青贮玉米与甜高粱/籽粒玉米间作系统的生产性能研究

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.034

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1942-1952.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.034

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

青贮玉米与甜高粱/籽粒玉米间作系统的生产性能研究

张丽娟, 谢开云, 颜安, 王岚, 崔荷婷, 朱震

新疆农业大学草业学院/西部干旱荒漠区草地资源与生态教育部重点实验室, 新疆乌鲁木齐 830052

收稿日期:2025-09-03 修回日期:2025-11-09 发布日期:2026-05-08
通讯作者: 谢开云，E-mail:xjndxky@xjau.edu.cn
作者简介:张丽娟（1999-），女，汉族，甘肃通渭人，硕士研究生，主要从事草地管理与牧草生产研究，E-mail:17339887841@163.com；
基金资助:
新疆三农骨干人才培养项目（2022SNGGGCC019）；新疆维吾尔自治区青年科技拔尖人才项目（2022TSYCCX0044）资助

Research on the Production Performance of Intercropping Systems of Silage Corn and Sweet Sorghum/Grain Corn

ZHANG Li-juan, XIE Kai-yun, YAN An, WANG Lan, CUI He-ting, ZHU Zhen

College of Grassland Science, Xinjiang Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Resources and Ecology in the Western Arid Desert Region, Ministry of Education, Urumqi, Xinjiang 830052, China

Received:2025-09-03 Revised:2025-11-09 Published:2026-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探究青贮玉米（Zea mays L.）与甜高粱（Sorghum bicolor）/籽粒玉米不同间作模式对饲草产量、品质及种间关系的影响，并筛选最优间作配置模式，本试验以青贮玉米（S）、甜高粱（T）和籽粒玉米（M）单作为对照，设置了6种间作模式（S₄T₂：4行青贮玉米∶2行甜高粱；S₃T₃：3行青贮玉米∶3行甜高粱；S₂T₄：2行青贮玉米∶4行甜高粱；S₄M₂：4行青贮玉米∶2行籽粒玉米；S₃M₃：3行青贮玉米∶3行籽粒玉米；S₂M₄：2行青贮玉米∶4行籽粒玉米）。结果表明：与单作相比，间作显著影响各饲草作物的农艺性状（P<0.05）。S₃T₃处理的鲜草产量最高，达107.8 t·hm^-2。S₃M₃处理的干草产量、粗蛋白产量和粗蛋白含量均最高，分别为36.3 t·hm^-2，3.5 t·hm^-2和9.6%，较青贮玉米单作分别提高17.3%，14.6%和58.2%。间作显著提高了土地当量比（Land equivalent ratio，LER=1.1~1.4），表明系统具有产量优势。其中，S₂T₄，S₃T₃，S₂M₄和S₃M₃处理中青贮玉米表现出更强的相对竞争力和营养竞争比率（Aggressivity，A>0；Competitive ratio，CR>1）。综合分析，3行青贮玉米与3行甜高粱间作（S₃T₃）为最佳模式，可有效提升作物产量与品质。

关键词: 间作, 青贮玉米, 生产性能, 营养品质, 种间竞争

Abstract: To explore the effects of different intercropping patterns of silage corn （Zea mays L.） and sweet sorghum （Sorghum bicolor） / grain corn （Z. mays） on forage yield， quality， and interspecies relationships， and to identify the optimal intercropping configuration， this experiment used silage corn （S）， sweet sorghum （T）， and grain corn （M） as controls， setting up six intercropping patterns： S₄T₂ （4 rows of silage corn∶2 rows of sweet sorghum）； S₃T₃ （3 rows of silage corn∶3 rows of sweet sorghum）； S₂T₄ （2 rows of silage corn： 4 rows of sweet sorghum）； S₄M₂ （4 rows of silage corn∶2 rows of grain corn）； S₃M₃ （3 rows of silage corn∶3 rows of grain corn）； S₂M₄ （2 rows of silage corn∶4 rows of grain corn）. The results indicated that intercropping significantly affected the agronomic traits of the forage crops compared to sole cropping （P<0.05）. The fresh grass yield of the S₃T₃ treatment was the highest， reaching 107.8 t·hm^-2； the S₃M₃ treatment exhibited the highest yields of hay， crude protein yield， and crude protein content， measuring 36.3 t·hm^-2， 3.5 t·hm^-2， and 9.6%， respectively， an increase of 17.3%， 14.6%， and 58.2% compared to sole silage corn. Intercropping significantly improved the Land Equivalent Ratio （LER=1.1~1.4）， indicating a yield advantage in the system. Notably， S₂T₄， S₃T₃， S₂M₄， and S₃M₃ treatments demonstrated stronger aggressivity and competitive ratio （Aggressivity， A>0； Competitive ratio， CR>1） for silage corn. Comprehensive analysis revealed that the intercropping of 3 rows of silage corn with 3 rows of sweet sorghum （S₃T₃） was the optimal pattern for effectively enhancing crop yield and quality.

