Research Progress on Natural Forage Silage Additives

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.002

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (3): 533-538.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.002

Previous Articles Next Articles

Research Progress on Natural Forage Silage Additives

JIA Yu-shan¹, YU Hao-ran¹, DU Shuai¹, WANG Wei¹, LU Qiang¹, SUN Lin²

1. College of Grassland Resources and Environment, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Key Laboratory of Forage Cultivation, Processing and High Efficient Utilization of Ministry of Agriculture, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010019, China;
2. Inner Mongolia Academy of Agricultural & Animal Husbandry Sciences, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia 010000, China

Received:2018-01-03 Revised:2018-05-25 Online:2018-06-15 Published:2018-08-24

天然牧草青贮添加剂研究进展

贾玉山¹, 于浩然¹, 都帅¹, 王伟¹, 卢强¹, 孙林²

1. 内蒙古农业大学草原与资源环境学院, 农业部饲草栽培、加工与高效利用重点实验室, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010019;
2. 内蒙古自治区农牧业科学院, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010000

作者简介:贾玉山(1962-),男,内蒙古赤峰人,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事饲草加工与贮藏研究,E-mail:jys_nm@sina.com
基金资助:
国家牧草产业技术体系CARS-34；草原英才创新团队；国家重点研发计划（2016YFC0501308）资助

Abstract

Abstract:

Silage additives can improve the quality of natural forage silage, reduce the loss of nutrients, improve the success rate of silage, the supply level of forage, the feed intake of livestock and palatability, satisfy the nutritional needs of ruminants, then solve the lack of domestic feed and the lack of nutrition in spring and winter, and ease the contradiction between grazing and insufficient supply of forage growing season. This article reviewed the types, effects and applications of natural forage silage additives around the world, and summarized the effect of silage additives on the nutritional quality and fermentation quality of natural forage silage. This article gives a prospect on the future development direction of natural forage silage additives in order to provide theoretical basis and practical reference for the modulaton of high-quality natural forage silage and the sustainable utilization of natural forage.

Key words: Natural forage, Silage, Additives

摘要：

青贮添加剂能够改善天然牧草青贮品质，降低营养成分损失，提高青贮的成功率、牧草的供给水平及家畜的采食量，进一步满足反刍动物的营养需要，解决国内春冬季饲料缺乏和营养不足问题，缓解放牧与牧草生长季饲草供应不足之间的矛盾。本文综述了国内外天然牧草青贮添加剂的种类、效果及应用等方面的研究，总结了青贮添加剂对天然牧草青贮饲料营养品质和发酵品质的影响，展望了天然牧草青贮添加剂今后的发展方向，以期为调制优质天然牧草青贮饲料及天然牧草可持续利用提供可借鉴的理论依据与实践参考。

关键词: 天然牧草, 青贮, 添加剂

CLC Number:

S816.5+3

JIA Yu-shan, YU Hao-ran, DU Shuai, WANG Wei, LU Qiang, SUN Lin. Research Progress on Natural Forage Silage Additives[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2018, 26(3): 533-538.

贾玉山, 于浩然, 都帅, 王伟, 卢强, 孙林. 天然牧草青贮添加剂研究进展[J]. 草地学报, 2018, 26(3): 533-538.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2018.03.002

