Effects of Two Tested Herbicides on the Yield of Oat, Weed Control and Safety of Succeeding Crops

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.029

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2015, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 187-193.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.029

Previous Articles Next Articles

Effects of Two Tested Herbicides on the Yield of Oat, Weed Control and Safety of Succeeding Crops

LIU Huan¹, MU Ping², ZHAO Gui-qin¹, JIAO Ting¹

1. College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University; Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Ministry of Education; Sino-U.S. Center for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China;
2. College of Agronomy, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2014-03-07 Revised:2014-05-15 Online:2015-02-15 Published:2015-01-31

2种除草剂对燕麦产量、杂草防除及后茬作物安全性的影响

刘欢¹, 慕平², 赵桂琴¹, 焦婷¹

1. 甘肃农业大学草业学院草业生态系统教育部重点实验室中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070;
2. 甘肃农业大学农学院, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 赵桂琴
作者简介:刘欢(1982-),女,山东招远人,博士,讲师,研究方向牧草与草坪草种质资源及育种,E-mail:liuhuan@gsau.edu.cn
基金资助:
现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-08-C);农业行业专项(201003023)资助

Abstract

Abstract:

Butralin and Bromoxynil octanoate plus MCPA-sodium which were best two herbicides selected by previous experiment were adopted in this experiment and used in oat field. The weed control, fresh forage and kernel yield of oat were surveyed, and the effects of herbicides at different concentrations on the germination rate, height and fresh weight of succeeding plant preliminary were investigated. The results showed that the control effect of weed after applied herbicides for 15 days and 30 days as well as the control effect of fresh weight after applied herbicides for 30 days were ordered as the treatment of Bromoxynil octanoate plus MCPA-sodium with high concentration > the treatment of Bromoxynil octanoate plus MCPA-sodium at middle concentration > the treatment of Butralin with high concentration. The oat yield increased in the treatments of all tested herbicides compared with controls. Both herbicides had obvious control efficiency in the middle concentration, and the effect of Bromoxynil octanoate plus MCPA-sodium was better than Butralin. The soil treated by both herbicides with low concentrations had no effect on the seedling emergence of succeeding crops such as winter rape (Brassica campestris), naked oat (Avena nuda)and husk oat(Avena sativa). Both herbicides at low and middle concentrations had promoting effects on the height, root length and fresh weight of the succeeding crop at adult stage, while the seedling emergence and growth of plant were inhibited with the concentrations of both herbicides increasing. Comprehensive evaluation indicated that the middle concentration treatment of Butralin had the least impact on the growth of succeeding crops, and the high concentration treatment of Bromoxynil octanoate plus MCPA-sodium had the largest inhibition to the growth of succeeding crops. So the optimum application concentrations of 40% Butralin and 40% Bromoxynil octanoate plus MCPA-sodium in oat land should not exceed 5625 and 2025 mL·hm^-2, respectively.

Key words: Oat, Herbicides, Weed control effect, Fresh forage yield, Kernel yield, Succeeding crops

摘要：

试验采用前期筛选的2种最佳除草剂仲丁灵和二甲·辛酰溴施用于燕麦田(Avena sativa),调查燕麦鲜草、种子产量及防效,并初步研究不同浓度除草剂对后茬植物出苗率、株高及鲜重的影响.结果表明:药后15 d,30 d株防效及鲜重防效表现为施用高浓度二甲·辛酰溴 > 中浓度二甲·辛酰溴 > 高浓度仲丁灵.表明与对照相比,所有处理对燕麦产量均有增产作用,2种除草剂都在中浓度增效明显,且二甲·辛酰溴优于仲丁灵.低浓度除草剂处理过的土壤对后茬冬油菜及皮、裸燕麦出苗无影响,在中、低浓度下对后茬成株期株高和鲜重有促进作用,而高浓度除草剂对后茬出苗率及成株期生长有抑制作用.仲丁灵中浓度对后茬影响最小,高浓度二甲·辛酰溴对后茬抑制最大.因此建议燕麦田施用40%仲丁灵和40%二甲·辛酰溴分别不超过5625 和2025 mL·hm^-2.

关键词: 燕麦, 除草剂, 防效, 鲜草产量, 种子产量, 后茬作物

CLC Number:

S482.4

LIU Huan, MU Ping, ZHAO Gui-qin, JIAO Ting. Effects of Two Tested Herbicides on the Yield of Oat, Weed Control and Safety of Succeeding Crops[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2015, 23(1): 187-193.

