Influence of Grazing Pressure and Grazing Time on the Foraging Behaviour of Goat

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.024

›› 2011, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (5): 852-857.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.024

Previous Articles Next Articles

Influence of Grazing Pressure and Grazing Time on the Foraging Behaviour of Goat

CHEN Wei-wei^1,2, WAN Li-qiang¹, HE Feng¹, LI Xiang-lin¹

1. Beijing Institute of Animal Science of CAAS, Beijing, 100094, China;
2. College of Pastoral Agriculture Science and Technology, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Provicne 730020, China

Received:2011-03-14 Revised:2011-04-19 Online:2011-10-15 Published:2012-07-12

不同放牧压和放牧时期对山羊牧食行为的影响

陈玮玮^1,2, 万里强¹, 何峰¹, 李向林¹

1. 中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所, 北京100193;
2. 兰州大学草地农业科技学院, 甘肃兰州730020

通讯作者: 李向林,E-mail:lxl@iascaas.net.cn
作者简介:陈玮玮(1986- ),男,河南社旗人,硕士研究生,研究方向为草地生态学,E-mail:chen_000@126.com
基金资助:
人工草地优质牧草生产技术研究与示范(nyhyzx07-022);公益性行业(农业)科研专项(200903060);牧草产业技术体系(nycytx-37)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Foraging behavior of goats was investigated under different grazing pressure and different grazing time in South China.Results showed both ingesting times and ingesting steps were decreased under lower grazing pressure index,whereas bite numbers per step,rate of ingestion,intake per bite,daily intake,time of rumination were significantly increased at the same time.There was little effect on other behaviors.In September,ingesting times and ingesting steps were the least and intake per bite was maximum among all tested times.Bite numbers per step in June was significantly less than that of other months.The rate of ingestion was significantly increased in October.Time of rumination,chewing time per ruminating food bolus was the longest in October.Both chewing rate and interval time had fewer differences between two ruminating food bolus in different month.

Key words: Grazing pressure, Grazing time, Goat, Grazing behaviour, Grazing

摘要： 在南方人工草地上,对云岭黑山羊在不同放牧压和放牧时期的牧食行为进行研究。结果表明:放牧压指数较小时,能减少采食时间和采食时行进步数,明显增加每步吃草口数、采食速度、口食量、日采食量、反刍时间,对其他牧食行为影响不大;9月份采食口数、行进步数最少,口食量、日采食量最大,6月份每步吃草口数明显小于其他月份。7,8,9月份采食速度相差不大,小于10月份采食速度;10月份反刍时间、每个食团咀嚼时间最长,反刍咀嚼速度、逆呕时间间隔在不同月份差别不大。

关键词: 放牧压, 放牧时期, 山羊, 牧食行为, 放牧

CLC Number:

S827
S815

CHEN Wei-wei, WAN Li-qiang, HE Feng, LI Xiang-lin. Influence of Grazing Pressure and Grazing Time on the Foraging Behaviour of Goat[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 852-857.

陈玮玮, 万里强, 何峰, 李向林. 不同放牧压和放牧时期对山羊牧食行为的影响[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 852-857.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2011.05.024

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2011/V19/I5/852

References

[1] 李诗洪.试谈家畜的摄食行为[J].家畜生态,1986,7(1):7-10
[2] 汪诗平.放牧绵羊行为生态学研究-不同放牧率对放牧绵羊牧食行为的影响[J].草业学报,1997,6(1):10-17
[3] 韩国栋.划区轮牧和季节连续放牧绵羊牧食行为[J].中国草地,1993,15(2):1-4
[4] 王旭,王德利,刘颖,等.不同放牧率下绵羊的采食量与食性选择研究[J].东北师大学报(自然科学版),2002,34(1):36-40
[5] 宋仁德,长谷川信美,李国梅,等.天然草地放牧牦牛采食行为及食性选择的研究[J].家畜生态学报,2008,28(5):31-35
[6] 刘发央,龙瑞军.不同放牧强度对牦牛夏季放牧行为的影响[J].兰州大学学报(方然科学版),2009,45(2):55-60
[7] 汪诗平,李永宏,王艳芬.绵羊采食行为与草场空间异质性关系[J].生态学报,1999,19(3):431-434
[8] 李永宏,汪诗平.放牧绵羊的食性食量研究[J].草业学报,1998,7(1):50-53
[9] 欧阳熙,王杰,刘剑良,等.波尔山羊舍饲行为观测研究[J].家畜生态,2003,24(3):17-22
[10] 刘艳芬,刘铀,林红英,等.雷州山羊春节牧食行为的观测[J].家畜生态,2001,22(4):34-38
[11] 刘庆华,聂芙蓉,刘太宇,等.舍饲成年波尔山羊行为习性观测初报[J].家畜生态学报,2007,28(2):37-39
[12] Hodgson J.The control of herbage intake in the grazing ruminant[J].Proceedings of the Nutrition Society,1985,44:339-346
[13] 丁海君,韩国栋,王忠武,等.短花针茅荒木草原不同载畜率对绵羊牧食行为的影响[J].畜牧与饲料科学,2008(4):38-43
[14] 曹毅,汤茂林,柏正强,等.青藏高寒草地夏秋季不同轮牧强度对牧草及绵羊的影响[J].草地学报,1995,5(4):328-332
[15] 卫智军,白云军,乌日图,等.荒漠草原不同放牧方式绵羊牧食策略研究[J].草地学报,2005,13(增刊):57-61
[16] 杨刚,杨智明,王宁.不同放牧强度下滩羊牧食习性的比较研究[J].宁夏农学院学报,2004,25(2):53-57