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2018/V26/I3/533

References

[1] 冯骁骋,尹强,刘兴波,等. 典型草原天然牧草青贮条件的研究[J]. 中国草地学报,2014,36(01):64-68
[2] 徐炜. 青藏高原高寒牧区紫花苜蓿青贮及青干草调制研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2014:15-16
[3] 周娟娟,王欣荣,吴建平,等. 调制方式对苜蓿青干草干燥特性和营养品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2013,30(08):1272-1277
[4] Kevin B,Jensen J G,Craig R,et al. Comparative trends in forage nutritional quality across the growing season in 13 grasses[J]. Canadian Journal of Plant Science,2017,97(1):72-82
[5] 李长春. 混合天然牧草青贮最适条件筛选研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2008:11-12
[6] 朱晓艳,赵诚,史莹华,等. 苜蓿青贮料替代苜蓿青干草对奶牛生产性能及乳品质的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(05):156-164
[7] 吴端钦,魏仲珊,高帅,等. 苎麻青贮替代苜蓿干草对奶牛生产性能、乳成分及血清指标的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2017,29(05):1645-1651
[8] 温学飞,王峰,黎玉琼,等. 柠条颗粒饲料开发利用技术研究[J]. 草业科学,2005,(03):26-29
[9] 杨连双. 牧草青贮的优点及其调制[J]. 哲里木畜牧学院学报,2000,(02):31-32
[10] Gebrehawerya B M,Frank J M,et al. Fatty acid, volatile and sensory characteristics of beef as affected by grass silage or pasture in the bovine diet[J]. Food Chemistry,2017:86-97
[11] Wei M,Chen L,Lian X M,et al. Energy and protein requirements for maintenance of Southern Yellow cattle fed a corn silage or straw-based diet[J]. Livestock Science,2018:75-82
[12] 王勇刚. 青贮饲料在奶牛养殖中的应用及注意事项[J]. 现代畜牧科技,2017,(11):50
[13] 李洋,李春雷,赵洪波,等. 不同产地全株玉米青贮的瘤胃降解特性与小肠消化率的研究[J]. 动物营养学报,2015,27(05):1641-1649
[14] 沙文锋,朱娟. 饲料霉菌毒素的危害及其预防措施[J]. 中国牧业通讯,2008,(02):32-34
[15] 刘鹰昊,刘兴波,格根图,等. 加工方式对天然牧草青贮营养品质的影响[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(08):19-24+48
[16] 薛艳林. 典型草原主要植物及群落青贮特性[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2014:10-11
[17] 黄钦成,谭北平,董晓慧,等. 饲料中添加壳寡糖和霉菌毒素吸附剂对凡纳滨对虾肠道黏膜形态及菌群结构的影响[J]. 中国水产科学,2017,(02):1-10
[18] 孙肖慧,原现军,郭刚,等. 添加乙醇和糖蜜对西藏地区燕麦和紫花苜蓿混合青贮发酵品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2014,45(03):417-425
[19] 李海,贾玉山,格根图,等. 处理方式对天然牧草青贮料有机酸的影响[J]. 草地学报,2008,(02):154-157
[20] 何依群. 乳酸菌青贮添加剂的研究及应用[D]. 无锡:江南大学,2004:13-15
[21] 孙璀,王育群,许留兴,等. 饲草青贮添加剂研究进展[J]. 贵州畜牧兽医,2014,38(06):15-19
[22] 庄益芬,安宅一夫,张文昌. 不同温度条件下添加剂对青贮苜蓿细胞壁成分和体外干物质消化率的影响[J]. 家畜生态学报,2006,(06):61-64
[23] 薛艳林,孙启忠,赵和平,等. 沙蒿与玉米秸秆混合比例和乳酸菌制剂对混合青贮饲料品质的影响[J]. 动物营养学报,2014,26(05):1310-1319
[24] 肖燕子,冯骁骋,贾玉山,等. 促进剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响研究[J]. 内蒙古草业,2012,24(01):37-40
[25] 郭婷. 四种添加剂对燕麦青贮效果的影响[D]. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学,2014:18-19
[26] 冯骁骋. 天然草地牧草青贮机理及品质调控研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2014:14-15
[27] 张晓庆,李鹏,郑琛,等. 添加甲酸对麻叶荨麻青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2013,21(03):618-621+625
[28] 司丙文,王宗礼,孙启忠,等. 尖叶胡枝子青贮微生物数量变化及发酵特性[J]. 草业学报,2012,29(04):650-657
[29] Anjaritha A R P,Sastia P P,Sobir R,et al. Metabolic profiling of Garcinia mangostana (mangosteen)based on ripening stages[J]. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering,2018,125(2)
[30] Mei L H,Ge G T,Ting Y L,et al. Silage preparation and fermentation quality of natural grasses treated with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase in meadow steppe and typical steppe[J]. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences,2017,30(6):788-796
[31] Chen L,Yang X G,Wang L,et al. Allelopathic effects of Caragana intermedia on monocot and dicot plant species and identification of allelochemicals[J]. Allelopathy Journal,2017,42(2):251-262
[32] Lin C,Bolsen K K,Brent B E,et al. Epiphytic microflora on alfalfa and whole plant corn[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1992,75(9):2484-2493
[33] Waroon K,Sura D P,David H,et al. Natural lactic acid bacteria population of tropical grasses and their fermentation factor analysis of silage prepared with cellulase and inoculant[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2016, 99(12):9768-9781
[34] 周天荣. 天然草地牧草裹包青贮工艺条件及质量调控技术研究[D]. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学,2015:12-13
[35] 马清河,李茂,周汉林. 纤维素酶对王草青贮品质和碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2011,(03):79-81
[36] 张晓庆,李鹏,郑琛,等. 添加甲酸对麻叶荨麻青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2013,21(03):618-621+625
