基于Biome-BGCMuSo的草地碳/水通量参数优化及其对极端气候的响应

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.04.008

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (4): 1215-1228.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.04.008

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

基于Biome-BGCMuSo的草地碳/水通量参数优化及其对极端气候的响应

王晓毅, 井长青, 王公鑫

新疆农业大学草业学院, 新疆草地资源与生态重点实验室, 西部干旱荒漠区草地资源与生态教育部重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2025-05-26 修回日期:2025-10-24 发布日期:2026-04-15
通讯作者: 井长青，E-mail：jingchangqing@126.com
作者简介:王晓毅（2001-），女，汉族，新疆塔城人，硕士研究生，主要从事草地生态遥感研究，E-mail：17590823770@163.com；
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目（42161024）；2025年中央财政林草科技推广示范项目（新[2025]TG09号）；新疆农业大学研究生科研创新项目（XJAUGRI2025001）资助

Optimization of Grassland Carbon/Water Flux Parameters Based on Biome-BGCMuSo and Their Responses to Extreme Climate

WANG Xiao-yi, JING Chang-qing, WANG Gong-xin

College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology, Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology of Western Arid Region, Ministry of Education, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2025-05-26 Revised:2025-10-24 Published:2026-04-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 不同草地生态系统碳/水循环对极端气候响应及其机制存在差异。本研究基于生物地球化学循环模型Biome-BGCMuSo（BGC with Multilayer Soil Module）结合涡度相关数据，通过敏感性分析和参数优化，探究了不同草地类型碳/水通量差异及其对极端气候的响应。结果表明，碳通量模拟对植被光合生理及碳分配参数敏感，水通量对叶片、根系参数敏感，且不同草地类型存在差异，优化高敏感参数可显著提升碳通量模拟精度，但水通量模拟仍有待进一步提高。生长季热浪期间，3种草地仍为碳汇，温性荒漠草原和山地草甸日间碳汇分别减弱28.7%和29.4%；极端降雨提升了3种草地的碳/水通量；干旱事件使温性荒漠草原碳汇增强62.5%，山地草甸碳汇减弱16.3%。本研究揭示了干旱-半干旱区草地碳/水循环对极端气候的不同响应机制，为预测气候变化下草地生态过程演变提供了科学依据。

关键词: Biome-BGCMuSo模型, 草地碳/水通量, 参数优化, 极端气候事件

Abstract: The responses of carbon/water cycles in different grassland ecosystems to extreme climatic events and the underlying mechanisms varied. This study， employed the biogeochemical cycle model Biome-BGCMuSo （BGC with Multilayer Soil Module）， integrated with eddy covariance data，conducted sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization to investigate variations in carbon/water fluxes across different grassland types and their responses to extreme climates. The results showed that carbon flux simulations were sensitive to vegetation photosynthetic physiology and carbon allocation parameters， while water flux simulations were sensitive to leaf and root parameters， with variations across grassland types. Optimizing highly sensitive parameters significantly improved carbon flux simulation accuracy， but water flux simulations still require refinement. During growing season heatwaves， all three grassland types remained carbon sinks， though diurnal carbon sequestration decreased by 28.7% and 29.4% in temperate desert steppe and mountain meadows， respectively. Extreme rainfall enhanced carbon and water fluxes across all three grasslands. Drought events increased carbon sequestration by 62.5% in temperate desert steppe but decreased it by 16.3% in mountain meadows. This study reveals distinct response mechanisms of carbon and water cycles in grasslands of arid-semiarid regions to extreme climatic events， providing scientific basis for predicting the evolution of grassland ecological processes under climate change.

Key words: Biome-BGCMuSo model, Grassland carbon/Water fluxes, Parameters optimization, Extreme climate events

中图分类号:

S812.6

王晓毅, 井长青, 王公鑫. 基于Biome-BGCMuSo的草地碳/水通量参数优化及其对极端气候的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1215-1228.

WANG Xiao-yi, JING Chang-qing, WANG Gong-xin. Optimization of Grassland Carbon/Water Flux Parameters Based on Biome-BGCMuSo and Their Responses to Extreme Climate[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(4): 1215-1228.

