放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶功能性状和植物群落地上生物量的影响

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.018

草地学报 ›› 2026, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 1764-1775.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2026.05.018

• 研究论文 • 上一篇

放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶功能性状和植物群落地上生物量的影响

赵佳乐¹, 王梓晗¹, 王忠武¹, 吕世杰¹, 张兴夫²

1. 内蒙古农业大学草业学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010018;
2. 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010020

收稿日期:2025-07-31 修回日期:2025-12-19 发布日期:2026-05-08
通讯作者: 王忠武，E-mail:wangzhongwu@imau.edu.cn
作者简介:赵佳乐（2000-），女，内蒙古巴彦淖尔人，汉族，硕士研究生，主要从事草地资源生态与管理研究，E-mail:15147410857@163.com；
基金资助:
内蒙古农业大学一流学科科研专项（YLXKZX-NND-002）；内蒙古科技重大专项（2024JBGS0011）；国家自然科学基金（32460353）资助

Effects of Grazing on Leaf Functional Traits of Dominant Plants and Aboveground Biomass of Community in Desert Steppe

ZHAO Jia-le¹, WANG Zi-han¹, WANG Zhong-wu¹, Lü Shi-jie¹, ZHANG Xing-fu²

1. College of Grassland Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010018, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Academy, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010020, China

Received:2025-07-31 Revised:2025-12-19 Published:2026-05-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为探讨不同放牧强度对优势植物短花针茅（Stipa breviflora）和无芒隐子草（Cleistogenes songorica）叶功能性状及地上生物量的影响，依托长期放牧平台，设置对照（CK）、轻度放牧（LG）、中度放牧（MG）和重度放牧（HG）处理。分析探究植物群落地上生物量与优势植物数量特征及叶功能性状的关系。结果表明：随放牧强度增加，植物群落平均高度、盖度和地上生物量显著降低（P<0.05）；密度在MG区最高。短花针茅的叶功能性状随放牧强度增加呈下降趋势，但无芒隐子草的叶干物质含量显著升高。植物群落地上生物量与两种优势植物的高度呈显著正相关，与密度呈负相关。无芒隐子草比叶面积的降低与叶片干物质含量的升高共同抑制了植物群落地上生物量的积累。因此，适度放牧，优势植物通过调整叶功能性状和种群结构维持草地生产力与生态系统的稳定；而重度放牧导致生态系统功能退化。

关键词: 放牧强度, 荒漠草原, 叶功能性状, 地上生物量, 优势种群

Abstract: This study investigated the effects of different grazing intensities on leaf functional traits and aboveground biomass of Stipa breviflora and Cleistogenes songorica in desert steppe of Inner Mongolia. Based on the long-term grazing platform， no grazing （CK）， light grazing （LG）， moderate grazing （MG） and heavy grazing （HG） treatments were set up. The relationships between aboveground biomass of plant community and the quantitative characteristics of dominant plants and leaf functional traits were analyzed. The results showed that with the increase of grazing intensity， the average height， total coverage and aboveground biomass of plant communities decreased significantly（P<0.05）. The density was the highest in MG treatment. The leaf functional traits of S.breviflora decreased with the increase of grazing intensity， but the leaf dry matter content of C.songorica increased significantly. The aboveground biomass of plant community was significantly positively correlated with the height of two dominant plants and negatively correlated with the density. The decrease of specific leaf area and the increase of leaf dry matter content of C.songorica inhibited the accumulation of aboveground biomass of plant community. Therefore， under moderate grazing， dominant plants adjusted leaf functional traits and population structure to maintain grassland productivity and ecosystem stability； heavy grazing led to the degradation of ecosystem function.

Key words: Grazing intensity, Desert steppe, Leaf functional traits, Aboveground biomass, Dominant plants

中图分类号:

S812.6

赵佳乐, 王梓晗, 王忠武, 吕世杰, 张兴夫. 放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶功能性状和植物群落地上生物量的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(5): 1764-1775.