[37] 王伟,周天荣,格根图,等. 添加剂对呼伦贝尔草甸草原牧草青贮品质与体外消化率的影响[J]. 中国草地学报,2017,39(05):102-107
[38] 侯美玲,格根图,孙林,等. 甲酸、纤维素酶、乳酸菌剂对典型草原天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 动物营学报,2015,27(09):2977-2986
[39] 陈雷,原现军,郭刚,等. 添加乳酸菌制剂和丙酸对全株玉米全混合日粮青贮发酵品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2015,46(01):104-110
[40] Mao L,Han L Z,Xue J Z,et al. Silage fermentation and ruminal degradation of stylo prepared with lactic acid bacteria and cellulase[J]. Animal Science Journal,2017, 88(10):1531-1537
[41] Yan S W,Wei S,Lin T H,et al. The effect of lactic acid bacterial starter culture and chemical additives on wilted rice straw silage[J]. Animal Science Journal,2016,87(4):525-535
[42] Simona M,Paolo B,Ernesto T,et al. Effect of Conservation Time and the Addition of Lactic Acid Bacteria on the Biogas and Methane Production of Corn Stalk Silage[J]. BioEnergy Research,2015,8(4):1810-1823
[43] 顾雪莹,玉柱,郭艳萍,等. 白花草木樨与燕麦混合青贮的研究[J]. 草业科学,2011,28(01):152-156
[44] 杨富裕,周禾,韩建国.添加甲酸对白花草木樨青贮品质的影响[J].草地学报,2004,(01):12-16
[45] 王保平,董晓燕,董宽虎. 不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(05):1096-1102
[46] 陈鑫珠,张诗,李文杨,等. 纤维素酶对不同比例葛藤甘蔗梢混合青贮品质的影响[J]. 家畜生态学报,2017,38(07):38-43
[47] 师希雄. 不同添加剂对苜蓿草渣青贮品质的影响[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2005:10-12
[48] 王保平,董晓燕,董宽虎. 不同添加剂对柠条嫩枝叶青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(05):1096-1102
[49] 付彤. 玉米青贮饲料中优势乳酸菌的筛选与青贮发酵调控技术研究[D]. 郑州:河南农业大学,2014:11-13
[50] Omidi M H,Azarfar A,Mirzaei M,et al. Effects of forage source and forage particle size as a free-choice provision on growth performance,rumen fermentation,and behavior of dairy calves fed texturized starters[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2016,101(5):4143-4157
[51] Kung L J,Robinson J R,Ranjit N K,et al. Microbial populations, fermentation end-products, and aerobic stability of corn silage treated with ammonia or a propionic acid-based preservative[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,2000,83(7):1479-1486
[52] Guido R,Gabriele A,Giovanna A,et al. Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus casei DSM 28872 as a silage additive for all animal species[J]. EFSA Journal,2017,15(3):332-339
[53] Xu S,Yang J,Qi M,et al. Impact of adding Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus buchneri on fermentation, aerobic stability, nutritive value, and microbial communities in corn silage[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2017,95(4):135
[54] Maria T S,Maria A R,et al. An improved ionic gelation method to encapsulate Lactobacillus spp. bacteria:Protection, survival and stability study[J]. Food Hydrocolloids,2017(69):67-75
[55] 格根图,尤思涵,贾玉山,等. 天然草地牧草青贮技术研究进展[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(05):953-959
[56] 张红梅,段珍,李霞,梁建勇,张建华,李晓康. 青贮饲料乳酸菌添加剂的应用现状[J]. 草业科学,2017,34(12):2575-2583
[57] 邵新庆,刘月华,刘庭玉,等. 不同乳酸菌添加剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 草地学报,2014,22(06):1348-1352
[58] 玉柱,白春生,孙启忠,等. 不同添加剂对无芒雀麦青贮品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报,2008,(04):76-81
[59] 刘晗璐,桂荣,塔娜. 乳酸菌添加剂对禾本科混合牧草青贮发酵特性的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2008,(06):739-745
[60] 李军训,高洁,王建华,等. 青贮乳酸菌的发酵生物量研究[J]. 饲料工业,2004,(07):48-51
[61] 侯美玲,杜珠梅,范文强,等. 乳酸菌与纤维素酶对草甸草原天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2017,48(05):871-880
[62] 刘辉,卜登攀,吕中旺,等. 乳酸菌和化学保存剂对窖贮紫花苜蓿青贮品质和有氧稳定性的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2015,46(05):784-791
[63] 刘振宇,玉柱,刘忠宽,等. 无机盐添加剂对窖贮紫花苜蓿品质的影响[J]. 草业科学,2010,27(10):154-159
[64] 阮文潇,娜日苏. 蒙药材添加剂对天然牧草青贮品质的影响[J]. 农家参谋,2017,(12):53-54
[65] Waldo D R,Keys J E,Gordon C,et al. Formaldehyde and Formic Acid as a Silage Additi-ve[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1973,56(2):229-232
[66] Sangines L,Corrales C,Perezgil R F. Effect of formaldehyde on the protection of proteins in the silage of the peanut plant (Arachis hypogaea)[J]. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Nutricion,1984,34(4):724-734
[67] Herve L,Veron M,Vanbergue E,et al. Effect of feed restriction and nature of forage on the mammary exfoliation rate in dairy cows[J]. Journal of Animal Science,2017,95(4):172

