蒿荒漠草地群落特征与地面光谱反射率相关性分析[J]. 草地学报, 2017, 25(2): 282-289.