Key words: Intercropping, Silage corn, Production performance, Nutritional quality, Interspecific competition

中图分类号:

S513
S548

张丽娟, 谢开云, 颜安, 王岚, 崔荷婷, 朱震. 青贮玉米与甜高粱/籽粒玉米间作系统的生产性能研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1942-1952.

ZHANG Li-juan, XIE Kai-yun, YAN An, WANG Lan, CUI He-ting, ZHU Zhen. Research on the Production Performance of Intercropping Systems of Silage Corn and Sweet Sorghum/Grain Corn[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(5): 1942-1952.

参考文献

[1] LU S, XIAO H X, XU Y P, et al. Development status of silage maize and high yield and high efficiency cultivation techniques[J]. Crop Research, 2019, 33(6):590-591 鲁珊, 肖荷霞, 徐玉鹏, 等. 青贮玉米发展现状及高产高效栽培技术[J]. 作物研究, 2019, 33(6):590-591
[2] WU P X, WANG S N, WANG J L, et al. Effects of cutting period and stubble height on feeding quality of whole-plant corn silage based on principal component analysis and membership function analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2024, 36(6):4022-4035 吴鹏鑫, 王胜男, 王嘉麟, 等. 基于主成分分析和隶属函数分析研究刈割期和留茬高度对全株玉米青贮饲用价值的影响[J]. 动物营养学报, 2024, 36(6):4022-4035
[3] WANG T Y. Design and experiment of cutting fresh corn threshing mechanism[D]. Harbin:Northeast Agricultural University, 2020:1-2 王天元. 切削式鲜食玉米脱粒机构的设计与试验[D]. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2020:1-2
[4] PAN D X, LI F, HE H Y, et al. Effects of different microbial agents on sensory evaluation of whole corn silage[J]. Cereal & Feed Industry, 2021(3):26-29 盘道兴, 李凡, 何鸿源, 等. 不同微生物菌剂对全株玉米青贮感官评价效果的影响[J]. 粮食与饲料工业, 2021(3):26-29
[5] LIU H H, QI X H, QIAO G H, et al. Empirical research on the development planning of agriculture and animal husbandry industry in northern farming-pastoral ecotone counties—taking Huade county, Inner Mongolia as an example[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning, 2022, 43(5):113-121 刘贺贺, 祁晓慧, 乔光华, 等. 北方农牧交错带县域农牧业产业发展规划实证研究——以内蒙古化德县为例[J]. 中国农业资源与区划, 2022, 43(5):113-121
[6] WANG J B, XIE J H, LI L L, et al. Effects of nitrogen management on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of maize in arid areas of central Gansu, China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2019, 28(1):60-69 王进斌, 谢军红, 李玲玲, 等. 氮肥运筹对陇中旱农区玉米光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2019, 28(1):60-69
[7] WANG P F, YU A Z, WANG F, et al. Effects of reducing nitrogen application on maize agronomic traits, grain yield and quality under green manure returning to field system in arid areas[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(13):2552-2563 王鹏飞, 于爱忠, 王凤, 等. 干旱地区绿肥还田条件下减氮对玉米农艺性状、产量及籽粒品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(13):2552-2563
[8] XU C L. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer and planting density on the growth and nutrient uptake of different varieties of maize[D]. Chongqing:Southwest University, 2018:71-72 徐春丽. 氮肥和种植密度对不同品种玉米生长及养分吸收的影响[D]. 重庆:西南大学, 2018:71-72
[9] LI S S, LI F, BAI Y F, et al. Sweet sorghum feeding value and feeding dairy cows technology[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2017, 34(7):1534-1541 李珊珊, 李飞, 白彦福, 等. 甜高粱饲用价值及饲喂奶牛技术[J]. 草业科学, 2017, 34(7):1534-1541
[10] ZHANG J L, SHEN Y X, LIU X B, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of low phosphorus tolerance and screening of representative evaluation indexes at sorghum seedling[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1):179-187 张景龙, 沈益新, 刘信宝, 等. 高粱苗期耐低磷能力的综合评价及代表性评价指标筛选[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1):179-187
[11] CHEN H, WEI Y M, JIAO T, et al. Effects of different mixing ratios and additives on the quality of mixed silage of whole quinoa and sweet sorghum[J/OL]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1156.S.20250709. 1201.004, 2025-07-09/2025-08-29 陈昊, 魏玉明, 焦婷, 等. 不同混合比例和添加剂对藜麦全株和甜高粱混合青贮品质的影响[J/OL]. https://link.cnki.net/urlid/62.1156.S.20250709.1201.004, 2025-07-09/2025-08-29