参考文献

[1] ZHANG K，WANG Y，MAMTIMIN A，et al. Variation characteristics and influencing mechanisms of CO₂ flux from grassland ecosystem in the Central Tianshan Mountains，China[J]. Ecological Indicators，2025，170：113069
[2] FANG J Y，YU G R，LIU L L，et al. Climate change， human impacts， and carbon sequestration in China[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America，2018，115（16）：4015-4020
[3] LIU X W，ZHANG R P，GUO J，et al. Analysis of the spatiotemporal dynamics of grassland carbon sinks in Xinjiang via the improved CASA model[J]. Ecological Indicators，2025，170：113062
[4] DI L. Study on variation characteristic and influencing factors of carbon and water flux in different ecosystems of wanchuan river basin[D]. Lanzhou：Lanzhou University，2022：1-6 邸乐. 宛川河流域不同生态系统碳/水通量变化特征及其影响因素的研究[D]. 兰州：兰州大学，2022：1-6
[5] NETSIANDA A，MHANGARA P. Aboveground biomass estimation in a grassland ecosystem using Sentinel-2 satellite imagery and machine learning algorithms[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment，2025，197（2）：138
[6] WANG Y Y，XIAO J F，MA Y M，et al. Carbon fluxes and environmental controls across different alpine grassland types on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2021，311：108694
[7] SU T C，WANG Y B，YOU C H，et al. Effects of drought on optimum temperature of carbon fluxes in temperate grasslands[J]. Environmental Research Letters，2024，19（12）：124099
[8] DHAKAL K，KAKANI V G，WAGLE P，et al. Regional switchgrass carbon sequestration estimates from high-frequency eddy covariance and Mesonet observations[J]. Agrosystems， Geosciences & Environment，2023，6（1）：e20328
[9] BALDOCCHI D D，HINCKS B B，MEYERS T P. Measuring biosphere-atmosphere exchanges of biologically related gases with micrometeorological methods[J]. Ecology，1988，69（5）：1331-1340
[10] YANG Q，ZHU X H，OUYANG G Z，et al. Optimization of the simulated parameters of grassland productivity using CLM5.0 in Hulunbuir of Inner Mongolia[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering，2023，39（6）：139-148 杨倩，朱小华，欧阳光洲，等. 基于CLM5.0的内蒙古呼伦贝尔草地生产力模拟参数优化[J]. 农业工程学报，2023，39（6）：139-148
[11] LIU H H，CHEN Y，LIU Y，et al. Simulation of spatial pattern and future trends of grassland net primary productivity in the Loess Plateau based on random forest model[J]. Arid Zone Research，2023，40（1）：123-131 刘欢欢，陈印，刘悦，等. 基于随机森林模型的黄土高原草地净初级生产力时空格局及未来演变趋势模拟[J]. 干旱区研究，2023， 40（1）：123-131
[12] FANG M Z，LIU W，ZHANG J Y，et al. Quantitative evaluation of the applicability of classical forest ecosystem carbon cycle models in China： a case study of the biome-BGC model[J]. Forests，2024，15（9）：1609
[13] POWLSON D S，SMITH P，SMITH J U. Evaluation of soil organic matter models： using existing long-term datasets[M]. Berlin，Heidelberg：Springer，1996：283-291
[14] WHITE M A，THORNTON P E，RUNNING S W，et al. Parameterization and sensitivity analysis of the BIOME-BGC terrestrial ecosystem model： net primary production controls[J]. Earth Interactions，2000，4（3）：1-85
[15] LIU J，CHEN J M，CIHLAR J，et al. A process-based boreal ecosystem productivity simulator using remote sensing inputs[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment，1997，62（2）：158-175
[16] YUAN C G，SONG Y H，TIAN M，et al. Study on soil carbon sequestration potential of wheat and maize double-cropping farmland based on century model—a case study of Xiangcheng County，Henan Province[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin，2024，40（35）：70-75 袁晨光，宋艳华，田梦，等. 基于Century模型的麦玉两熟农田土壤固碳潜力研究——以河南省襄城县为例[J]. 中国农学通报，2024，40（35）：70-75
