Study on Straw Yield and Nutritional Quality of Feed-type Triticale Lines

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.016

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2019, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (4): 913-920.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.016

Previous Articles Next Articles

Study on Straw Yield and Nutritional Quality of Feed-type Triticale Lines

ZHAO Fang-yuan, DU Wen-hua, TIAN Xin-hui

College of Pratacultural Science, Gansu Agricultural University/Key Laboratory of Grassland Ecosystem, Gansu Agricultural University, Ministry of Education/Pratacultural Engineering Laboratory of Gansu Province/Sino-U. S. Centers for Grazingland Ecosystem Sustainability, Lanzhou, Gansu Province 730070, China

Received:2019-01-30 Revised:2019-06-11 Online:2019-08-15 Published:2019-09-26

饲料型小黑麦品系的秸秆产量及其营养品质研究

赵方媛, 杜文华, 田新会

甘肃农业大学草业学院/草业生态系统教育部重点实验室/甘肃省草业工程实验室/中-美草地畜牧业可持续发展研究中心, 甘肃兰州 730070

通讯作者: 田新会
作者简介:赵方媛(1992-),女,甘肃天水人,博士研究生,主要从事草种质资源及育种栽培研究,E-mail:1006997460@qq.com
基金资助:
西藏饲草产业专项（XZ201801NA02）；甘肃省草地畜牧业可持续发展创新团队项目（2017C-11）；国家重点研发计划（2018YFD0502402-3）；现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金（CARS-40-09B）资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to screen the feed-type triticale lines with high straw yield and fine nutritional quality,the straw yield and nutritional quality of 18 feed-type triticale lines from 2015 to 2016 were studied,and 2 triticale varieties were as the control. The results showed that Z12 had the highest average straw yield among all the triticale germplasm tested. The average straw yield of all triticale germplasm in 2015 was significantly higher than that in 2016. From the interaction of germplasm and year,Z12 in 2015 had the highest straw yield. The highest average contents of crude protein,ether extract,and dry matter digestibility were obtained in Z36,Z9,and Z8,respectively,and the lowest average contents of acid and neutral detergent fiber existed in Z6 and Z8,respectively. Average contents of crude protein and neutral detergent fiber in 2015 were significantly lower than that in 2016. However,the average ether extract content and dry matter digestibility were significantly higher than that in 2016,and there was no significant difference in average acid detergent fiber content between 2 years. According to the interaction of germplasm and year,Z6 of 2016 had the highest crude protein content and the lowest acid detergent fiber content,Z9 of 2015 had the highest ether extract content,and Z8 of 2015 had the lowest neutral detergent fiber content and highest dry matter digestibility. Based on the analysis by synthesis,triticale lines Z9,Z12 and Z55 had better comprehensive performance,which could be used as the quality coarse fodder to feed livestock.

Key words: Triticale, Straw yield, Nutritional quality, Grey correlation analysis

摘要： 为筛选秸秆产量高、品质好的小黑麦品系，本试验以2个小黑麦品种为对照，研究了18个饲料型小黑麦品系2年（2015，2016年）的秸秆产量及营养品质。结果表明，不同小黑麦种质中Z12的平均秸秆产量最高；2015年的平均秸秆产量显著高于2016年；从种质和年份交互作用看，2015年Z12的秸秆产量最高。不同小黑麦种质中，平均粗蛋白、粗脂肪含量及消化率最高的分别是Z36、Z9和Z8，平均酸性洗涤纤维和中性洗涤纤维含量最低的分别是Z6和Z8；2015年的平均粗蛋白和中性洗涤纤维含量显著低于2016年，而平均粗脂肪含量和消化率显著高于2016年，年份间平均酸性洗涤纤维含量差异不显著；从种质与年份交互作用看，2016年Z6的粗蛋白含量最高，酸性洗涤纤维含量最低，2015年Z9的粗脂肪含量最高，Z8的中性洗涤纤维含量最低，消化率最高。综合分析，Z9，Z12，Z55的综合性状较好，可作为优质粗饲料饲喂家畜。

关键词: 小黑麦, 秸秆产量, 营养品质, 灰色关联分析

CLC Number:

S544

ZHAO Fang-yuan, DU Wen-hua, TIAN Xin-hui. Study on Straw Yield and Nutritional Quality of Feed-type Triticale Lines[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2019, 27(4): 913-920.

