Effects of Different Mixtures and Proportions of Avena sativa and Pea on Forage Yield and Quality in Alpine Cold Region

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.02.029

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (2): 487-494.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.02.029

Effects of Different Mixtures and Proportions of Avena sativa and Pea on Forage Yield and Quality in Alpine Cold Region

FENG Ting-xu¹, DE Ke-jia², XIANG Xue-mei¹, WEI Xi-jie², XU Cheng-ti², WANG Wei², LIN Wei-shan², QIAN Shi-yi²

1. College of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810013, China;
2. Academy of Animal Science and Veterinary Sciences, Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai Province 810016, China

Received:2021-06-28 Revised:2021-09-27 Published:2022-03-10

高寒地区燕麦与豌豆不同混播组合和比例对饲草产量及品质的影响

冯廷旭¹, 德科加², 向雪梅¹, 魏希杰², 徐成体², 王伟², 林伟山², 钱诗祎²

1. 青海大学农牧学院, 青海西宁 810013;
2. 青海大学畜牧兽医科学院, 青海西宁 810016

通讯作者: 德科加,E-mail:1162157948@qq.com
作者简介:冯廷旭(1994-),男,甘肃武威人,硕士研究生,主要从事饲草栽培管理方面研究,E-mail:1085054116@qq.com;
基金资助:
青海省重大科技专项课题(2016-NK-A7-2);三江源生态系统教育部野外科学观测研究站资助

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to explore the best combination and proportion of mixed forage land of annual gramineae and leguminous forage. The production performance,nutrient quality,and soil nutrients of Avena sativa, Pisum sativa, and Vicia sativa were analyzed with different mixed sowing combinations and ratios and evaluated comprehensively by grey correlation degree. The results showed that the fresh and dry weight of Avena sativa mixed with Vicia sativa and Pisum sativa was slightly lower than that of unicast Avena sativa,and higher than that of the two unicast legumes. With the increase of the proportion of mixed legume forage,the crude protein content of the forage increased,while the acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber contents decreased,and the contents of total phosphorus and organic carbon in soil showed an increasing trend. By grey relational comprehensive evaluation to the mixed seeding grass forage yield and quality indexes comprehensive judgment,the mixed portfolio,Avena sativa+Vicia sativa (7∶3) processing,Avena sativa+Pisum sativa (6∶4) dealing with the comprehensive evaluation of high,fresh,hay yield and forage grass has better nutritional quality,suitable for in the three-river source area annual mixed planting forage grassland application.

Key words: Avena sativa, Pisum sativa, Vicia sativa, Mixed proportion, Grass yield, Quality, Grey relational degree evaluation

摘要： 为探究高寒地区建植一年生禾本科和豆科饲草混播饲草地的最佳组合及比例，以燕麦、饲用豌豆、箭筈豌豆为试验对象，设置不同混播组合及比例，对饲草生产性能、营养品质及土壤养分等指标进行测定分析，采用灰色关联度综合评价。结果表明：燕麦(Avena sativa)与箭筈豌豆(Vicia sativa)、饲用豌豆(Pisum sativa)混播时，各混播组合鲜、干重较单播燕麦略有降低，高于两种单播豆科处理。随着各混播豆科饲草比例增加，饲草粗蛋白含量升高，而酸性洗涤纤维、中性洗涤纤维含量均降低，土壤中全磷、有机碳的含量呈增加趋势。通过灰色关联度评价对混播草地饲草产量及品质指标进行综合判定，各混播组合中燕麦＋箭筈豌豆(7∶3)处理、燕麦＋饲用豌豆(6∶4)处理的综合评价较高，鲜、干草产量与饲草营养品质较优，适合在三江源区一年生混播饲草地建植应用。

关键词: 燕麦, 饲用豌豆, 箭筈豌豆, 混播比例, 产草量, 品质, 灰色关联度评价

CLC Number:

S152.6

FENG Ting-xu, DE Ke-jia, XIANG Xue-mei, WEI Xi-jie, XU Cheng-ti, WANG Wei, LIN Wei-shan, QIAN Shi-yi. Effects of Different Mixtures and Proportions of Avena sativa and Pea on Forage Yield and Quality in Alpine Cold Region[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 487-494.