ZHAO Jia-le, WANG Zi-han, WANG Zhong-wu, Lü Shi-jie, ZHANG Xing-fu. Effects of Grazing on Leaf Functional Traits of Dominant Plants and Aboveground Biomass of Community in Desert Steppe[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2026, 34(5): 1764-1775.

参考文献

[1] HE J S, HAN X G. Ecological stoichiometry: searching for unifying principles from individuals to ecosystems[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2010, 34(1):2-6 贺金生, 韩兴国. 生态化学计量学:探索从个体到生态系统的统一化理论[J]. 植物生态学报, 2010, 34(1):2-6
[2] LI B. Present situation, problems and countermeasures of grassland resources in China[J]. Bulletin of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 1997, 12(1):49-51 李博. 我国草地资源现况、问题及对策[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 1997, 12(1):49-51
[3] LIU D F, XI S Z, LIU Y Z. Evaluation of grassland resources in Inner Mongolia[J]. Inner Mongolia Prataculture, 1990, 2(1):1-7 刘德福, 席锁柱, 刘永志. 内蒙古草地资源评价[J]. 内蒙古草业, 1990, 2(1):1-7
[4] YUE R W, ZHANG N, WANG J J, et al. Spatiotemporal variation of grassland aboveground biomass in Inner Mongolia from 2000 to 2019[J].Journal of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2022, 39(1):21-33 乐荣武, 张娜, 王晶杰, 等. 2000—2019年内蒙古草地地上生物量的时空变化特征[J]. 中国科学院大学学报, 2022, 39(1):21-33
[5] ZHANG Y J, ZHU J T, SHEN R N, et al. Research progress on the effects of grazing on grassland ecosystem[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2020, 44(5):553-564 张扬建, 朱军涛, 沈若楠, 等. 放牧对草地生态系统影响的研究进展[J]. 植物生态学报, 2020, 44(5):553-564
[6] LIU X J, MA K P. Plant functional traits—concepts, applications and future directions[J]. Scientia Sinica (Vitae), 2015, 45(4):325-339 刘晓娟, 马克平. 植物功能性状研究进展[J]. 中国科学:生命科学, 2015, 45(4):325-339
[7] ZHAO N, ZHAO X Q, ZHAO L, et al. Progress in researches of the response of plant functional traits to grazing disturbance[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2016, 35(7):1916-1926 赵娜, 赵新全, 赵亮, 等. 植物功能性状对放牧干扰的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35(7):1916-1926
[8] LI J W, HAN G D, LI Z G, et al. Variation of response in Cleistogenes songorica above-ground part functional traits to long-term grazing in a desert steppe[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2018, 35(5):1179-1187 李江文, 韩国栋, 李治国, 等. 无芒隐子草地上部分功能性状对长期放牧的变异性响应[J]. 草业科学, 2018, 35(5):1179-1187
[9] PEI J H, LI J W, HAN G D, et al. Response of functional characters of Stipa breviflora desert grassland plants to stocking rate[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2025, 47(1):27-36 裴婧宏, 李江文, 韩国栋, 等. 短花针茅荒漠草原植物功能性状对载畜率的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2025, 47(1):27-36
[10] AN H. Effect of grazing on morphological plasticity and biomass allocation of dominant species in desert steppe[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2014, 28(11):116-121 安慧. 放牧干扰对荒漠草原优势植物形态可塑性及生物量分配的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2014, 28(11):116-121
[11] CHEN D D, LI Q, HE F Q, et al. A dataset of vegetation aboveground biomass, nutrients, and soil physicochemical properties in Sanjiangyuan and its surrounding areas in 2017[J]. China Scientific Data, 2025, 10(1):283-293 陈懂懂, 李奇, 贺福全, 等. 2017年三江源及其周边区域植被地上生物量、养分及土壤理化性质数据集[J]. 中国科学数据, 2025, 10(1):283-293
[12] TILMAN D, DOWNING J A. Biodiversity and stability in grasslands[J]. Nature, 1994, 367:363-365
[13] ZHANG B, LI S Y, GU C, et al. Biomass allocation of four dominant plant species in Inner Mongolia Desert grasslands in response to different grazing intensities[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(12):3355-3363 张彬, 李邵宇, 古琛, 等. 内蒙古荒漠草原4种优势植物生物量分配对不同放牧强度的响应[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(12):3355-3363