[12] WEI W H, LI P, SHAO G G, et al. Response of silage maize yield and quality to reduced irrigation and combined organic-inorganic fertilizer in northwest irrigation areas[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2025, 58(8):1521-1534 韦文华, 李盼, 邵冠贵, 等. 西北灌区青贮玉米产量及品质对减量灌水与有机无机肥配施的响应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2025, 58(8):1521-1534
[13] NI W, LIANG D N, SHI X W, et al. Effects of irrigation frequency and fertilizer application rate on production performance and photosynthetic characteristics of sweet sorghum[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1):294-301 倪旺, 梁丹妮, 时兴伟, 等. 灌溉次数和施氮量对甜高粱生产性能及光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(1):294-301
[14] Сторожик ЛI, Музика О В. Features of formation of productivity of sweet sorghum hybrids depending on the influence of agrotechnical factors: width of row spacing, crop density and processing by growth regulator[J]. Plant Varieties Studying and Protection, 2019, 15(2):171-181
[15] TIAN Y X, ZHU J Y, LI C Y, et al. Effects of intercropping patterns on photosynthesis, yield and interspecific competitiveness of maize/soybean intercropping system[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2025, 39(8):1775-1785 田艺心, 朱金英, 李春燕, 等. 间作模式对玉米/大豆间作系统光合、产量及种间竞争力的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2025, 39(8):1775-1785
[16] CHEN Y L, QI S, XU R X, et al. Effects of planting row number and density of corn-alfalfa intercropping system on maize performance in Hexi Corridor[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(6):2013-2022 陈彦龙, 齐帅, 许瑞轩, 等. 河西走廊玉米-苜蓿间作体系行数与密度对玉米生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6):2013-2022
[17] LI W B, ZHU J F, LIANG T Z, et al. Effect of dryland corn-Lablab purpureus intercropping with different levels of nitrogen application on yield, mixed storage nutrition and emergy index[J]. Feed Research, 2022, 45(23):105-108 李文彬, 朱俊峰, 梁天柱, 等. 不同水平施氮量的旱地玉米-拉巴豆间作栽培对产量、混贮营养及能值的影响[J]. 饲料研究, 2022, 45(23):105-108
[18] DONG Z X, HE R H, KUANG J Y, et al. Effects of sweet sorghum intercropping with Lablab purpureus on yield and quality of mixed forage in Chengdu Plain, China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7):1578-1583 董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 等. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7):1578-1583
[19] SU Y, YU R P, XU H S, et al. Crop cultivar mixtures stabilize productivity, partly via facilitation, when conditions are less benign[J]. Field Crops Research, 2023, 302:109046
[20] YANG W T, LI Z X, WANG J W, et al. Crop yield, nitrogen acquisition and sugarcane quality as affected by interspecific competition and nitrogen application[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 146:44-50
[21] LITHOURGIDIS A, DORDAS C, DAMALAS C A, et al. Annual intercrops: an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture[J]. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2011, 5(4):396-410
[22] WILLEY R W, RAO M R. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops[J]. Experimental Agriculture, 1980, 16(2):117-125
[23] ZHANG G G, YANG Z B, DONG S T. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124(1):66-73
[24] YANG H, ZHANG W P, LI L. Intercropping: feed more people and build more sustainable agroecosystems[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2021, 8(3):373-386
[25] LI X F, WANG Z G, BAO X G, et al. Long-term increased grain yield and soil fertility from intercropping[J]. Nature Sustainability, 2021, 4(11):943-950
[26] DU J B, HAN T F, GAI J Y, et al. Maize-soybean strip intercropping: achieved a balance between high productivity and sustainability[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2018, 17(4):747-754
[27] WU Y H, WANG Z K, LIU Y N, et al. Effects of row configuration on characteristics of the light environment and light use efficiency in maize/alfalfa intercropping[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3):144-155 吴玉环, 王自奎, 刘亚男, 等. 带幅设计对玉米/苜蓿间作群体光环境特征及光能利用效率的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3):144-155
[28] WANG R N, SUN Z X, ZHANG L Z, et al. Border-row proportion determines strength of interspecific interactions and crop yields in maize/peanut strip intercropping[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 253:107819