[17] WU A Y，LI X L，ZHAO Y，et al. Simulation of soil organic carbon dynamics in farmland in Huainan City based on CENTURY model[J]. Journal of Hefei University of Technology （Natural Science），2024，47（10）：1305-1313 吴安云，李湘凌，赵燕，等. 基于CENTURY模型的淮南市农田土壤有机碳动态模拟[J]. 合肥工业大学学报（自然科学版），2024，47（10）：1305-1313
[18] XING X L，WU M S，ZHU H J，et al. Optimized gross primary productivity over the croplands within the BEPS particle filtering data assimilation system （BEPS_PF v1. 0）[J]. Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems，2025，17（1）：e2024MS004412
[19] SUN Q L，LI B L. Developing the biome-BGC model to estimate net primary productivity of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[C]//2016 3rd International Conference on Information Science and Control Engineering （ICISCE）. IEEE，2016：334-337
[20] HIDY D，BARCZA Z，HOLLOS R，et al. User’s Guide for Biome-BGCMuSo 6.2[J]. Budapest：ELTE，2021：2158-2165
[21] JIANG L，ZHU T C，MA L G，et al. Responses of ecosystem’s carbon and water fluxes to global change on the Songnen steppe[J]. Science & Technology Review，2011，29（6）：35-42 蒋丽，祝廷成，马略耕，等. 松嫩草地碳和水通量对全球变化的响应[J]. 科技导报，2011，29（6）：35-42
[22] WANG T H，WANG X F，ZHANG Q，et al. Effects of extreme temperature events on carbon fluxes in different ecosystems in the Heihe River Basin， China[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2025，362：110380
[23] CHAI H，MA J Y，ZHANG J W，et al. Nonlinear responses of ecosystem carbon fluxes to precipitation change in a semiarid grassland[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science，2025，16：1519879
[24] ZHAO H C，JIA G S，WANG H S，et al. Seasonal and interannual variations in carbon fluxes in East Asia semi-arid grasslands[J]. Science of the Total Environment，2019，668：1128-1138
[25] JOHNSTON S E，GUNAWARDANA P V S L，ROOD S B，et al. Multidecadal trends in organic carbon flux through a grassland river network shaped by human controls and climatic cycles[J]. Geophysical Research Letters，2022，49（4）：e2021GL096885
[26] LI Y. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity analysis of optimal value of sensitive parameters in ecological process model： The BIOME-BGC model as an example[D]. Yangling：Northwest A&F University，2018：14-16 李英. 生态过程模型参数敏感性的时空异质性分析——以Biome-BGC模型为例[D]. 杨凌：西北农林科技大学，2018：14-16
[27] LI Y Z，ZHANG T L，LIU Q Y，et al. Temporal and spatial heterogeneity analysis of optimal value of sensitive parameters in ecological process model： The BIOME-BGC model as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2018，29（1）：84-92 李一哲，张廷龙，刘秋雨，等. 生态过程模型敏感参数最优取值的时空异质性分析——以BIOME-BGC模型为例[J]. 应用生态学报，2018，29（1）：84-92
[28] GUPTA H V，KLING H，YILMAZ K K，et al. Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria： Implications for improving hydrological modelling[J]. Journal of Hydrology，2009，377（1/2）：80-91
[29] QU L P. Heat waves effect on grassland ecosystem carbon flux in north China[D]. Changchun：Northeast Normal University，2016：26-27 曲鲁平. 热浪对中国北方草地生态系统碳通量的影响研究[D]. 长春：东北师范大学，2016：26-27
[30] CHOI N，LEE M I，CHA D H，et al. Decadal changes in the interannual variability of heat waves in East Asia caused by atmospheric teleconnection changes[J]. Journal of Climate，2020，33（4）：1505-1522
[31] ZHANG Q J，HUANG Y M，HAO L T，et al. Spatiotemporal characteristics of high temperature and heat wave in Dongting Lake Basin based on percentile threshold method[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment，2025，41（1）：66-73 张秋锦，黄一民，郝丽婷，等. 基于百分位阈值法的洞庭湖流域高温热浪时空特征[J]. 气象与环境学报，2025，41（1）：66-73
[32] WARING R H，RUNNING S W. Forest ecosystems：Analysis at multiple scales[M]. Amsterdam：Elsevier，2007：1-16
[33] YANG F，ZHANG L，YAN M，et al. Carbon flux modeling with the calibrated biome-BGCMuSo in China’s tropical forests： natural and rubber-planted forests[J]. Forests，2025，16（4）：661