[14] DENG T T, LI C B, LI X L, et al. Effects of different grazing intensities on species diversity and biomass of alpine meadows on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau[J].Journal of Gansu Agricultural University, 2025, 60(6):246-254 邓彤彤, 李长斌, 李希来, 等.不同放牧强度对青藏高原高寒草甸物种多样性和生物量的影响[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 2025, 60(6):246-254
[15] GAO S, SIQIN C, WU L, et al. Relationship between species diversity and biomass of Stipa krylovii steppe community and its responses to grazing intensity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2022, 42(23):9736-9746 高苏日固嘎, 斯琴朝克图, 乌兰图雅, 等. 克氏针茅草原群落物种多样性与生物量关系对放牧强度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2022, 42(23):9736-9746
[16] CRUZ P, DE QUADROS F L F, THEAU J P, et al. Leaf traits as functional descriptors of the intensity of continuous grazing in native grasslands in the south of Brazil[J]. Rangeland Ecology & Management, 2010, 63(3):350-358
[17] GARNIER E, SHIPLEY B, ROUMET C, et al. A standardized protocol for the determination of specific leaf area and leaf dry matter content[J]. Functional Ecology, 2001, 15(5):688-695
[18] AN H. Effects of grazing disturbance on leaf traits and their interrelationships of plants in desert steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2012, 23(11):2991-2996 安慧. 放牧干扰对荒漠草原植物叶性状及其相互关系的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23(11):2991-2996
[19] ZHANG X X, ZUO X A, YUE P, et al. Response of leaf morphological traits and aboveground biomass of dominant plants to multi-resource synergies in desert steppe of Inner Mongolia[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2025, 45(6):2811-2820 张晓雪, 左小安, 岳平, 等. 内蒙古荒漠草原优势植物叶形态性状与地上生物量对多资源协同的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2025, 45(6):2811-2820
[20] ZHANG J. Effects of grazing and hydrothermal condition on quantitative characteristics of plant community in Stipa breviflora desert steppe [D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019:3-13 张军. 放牧和水热条件对短花针茅荒漠草原植物群落数量特征的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2019:3-13
[21] LIU W T. Response mechanism of Stipa breviflora to grazing in desert steppe[D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018:5-6 刘文亭. 荒漠草原短花针茅种群对放牧强度的响应机制[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018:5-6
[22] LI B. Ecology[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000:40-50 李博. 生态学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2000:40-50
[23] YAN R R, XIN X P, ZHANG B H, et al. Influence of cattle grazing gradient on plant community characteristics in Hulunber meadow steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2010, 32(3):62-67 闫瑞瑞, 辛晓平, 张保辉, 等. 肉牛放牧梯度对呼伦贝尔草甸草原植物群落特征的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2010, 32(3):62-67
[24] ZHANG W H, GUAN S Y, LI Y J. Effect of graxing capacity on water content, nutrient and biomass of steppe soil[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2000, 14(4):62-65 张伟华, 关世英, 李跃进. 不同牧压强度对草原土壤水分、养分及其地上生物量的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2000, 14(4):62-65
[25] WANG S P, WANG Y F, LI Y H, et al. The influence of different stocking rates on herbage regrowth and aboveground net primary production[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 1998, 6(4):275-281 汪诗平, 王艳芬, 李永宏, 等. 不同放牧率对草原牧草再生性能和地上净初级生产力的影响[J]. 草地学报, 1998, 6(4):275-281
[26] NOY-MEIR I. Compensating growth of grazed plants and its relevance to the use of rangelands[J]. Ecological Applications, 1993, 3(1):32-34