赵方媛, 杜文华, 田新会. 饲料型小黑麦品系的秸秆产量及其营养品质研究[J]. 草地学报, 2019, 27(4): 913-920.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2019.04.016

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2019/V27/I4/913

References

[1] 解恒参,赵晓倩. 农作物秸秆综合利用的研究进展综述[J]. 环境科学与管理,2015,40(01):86-90
[2] 孟德臣,宗宪春,关法春,等. "农牧一体化"生产下的农田植株营养价值及载畜量[J]. 玉米科学,2018,26(06):63-67
[3] 金三俊,董佳琦,宋建楼,等. 秸秆饲料的研究进展[J]. 饲料博览,2016(02):8-10
[4] 尚燕,颜廷武,张童朝,等. 从众意识对农民秸秆焚烧危害认知的影响——基于鲁、鄂两省的农民调查[J]. 干旱区资源与环境,2018,32(02):44-51
[5] 王红彦,王飞,孙仁华,等. 国外农作物秸秆利用政策法规综述及其经验启示[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(16):216-222
[6] 刘巽浩,王爱玲,高旺盛. 实行作物秸秆还田促进农业可持续发展[J]. 作物杂志,1998(5):2-6
[7] 楚天舒,杨增玲,韩鲁佳. 中国农作物秸秆饲料化利用满足度和优势度分析[J]. 农业工程学报,2016,32(22):1-9
[8] 字学娟,李茂,张亚格,等. 热带地区粗饲料资源研究进展[J]. 家畜生态学报,2018,39(01):80-83
[9] 朱铁霞,高凯,王国成. 小黑麦研究进展[J]. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2011,26(04):433-437
[10] 孙敏,郭媛. 小黑麦生物学特性、营养价值及利用前景[J]. 山西农业大学学报,2003(3):200-203
[11] 佟桂芝,马野,魏念春,等. 小黑麦的饲用价值[J]. 黑龙江畜牧科技,2000(2):18
[12] Nathu,Sarker,Mohammad,et al. Feeding Effect of Triticale Fodder as Replacement of Straw on Production Performance of Dairy Cows[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science & Technology,2013,3(1):72-82
[13] 赵方媛. 饲料型小黑麦新品系的抗旱性评价及在干旱半干旱灌区的生产性能研究[D]. 兰州:甘肃农业大学,2017:27-34
[14] 孙敏,苗果园,杨珍平,等. 小黑麦、黑麦与普通小麦粮用和饲用价值的差异[J]. 麦类作物学报,2008(04):644-648
[15] 杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京:北京农业大学出版杜,1993:19-21,56-66
[16] 梁建勇,焦婷,吴建平,等. 不同类型草地牧草消化率季节动态与营养品质的关系研究[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(6):108-115
[17] 杨秀芳,陈玲玲,乌艳红,等. 应用灰色关联度综合评价26个青贮玉米的生产性能[J]. 草业科学,2012,29(01):105-111
[18] 陈丽霞,田新会,杜文华. 甘农1号小黑麦的田间抗旱性研究[J]. 草地学报,2017,25(05):1079-1087
[19] 李冬梅,田新会,杜文华. 小黑麦新品系的草产量及营养价值研究[J]. 草地学报,2016,24(06):1164-1169
[20] 江虎琳,孙元枢,王崇义. 秦岭山区试种小黑麦获得成功[J]. 作物杂志,1991(3):35-36
[21] 董卫民,王宏,李凤兰. 小黑麦在畜牧业生产中的应用[J]. 中国草食动物,2003,23(3):28-29
[22] 马啸,张有杰,刘国顺,等. 连作对作物生长发育及品质和产量影响的研究进展[J]. 河南农业科学,2009(10):26-30
[23] 段珍,张红梅,张建华,等. 农作物秸秆饲料研究进展[J]. 粮食与饲料工业,2017(02):40-43
[24] 闫亚飞. 河套灌区不同饲草生产性能与品质研究[D]. 北京:中国农业科学院,2016,32-33
[25] 何江峰,赵萌莉,郑轶慧,等. 小黑麦的饲用特性及其在草地生态中的应用前景[J]. 中国草地学报,2012,34(1):101-107
[26] 闫贵龙,田树飞,穆秀明,等. 糯玉米秸秆不同收获时间对其营养成分含量和干物质消化率的影响[J]. 畜牧兽医学报,2015,46(02):251-256
[27] 陶莲,冯文晓,王玉荣,等. 微生态制剂对玉米秸秆青贮发酵品质、营养成分及瘤胃降解率的影响[J]. 草业学报,2016,25(09):152-160
[28] 许能祥,丁成龙,董臣飞,等. 不同栽培方式C4牧草在沿海滩涂的生产性能评价[J]. 草业学报,2015,24(02):11-21