Influence of Grazing Pressure and Grazing Time on the Foraging Behaviour of Goat

不同放牧压和放牧时期对山羊牧食行为的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[2]	HOU Lu-lu, WANG Xu, ZHANG Xiang, YAN Yu-chun, YAN Rui-rui, CHENG Li, XIN Xiao-ping. The Effect of Grazing Intensity on Beef Cattle’s Behavior [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1974-1982.
[3]	ZHANG Bo, CHENG Jie, WANG Shu-hong, LIU Jing, YANG Xue, YAN Xin-hui, LI Wei. Effects of Nitrogen Addition and Grazing on Allometric Growth of Dominant Plant Species in Grassland in the Yunwu Mountains [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1983-1991.
[4]	LIU Jing-jing, YIN Ya-li, LI Shi-xiong, ZHAO Wen, DONG Yi-ling, SU Shi-feng. Effects of Different Regulation Measures on Vegetation and Soil of Moderately Degraded Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2074-2080.
[5]	QU Yan, SONG Qian, YANG He-long, ZHAO Kun, ZHAO Min, LIU Yu-ling, WANG De-ping, RONG Yu-ping. The Influence of Different Utilization Methods of Hulunbuir Grassland on the Structure of Soil Microbial Clusters [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1621-1627.
[6]	SUN Cai-cai, FENG Bin, DONG Quan-min, LIU Wen-ting, SHI Guang, LIU Yu-zhen, ZHANG Xiao-fang, YU Yang, ZHANG Chun-ping, YANG Xiao-xia. Effects of Mixed Grazing of Yak and Tibetan Sheep on the Functional Characteristics of Stipa purpurea in an Alpine Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1477-1483.
[7]	PEI Wen, CHEN Qing, ZHANG Luo-zi, JIA Li-ying. Effects of Grazing,Water and Nitrogen on Soil Aggregates in Inner Mongolia Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1499-1506.
[8]	QIAN Qian, ZHANG Xiu-juan, WANG Jun-bang, YE Hui, LI Ying-nian, ZHANG Zhi-jun. The Spatio-temporal Pattern of Grazing Pressure in the Three-River Headwaters in Qinghai Province from 2005 to 2017 [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1311-1317.
[9]	LI Na-na, YANG Jiu-yan, JIA Zhe-ting, YAN Rui-ling, CHEN Qi. Effects of Different Grazing Patterns on Community Characteristics and Soil Nutrients in the Main Pasture Types of Alxa Zuoqi [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 991-1003.
[10]	QIN Jin-ping, LIU Ying, MA Yu-shou, WANG Yan-long, LI Shi-xiong. Effects of Rest Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Photosynthetic Physiology of Dominant Species in Degraded Alpine Grasslands During Greenup Period [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1034-1042.
[11]	WANG Chao, WANG Xiao-li , SHI Jian-jun , WU Jian-li , XING Yun-fei ,Cairenqiuji, Yixicuomao. Effect of Rest-grazing in Regreen-up Period on Plant Community Characteristics of Maduo Alpine Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 763-771.
[12]	SUN Yi-mei, TIAN Qing, GUO Ai-xia, ZHANG Sen-xi, LV Peng, ZUO Xiao-an. Effects of Grazing and Nitrogen Addition on Functional Traits of Dominant Species Cleistogenes squarrosa and Community in Semi-arid Sandy Grassland [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 563-571.
[13]	ZHANG Ya-nan, WANG Cheng-jie, HAN Yong-jun, HONG Ling, QI Shi-san, WANG Zhan-yi. Simulating the Effect of Grazing on the Growth of Stipa sareptana var. krylovii by Adding Fertilizer and Mowing [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 317-323.
[14]	LI wen, MA Xin-xin, MA Ning, ZHAO Yun-ge, QIAO Yu, WANG Peng, SUN Hui. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Stoichiomerty of Biological Soil Crusts in the Hilly Loess Plateau region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2547-2555.
[15]	LI Tong, ZHANG Yu, ZHAO Jin-ling, YAN Rui-rui, XIN Xiao-ping, WANG Xu, CHEN Jin-qiang, WU Dong-xiu, LI Ling-hao, ZHAO Man. Effects of Grazing Intensity on Soil Water-Heat Regime and Above-Ground Biomass in a Meadow Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2577-2582.