[27] CHRISTIANSEN S, SVEJCAR T. Grazing effects on shoot and root dynamics and above- and below-ground non-structural carbohydrate in Caucasian bluestem[J]. Grass and Forage Science, 1988, 43(2):111-119
[28] BELSKY A J. Does herbivory benefit plants:a review of the evidence[J]. The American Naturalist, 1986, 127(6):870-892
[29] LIU W, ZHOU L, WANG X. Responses of plant and rodents to different grazing intensity[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(3):376-382 刘伟, 周立, 王溪. 不同放牧强度对植物及啮齿动物作用的研究[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(3):376-382
[30] HICKMAN K R, HARTNETT D C. Effects of grazing intensity on growth, reproduction, and abundance of three palatable forbs in Kansas tallgrass prairie[J]. Plant Ecology, 2002, 159(1):23-33
[31] GUO J Y, DONG Z, LI J R, et al. Effects of grazing intensity on soil physical properties and soil erosion and sediment yield in desert steppe[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2019, 41(3):74-82 郭建英, 董智, 李锦荣, 等. 放牧强度对荒漠草原土壤物理性质及其侵蚀产沙的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2019, 41(3):74-82
[32] LIU S Y, LI X B, LI M Y, et al. The response of vegetation and soil properties to grazing intensity in typical steppe of Inner Mongolia[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2021, 43(9):23-31 刘丝雨, 李晓兵, 李梦圆, 等. 内蒙古典型草原植被和土壤特性对放牧强度的响应[J]. 中国草地学报, 2021, 43(9):23-31
[33] LIU F Y, XU C L, LONG R J. Effect of yak grazing intensity on species diversity of Dasiphora fruticosa shrub grassland communities[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2008, 16(6):613-618 刘发央, 徐长林, 龙瑞军. 牦牛放牧强度对金露梅灌丛草地群落物种多样性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2008, 16(6):613-618
[34] XUE C L, DONG R, LV S J, et al. Study on the similarity of plant communities in desert steppe under different grazing intensities[J]. Grassland and Prataculture, 2024, 36(4):22-27 薛昌琳, 董瑞, 吕世杰, 等. 荒漠草原中不同放牧强度下植物群落的相似性研究[J]. 草原与草业, 2024, 36(4):22-27
[35] WEI Z J, LIU W T, LV S J, et al. Response of Stipa breviflora height to grazing in a desert grassland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(4):885-891 卫智军, 刘文亭, 吕世杰, 等. 短花针茅种群高度对放牧调控的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36(4):885-891
[36] MA S W, GUO J Y, LI J R, et al. Effect of grazing intensity on Stipa breviflora communities and canopy interception[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2016, 38(5):66-70 马少薇, 郭建英, 李锦荣, 等. 放牧强度对短花针茅群落特征及冠层截留的影响[J]. 中国草地学报, 2016, 38(5):66-70
[37] WANG H Y, GUO J Y, LI H L, et al. Vegetation characteristics of Stipa breviflora desert steppe in different degradation degree[J]. Chinese Journal of Grassland, 2015, 37(3):74-79 王合云, 郭建英, 李红丽, 等. 短花针茅荒漠草原不同退化程度的植被特征[J]. 中国草地学报, 2015, 37(3):74-79
[38] SHAN Y M, WEN C, CHEN H J, et al. The seasonal variation of population density under different grazing intensities[J]. Ecological Science, 2017, 36(6):125-129 单玉梅, 温超, 陈海军, 等. 不同放牧强度下植物种群密度的季节性变化[J]. 生态科学, 2017, 36(6):125-129
[39] BAI Y F, LI D X, XU Z X, et al. Growth and reproduction of Stipa Krylovii population on a grazing gradient[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1999, 19(4):479-484 白永飞, 李德新, 许志信, 等. 牧压梯度对克氏针茅生长和繁殖的影响[J]. 生态学报, 1999, 19(4):479-484
[40] QU Z Q, SUN X Y, YANG Z Q, et al. Effects of different grazing intensities on the characteristics of micro-patch of desert grassland meadows[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2024, 32(5):1558-1571 屈志强, 孙雪岩, 杨子琼, 等. 不同放牧强度对荒漠草原草地微斑块特征的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2024, 32(5):1558-1571