Study on Straw Yield and Nutritional Quality of Feed-type Triticale Lines

饲料型小黑麦品系的秸秆产量及其营养品质研究

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[3]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[4]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[5]	DONG Zhi-xiao, HE Run-hao, KUANG Jian-yang, NIE Cong, YANG Jian, ZHANG Jian-bo, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Sweet Sorghum Intercropping with Lablab Purpureus on Yield and Quality of Mixed Forage in Chengdu Plain,China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1578-1583.
[6]	HAN Xue-qin, DENG Hong-shan, PU Tian-lei, LUO Hui-ying, ZHAO Qiong-ling, LIAO Cheng-fei, XUE Shi-ming, FAN Jian-cheng, JIN Jie. The Study on Agronomic Characters of Silage Maize Varieties in Dry-hot Valley Region of Jinsha River [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(6): 1327-1335.
[7]	LI Wen, MA Lin-feng, CAO Xi-min, YU Feng-fang, SHE Zhi-hui, XU Zhan-yun, LIU Gui-he, LYU Ai-zhi. Effect of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Zea mays L. in Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in Northwest Hebei Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1080-1086.
[8]	NIE Cong, YANG Xiao-peng, LIU Zhe-chuan, ZHAO Yu-han, CHEN Wan-ting, HE Run-hao, LIU Wei, GOU Wen-long, MA Xiao. Effects of Different Preceding Combination and Planting Density on Production Performance and Quality of Forage Corn [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(4): 709-716.
[9]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Adaptability Evaluation of Secale cereale ‘Gannong No.2’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 504-514.
[10]	SU Li-he, ZHANG Fan-fan, WANG Xu-zhe, WANG Ting, FU Dong-qing, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Snow Cover on the Yield and Nutritional Quality of Alfalfa with Different Fall-dormancy Levels [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 356-363.
[11]	YAO Xi-xi, ZHOU Rui, LI Chang-hui, DUOJIE Suo-nan. Effects of Slope Aspect on Vegetation Distribution Pattern and Forage Quality Characteristics of Alpine Grassland in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2792-2799.
[12]	LI Wen, WEI Ting-hu, Abaodi, Yongcuobazhan, Cairentaci, ZHOU Yu-hai, LI Wen-hao, GUO Wei-xing, ZHANG Yan-ping. Effects of Reduction of Chemical Fertilizer and Organic Manure Supplement on Oat Nutrient Quality and Soil Nutrient in Alpine Cold Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(12): 2878-2886.
[13]	LU Ping-le, WEI Yu-ming, YANG Fa-rong, JIANG Xiao-fan, LI Qian, ZHAO Sheng-guo, CAI Yuan, JIAO Ting. Feeding Value Ealuation of Mixed Silage of Whole Plant Green Quinoa and Green Corn by Using an In Vitro Gas Production Technique [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2391-2398.
[14]	YUE Li-nan, SHI Shang-li, QI Juan, YANG Pei-zhi, LIU Gang, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Ying-jun, JING Jing-ying. Effects of No-tillage Reseeding on Productivity and Nutritional Quality of Degraded Grassland in Northern China [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2583-2590.
[15]	HE Peng-liang, WANG Ya-mei, JIE Hong-dong, DENG Hui-fen, XING Hu-cheng, JIE Yu-cheng. Effects of Different Cutting Time on the Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Triticale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2609-2614.