[34] ZHANG M Y，MA Y J，CHEN P，et al. Growing-season carbon budget of alpine meadow ecosystem in the Qinghai Lake Basin： a continued carbon sink through this century according to the Biome-BGC model[J]. Carbon Balance and Management，2023，18（1）：25
[35] YOU Y F，WANG S Y，MA Y X，et al. Improved modeling of gross primary productivity of alpine grasslands on the Tibetan Plateau using the biome-BGC model[J]. Remote Sensing，2019，11（11）：1287
[36] MAO F J，LI P H，ZHOU G M，et al. Development of the BIOME-BGC model for the simulation of managed Moso bamboo forest ecosystems[J]. Journal of Environmental Management，2016，172：29-39
[37] AGUILOS M，TAKAGI K，LIANG N S，et al. Dynamics of ecosystem carbon balance recovering from a clear-cutting in a cool-temperate forest[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2014，197：26-39
[38] YANG Y H，FANG J Y，MA W H，et al. Soil carbon stock and its changes in northern China’s grasslands from 1980s to 2000s[J]. Global Change Biology，2010，16（11）：3036-3047
[39] ZHANG T L，SUN R，HU B，et al. Simulation of water and carbon fluxes in Harvard forest area by using improved Biome-BGC model[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology，2011，30（9）：2099-2106 张廷龙，孙睿，胡波，等. 改进Biome-BGC模型模拟哈佛森林地区水、碳通量[J]. 生态学杂志，2011，30（9）：2099-2106
[40] LIU Q Y，ZHANG T L，DU M X，et al. A better carbon-water flux simulation in multiple vegetation types by data assimilation[J]. Forest Ecosystems，2022，9：100013
[41] QIN G X，WU J，LI C B，et al. Sensitivity analysis of WOFOST model crop parameters in different grassland types[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica，2022，31（5）：13-25 秦格霞，吴静，李纯斌，等. 不同草地类型WOFOST模型参数敏感性分析[J]. 草业学报，2022，31（5）：13-25
[42] BRILLI F，HÖRTNAGL L，HAMMERLE A，et al. Leaf and ecosystem response to soil water availability in mountain grasslands[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology，2011，151（12）：1731-1740
[43] SCHMITT M，BAHN M，WOHLFAHRT G，et al. Land use affects the net ecosystem CO₂ exchange and its components in mountain grasslands[J]. Biogeosciences，2010，7（8）：2297-2309
[44] DE BOECK H J，DREESEN F E，JANSSENS I A，et al. Climatic characteristics of heat waves and their simulation in plant experiments[J]. Global Change Biology，2010，16（7）：1992-2000
[45] HOOVER D L，KNAPP A K，SMITH M D. Resistance and resilience of a grassland ecosystem to climate extremes[J]. Ecology，2014，95（9）：2646-2656
[46] ARCA V，POWER S A，DELGADO-BAQUERIZO M，et al. Seasonal effects of altered precipitation regimes on ecosystem-level CO₂ fluxes and their drivers in a grassland from Eastern Australia[J]. Plant and Soil，2021，460（1）：435-451
[47] WANG B X，ZENG Y H，WANG D Y，et al. Responses of leaf stomata to environmental stresses in distribution and physiological characteristics[J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas，2010，28（2）：122-126，131 王碧霞，曾永海，王大勇，等. 叶片气孔分布及生理特征对环境胁迫的响应[J]. 干旱地区农业研究，2010，28（2）：122-126，131
[48] JIAO T，WILLIAMS C A，DE KAUWE M G，et al. Patterns of post-drought recovery are strongly influenced by drought duration，frequency，post-drought wetness，and bioclimatic setting[J]. Global Change Biology，2021，27（19）：4630-4643
[49] WANG Z Y，SUN G，LUO P，et al. A study of soil-dynamics based on a simulated drought in an alpine meadow on the Tibetan Plateau[J]. Journal of Mountain Science，2013，10（5）：833-844
[50] LEI T J，PANG Z G，WANG X Y，et al. Drought and carbon cycling of grassland ecosystems under global change： a review[J]. Water，2016，8（10）：460
[51] ZAVALLONI C，GIELEN B，LEMMENS C M H M，et al. Does a warmer climate with frequent mild water shortages protect grassland communities against a prolonged drought？[J]. Plant and Soil，2008，308（1）：119-130