[41] MCINTYRE S L S. Disturbance response in vegetation: towards a global perspective on functional traits[J]. Journal of Vegetation Science, 1999, 10(5):621-630
[42] CYRILLE VIOLLE M N. Let the concept of trait be functional！[J]. Oikos, 2007, 116(5):882-892
[43] ADLER P B, SALGUERO-GÓMEZ R, COMPAGNONI A, et al. Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies[J]. PNAS, 2014, 111(2):740-745
[44] SALGADO-NEGRET B, CANESSA R, VALLADARES F, et al. Functional traits variation explains the distribution of Aextoxicon Punctatum (Aextoxicaceae) in pronounced moisture gradients within fog-dependent forest fragments[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2015, 6:511
[45] LI J W. Relationship between plant functional traits and functional diversity in a Stipa breviflora desert steppe under long-term grazing with different stocking rates[D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018:37-39 李江文. 长期不同载畜率下短花针茅荒漠草原植物功能性状与功能多样性的关系[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018:37-39
[46] WANG N. Physio-ecological response mechanisms to simulating leaf damage in four warm-temperate woody species[D]. Jinan:Shandong University, 2021:23-37 王宁. 暖温带四种木本植物对模拟叶受损的生理生态学响应机制[D]. 济南:山东大学, 2021:23-37
[47] HONG C J, LIN H, HONG W, et al. Leaf functional characteristics in different strains of Prunus campanulata[J]. Journal of Tropical and Subtropical Botany, 2015, 23(2):191-196 洪陈洁, 林晗, 洪伟, 等. 不同品系福建山樱花叶功能性状研究[J]. 热带亚热带植物学报, 2015, 23(2):191-196
[48] ZHANG Y F, YANG X X, DONG Q M, et al. Effects of mixed grazing of yak and Tibetan sheep on feed intake of grazing livestock and plant compensation growth[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(6):1607-1614 张艳芬, 杨晓霞, 董全民, 等. 牦牛和藏羊混合放牧对放牧家畜采食量和植物补偿性生长的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(6):1607-1614
[49] DONG Q M, MA Y S, LI Q Y, et al. Effects of yaks stocking pates on aboveground and belowgrou nd blomass in kobrecia parva alpine meadow[J]. Pratacultural Science, 2004, 21(2):48-53 董全民, 马玉寿, 李青云, 等. 牦牛放牧强度对高寒草甸暖季草场植被的影响[J]. 草业科学, 2004, 21(2):48-53
[50] MCNAUGHTON S J. Grazing as an optimization process: grass-ungulate relationships in the serengeti[J]. The American Naturalist, 1979, 113(5):691-703
[51] TRLICA M J, RITTENHOUSE L R. Grazing and plant performance[J]. Ecological Applications, 1993, 3(1):21-23
[52] GU C. Effects of stocking rate on the biomass and its allocation of vegetation in the stipa breviflora desert steppe[D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2019:45-46 古琛. 载畜率对短花针茅荒漠草原植被生物量及其分配的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2019:45-46
[53] LIU Z E, WANG Y S, PAN J Z, et al. Prediction of aboveground biomass of Leymus chinensis grassland[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2004, 23(4):179-183 刘正恩, 王昱生, 潘介正, 等. 羊草草原地上生物量的预测[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23(4):179-183
[54] KANG B W. Formative regularity of aboveground biomass of Agropyron and Elymus species[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1992, 3(1):56-61 康博文. 几种冰草属披碱草属牧草种群地上生物量形成规律的研究[J]. 应用生态学报, 1992, 3(1):56-61
[55] ZHANG R Y. Effects of grazing on biodiversity and ecosystem function of Stipa breviflora desert grassland[D]. Hohhot:Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, 2018:45-46 张睿洋. 放牧对短花针茅荒漠草原生物多样性和生态系统功能的影响[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2018:45-46
[56] POSTMA J A, HECHT V L, HIKOSAKA K, et al. Dividing the pie: A quantitative review on plant density responses[J]. Plant, Cell & Environment, 2021, 44(4):1072-1094