刘欢, 慕平, 赵桂琴, 焦婷. 2种除草剂对燕麦产量、杂草防除及后茬作物安全性的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2015, 23(1): 187-193.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2015.01.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2015/V23/I1/187

References

[1] 杨海鹏,孙泽民. 中国燕麦[M]. 北京:农业出版社,1989,11-12
[2] 曲祥春,何中国,郝文媛,等. 我国燕麦生产现状及发展对策[J]. 杂粮作物,2006,26(3):233-235
[3] 冷廷瑞,杨君,郭来春,等. 几种除草剂在燕麦田的应用效果[J]. 杂草科学,2011,29(1):70-71
[4] 王树凤,徐礼,马建义,等. 除草剂生物筛选研究进展[J]. 农药学报,2002,4(4):3-9
[5] 王桃,徐长林,姜文清,等. 高寒草甸区饲用燕麦品种营养价值综合评价研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2010,32(3):69-75
[6] 陈恭,郭丽梅,任长忠,等. 行距及间作对箭筈豌豆与燕麦青干草产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报,2011,37(11):2066-2074
[7] Schnitzenbaumer B, Arendt E K. A comparative study of oat (Avena sativa) cultivars as brewing adjuncts [J]. European Food Research and Technology,2013,236(6):1015-1025
[8] 塔娜,逯晓萍,张雅慧,等. 皮、裸燕麦种质资源的性状表现和遗传差异分析[J]. 内蒙古农业科技,2010(2):33-35
[9] 袁卉馥,牛瑞明,刘俊喜,等. 冀西北坝上地区莜麦田间除草剂的筛选研究[J]. 河南农业科学,2009(11):90-93
[10] 刘敏艳,胡冠芳,陈海贵,等. 异丙隆对地膜小麦田杂草的防效及其对后茬作物安全性的研究[J]. 植物保护,2000,26(5):40-42
[11] 蔡丽艳,宋志萍,许静,等. 18份燕麦属牧草种质材料的鉴定与评价[J]. 中国草地学报,2007,29(4):21-27
[12] 裘丽珍,黄有军,黄坚钦,等. 不同耐盐植物在盐胁迫下的生长与生理特性比较研究[J]. 浙江大学学报,2006,32(4):420-427
[13] 武俊英,刘景辉,李倩,等. 盐胁迫对燕麦种子萌发、幼苗生长及叶片质膜透性的影响[J]. 麦类作物学报,2009,29(2):341-345
[14] 董海,杨皓,杨眉,等. 高粱田苗前化学除草技术初探[J]. 杂草科学,2007(7):48-49
[15] 范其新,韩仁长,蒙大庆, 等. 7种除草剂对直播油菜田间杂草防效及油菜生长的影响[J]. 江西农业学报,2013,25(8):80-82
[16] 胡战朝,赵桂琴,刘欢,等. 除草剂对燕麦田杂草的防效及其对燕麦产量的影响[J]. 甘肃农业大学学报,2012,47(2),97-103
[17] Calvino P A, Studdert G A, Abbate P E, et al. Use of non-selective herbicides for wheat physiological and harvest maturity acceleration [J]. Field Crop Research,2002,77(2):191-199
[18] Kieloch R, Rola H. Sensitivity of winter wheat cultivars to selected herbicides[J].Journal of Plant Protection Research,2010,50(1):35-40
[19] 吴明根,刘海峰,韩云哲,等. 除草剂玉宝防除玉米地杂草的效果[J]. 延边大学农学学报,2000,22(4),270-274
[20] 王克勤. 除草剂对高油大豆产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报,2005,21(11):311-313
[21] 宋忠利,张慎举,刘新社,等. 除草剂克阔乐对夏大豆农艺及产量性状的影响[J]. 河南农业科学,2002(6):20-21
[22] Malhi S S, Lemke R, Wang Z H, et al. Nitrogen and crop residue effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality, and greenhouse gas emissions [J]. Soil and Tillage Research,2006,90(12):171-183
[23] 党建友,张定一,裴雪霞,等. 除草剂对冬小麦光合特性、籽粒产量及品质的调控效应[J]. 西北植物学报,2007,27(7):1438-1445
[24] 王正贵,于倩倩,周立云,等. 几种除草剂对小麦籽粒产量及生理特性的影响[J]. 核农学报,2011,25(4):791-795
[25] 李会宾,吴思荣,王琳. 3种除草剂对后茬作物出苗率及成活率的影响[J]. 甘肃农业科技,2009(12):25-27
[26] 付群梅,董德臻,吕龙,等. 丙酯草醚在土壤中的残留及对后茬作物的安全性[J]. 农药,2009,48(1):21-23
[27] Jacques G L, Harvey R G. Persistence of Dinitroaniline Herbicides in Soil [J].Weed Science,1979,27(6):660-665
[28] Schloss J V. Acetolactate synthase,mechanism of action and its herbicide binding site [J]. Pesticide Science,1990,29(3):283-292
[29] José L A, Eva H S, Susana L, et al. Effects of sulfosulfuron soil residues on barley (Hordeum vulgare), sunflower (Helianthus annuus) and common vetch (vicia sativa) [J]. Crop Protection,2002,21(10):1061-1066
[30] Matocha M A, Grichar W J, Scotta S, et al. The Persistence of Imazapic in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) Crop Rotations [J]. Weed Technology,2003,17(2):325-329
[31] 荆瑞勇,王丽艳,王彦杰,等. 乙草胺对土壤微生物数量和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报,2010,18(6):1302-1305
[32] Sullivan J O', Thomas R J, Bouw W J. Effect of imazethapyr and imazamox soil residues on several vegetable crops grown in Ontario [J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,1998,78(4):647-651
[33] 叶贵标,魏福香,朱天纵. 影响除草剂药效药害的因子[J]. 农药科学与管理,1998,3(3):27-31
[34] AI-khatib M, Mcneilly T, Collins J C. The potential of selection and breeding for improved salt tolerance in Lucerne (Medicago sativa L.) [J]. Euphytica,1993,65(1):43-51
[35] 李源,刘贵波,高洪文,等. 紫花苜蓿种质耐盐性综合评价及盐胁迫下的生理反应[J]. 草业学报,2010,19(4):79-86

