甜高粱与田菁间作比例对饲草生产力及种间关系的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.029

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1889-1899.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.029

• 技术研发 • 上一篇

甜高粱与田菁间作比例对饲草生产力及种间关系的影响

董志晓¹, 傅康¹, 刘英杰¹, 王昭婷¹, 谭小平¹, 范文涛¹, 赵俊茗¹, 马啸¹, 张健²

1. 四川农业大学草业科技学院, 四川成都 611130;
2. 四川省林业和草原发展研究中心, 四川成都 610036

收稿日期:2025-09-12 修回日期:2025-12-02 发布日期:2026-05-08
通讯作者: 马啸，E-mail:maroar@126.com;张健，E-mail:zjturf@163.com
作者简介:董志晓（1993-），男，汉族，河北邢台人，博士研究生，主要从事饲草种质创新与育种研究，E-mail:1565752354@qq.com；
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2024YFD1301200）；四川肉牛创新团队建设项目（SCCXTD-20-13）资助

Effects of Intercropping Ratios of Sorghum bicolor and Sesbania cannabina on Forage Productivity and Interspecific Relationships

DONG Zhi-xiao¹, FU Kang¹, LIU Ying-Jie¹, WANG Zhao-ting¹, TAN Xiao-ping¹, FAN Wen-tao¹, ZHAO Jun-ming¹, MA Xiao¹, ZHANG Jian²

1. College of Grassland Science and Technology, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 611130, China;
2. Sichuan Forestry and Grassland Development Research Center, Chengdu, Sichuan Province 610036, China

Received:2025-09-12 Revised:2025-12-02 Published:2026-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为明确甜高粱（Sorghum bicolor）与田菁（Sesbania cannabina）在成都平原地区的适宜间作比例及其对饲草生产力和种间关系的影响。本研究以单作为对照，设置五种播量比例（甜高粱：田菁）3∶1，2∶1，1∶1，1∶2和1∶3，并系统评估间作对作物生长、饲草产量及品质指标的综合效应。结果表明：间作显著降低了两种作物的株高和茎粗，但间作饲草的营养品质较甜高粱单作明显改善，且粗蛋白、总可消化养分及综合品质指标随着田菁比例增加而提升。虽然甜高粱单作的鲜草与干草产量最高，但间作3∶1处理在各组合中产量表现较优。种间关系分析表明，当间作比例大于1∶1时，两种作物呈协同互促效应，而比例小于1∶1时田菁对甜高粱生长产生抑制。基于TOPSIS与隶属函数的综合评价结果，甜高粱与田菁在成都平原的最佳播种比例为2∶1，对应播量为14.67 kg·hm^-2和30.00 kg·hm^-2。

关键词: 甜高粱, 田菁, 间作, 生产性能, 种间关系

Abstract: This study aimed to identify the optimal intercropping ratio of sweet sorghum （Sorghum bicolor） and sesbania （Sesbania cannabina） in the Chengdu Plain region and to clarify its effects on forage productivity and interspecific interactions. Five intercropping ratios （3∶1， 2∶1， 1∶1， 1∶2 and 1∶3； sweet sorghum ： sesbania） were established， with monocultures as controls. Agronomic traits， forage yield and nutritional quality were evaluated to assess the overall performance of the intercropping system. The results showed that intercropping significantly reduced plant height and stem diameter of both species. However， the nutritional quality of the mixed forage was significantly improved compared to sweet sorghum monoculture. Crude protein， total digestible nutrients and comprehensive quality indicators increased with the increas of sesbania proportion. Sweet sorghum monoculture produced the highest fresh and dry matter yields， while the 3∶1 intercropping ratio achieved the highest yield among the intercropping treatments. Interspecific interaction analysis indicated a facilitative effect when the sowing ratio exceeded 1∶1， whereas sesbania inhibited sweet sorghum growth at lower ratios. Based on TOPSIS and membership function evaluation， the optimal sowing ratio in the Chengdu Plain was determined to be 2∶1， corresponding to 14.67 kg·hm^-2 of sweet sorghum and 30.00 kg·hm^-2 of sesbania. These findings provide a scientific basis for optimizing the sweet sorghum–sesbania intercropping system in the Chengdu Plain.

