不同放牧强度对内蒙古荒漠草原藻结皮特征的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.06.029

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 2269-2276.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.06.029

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

不同放牧强度对内蒙古荒漠草原藻结皮特征的影响

王宁斌¹, 李邵宇², 郑佳华², 张峰², 张彬², 王琪⁴, 赵萌莉², 季祥^1,3

1. 内蒙古农业大学生命科学学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
2. 内蒙古农业大学草业学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010010;
3. 赤峰大学, 内蒙古赤峰 024000;
4. 乌兰察布市农牧业生态资源保护中心, 内蒙古乌兰察布 012000

收稿日期:2025-07-11 修回日期:2025-08-26 发布日期:2026-06-02
通讯作者: 赵萌莉,E-mail:nmgmlzh@126.com;季祥,E-mail:jixiang@imau.edu.cn
作者简介:王宁斌(1998-),男,汉族,江西赣州人,硕士研究生,主要从事草地生态学研究,E-mail:1512914631@qq.com
基金资助:
科技部政府间合作项目（2024YFE0113100）；国家重点研发计划（2023YFF1304104）资助

The Influence of Different Grazing Intensities on the Characteristics of Algal Crusts in the Desert Steppe of Inner Mongolia

WANG Ning-bin¹, LI Shao-yu², ZHENG Jia-hua², ZHANG Feng², ZHANG Bin², WANG Qi⁴, ZHAO Meng-li², JI Xiang^1,3

1. College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
2. College of Grassland Science, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010010, China;
3. Chifeng University, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia 01500, China;
4. Ulanqab Agricultural and Pastoral Ecological Resources Protection Center, Ulanqab, Inner Mongolia 012000, China

Received:2025-07-11 Revised:2025-08-26 Published:2026-06-02

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 藻结皮是荒漠草原重要的生物结皮类型，作为重要的“生态工程师”，在固土、保水、抗风蚀和碳氮固存方面作用显著。然而，关于不同放牧强度对荒漠草原藻结皮特征影响的研究相对较少。本研究依托内蒙古四子王旗荒漠草原长期放牧试验平台（2004年—至今），探究了不同放牧强度对藻结皮特征的影响及关键驱动因子。本研究测定了不同放牧强度下藻结皮的盖度、厚度、叶绿素a含量以及相关土壤理化性质。结果显示，随着放牧强度的增加，藻结皮盖度、厚度和叶绿素a含量均显著降低（P<0.05）。结构方程模型进一步揭示了驱动藻结皮变化的关键土壤因子，其中土壤速效氮是影响藻结皮特征的最关键因子。本研究表明，中度和重度放牧显著抑制了荒漠草原藻结皮的生长，其中与藻结皮特征变化最相关的关键因子是土壤容重、毛管持水量和土壤速效氮。为维持藻结皮在荒漠草原生态系统中的生态作用，严格控制放牧强度至关重要，长期高强度放牧将导致其严重退化。

关键词: 荒漠草原, 藻结皮, 放牧强度, 土壤理化性质

Abstract: Algal crusts represent a crucial type of biological soil crust in desert grasslands and serve as an important significant “ecological engineer”. They play a vital role in soil stabilization， water retention， wind erosion resistance， and carbon and nitrogen sequestration. However， researches on the effects of different grazing intensities on the characteristics of algal crusts in desert grasslands remains relatively limited. Based on a long-term grazing experiment platform （2004-present） in the desert grassland of Siziwang Banner， Inner Mongolia， in this study we investigated the impacts of varying grazing intensities on the algal crusts characteristics and identified the key driving factors. We measured the coverage， thickness， chlorophyll-a content of algal crusts， as well as related soil physicochemical properties under different grazing intensities. The results showed that as grazing intensity increased， the coverage， thickness， and chlorophyll-a content of algal crusts significantly decreased （P<0.05）. Structural equation modeling further revealed the key soil factors driving changes in algal crusts， among which soil available nitrogen was the most critical factor influencing characteristics of algal crusts. This study demonstrated that moderate and heavy grazing significantly inhibited the growth of algal crusts in desert grasslands， with soil bulk density， capillary water holding capacity， and soil available nitrogen were the most closely related factors to the changes in algal crusts characteristics. To maintain the ecological functions of algal crusts in desert grassland ecosystems， it is essential to strictly control grazing intensity， as long-term high-intensity grazing will lead to their severe degradation.

