Resistance Evaluation and Response of 16 Millet Varieties at Germination Stage to Drought Stress

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.014

›› 2013, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 302-307.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.014

Previous Articles Next Articles

Resistance Evaluation and Response of 16 Millet Varieties at Germination Stage to Drought Stress

ZHANG Mei-jun¹, YANG Wu-de¹, QIAO Zhi-jun², FENG Mei-chen¹, WANG Guan¹, DUAN Yun¹, CHEN Ling²

1. College of Agronomy, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu, Shanxi Province 030801, China;
2. Institute of Germplasm Resources, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan, Shanxi Province 030031, China

Received:2012-10-22 Revised:2013-02-15 Online:2013-04-15 Published:2013-04-23

不同糜子品种萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价

张美俊¹, 杨武德¹, 乔治军², 冯美臣¹, 王冠¹, 段云¹, 陈凌²

1. 山西农业大学农学院, 山西太谷 030801;
2. 山西省农业科学院农作物品种资源研究所, 山西太原 030031

通讯作者: 乔治军,nkypzs@yahoo.com.cn
作者简介:张美俊(1970-),女,山西河曲人,博士,副教授,主要从事作物生态与旱作农业研究,E-mail:meijunz@126.com
基金资助:
国家现代农业产业技术体系糜子栽培岗位项目(CARS-07-12.5-A12)资助

Abstract

Abstract: Related indicators to drought resistance were measured for 16 millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) varieties at germination stage under simulated drought stress using polyethylence glycol (PEG)-6000 solution. Drought resistance was comprehensively evaluated with subordinative function at this stage to investigate the response of varieties to drought stress. Results showed significant drought resistance among 16 millet varieties. Seed germination speed and rate were decreased by restraining seed germination vigor under drought stress. The inhibitory effect of drought stress on radicle was stronger than on embryo. Therefore, germination drought resistance index, relative germination rate, relative germination energy, relative germ and radicle length, relative germination index and relative vigor index were able to be used as effective indicators for drought resistance identification at the germination stage of millet. Hequhong millet, Yihong millet and Nianfeng millet 5 having stronger drought resistance were tested.

Key words: Millet, Germination stage, Drought stress, Subordinative function method, Drought-resistance evaluation

摘要： 利用PEG-6000溶液模拟干旱胁迫,对16个糜子(Panicum miliaceum L.)品种萌发期与抗旱性相关的指标进行测定,比较其抗旱性,并采用隶属函数法对其抗旱性进行综合评价。结果表明:不同糜子品种抗旱性有显著性差异。干旱胁迫抑制糜子种子萌发活力,降低了萌发速度和发芽率;干旱胁迫对糜子胚根的抑制要强于胚芽;萌发抗旱指数、相对发芽率、相对发芽势、相对胚芽长、相对胚根长、相对萌发指数和相对活力指数均可作为糜子萌发期抗旱性鉴定的参考指标。河曲红黍子、伊选红糜、粘丰5号这3个品种抗旱性较强。

关键词: 糜子, 萌发期, 干旱胁迫, 隶属函数法, 抗旱性评价

CLC Number:

Q945.78
S516

ZHANG Mei-jun, YANG Wu-de, QIAO Zhi-jun, FENG Mei-chen, WANG Guan, DUAN Yun, CHEN Ling. Resistance Evaluation and Response of 16 Millet Varieties at Germination Stage to Drought Stress[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 302-307.

张美俊, 杨武德, 乔治军, 冯美臣, 王冠, 段云, 陈凌. 不同糜子品种萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J]. , 2013, 21(2): 302-307.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2013.02.014

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2013/V21/I2/302

References

[1] 山仑,康绍忠,吴普特. 中国节水农业[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社,2004
[2] 柴岩. 糜子[M]. 中国农业出版社,1999
[3] 王纶,王星玉,温琪汾,等. 中国黍稷种质资源研究与利用[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2005,6(4):474-477
[4] Hu X Y, Wang J F, Lu P, et al. Assessment of genetic diversity in broomcorn millet (Panicum miliaceum L.) using SSR markers[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics,2009,36(8):491-500
[5] 王纶,王星玉,温琪汾,等. 中国黍稷种质资源蛋白质和脂肪含量的鉴定分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报,2007,8(2):165-169
[6] 冯伯利,曾盛名,蒋纪芸,等. 品种、播期与肥力对糜子籽粒蛋白质及其组分的影响[J]. 陕西农业科学,1996(5):3-5
[7] 林凡云,胡银岗,宋国琦,等. 糜子抗旱及复水相关基因的cDNA-AFLP 差异显示[J]. 干旱地区农业研究,2006,24(3):95-99
[8] 张盼盼,冯佰利,王鹏科,等. 糜子芽期抗旱性指标鉴选与利用研究[J]. 河北农业科学,2010,14(11):22- 27
[9] 王纶,温琪汾,曹厉萍,等. 黍稷抗旱种质筛选及抗旱机理研究[J]. 山西农业科学,2007,35(4):31-34
[10] 揭雨成,黄丕生,李宗道. 苎麻基因型抗旱性差异及其早期鉴定研究[J]. 作物学报,2000,26(6):942-946
[11] 陈荣敏,杨学举,梁凤山,等. 利用隶属函数法综合评价冬小麦的抗旱性[J]. 河北农业大学学报,2002,25(2):7-9
[12] 祁旭升,王兴荣,许军. 胡麻种质资源成株期抗旱性评价[J]. 中国农业科学,2010,43(15):3076-3087
[13] 王曙光,孙黛珍,周福平,等. 六倍体小黑麦萌发期抗旱性分析[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2008,16(6):1403-1408
[14] 李贵全,张海燕,季兰,等. 不同大豆品种抗旱性综合评价[J]. 应用生态学报,2006,17(12):2408-2412
[15] 毛培春,孟林,高洪文. 20份无芒雀麦种质材料苗期抗旱性综合评价及光合特性分析[J]. 草地学报,2011,17(4):619-630
[16] 李文娆,张岁岐,山仑. 水分胁迫下紫花苜蓿和高粱种子萌发特性及幼苗耐旱性[J]. 生态学报,2009,29(6):3066-3074
[17] 史薇,徐海量,赵新风. 胀果甘草种子萌发对干旱胁迫的生理响应[J]. 生态学报,2010,30(8):2112-2117
[18] 张智猛,万书波,戴良香. 花生抗旱性鉴定指标的筛选与评价[J]. 植物生态学报,2011,35(1):100-109
[19] 余方玲,杨满业,干友民,等. 川西北高寒草地3种禾草种子萌发期抗旱性[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(6):993-997
[20] 秦文静,梁宗锁. 四种豆科牧草萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(4):61-70
[21] 李源,刘贵波,高洪文,等. 紫花苜蓿种质苗期抗旱性综合评价研究[J]. 草地学报,2009,17(6):807-812