[29] SUN Y Q, WANG Y W, FAN X Q, et al. Effects of silage maize and feeding millet intercropping on their yield[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2023, 40(12):3138-3149 孙颖琦, 王钰文, 范晓庆, 等. 青贮玉米与饲用谷子间作对产量相关性状的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2023, 40(12):3138-3149
[30] XU Y X, YANG Z, WANG H B, et al. Evaluation of production performance and nutritive values of inter-cropping between silage maize and grain maize[J]. Feed Research, 2024, 47(11):114-119 徐艳霞, 杨曌, 王洪宝, 等. 青贮玉米与籽粒玉米间作生产性能和营养品质综合评价[J]. 饲料研究, 2024, 47(11):114-119
[31] WANG T F, WANG B, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Response of productivity of silage maize-forage sorghum intercropping system to row ratio configuration[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2025, 33(8):1529-1540 王腾飞, 王斌, 张译尹, 等. 青贮玉米-饲用高粱间作系统生产力对行比配置的响应[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2025, 33(8):1529-1540
[32] LIU T X, LI C H, FU J, et al. Population quality of different Maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes intercropped[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(11):6302-6309 刘天学, 李潮海, 付景, 等. 不同基因型玉米间作的群体质量[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(11):6302-6309
[33] DU J M, WANG Z J, WANG W, et al. Strip intercropping and mixed harvesting and storage technology of silage corn/feed sorghum in Ningxia irrigation area[J]. Journal of Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2023, 64(9):10-13 杜建民, 王占军, 汪威, 等. 宁夏灌区青贮玉米/饲用高粱带状间作混收混贮技术[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2023, 64(9):10-13
[34] HAN J, WANG Y F, GAO Y H, et al. Effect of crop nutrient uptake utilization and yield in the flax intercropping pattern[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2024, 32(6):997-1008 韩静, 王一帆, 高玉红, 等. 胡麻间作模式对作物养分吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(6):997-1008
[35] SHI Z S, ZHU M, LI F H, et al. Research on yield-increasing of different kinds of maize[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2008, 16(2):107-109 史振声, 朱敏, 李凤海, 等. 玉米不同品种间作的增产效果研究[J]. 玉米科学, 2008, 16(2):107-109
[36] DONG S. Effects of density and nitrogen application on yield, Quality and Water Utilization ofForage Crops in Silage Maize/Lablab BeanIntercropping System in Hexi Irrigation Area[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2021:18-28 董姗. 密度和施氮对河西灌区青贮玉米/拉巴豆间作体系饲草产量、品质和水分利用的影响[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2021:18-28
[37] LI G, LIU H Q, GAO F, et al. Effects of mixed planting on yield and feed value of silage corn[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2008, 16(4):417-421 李钢, 刘惠青, 高飞, 等. 混播对青贮玉米产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2008, 16(4):417-421
[38] WANG B, DONG X, LI M Y, et al. Effects of mixed planting of Dolichos lablab with different sowing rates and silage corn on grassland productivity and forage quality[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4):828-834 王斌, 董秀, 李满有, 等. 不同播量拉巴豆与青贮玉米混播对草地生产性能及牧草品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(4):828-834
[39] SUN J X, LIU X H, CHENG F M, et al. Effects of strip intercropping of sweet sorghum and corn and their mixed storage as silage on their biomass and silage quality[J]. Barley and Cereal Sciences, 2023, 40(2):48-53 孙健雄, 刘兴华, 程芳梅, 等. 甜高粱-玉米复种与混合青贮对生物量和青贮品质的影响[J]. 大麦与谷类科学, 2023, 40(2):48-53
[40] LI C J, HOFFLAND E, KUYPER T W, et al. Syndromes of production in intercropping impact yield gains[J]. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(6):653-660
[41] YU Y, STOMPH T J, MAKOWSKI D, et al. A meta-analysis of relative crop yields in cereal/legume mixtures suggests options for management[J]. Field Crops Research, 2016, 198:269-279
[42] HAUGGAARD-NIELSEN H, JENSEN E S. Evaluating pea and barley cultivars for complementarity in intercropping at different levels of soil N availability[J]. Field Crops Research, 2001, 72(3):185-196