Key words: Desert steppe, Algal crusts, Grazing intensity, Soil physical and chemical properties

中图分类号:

S812

王宁斌, 李邵宇, 郑佳华, 张峰, 张彬, 王琪, 赵萌莉, 季祥. 不同放牧强度对内蒙古荒漠草原藻结皮特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2269-2276.

WANG Ning-bin, LI Shao-yu, ZHENG Jia-hua, ZHANG Feng, ZHANG Bin, WANG Qi, ZHAO Meng-li, JI Xiang. The Influence of Different Grazing Intensities on the Characteristics of Algal Crusts in the Desert Steppe of Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(6): 2269-2276.

参考文献

[1] ZHOU Y，SONG S M，LI X. General situation and function of biological crust in alpine forest and grass ecosystem in Kangding city[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology，2022（18）：136-139 周扬，宋思梦，李勋.康定市高寒林草生态系统生物结皮概况及功能研究[J].现代农业科技，2022（18）：136-139
[2] JING H M，ZHOU N，YU T T，et al. Artificial cyanobacteria crusts can improve soil fertility and plant growth in a semi-arid area，northern China[J]. Journal of Arid Land，2025，17（6）：808-822
[3] LI Y G，HUANG Y J，ZHANG Q，et al. Surface soil physical properties and stability： determined by biological soil crust type and driven by aridity in the desert regions of Northwest China[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal，2025，89（3）：e70092
[4] LI X R，ZHAO Y，HUI R，et al. Progress and trend of development of restoration ecology research in the arid regions of China[J]. Progress in Geography，2014，33（11）：1435-1443 李新荣，赵洋，回嵘，等.中国干旱区恢复生态学研究进展及趋势评述[J].地理科学进展，2014，33（11）：1435-1443
[5] SUN F H，XIAO B，KIDRON G J，et al. Biocrusts critical regulation of soil water vapor transport （diffusion，sorption，and late-stage evaporation） in drylands[J]. Water Resources Research，2024，60（7）：e2023WR036520
[6] CAO Y S，XIAO B ，GHANBARIAN B .Biocrusts enhance soil structural stability during freeze-thaw cycles and improve soil erosion resistance in cold-winter drylands[J].Catena，2024，243：108206
[7] BELNAP J， PHILLIPS S L， HERRICK J E， et al.Wind erodibility of soils at Fort Irwin， California （Mojave Desert）， USA， before and after trampling disturbance： implications for land management[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms，2007，32（1）：75-84
[8] WU Y W，RAO B Q，WU P P，et al. Development of artificially induced biological soil crusts in fields and their effects on top soil[J]. Plant and Soil，2013，370（1/2）：115-124
[9] LI H，CHEN Y X，YU G L，et al. Multiple diversity facets of crucial microbial groups in biological soil crusts promote soil multifunctionality[J]. Global Ecology and Biogeography，2021，30（6）：1204-1217
[10] GUAN Y. Effects of different grazing intensities on the physical and chemical properties of biological crusts and changes of soil enzyme activities in sandy land of western Liaoning Province[J]. Protection Forest Science and Technology，2021（1）：31-32，62 管颖.不同放牧强度对辽西沙地生物结皮理化性质及土壤酶活性变化的影响[J].防护林科技，2021（1）：31-32，62
[11] ZHANG J，DUAN Q W，MA J， et al.The disturbance of biocrusts subsoil stoichiometry by grazing could not compensate for its damage effect[J].Land Degradation & Development，2024，35（17）：5078-5087
[12] BELNAP J.Recovery rates of cryptobiotic crusts：inoculant use and assessment methods[J].Grea tBasin Naturalist，1993，53： 89-95
[13] LI Y， SUN Y Q， GUFWAN L A， et al.Grazing disturbance reduces biocrust-related cyanobacteria and N-fixer abundance but increases bacterial diversity： Implications for biocrust restoration in degraded drylands[J].Agriculture， Ecosystems & Environment，2025，379：109367
[14] XU J，NING Y Y. Impact of overgrazing and enclosing on biomass and soil factors of the microbiotic soil crusts in horqin sandy land[J]. Journal of Desert Research，2010，30（4）：824-830 徐杰，宁远英.科尔沁沙地持续放牧和不同强度放牧后封育草场中生物结皮生物量和土壤因子的变化[J].中国沙漠，2010，30（4）：824-830