冯廷旭, 德科加, 向雪梅, 魏希杰, 徐成体, 王伟, 林伟山, 钱诗祎. 高寒地区燕麦与豌豆不同混播组合和比例对饲草产量及品质的影响[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(2): 487-494.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.02.029

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I2/487

References

[1] 王伟,徐成体,德科加,等.称多县燕麦与小黑麦引种试验初步研究[J].青海省畜牧兽医杂志,2015,45(5):4-6
[2] 秦燕,刘勇,张永超,等.不同混播比例对燕麦和箭筈豌豆混播草地植物生长特征的影响[J].草地学报,2020,28(6):1768-1774
[3] 周青平.高寒地区优良豆科牧草的筛选及生产性能的研究[J].草原与草坪,2002,96(1):50-53
[4] 柴强,胡发龙,陈桂平.禾豆间作氮素高效利用机理及农艺调控途径研究进展[J].中国生态农业学报,2017,25(1):19-26
[5] 芦奕晓,牟乐,杨惠敏.豆科与禾本科牧草混播改良土壤的研究进展[J].中国草地学报,2019,41(1):94-100
[6] 朱亚琼,于辉,郑伟,等.燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地混播优势的测度与影响因素分析[J].草业学报,2020,29(1):74-85
[7] 刘文辉,张永超,梁国玲,等.高寒区不同农艺措施对燕麦人工草地各生育期土壤碳氮储量与碳氮比的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(3):675-686
[8] 关正翾,娜尔克孜,朱亚琼,等.不同混播方式下燕麦+箭筈豌豆混播草地的生产性能及土壤养分特征[J].草业科学,2019,36(3):72-784
[9] 杨晓鹏,李平,董臣飞,等.多花黑麦草+燕麦混播草地地上生物量和营养品质动态研究[J].草地学报,2020,28(1):149-158
[10] 崔国文,李冰,王明君,等.西藏人工草地的发展现状、存在问题及解决途径[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2015,11(21):137-138
[11] 徐丽君,杨桂霞,辛晓平，等.不同混播模式下草地营养成分综合评价[J].草业科学,2014,31(2):278-283
[12] 刚永和,张海博,杜江,等.燕麦与饲用豌豆混播对饲草产质量的影响[J].惠州农业科学,2020,48(7):23-28
[13] 马晓东,孙金金,汪鹏斌.青海果洛高寒地区燕麦和小黑麦最佳混播比例筛选[J].草业科学,2020,37(4):753-761
[14] 孙杰,巩林，连露,等.海拔高度和混播比例对燕麦与箭筈豌豆产草量及质量的影响[J].草业科学,2018,35(10):2438-2449
[15] 马晓东,孙金金,汪鹏斌,等.青海省甘德县燕麦+毛苕子+豌豆混播比例生产性能的综合评价[J].草原与草坪,2020,40(6):76-82
[16] 李佶凯,孙涛,旺扎,等.西藏地区燕麦与箭筈豌豆不同混播比例对牧草产量和品质的影响[J].草地学报,2011,19(5):830-833
[17] 席杏媛,闫慧颖,李春喜.青海水、旱地甜高粱与豆科混播及其刈割对草产量的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(5):1400-1409
[18] 马春晖,韩建国,张玲.高寒牧区一年生牧草种间竞争的动态研究[J].草业科学,2001,18(1):22-24
[19] 周青平.高寒地区一年生禾豆饲草混播群落内部组分及调控的研究[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2003:7-9
[20] 柳茜,王红梅,傅平,等.多花黑麦草+光叶紫花苕混播草地生产力特征[J].草业科学,2013,30(10):1584-1588
[21] YAHUZA I.Review of some methods of calculating intercrop efficiencies with particular reference to the estimates of intercrop benefits in wheat/faba bean system[J].International Journal of Biosciences,2011(5):18-30
[22] 徐强,田新会,杜文华.高寒牧区黑麦和箭筈豌豆混播对草产量和营养品质的影响研究[J].草业学报,2021,30(8):49-59
[23] 富新年,潘正武,孟祥君,等.高寒地区甘引1号黑麦与箭筈豌豆混播试验研究[J].畜牧兽医杂志,2016,35(4):15-17，20
[24] 权宏林.建立人工草地是保证甘南州畜牧业生产稳定持续增长的关键措施[J].草业科学,2004,21(9):62-64
[25] 韩建国,马春晖,毛培胜,等.播种量和施氮比例及刈割期对燕麦与豌豆混播草地产草量和质量的影响[J].草地学报,1999,7(2):87-93
[26] 王伟,范月君,邓艳芳,等.青海省饲草产业发展供求和潜力分析及发展建议[J].青海畜牧医杂志,2018,48(5):51-54
[27] 张骞,张中华,马丽,等.不同牧草混播对退化高寒草甸土壤养分及生物量的影响[J].草地学报,2019,27(6):1659-1666
[28] 王平,王天慧,周道玮,等.松嫩地区禾-豆混播草地生产力研究[J].中国科技论文在线,2007,2(2):121-128
[29] 杨春华,李向林,张新全,等.扁穗牛鞭草+红三叶混播草地生物量、品质及种间竞争的动态研究[J].四川农业大学学报,2006,24(1):32-36
[30] 韩路,贾志宽,韩清芳,等.应用AHP模型综合评价苜蓿生产性能的研究[J].草业科学,2004,21(2):12-16
[31] 邹志红,孙靖南,任广平.模糊评价因子的熵权法赋权及其在水质评价中的应用[J].环境科学学报,2005,25(4):552-556
[32] 王晓明,翟英芬,徐友阳.超甜玉米生产性能模糊综合评价[J].玉米科学,2007,15(1):142-146
[33] 郑伟,朱进忠.加娜尔古丽.不同混播方式豆禾混播草地生产性能的综合评价[J].草业学报,2012,21(6):242-251(责任编辑彭露茜)第30卷第2期 Vol.30 No. 2草地学报 ACTAAGRESTIASINICA 2022年 2月