放牧对荒漠草原优势植物叶功能性状和植物群落地上生物量的影响

Effects of Grazing on Leaf Functional Traits of Dominant Plants and Aboveground Biomass of Community in Desert Steppe

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	帅争峰, 雷咸道, 汪常明, 黄晨, 魏学文, 吴睿, 林长存. 北方荒漠草原区光伏电站建设对植物多样性的影响机制研究[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(4): 1137-1145.
[2]	董颢, 张晓嘉, 韩国栋. 放牧强度对荒漠草原植物群落组成及物种生态位的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 761-769.
[3]	刘梦迪, 张振杰, 王红梅, 赵亚楠, 李傲天. 灌丛引入对荒漠草原土壤碳氮磷化学计量及其与水分权衡的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 905-916.
[4]	米雨晴, 许宏斌, 张雷, 唐月坤, 敖胡日查, 温都日根, 李艾兰. 围封对内蒙古荒漠草原植被生态位及种间联结性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(3): 1007-1016.
[5]	毕鑫, 俞天琦, 侍梦圆, 辛晓平, 张智涛, 闫瑞瑞, 韩国栋. 放牧强度对羊草草甸草原植物群落组成及生态位的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 403-414.
[6]	刘昭岐, 王琪, 郑佳华, 张峰, 李邵宇, 杨立山, 张彬, 乔荠瑢, 赵萌莉, 徐龙超, 王宁斌, 周清格, 邓扬臻, 王锡湲, 陈信力, 季祥, 王忠武. 不同放牧强度下荒漠草原短花针茅丛枝菌根真菌侵染特征及其影响因素[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 469-477.
[7]	马磊超, 王兴, 杨秀春, 杨东, 王子超, 邢晓语. 基于无人机多源遥感数据的灌丛草原地上生物量估算[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(2): 559-572.
[8]	陈文美, 高卉, 胡海娜, 黄真真, 孙智, 李海港. 土壤微生物对荒漠草原一年生和多年生牧草生长发挥的效应[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(1): 61-74.
[9]	包志鹏, 林栋, 刘雪鹏, 罗薇薇, 宋一诺, 花欣颖. 放牧强度对高寒草甸土壤有机碳及其组分的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2026, 34(1): 172-181.
[10]	邓扬臻, 王锡湲, 李邵宇, 郑佳华, 张峰, 赵萌莉, 张彬. 荒漠草原弃耕演替过程中土壤多功能性及其与生物多样性关系[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2863-2872.
[11]	郭芳, 张卫青, 关海波, 万志强, 袁亚楠, TSEDEVDORJ Ser-od, 张丽. 不同放牧强度下内蒙古典型草原地表节肢动物群落特征[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2950-2961.
[12]	鞠馨, 王新雅, 王冰莹, 韩国栋, 武倩. 放牧强度对荒漠草原植物群落组成和营养品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(9): 2962-2972.
[13]	王瑞, 苏世锋, 尹亚丽, 赵文, 王彦龙, 李世雄. 放牧对高寒草甸春季草场土壤磷素转化率的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2502-2511.
[14]	张丽, 张卫青, 关海波, 袁亚楠, 春风, 万志强, 郭芳. 不同放牧强度下内蒙古典型草原土壤团聚体线虫群落特征[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2531-2540.
[15]	张磊, 张玉娟, 孙世贤, 徐学宝, 邢越, 刘晓丽, 高翠萍, 王成杰. 不同放牧强度对荒漠草原土壤活性有机碳的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(8): 2541-2547.