[15] GU K M，ZHAO Y G，ZHANG Z H，et al. Effects of simulated grazing disturbance on soil water infiltration of biocrust slope in the hilly Loess Plateau，China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2022，33（7）：1827-1834 谷康民，赵允格，张子辉，等.模拟放牧干扰对黄土丘陵区生物结皮坡面土壤水分入渗的影响[J].应用生态学报， 2022， 33（7）：1827-1834
[16] CONCOSTRINA-ZUBIRI L，HUBER-SANNWALD E，MARTÍNEZ I，et al. Biological soil crusts across disturbance–recovery scenarios： effect of grazing regime on community dynamics[J]. Ecological Applications，2014，24（7）：1863-1877
[17] WANG Y F，LI X，LUO S S，et al. Effects of temperature and initial pH on the growth of four dominant cyanobacteria species in biological soil crusts[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2024，35（2）：516-522 王一帆，李璇，罗珊珊，等.温度和初始pH对生物结皮中4种优势蓝藻生长的影响[J].应用生态学报，2024，35（2）：516-522
[18] ZHAO Y Q，LIAN Y C，XU W W，et al. Effects of fine substance content in soil substrate on the formation of artificial cyanobacteria crusts[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2023，34（9）：2398-2404 赵燕翘，连煜超，许文文，等．土壤基质中细物质含量对人工蓝藻结皮形成的影响[J]．应用生态学报，2023，34（9）：2398-2404
[19] BULLARD J E，STRONG C L，AUBAULT H A P. Cyanobacterial soil crust responses to rainfall and effects on wind erosion in a semiarid environment，Australia： implications for landscape stability[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research：Biogeosciences，2022，127（2）：e2021JG006652
[20] ZHAO Y，XU W W，WANG N. Effects of covering sand with different soil substrates on the formation and development of artificial biocrusts in a natural desert environment[J]. Soil and Tillage Research，2021，213：105081
[21] LAN S B，WU L，ZHANG D L，et al. Effects of drought and salt stresses on man-made cyanobacterial crusts[J]. European Journal of Soil Biology，2010，46（6）：381-386
[22] SHE Y，GAO X，JING X，et al. Effects of nitrogen source and NaCl stress on oil production in Vischeria sp. WL1 （Eustigmatophyceae） isolated from dryland biological soil crusts in China[J]. Journal of Applied Phycology，2022，34（3）：1281-1291
[23] XU H F，RAANAN H，DAI G Z，et al. Reading and surviving the harsh conditions in desert biological soil crust： the cyanobacterial viewpoint[J]. FEMS Microbiology Reviews，2021，45（6）：fuab036
[24] KANG S，HAN G D，ZHAO M L，et al. Research progress of Stipa breviflora desert grassland under grazing background[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2023，31（12）：3587-3596 康萨如拉，韩国栋，赵萌莉，等.放牧背景下短花针茅荒漠草原研究进展[J].草地学报，2023，31（12）：3587-3596
[25] ZHANG Y J，ZHU J T，SHEN R N，et al. Research progress on the effects of grazing on grassland ecosystem[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology，2020，44（5）：553-564 张扬建，朱军涛，沈若楠，等.放牧对草地生态系统影响的研究进展[J].植物生态学报，2020，44（5）：553-564
[26] ZHANG F，BENNETT J A，ZHANG B，et al. Cessation of grazing stabilizes productivity through effects on species asynchrony and stability of shrub/semi-shrub plants in arid grasslands[J]. Agriculture，Ecosystems & Environment，2023，348：108411
[27] WEI Z， HAN G， YANG J， et al.The response of Stipa breviflora community to stocking rate[J].Grassland of China， 2000（6）： 2-6
[28] CASTLE S C，MORRISON C D，BARGER N N. Extraction of chlorophyll a from biological soil crusts： A comparison of solvents for spectrophotometric determination[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry，2011，43（4）：853-856
[29] ZHAO T Q. Effect of grazing intensities on soil organic carbon characteristics in desert steppe and their mechanisms [D]. Hohhot：Inner Mongolia Agricultural University，2022：21 赵天启.放牧强度对荒漠草原土壤有机碳特征的影响及其机制[D]. 呼和浩特：内蒙古农业大学，2022：21