青贮玉米与甜高粱/籽粒玉米间作系统的生产性能研究

Research on the Production Performance of Intercropping Systems of Silage Corn and Sweet Sorghum/Grain Corn

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	方菊梅, 窦梓镱, 李桂真, 郑伟, 王玲玲, 王钰杰. 豆禾混播牧草的种间竞争对土壤磷吸收效率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1641-1653.
[2]	韦姗姗, 李成, 蔡雄卫, 赵涵, 刘方材, 王萍, 张晓娟, 姜华, 周凯. 低纬高原季风区青贮玉米品种筛选与综合评价—以云南大理为例[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1776-1786.
[3]	董志晓, 傅康, 刘英杰, 王昭婷, 谭小平, 范文涛, 赵俊茗, 马啸, 张健. 甜高粱与田菁间作比例对饲草生产力及种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1889-1899.
[4]	胡奕, 于辉, 管廷贤, 刘兴义, 杨合龙, 王文浩. 灌溉量与生物质炭施用对紫花苜蓿营养品质与经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1900-1909.
[5]	张金凤, 张婷, 张运婷, 左爱玲, 杨子森, 侯东来, 赵祥, 高鹏. 晋北黄土旱塬区38个饲用燕麦品种的适应性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1262-1274.
[6]	牛浴林, 仝宗永, 陈鹏伟, 秦燕. 土壤改良剂对柴达木盐碱地燕麦生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1483-1491.
[7]	禹丽红, 余易泽, 道吉草, 龙思, 冉姝琪, 李晗玉, 许岳飞. 生物炭配施有机肥对青贮玉米生长及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1502-1509.
[8]	李霄坤, 张利平, 单新河, 杨军卫, 任伟, 杨朝伟, 王显国. 青贮玉米与拉巴豆不同混播方式对饲草产量和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1053-1059.
[9]	原野, 邹雨琪, 白宝超, 孟和高勒, 宝乐尔, 格根图. 玉米-笤帚糜子秸秆比例对TMR发酵特性及腐败机制的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1060-1076.
[10]	刘盼婷, 张朝辉, 张邦彦, 武晋民, 张家豪, 蔺美玲, 张百含, 王彬. 盐碱地湖南稷子间作大豆对作物光合特性和生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1077-1086.
[11]	杨禾雨, 郝俊峰, 王志军, 贾玉山, 范美超, 格根图. 地表水与地下水灌溉对紫花苜蓿水分利用效率及生产特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1128-1136.
[12]	尉志强, 杜文华, 任昱鑫, 贺俊生. 西藏牧区‘藏饲3号’小黑麦品种的饲草生产性能研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 702-712.
[13]	薛一凡, 赵方媛, 杜文华. 陇中沟壑区有机肥与化肥配施对不同小黑麦品种产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 734-744.
[14]	王雪丽, 王云玲, 齐开源, 严海军, 王显国, 孟根其格木, 周立业. 水分调控对不同品种紫花苜蓿生产性能及土壤酶的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2808-2819.
[15]	鞠馨, 王新雅, 王冰莹, 韩国栋, 武倩. 放牧强度对荒漠草原植物群落组成和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2962-2972.