Research Progress on Natural Forage Silage Additives

天然牧草青贮添加剂研究进展

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	LU Jia-ding, YANG Xu, ZHU Xiao-yan, CUI Ya-lei, WANG Cheng-zhang, LI De-feng, SHI Ying-hua. Comprehensive Evaluation of 21 Corn Silage Varieties with both Grain and Forage in Henan Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1950-1958.
[2]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[3]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[4]	WU Shuo, ZOU Xuan, WANG Ming-ya, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Chenpi Citrus Juice on Fermentation Quality of Stylo and Rice Straw Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1565-1570.
[5]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[6]	LYU Hong-jian, ZOU Xuan, WU Shuo, LI Yun, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effect of Adding Moringa Oleifera Leaves and Lactobacillus farciminis on Quality of Corn Stover Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1343-1349.
[7]	QIN Wei-na, JIAO Ting, SHI Shang-li, LI Xiong-xiong, GAO Xue-mei, ZHAO Sheng-guo, QI Juan, WANG Zheng-wen. Evaluation of Silage Quality of 10 Green-fed Corn Varieties under Different Hydrothermal Rescource Conditions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1070-1079.
[8]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[9]	WANG Xin-yu, SHEN Chen, HUO Wen-jie, LIU Qiang, ZHANG Shuan-lin, WANG Cong, CHEN Lei, XU Qing-fang, WANG Yong-xin, GUO Gang. Analysis of Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community Structure of Whole Corn Silage of Different Varieties in Yanbei Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1087-1093.
[10]	ZHENG Ming-yang, WU Shuo, GUO Xiang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHANG Qing. Effects of Lactobacillus and Cellulase on the Silage Quality of Amomum Villosum leaves [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1113-1117.
[11]	YOU Si-Han, DU Shuai, ZHOU Zhong-Yi, Gegentu, WAN Tao, JIA Yu-Shan. Mixed Silage of Sorghum Hybrid Sudan Grass and Perennial Ryegrass with Different Proportions [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 821-827.
[12]	WANG Bin, DONG Xiu, LI Man-you, YANG Yu-qi, LAN Jian. Effects of Mixed Planting of Dolichos Lablab with Different Sowing Rates and Silage Corn on Grassland Productivity and Forage Quality [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 828-834.
[13]	LU Yong-xiang, YAN Xian-ming, ZHOU Zhao-xiang, ZHU Hui-xian, GOU Wen-long, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, CHEN Shi-yong, LI Ping, BAI Shi-qie. Effects of Different Additives on Fermentation Quality and Bacterial Community of High-moisture Whole-plant Corn Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 842-847.
[14]	CHEN De-kui, GUO Xiang, ZHENG Ming-yang, CHEN Xiao-yang, ZHOU Wei, ZHANG Qing. The Effects of Amomum Villosum Lour. Essential Oil on the Fermentation Quality of Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 855-860.
[15]	WANG Li-xue, HAN Jing, CHEN Long-bin, YU Xin-yue, LIU Jing-xi, MA Yi, HUO Wen-juan. Effects of Various Lactic Acid Bacteria Combinations on Bacterial Community Structure of Alfalfa Silage [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 388-395.