Resistance Evaluation and Response of 16 Millet Varieties at Germination Stage to Drought Stress

不同糜子品种萌发期对干旱胁迫的响应及抗旱性评价

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	TONG Li-rong, NI Shun-gang, REN Xing-yuan, LIU Jia-xin, WEN Jing, WANG Juan, SONG Yu. Effects of Melatonin on Seedling Growth and Leaf Water Physiology of Lespedeza davurica under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1682-1688.
[2]	LI Peng-zhen, ZHAO De-qin, DENG Bo, Yang Jun, Zhao Guo-hua, Zhao Liang. Effects of Biochar Addition and Drought Stress on Photosynthetic Efficiency and Growth of Alfalfa Inoculated with Rhizobia [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1257-1264.
[3]	LIANG Jia, MAYINU·Wusiman, FANG Zhi-gang. Effects of Exogenous Growth Substances on Seed Germination of Sweet Sorghum under Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 610-617.
[4]	YE Xiao-qian, LIU Rui-xi, FENG Jin-hui, DENG Shi-ming, LI Ji-tao, DENG Zhi-jun. Effect of Mucilage of Plantago asiatica Seeds on Its Deterioration and Germination Resistance [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2728-2732.
[5]	YU Shu-yan, ZHOU Yan-fei, HUANG Wei, WANG Xing, GAO Xue-qin, FU Bing-zhe. Effects of Drought,Salt,and Drought-salt Combined Stress on Photosynthetic and Physiological Characteristics of Agropyron mongolicum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2399-2406.
[6]	QI Chen-xi, YI Guan-tao, FU Xiao-xuan, WANG Hai-long, WANG Jia-lin, WU Jian-hui. Effects of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi on Physiological Indexes of Potentilla anserina under Drought-Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2407-2412.
[7]	XIE Nan, LIU Zhen-yu, FENG Wei, ZHI Jian-fei, LI Meng, DU Zi-xuan, LIU Zhong-kuan. The Production Performance and Forage Quality of Forage Millet in Saline Alkali Dryland Around Bohai Sea [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 60-71.
[8]	QIN Li-gang, LI Xue, LI Wei-yao, HU Yao, LI Jun, CUI Guo-wen. Effects of PEG Stress on Osmotic Regulation Substances and Enzyme Activities during Seed Germination of Three Allium L. [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 72-79.
[9]	ZHANG Ran, MA Xiang, ZHU Rui-ting, NIU Kui-ju, ZHAO Chun-xu, MA Hui-ling. Metabolic Pathway and Transcriptional Regulation of Qinghai Wild Poa pratensis in Response to Drought Stress [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1508-1518.
[10]	LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, LIANG Guo-ling. Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[11]	WANG Xiao-xue, LI Yue, ZHANG Bin, JIA Ju-qing, FENG Mei-chen, ZHANG Mei-jun, YANG Wu-de. Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on Root Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
[12]	LI Chun-yan, WANG Xi, ZHOU Sheng-hua, LI Xi, ZHONG Hua, DONG Kuan-hu. Excavation of R2R3-MYB Transcription Factor and Its Response to Drought Stress in Bothriochloa ischaemum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1784-1790.
[13]	CHEN Ai-ping, SUI Xiao-qing, WANG Yu-xiang, JIN Gui-li, WANG Kun, AN Sha-zhou. Effects of Drought and Re-watering on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Seriphidium transiliense Seedlings [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1216-1225.
[14]	LUO Xiao-yan, LI Xin-yong, ZHANG Yu, WANG Wen-qiang, DING Xi-peng. Difference Analysis of Salt and Drought Tolerance of Eight Desmodium Species Seeds During Germination [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1329-1336.
[15]	YU Xin-rong, ZHANG Zhi-wei, ZHOU Yu, LIU Peng, YAO Hong-bin, MIAO Yan-jun, FU Juan-juan. Effects of Melatonin on Growth and Antioxidant System of Perennial Ryegrass Seedlings Under Cold and Drought Stresses [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(5): 1337-1345.