祁连山国家公园不同退化高寒草甸植物与土壤特性研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.028

草地学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1530-1538.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.028

祁连山国家公园不同退化高寒草甸植物与土壤特性研究

赵帅¹, 杨文权², 蔺宝珺¹, 乔千洛¹, 武燕茹¹, 李钦瑶¹, 张生祥¹, 韩显忠³, 李希来⁴, 寇建村¹

1. 西北农林科技大学草业与草原学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
2. 西北农林科技大学生命科学学院, 陕西杨凌 712100;
3. 门源县草原站, 青海门源 810300;
4. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810016

收稿日期:2022-11-03 修回日期:2022-12-26 出版日期:2023-05-15 发布日期:2023-05-31
通讯作者: 寇建村,E-mail:jiancun02@163.com
作者简介:赵帅(1996-)，男，汉族，河南郑州人，主要从事草地生态恢复学研究，E-mail:zsalright@163.com
基金资助:
2021年第一批林业草原生态保护恢复资金自然资源调查监测项目(QHXH-2021-018)；国家自然科学基金项目(U21A20191)；中央财政林草科技推广示范项目(青[2021]TG01号)；青海省财政林业改革发展资金技术推广项目([2021]001号)资助

Plant and Soil Characteristics of Different Degraded Alpine Meadows in Qilian Mountain National Park

ZHAO Shuai¹, YANG Wen-quan², LIN Bao-jun¹, QIAO Qian-luo¹, WU Yan-ru¹, LI Qin-yao¹, ZHANG Sheng-xiang¹, HAN Xian-zhong³, LI Xi-lai⁴, KOU Jian-cun¹

1. College of Grassland Agriculture, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
2. College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F University, Yangling, Shaanxi Province 712100, China;
3. Menyuan County Grassland Station, Menyuan, Qinghai Province 810300, China;
4. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, hina

Received:2022-11-03 Revised:2022-12-26 Online:2023-05-15 Published:2023-05-31

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 本研究以祁连山国家公园内不同退化程度高寒草甸为研究对象,通过测定植被特征及土壤养分指标,结合相关性分析和冗余分析(Redundance analysis,RDA)探究植物群落和土壤理化性质及其内在关系。结果表明:未退化草甸植被以莎草科、禾本科为主,随退化程度的加重,禾本科植物逐渐被豆科、杂类草(如菊科)所取代,植物群落的高度、盖度、地上生物量和植物群落的多样性指数均呈下降趋势,土壤含水量、总孔隙度、速效氮含量、速效磷含量、速效钾含量、全氮含量、全磷含量、全钾含量和有机质含量逐渐降低,而土壤容重、pH值逐渐增加,与未退化高寒草甸相比,重度退化高寒草甸土壤含水量和有机质含量分别下降了61.3%,43.8%,土壤容重上升了37.8%;相关性分析表明,植物特征与土壤因子之间存在显著相关性,其中植被盖度和地上生物量受到土壤容重、含水量、总孔隙度、速效磷含量的影响较大。本研究可为全面了解高寒草甸的退化机制以及退化预测、管理和恢复研究提供一定理论依据。

关键词: 高寒草甸, 退化程度, 植物群落, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: In this study,the plant community and soil physicochemical properties and their intrinsic relationships were investigated by correlation analysis and redundancy analysis(RDA) through the measurements of vegetation characteristics and calculation of soil nutrient indexes in alpine meadows in different degradation status in Qilian Mountain National Park. The results showed that the species of Salicaceae and Gramineae families were the dominant ones in the undegraded meadow. With the increase of degradation,the Gramineae species were gradually replaced by legumes and forbs (e.g. Asteraceae),and the vegetation height,coverage,aboveground biomass,and diversity index of the plant community were decreasing,while the water content,total porosity,available nitrogen content,available phosphorus content,available potassium content,total nitrogen content,total phosphorus content,total potassium content and organic matter content of soils gradually decreased along with the gradual increases of soil bulk density and pH value. Compared to the undegraded alpine meadows,the soil water content and organic matter content of the heavily degraded alpine meadows decreased by 61.3% and 43.8%,respectively,and the soil capacity increased by 37.8%;Correlation analysis showed that there were significant correlations between plant characteristics and soil physicochemical factors,among which vegetation coverage and above-ground biomass were more influenced by the bulk density,water content,total porosity,and fast-acting phosphorus content of soils. This study could provide a theoretical basis for a comprehensive understanding of the degradation mechanism of alpine meadows and degradation prevention,alpine meadow management and restoration research.