Key words: Sorghum bicolor, Sesbania cannabina, Intercropping, Production performance, Interspecific relationship

中图分类号:

S542.9

董志晓, 傅康, 刘英杰, 王昭婷, 谭小平, 范文涛, 赵俊茗, 马啸, 张健. 甜高粱与田菁间作比例对饲草生产力及种间关系的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1889-1899.

DONG Zhi-xiao, FU Kang, LIU Ying-Jie, WANG Zhao-ting, TAN Xiao-ping, FAN Wen-tao, ZHAO Jun-ming, MA Xiao, ZHANG Jian. Effects of Intercropping Ratios of Sorghum bicolor and Sesbania cannabina on Forage Productivity and Interspecific Relationships[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(5): 1889-1899.

参考文献

[1] WU W D, WANG J W, LI H Q, et al. Analysis on the development and utilization of grassland resources in southern Sichuan Province[J]. Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2024, 51(9):3-5 伍文丹, 王建文, 李洪泉, 等. 四川省南方草地资源开发利用情况分析[J]. 四川畜牧兽医, 2024, 51(9):3-5
[2] TANG C J, LIU W, YANG C T, et al. Report on forage production situation and industrial development in Sichuan Province in 2023[J]. Sichuan Animal & Veterinary Sciences, 2024, 51(5):1-3 唐川江, 刘伟, 杨春桃, 等. 四川省2023年饲草生产形势与产业发展报告[J]. 四川畜牧兽医, 2024, 51(5):1-3
[3] WANG M J, SHI W, CHANG S H, et al. Effects of irrigation modes on forage yield, quality and water use of corn-legume intercropping systems in the Hexi irrigation area[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2023, 32(3):13-29 王茂鉴, 石薇, 常生华, 等. 灌溉模式对河西灌区禾-豆间作系统饲草产量、品质和水分利用的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2023, 32(3):13-29
[4] ZHANG Y L, ZHANG L J, YU T F, et al. Effects of grass-legume combinations and intercropping patterns on the forage yield and yield stability[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(5):1410-1418 张永亮, 张丽娟, 于铁峰, 等. 禾豆组合与间作方式对牧草产量及产量稳定性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(5):1410-1418
[5] BAO G S, ZHANG P, MA X, et al. Effect of nitrogen addition on forage and seed yields of intercropping system of Avena sativa and Pisum sativum in Alpine regions[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(7):2210-2219 鲍根生, 张鹏, 马祥, 等. 高寒区氮添加对禾豆间作系统牧草和种子产量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2023, 31(7):2210-2219
[6] WANG B, DENG J Q, WANG T F, et al. Effect of seeding options on interspecific competition in oat (Avena sativa L.)–common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) forage crops[J]. Agronomy, 2022, 12(12):3119
[7] ZHAO Y, TIAN Y Q, LI X B, et al. Nitrogen fixation and transfer between legumes and cereals under various cropping regimes[J]. Rhizosphere, 2022, 22:100546
[8] GETAHUN A, ALEMU A, NIDA H, et al. Multi-locus genome-wide association mapping for major agronomic and yield-related traits in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. moench) landraces[J]. BMC Genomics, 2025, 26(1):304
[9] ZHOU Z X, ZHAO B, WANG W X, et al. Determination of three soluble sugars in stem juice of sweet sorghum by anthrone colorimetry[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(5):940-948 周振祥, 赵博, 王唯先, 等. 不同前处理对测定甜高粱茎秆汁液3种糖含量的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(5):940-948
[10] CONTRERAS-GOVEA F E, LAURIAULT L M, MARSALIS M, et al. Performance of forage sorghum-legume mixtures in southern high Plains, USA[J]. Forage & Grazinglands, 2009, 7(1):1-8
[11] LAURIAULT L M, DARAPUNENI M K, MARTINEZ G K. Sorghum-legume mixtures to improve forage yield and nutritive value in semiarid regions[J]. Grasses, 2024, 3(3):163-173
[12] HUO Q Q, SONG Y Y, FENG B, et al. Study on forage yield and quality under strip planting patterns with different row ratios of sorghum-sudangrass and Sesbania[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(7):83-95 霍倩倩, 宋洋洋, 冯斌, 等. 高丹草与田菁不同行比带状种植模式下饲草产量与品质研究[J]. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(7):83-95
[13] ZHAO W S, SUN Y L, LIU X P. Effects of drought-rewatering-drought on photosynthesis and growth of maize[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2016, 40(6):594-603 赵文赛, 孙永林, 刘西平. 干旱-复水-再干旱处理对玉米光合能力和生长的影响[J]. 植物生态学报, 2016, 40(6):594-603