基于Biome-BGCMuSo的草地碳/水通量参数优化及其对极端气候的响应

Optimization of Grassland Carbon/Water Flux Parameters Based on Biome-BGCMuSo and Their Responses to Extreme Climate

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	布仁其其格, 叶国辉, 陈国康, 孙珊珊, 李鑫, 杨文蕾, 付和平, 袁帅. 气候因子对五趾跳鼠体重和肌肉组织碳氮稳定同位素的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(1): 163-171.
[2]	蒙陈晨, 张克闽, 万吉鑫, 秘一先, 杨高文. 退化草地原位土壤接种丛枝菌根真菌对黄花苜蓿抗旱性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(12): 3885-3897.
[3]	王宁斌, 乔荠瑢, 李邵宇, 郑佳华, 张峰, 张彬, 徐龙超, 周清格, 陈信力, 赵萌莉, 季祥. 放牧强度对短花针茅根系形态影响的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(12): 4015-4022.
[4]	孟浦嘉, 王梓晗, 闫宝龙, 吕世杰, 王忠武. 载畜率对驼绒藜邻近土壤养分空间分布的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(12): 4139-4151.
[5]	刘宏金, 郝佳慧, 许显莉, 罗崇亮, 徐世晓. 可可西里典型高寒草地植被群落特征及野生食草动物承载力[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(11): 3505-3514.
[6]	杜金山, 蒲俊宇, 黄晶, 乔建霞, 苏颖佳, 邢志贤, 洪逸楠, 钟小兰, 王新生, 刘克思. 温带羊草草原退化对羊草根系形态特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(10): 3147-3154.
[7]	刘海强, 李世雄, 赵文, 刘晶晶, 徐海峰, 尹亚丽. 免耕补播对中度退化草地植被及土壤细菌群落特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(10): 3280-3290.
[8]	吴明白, 王露巍, 窦梓镱, 郑伟, 刘永萍, 刘丽燕, 吴天忠. 阿勒泰荒漠区草地自然恢复潜力评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(10): 3405-3418.
[9]	吴沛桐, 温仲明, 郑诚, 袁浏欢, 谭凯, 王志鹏, 石长春, 马雅莉, 张艳. 毛乌素沙地不同恢复年限植物多样性与群落稳定性特征及其关系[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2880-2889.
[10]	段俊光, 房凯, 褚建民, 王迎新, 张琦. 退化程度对典型草原物种多样性和土壤养分关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2890-2899.
[11]	康晓玉, 叶国辉, 孙珊珊, 王海龙, 张治良, 李亚楠, 布仁其其格, 王千成, 袁帅, 付和平. 典型草原过度放牧方式下布氏田鼠种群季节动态与植被特征的关系[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2931-2940.
[12]	赵海东, 梁海红, 胡小文, 冯彦皓, 常生华, 李春杰, 侯扶江. 基于草地植被恢复指数的退化高寒草甸生态修复措施初步效果评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3057-3067.
[13]	张姝玭, 乌日罕, 颜安, 高英志. 草原防火技术研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2413-2422.
[14]	刘涛, 明明, 袁帅, 付和平, 那顺孟克, 格根塔娜, 杨文蕾, 武晓东. 基于DNA宏条形码技术分析布氏田鼠的食物组成及其季节差异[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2474-2481.
[15]	李海铭, 谢文文, 沈邱筱潇, 陈进勋, 申婉青, 党明雨, 王忠斌. MaxEnt模型优化预测气候变化下西藏瑞香狼毒潜在适生区[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2603-2617.