Key words: Alpine meadows, Degree of degradation, Plant communities, Soil physicochemical properties

中图分类号:

S812

赵帅, 杨文权, 蔺宝珺, 乔千洛, 武燕茹, 李钦瑶, 张生祥, 韩显忠, 李希来, 寇建村. 祁连山国家公园不同退化高寒草甸植物与土壤特性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1530-1538.

ZHAO Shuai, YANG Wen-quan, LIN Bao-jun, QIAO Qian-luo, WU Yan-ru, LI Qin-yao, ZHANG Sheng-xiang, HAN Xian-zhong, LI Xi-lai, KOU Jian-cun. Plant and Soil Characteristics of Different Degraded Alpine Meadows in Qilian Mountain National Park[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(5): 1530-1538.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2023.05.028

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/CN/Y2023/V31/I5/1530

参考文献

[1] 单姝瑶,徐浩杰,杨磊,等. 祁连山国家公园生态承载力年际变化特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(8):2191-2198
[2] 杨学亭,樊军,盖佳敏,等. 祁连山不同类型草地的土壤理化性质与植被特征[J]. 应用生态学报,2022,33(4):878-886
[3] 肖云飞,陈文业,王斌杰,等. 祁连山国家级自然保护区土地利用时空变化及与气候因子关系研究[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(9):2049-2057
[4] 张建贵,王理德,姚拓,等. 东祁连山不同退化草地植物群落特征与土壤养分特性[J]. 水土保持学报,2019,33(1):227-233
[5] 尹宪志,张强,徐启运,等. 近50年来祁连山区气候变化特征研究[J]. 高原气象,2009,28(1):85-90
[6] 吕荣芳,赵文鹏,田晓磊,等. 祁连山地区生态系统服务间权衡的社会-生态环境响应机制研究[J].冰川冻土,2021,43(3):928-938
[7] GUO N,DEGEN A A,DENG B,et al. Changes in vegetation parameters and soil nutrients along degradagrasslands of the Tibetan plateau[J]. Agriculture,Ecosystems & Environment,2019,284:106593
[8] CUI H,WANG C,WANG X,et al. The loss of above- and below-ground biodiversity in degraded grasslands drives the decline of ecosystem multifunctionality[J]. Applied Soil Ecology,2022,172:104370
[9] PENG F,XUE X,LI C,et al. Plant community of alpine steppe shows stronger association with soil properties than alpine meadow alongside degradation[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2020,733:139048
[10] 周华坤,赵新全,温军,等. 黄河源区高寒草原的植被退化与土壤退化特征[J]. 草业学报,2012,21(5):1-11
[11] 杨元武,李希来,周旭辉,等. 高寒草甸植物群落退化与土壤环境特征的关系研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(6):1211-1217
[12] LIU M,ZHANG Z,SUN J,et al. The Response of Vegetation Biomass to Soil Properties along Degradation Gradients of Alpine Meadow at Zoige Plateau[J]. Chinese Geographical Science,2020,30(3):446-455
[13] 彭艳,孙晶远,马素洁,等. 藏北不同退化阶段高寒草甸植物群落特征与土壤养分特性[J]. 草业学报,2022,31(8):49-60
[14] 张宇鹏,吴笑天,李希来,等. 黄河源流域单元退化高寒草甸空间分布及其对土壤理化性质的响应[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(3):503-512
[15] 李玉辰,李宗省,张小平,等. 祁连山国家公园植被时空变化及其对人类活动的响应研究[J]. 生态学报,2023,43(1):219-233
[16] 国家质检总局.GB19377-2003 天然草地退化、沙化、盐渍化的分级指标[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社,2003:2-3
[17] 马克平,黄建辉,于顺利,等. 北京东灵山地区植物群落多样性的研究Ⅱ丰富度、均匀度和物种多样性指数[J]. 生态学报,1995,15(3):268-277
[18] RICOTTA C,AVENA G. On the relationship between Pielou's evenness and landscape dominance within the context of Hill's diversity profiles[J]. Ecological Indicators,2003,2(4):361-365
[19] 贺慧丹,李红琴,祝景彬,等. 黄河源高寒草甸封育条件下的土壤持水能力[J]. 中国草地学报,2017,39(5):62-67
[20] 尚浩博. 资源环境常规分析方法[M]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学出版社,2010:5-38
[21] WANG C,WEI M,WU B,et al. Alpine grassland degradation reduced plant species diversity and stability of plant communities in the Northern Tibet Plateau[J]. Acta Oecologica,2019,98:25-29
[22] XU H P,ZHANG J,PANG X P,et al. Responses of plant productivity and soil nutrient concentrations to different alpine grassland degradation levels[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2019,191(11):678