Effects of Different Mixtures and Proportions of Avena sativa and Pea on Forage Yield and Quality in Alpine Cold Region

高寒地区燕麦与豌豆不同混播组合和比例对饲草产量及品质的影响

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	YANG Xi-jiang, YANG Chang-fu, JIANG Xue-qian, ZHANG Fan, HE Fei, YANG Qing-chuan, KANG Jun-mei. QTL Analysis of Ash and Mineral Elements in Alfalfa [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 312-319.
[2]	YAO Xi-xi, CHEN Yong-long, XU Cheng-ti, HAI Cun-xiu, LIU Hao-dong. Effects of Dietary Energy Level on Production Performance,Meat Quality and Rumen Microbes of Yak (Bos grunniens) [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 432-439.
[3]	DUAN Lian-xue, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, HE Ji-tong, JIA Zhi-feng. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Avena sativa ‘Qinghai’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 471-478.
[4]	ZHANG Guang-ru, LUO Fang-lin, ZHANG Fa-wei, ZHU Jing-bin, HE Hui-dan, YANG Yong-sheng, WANG Chun-yu, LI Ying-nian. Vegetation and Soil Characteristics During Restoration of Grazing Rest in Warm Season of Degraded Alpine Meadows [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 144-152.
[5]	WEI Xiao-li, XU Cheng-ti, PU Xiao-jian, DUAN Na-ning, WANG Wei. Analysis of Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Mixed Seeding of Triticale and Forage Peas in Haibei Prefecture [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(1): 236-244.
[6]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, LI Quan-lin, WANG You-bin, MA Bing-yun, LEI Yan-min, ZHOU Rui, XIE Jiu-xiang. Characteristics of Forage Nutritional Quality and Digestibility in Different Types of Grassland in Qinghai Tibet Plateau and their Correlation [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 113-120.
[7]	YAO Xi-xi, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun, ZHOU Rui. Effects of Grazing on Vegetation Characteristics and Forage Nutrientional Quality in a Temperate Desert Steppe [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 165-172.
[8]	YAN He-piao, LI Wen-long, LIANG Tian-gang, ZHOU Hua-kun, CAO Ya-peng, LIAO Yuan-cheng. Effects of Different Restoration Measures on Degraded Alpine Grasslands of the Tibetan Plateau: A meta-analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 190-198.
[9]	YAO Xi-xi, XIAO Feng, QI Shou-zhong, CHEN Guo-ming, WANG Li-ya, YAN Zhen-ying, ZHANG Wen-juan, SUN Hai-qun. Responses of Plant Functional Group Traits and Nutritional Quality to Fencing in an Alpine Meadow [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(S1): 208-217.
[10]	MENG Xuan-chen, MA Peng-cheng, MA Jie, DUAN Zhen, HAN Yang-yang, ZHANG Ji-yu. Study on the Effect of Mulching Furrow and Fertilization of Alfalfa in Semi-arid Areas of Loess Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2098-2106.
[11]	MA Ran-ran, YUAN Jie, ZHANG Wen-jie, XU Neng-xiang, GU Hong-ru. Effects of Stacking Time on Feeding and Fermentation Quality of Broccoli Waste [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 2107-2114.
[12]	YAO Xi-xi, CAI Hua, LIU Hao-dong, LI Chang-hui. Analysis of Rumen Fermentation Characteristics and In Vitro Digestibility of Alpine Meadow Forage in Different Seasons [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(8): 1729-1737.
[13]	HE Zhen-fu, HE Chun-gui, WANG Fei, CHEN Ping. Analysis of Production Performance and Quality of Different Types of Forage Sorghum [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1446-1453.
[14]	DU Zhao-chang, WANG Hong, YAN Yan-hong, MUHAMMAD Tahir, WEI Xiao, ZENG Tai-ru, LI Hong-liang. Effects of Rice Husk and Wheat Bran Addition on Silage Quality of Fresh Corn Straw [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1549-1554.
[15]	SONG Jian-chao, YU Xiao-jun, WEI Kong-tao, WANG Peng-bin, TONG Yong-shang, LI Zhen, HE You-long, WANG Hai-bo. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Production Performance and Nutritional Quality of Elymus nutans in Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(7): 1555-1564.