[14] XIONG Y, XU Q F, YU Z, et al. Evaluation of nutritional and feeding value of oat hay from different regions[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(10):2457-2462 熊乙, 许庆方, 玉柱, 等. 不同产地燕麦干草养分及饲用价值[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(10):2457-2462
[15] CHEN X, LI S S, WANG N X, et al. Effects of different intercropping patterns on interspecific competition pattern and production performance of Triticale and common vetch grassland[J]. Grassland and Turf, 2023, 43(5):5-14 陈雪, 黎松松, 王宁欣, 等. 不同间作方式对小黑麦+箭筈豌豆草地种间竞争格局和生产性能的影响[J]. 草原与草坪, 2023, 43(5):5-14
[16] WU Q, YAO Z Y, WEI X T, et al. Effects of water and fertilizer cooperation on production performance and quality of legume-grass mixed pasture in North China Plain[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(11):3547-3553 吴琼, 姚泽英, 位晓婷, 等. 水肥协作对华北平原豆禾混播牧草生产性能和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(11):3547-3553
[17] HWANG C L, YOON K. Multiple attribute decision making[M]. Berlin, Heidelberg:Springer, 1981:1-10
[18] MOU L. Production performance, nutrient utilization and regulation mechanism of spring wheat/alfalfa strip intercropping system in northwest inland arid area[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University, 2024:4-6 牟乐. 西北内陆旱区春小麦/紫花苜蓿带状间作系统生产性能、养分利用及其调控机制[D]. 兰州:兰州大学, 2024:4-6
[19] ZHANG Z H, ZHANG B Y, XIE X W, et al. Effects of sweet sorghum intercropping soybean on crop production performance and photosynthetic characteristics in saline-alkali land[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(1):219-228 张朝辉, 张邦彦, 谢小伟, 等. 盐碱地甜高粱间作大豆对作物生产性能和光合特性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(1):219-228
[20] NI W, WANG B, WANG T F, et al. Effect of mixed sowing of Dolichos lablab and Sorghum dochna on mixed forage silage quality[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2022, 39(8):1628-1635 倪旺, 王斌, 王腾飞, 等. 不同播量拉巴豆与甜高粱混播对混合饲草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2022, 39(8):1628-1635
[21] BACCHI M, MONTI M, CALVI A, et al. Forage potential of cereal/legume intercrops: agronomic performances, yield, quality forage and LER in two harvesting times in a Mediterranean environment[J]. Agronomy, 2021, 11(1):121
[22] DONG Z X, HE R H, KUANG J Y, et al. Effects of sweet sorghum intercropping with Lablab purpureus on yield and quality of mixed forage in Chengdu Plain, China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7):1578-1583 董志晓, 何润濠, 况鉴洋, 等. 成都平原甜高粱间作拉巴豆对混合饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2021, 29(7):1578-1583
[23] QI J, ZHENG W, ZHANG X H, et al. Determination and comparison of the production performance of pastures among different spatial structure of legume-grass mixtures[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2016, 33(1):116-128 祁军, 郑伟, 张鲜花, 等. 不同豆禾混播模式的草地生产性能[J]. 草业科学, 2016, 33(1):116-128
[24] WANG P, ZHOU D W, JIANG S C. Research on biological nitrogen fixation of grass-legume mixtures in a semi-arid area of China[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2010, 19(6):276-280 王平, 周道玮, 姜世成. 半干旱地区禾-豆混播草地生物固氮作用研究[J]. 草业学报, 2010, 19(6):276-280
[25] LIU Q, FU P, AO X C, et al. Study on production performance and interspecific competition of Italian ryegrass and villose vetch mixed grassland in winter fallow farmlands[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2016, 24(1):42-46 柳茜, 傅平, 敖学成, 等. 冬闲田多花黑麦草十光叶紫花苕混播草地生产性能与种间竞争的研究[J]. 草地学报, 2016, 24(1):42-46
[26] LIU Q Y, YUN L, CHEN Y F, et al. The dynamic analysis of forage yield and interspecific competition in alfalfa-grass mixed pasture[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2022, 31(3):181-191 刘启宇, 云岚, 陈逸凡, 等. 苜蓿——禾草混播草地牧草产量及种间竞争关系的动态研究[J]. 草业学报, 2022, 31(3):181-191
[27] XIN Y F, ZHANG L, CHEN C, et al. Study on pasture yield and interspecific relationship of mixed pasture of avean sativa and Vicia sativa[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(6):935-941 辛亚芬, 张磊, 陈晨, 等. 燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播草地牧草产量及种间关系研究[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(6):935-941