[23] WANG X,DONG S,YANG B,et al. The effects of grassland degradation on plant diversity,primary productivity,and soil fertility in the alpine region of Asia's headwaters[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,2014,186(10):6903-6917
[24] 佘延娣,杨晓渊,马丽,等. 退化高寒草甸植物群落和土壤特征及其相互关系研究[J]. 草地学报,2021,29(S1):62-71
[25] 罗方林,张法伟,王春雨,等. 青藏高原高寒草甸群落特征和代表性植物生存状态对草地退化的响应[J]. 生态学杂志,2022,41(1):18-24
[26] 郝爱华,薛娴,彭飞,等. 青藏高原典型草地植被退化与土壤退化研究[J]. 生态学报,2020,40(3):964-975
[27] WANG C T,CAO G M,WANG Q L,et al. Changes in plant biomass and species composition of alpine Kobresia meadows along altitudinal gradient on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Science in China,Series C,life Sciences,2008,51:86-94
[28] 刘旻霞,南笑宁,张国娟,等. 高寒草甸不同坡向植物群落物种多样性与功能多样性的关系[J]. 生态学报,2021,41(13):5398-5407
[29] 邵建翔,刘育红,马辉,等. 退化高寒草地浅层土壤理化性质Meta分析[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(6):1370-1378
[30] MA X,ASANO M,TAMURA K,et al. Physicochemical properties and micromorphology of degraded alpine meadow soils in the Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Catena,2020,194:104649
[31] XIE H H,WU Q G,HU J Y,et al. Changes in Soil Physical and Chemical Properties During the Process of Alpine Meadow Degradation along the Eastern Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Eurasian Soil Science,2018,51(12):1440-1446
[32] LI H,QIU Y,YAO T,et al. Nutrients available in the soil regulate the changes of soil microbial community alongside degradation of alpine meadows in the northeast of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2021,792:148363
[33] SHE Y,ZHANG Z,MA L,et al. Vegetation attributes and soil properties of alpine grassland in different degradation stages on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau,China:a meta-analysis[J]. Arabian Journal of Geosciences,2022,15(2):193
[34] YUAN Z Q,JIANG X J,LIU G J,et al. Responses of soil organic carbon and nutrient stocks to human-induced grassland degradation in a Tibetan alpine meadow[J]. Catena,2019,178:40-48
[35] LI Y Y,DONG S K,WEN L,et al. Soil carbon and nitrogen pools and their relationship to plant and soil dynamics of degraded and artificially restored grasslands of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Geoderma,2014,213:178-184
[36] ZHOU H,ZHANG D,JIANG Z,et al.Changes in the soil microbial communities of alpine steppe at Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau under different degradation levels[J]. Science of The Total Environment,2019,651:2281-2291
[37] WU G L,REN G H,DONG Q M,et al. Above- and Belowground Response along Degradation Gradient in an Alpine Grassland of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Clean Soil Air Water,2014,42(3):319-323
[38] REN G,SHANG Z,LONG R,et al. The relationship of vegetation and soil differentiation during the formation of black-soil-type degraded meadows in the headwater of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau,China[J]. Environmental Earth Sciences,2013,69(1):235-245
[39] 李强,何国兴,刘志刚,等. 东祁连山高寒草甸植被特征和生物多样性对生境的响应[J]. 草地学报,2022,30(1):169-177
[40] TENG Y,ZHAN J,AGYEMANG F B,et al. The effects of degradation on alpine grassland resilience:A study based on meta-analysis data[J]. Global Ecology and Conservation,2020,24:e01336
[41] YANG Z,ZHU Q,ZHAN W,et al. The linkage between vegetation and soil nutrients and their variation under different grazing intensities in an alpine meadow on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau[J]. Ecological Engineering,2018,110:128-136
[42] 王珍,金轲,丁勇,等. 植物-土壤微生物反馈在草地演替过程中的作用机制[J]. 中国草地学报,2022,44(1):95-103