[30] YANG L P，BAI Y L，WANG L，et al. Study on the method of determining available phosphorus （Olsen-P） with high testing efficiency[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2011（3）：87-91 杨俐苹，白由路，王磊，等.基于常规土壤有效磷（Olsen法）分析的高效测试技术研究 [J].中国土壤与肥料， 2011（3）： 87-91
[31] SHEN C Y，CHEN M Z，QIAN B，et al. Study on optimization of soil organic carbon pretreatment detection method[J]. Zhejiang Land & Resources，2021（S1）：101-105 沈纯怡，陈敏筑，钱彪，等. 土壤有机碳前处理检测方法的优化研究 [J]. 浙江国土资源， 2021（S1）： 101-105
[32] LI G H，YE X L，LV Z Q，et al. Comparison of element analyzer（Dumas Combustion） and automated Kjeldahl analyzer（Kjeldahl methods） for determining total nitrogen content in soils[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China，2015（3）：111-115 李桂花，叶小兰，吕子古，等.元素分析仪和全自动凯氏定氮仪测定土壤全氮之比较[J].中国土壤与肥料，2015（3）：111-115
[33] BAO T L， JIAO X Q， YANG X Q，et al.Response dynamics and sustainability of the microbial community structure in biocrusts to moderate disturbance： Results of long-term effects[J].Geoderma，2022，405：115460
[34] LI T， FANG Y， FAN Y T，et al.Migration and structural implication of cyanobacteria in biological soil crusts in response to water and particle burial[J]. The Innovation， 2025，6（9）：100947
[35] COPELAND S M，CONDON L A，ROSENTRETER R，et al. Biocrusts indicators of livestock grazing effects on soil stability in sagebrush steppe： a case study from a long-term experiment in the northern great basin[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management，2023，91：82-86
[36] ZHANG B C，WANG J Z，ZHANG Y M，et al. Roles of moisture in constructing man-made algal crust with Micocoleus vaginatus[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2013，24（2）：535-540 张丙昌，王敬竹，张元明，等.水分对具鞘微鞘藻构建人工藻结皮的作用[J].应用生态学报，2013，24（2）：535-540
[37] WANG T L，WEI Z J，LIU W T，et al. Study on changes of soil nutrients and plant community of Stipa breviflora steppe under different grazing intensities[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2017，25（4）：711-716 王天乐，卫智军，刘文亭，等.不同放牧强度下荒漠草原土壤养分和植被特征变化研究[J].草地学报，2017，25（4）：711-716
[38] CASTER J，SANKEY T T，SANKEY J B，et al. Biocrust and the soil surface： influence of climate，disturbance，and biocrust recovery on soil surface roughness[J]. Geoderma，2021，403：115369
[39] RUMIN M，LOPATOVSKAYA O，STOM D，et al. Change in capillary moisture capacity of oil-contaminated soil after washing with Tween-80[J]. E3S Web of Conferences，2023，463：03010
[40] SERRANO J，CARREIRA E，SHAHIDIAN S，et al. Impact of deferred versus continuous sheep grazing on soil compaction in the Mediterranean montado ecosystem[J]. AgriEngineering，2023，5（2）：761-776
[41] YOUNG K E，REED S C，MORTON M，et al. Inoculated biocrust cover and functions diverged over a gradient of soil textures and water availability[J]. Restoration Ecology，2024，32（6）：e14125
[42] ZHAO Y Q，LIAN Y C，XU W W，et al. Research progress and prospect of artificial cyanobacteria crusts in China[J]. Journal of Desert Research，2023，43（5）：214-222 赵燕翘，连煜超，许文文，等.中国人工蓝藻结皮研究进展[J].中国沙漠，2023，43（5）：214-222
[43] XU T Q，ZHANG Z C，WANG Y F，et al. Effects of nitrogen deposition on microbial communities in grassland ecosystems： pronounced responses of Archaea[J]. Journal of Environmental Management，2025，390：126350
[44] CHEN S S，WANG M，ZHANG C，et al. Impacts of grazing disturbance on soil nitrogen component contents and storages in a Leymus chinensis meadow steppe[J]. Agronomy，2023，13（6）：1574
[45] SUI Q Q，YIN Y L，ZHAO W，et al. Effects of different grazing intensities on soil nitrogen use in alpine meadow in spring[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2025，33（1）：189-198 随奇奇，尹亚丽，赵文，等.春季不同放牧强度对高寒草甸土壤氮利用的影响[J].草地学报，2025，33（1）：189-198