甜高粱与田菁间作比例对饲草生产力及种间关系的影响

Effects of Intercropping Ratios of Sorghum bicolor and Sesbania cannabina on Forage Productivity and Interspecific Relationships

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张金凤, 张婷, 张运婷, 左爱玲, 杨子森, 侯东来, 赵祥, 高鹏. 晋北黄土旱塬区38个饲用燕麦品种的适应性综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1262-1274.
[2]	刘盼婷, 张朝辉, 张邦彦, 武晋民, 张家豪, 蔺美玲, 张百含, 王彬. 盐碱地湖南稷子间作大豆对作物光合特性和生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1077-1086.
[3]	尉志强, 杜文华, 任昱鑫, 贺俊生. 西藏牧区‘藏饲3号’小黑麦品种的饲草生产性能研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 702-712.
[4]	薛一凡, 赵方媛, 杜文华. 陇中沟壑区有机肥与化肥配施对不同小黑麦品种产量、品质及经济效益的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 734-744.
[5]	袁玉涛, 吴莉, 魏小星, 刘文辉, 陈有军, 何克燕, 周青平. 河西走廊半干旱区12个紫花苜蓿品种生产性能及品质评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 3088-3098.
[6]	陈浩, 高万顺, 王旭哲, 马春晖. 不同品种田菁与青贮玉米混贮的养分及发酵品质[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2713-2720.
[7]	蔡春江, 张峰举, 刘金龙, 王学琴, 项凌飞, 马巧利. 水肥耦合对湖南稷子饲草生产性能及营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2745-2754.
[8]	王德贵, 董永梅, 呼延美静, 袁艺, 何雨飞, 马啸, 马莉, 刘伟. 川西北农牧交错区9个秋播饲用燕麦生产性能综合评价[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6): 1878-1885.
[9]	王召明, 陈翔, 赵杰, 赵晨, 邱雯婧, 付娟娟, 张晓严, 谢海桃, 魏荣博. 生物炭与氮肥配施对豆禾间作系统农艺性状和品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6): 1982-1990.
[10]	文兴金, 袁小情, 刘海平, 李小梅, 武齐丰, 辛亚芬, 范文涛, 张建波, 游明鸿, 季晓菲, 雷雄, 罗燕, 闫艳红. 成都平原燕麦与箭筈豌豆混播模式对饲草生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6): 2002-2012.
[11]	陈彦龙, 齐帅, 许瑞轩, 张蓓, 王恕平, 董嘉莉, 曹文侠. 河西走廊玉米-苜蓿间作体系行数与密度对玉米生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6): 2013-2022.
[12]	张兰, 宋谦, 马淑梅, 余小亮, 张鹏, 李静生, 陈杰新, 王纯喜. 覆膜栽培对不同品种青贮玉米生产性能和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(6): 2033-2040.
[13]	吴文琪, 徐成体, 蒲小剑, 赵媛媛, 葛容琳, 王伟. 柴达木轻度盐碱地不同燕麦品种生产性能比较研究[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(5): 1497-1509.
[14]	曹铨, 童永尚, 张正社, 张春平, 俞旸, 刘玉祯, 杨晓霞, 刘文亭, 董全民. 高寒地区混播方式及比例对牧草生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(4): 1172-1180.
[15]	王怡然, 邢岩, 马南楠, 赵辉祥, 姜汝玉, 曲善民. 四种调节剂对盐碱条件下紫花苜蓿生产性能的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(2): 636-643.