祁连山国家公园不同退化高寒草甸植物与土壤特性研究

Plant and Soil Characteristics of Different Degraded Alpine Meadows in Qilian Mountain National Park

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	尹正辉, 陈新丰, 拉多. 模拟增温和放牧对高寒草甸主要植物生态位及种间联结的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1302-1313.
[2]	王安林, 马瑞, 马彦军, 牛丹妮, 何晨晨, 唐卫东. 不同治沙措施对土壤细菌群落多样性及理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1359-1367.
[3]	谢乐乐, 王晓丽, 马源, 马玉寿, 王彦龙, 周选博. 返青期休牧对高寒草甸植物品质与碳氮磷化学计量比的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(5): 1454-1460.
[4]	王明涛, 赵玉红, 苗彦军, 马素洁, 包赛很那, 徐雅梅, 雷变霞. 不同土地利用方式对藏东南典型草原土壤真菌群落的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 992-1000.
[5]	孙建波, 李成阳, 赖炽敏, 陈洋, 陈小杰, 周俊, 彭飞. 高寒草甸土壤团聚体碳氮磷对退化的响应及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1106-1114.
[6]	王雪松, 贺晶, 马普, 苏德荣. 辉河保护区温性草甸草原植被群落结构和碳储量对盐碱化的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(4): 1154-1162.
[7]	刘艳, 陈梦娇, 郭童童, 崔靖, 李兰平, 梁德飞, 李永慧, 张振华, 朱小雪, 任飞. 多梯度氮磷添加对高寒草甸植物群落生物量与氮磷含量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 751-759.
[8]	朱牛, 孙建, 石凝, 王金牛, 张林, 罗栋梁, 申承, 盖艾鸿. 短期围栏封育对高寒草甸植物群落及土壤理化性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 834-843.
[9]	常涛, 张骞, 秦瑞敏, 苏洪烨, 魏晶晶, 程洪杰, 赵天悦, 邵新庆, 周华坤. 氮素配施对三江源区退化高寒草甸植被和土壤的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(3): 860-867.
[10]	孟令旭, 贾彩玲, 许春雪, 张潇文, 呼和. 高寒草甸土壤细菌群落多样性和共现性网络对牦牛觅食强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 9-18.
[11]	杜晨璐, 乔一诺, 赵理荣, 陈瀚文, 曹孟阳, 刘玉. 退化高寒草甸斑块根—土复合体特征研究[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 202-209.
[12]	李林芝, 马源, 张小燕, 海龙, 林栋, 张德罡, 张海涛. 不同退化程度高寒草甸土壤团聚体及其有机碳分布特征[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1): 210-219.
[13]	王玉琴, 宋梅玲, 周睿, 王宏生, 马玉寿. 高寒草甸不同黄帚橐吾密度斑块的植物群落结构特征[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(9): 2264-2272.
[14]	王利锋, 吴秀扬, 常杰超, 任海彦. 季节性休牧对草甸草原植物群落空间分布格局的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 1944-1953.
[15]	费璇, 锁才序, 向双, 孙书存. 青藏东缘高寒草甸植物群落结构及功能群特征对长期季节放牧的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(8): 1954-1963.