不同放牧强度对内蒙古荒漠草原藻结皮特征的影响

The Influence of Different Grazing Intensities on the Characteristics of Algal Crusts in the Desert Steppe of Inner Mongolia

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	汪蓉, 吕世杰, 张博涵, 屈志强, 李治国. 不同载畜率下荒漠草原植物群落氮磷内稳性研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2090-2098.
[2]	王钰杰, 窦梓镱, 方菊梅, 王玲玲, 郑伟. 不同伊犁马放牧强度对昭苏山地草甸草原承载力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2147-2160.
[3]	李艳华, 于群家, 朱春磊, 马玥琪, 郑博方, 张磊, 王成杰. 增施沼液肥对中度退化草地土壤理化性质的短期影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2242-2251.
[4]	郭志成, 张博涵, 吕世杰. 荒漠草原植物群落状态转移随载畜率的变化规律[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(6): 2261-2268.
[5]	赵佳乐, 王梓晗, 王忠武, 吕世杰, 张兴夫. 放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶功能性状和植物群落地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1764-1775.
[6]	刘仰乔, 张灿浩, 杜丽娟, 殷欣茹, 阿拉坦其其格, 康萨如拉. 放牧强度对荒漠草原枯落物-土壤生态化学计量学的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1817-1826.
[7]	帅争峰, 雷咸道, 汪常明, 黄晨, 魏学文, 吴睿, 林长存. 北方荒漠草原区光伏电站建设对植物多样性的影响机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1137-1145.
[8]	李佳, 张宁, 朱牛, 张林, 宿星, 王金牛. 陇中黄土丘陵区滑坡体在不同生态恢复措施下的土壤特征[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1302-1312.
[9]	董颢, 张晓嘉, 韩国栋. 放牧强度对荒漠草原植物群落组成及物种生态位的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 761-769.
[10]	童永尚, 董全民, 杨俊霞, 曹铨, 俞旸, 张春平. 氮素形态对多年生高寒栽培草地植物群落和土壤性质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 881-890.
[11]	刘梦迪, 张振杰, 王红梅, 赵亚楠, 李傲天. 灌丛引入对荒漠草原土壤碳氮磷化学计量及其与水分权衡的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 905-916.
[12]	米雨晴, 许宏斌, 张雷, 唐月坤, 敖胡日查, 温都日根, 李艾兰. 围封对内蒙古荒漠草原植被生态位及种间联结性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1007-1016.
[13]	郑文贤, 李世雄, 赵文, 宋江琴, 火久艳, 随奇奇, 徐海峰, 尹亚丽. 炭氮配施对黑土滩人工草地植被与土壤的修复研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1041-1052.
[14]	毕鑫, 俞天琦, 侍梦圆, 辛晓平, 张智涛, 闫瑞瑞, 韩国栋. 放牧强度对羊草草甸草原植物群落组成及生态位的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 403-414.
[15]	刘昭岐, 王琪, 郑佳华, 张峰, 李邵宇, 杨立山, 张彬, 乔荠瑢, 赵萌莉, 徐龙超, 王宁斌, 周清格, 邓扬臻, 王锡湲, 陈信力, 季祥, 王忠武. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原短花针茅丛枝菌根真菌侵染特征及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 469-477.