Effects of Two Tested Herbicides on the Yield of Oat, Weed Control and Safety of Succeeding Crops

2种除草剂对燕麦产量、杂草防除及后茬作物安全性的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	SONG Ci, HUANG Xiao-tao, SHI Guo-xi, ZHOU Hua-kun, WANG Fang-ping, YAO Bu-qing. Effects of Sowing Dates on the Growth and Forage Quality of Oat on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 121-127.
[2]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[3]	TONG Yong-shang, YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Peng-bin, SONG Jian-chao, LI Zhen, LI Ying. Effects of Sowing Date on Forage Yield and Quality of Seven Oat Varieties in Tianzhu Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[4]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, MA Xiang. Phenotypic Diversity of the Panicle Among 590 Covered Oats Germplasm Resources in Apline of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[5]	LIU Bei, SONG Yu-mei, SUN-ming, MAO Pei-sheng. Physiological Responses of Mitochondrial AsA-GSH Cycle to Imbibition of Deteriated Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[6]	JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Gui-qin. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Sowing Rate on Photosynthetic Characteristics,Phytohormone Content and Grain Yield of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 293-302.
[7]	LI Wen, WEI Ting-hu, Abaodi, Yongcuobazhan, Cairentaci, ZHOU Yu-hai, LI Wen-hao, GUO Wei-xing, ZHANG Yan-ping. Effects of Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer and Organic Manure Supplement on Oat Nutrient Quality and Soil Nutrient in Alpine Cold Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[8]	WANG Xue, LIU Xiao-jing, ZHAO Ya-jiao, WANG Jing. Effects of Alfalfa/Oat Intercropping on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Matter Accumulation of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2258-2264.
[9]	ZHOU Lei, WANG Lu, ZHAO Bao-ping, MI Jun-zhen, WANG Feng-wu, LIU Jing-hui, ZHANG Dan, LIU Ye-kun. Effect of Different Sowing Date and Cutting Time on Yield and Quality of Forage Oat in Agro-pastoral Ecotone of Northern China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2355-2363.
[10]	FU Dong-qing, WANG Yan-chao, SONG Lei, WANG Xu-zhe, ZHANG Fan-fan, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Production Performance of Early Maturing Forage Oat in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2364-2371.
[11]	JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, ZHAO Gui-qin. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer and Plant Density on Oat Leaf Senescence Characteristics and Cell Structure [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(1): 80-87.
[12]	SUN Hao-yang, ZHAO Gui-qin, ZHANG Jian-gui, LI Xin, YANG Yan-shan, CHAI Ji-kuan, ZENG Liang, JIAO Run-an, JIN Xiao-wen, LI Rong, GONG Wen-long. Incidence of Oat Powdery Mildew and Pathogen Identification in the Main Oat Production Areas of Gansu Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1535-1543.
[13]	LIU Kai-qiang, LIU Wen-hui, JIA Zhi-feng, MA Xiang, LIANG Guo-ling. Effects of Water Stress on Organ Growth and Water Use Efficiency of Avena sativa ‘Qingyan No. 1’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1552-1562.
[14]	HAO Shuang-nan, QIN Jie, LIU Pan-feng, YANG Wu-de, ZHANG Mei-jun, FENG Mei-chen, WANG Chao, SONG Xiao-yan. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on Stem Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1572-1579.
[15]	WANG Xiao-xue, LI Yue, ZHANG Bin, JIA Ju-qing, FENG Mei-chen, ZHANG Mei-jun, YANG Wu-de. Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on Root Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.