Applying CNCPS system to Evaluate the Nutritive Value of Oat and Forage Triticale

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.018

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2022, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (4): 931-935.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.018

Applying CNCPS system to Evaluate the Nutritive Value of Oat and Forage Triticale

YANG Yan-yan¹, SUN Yu¹, WU Chun-hui¹, LI Yun-qi¹, WU Rui-xin², WANG Ming-ya¹, LI Qiu-feng¹

1. College of Animal Science and Technology of Hebei Agricultural University, Baoding, Hebei Province 071000, China;
2. Dryland Farming Institute, Hebei Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Hebei Key Laboratory of Crops Drought Resistance, Hengshui, Hebei Province 053000, China

Received:2021-08-16 Revised:2021-10-26 Published:2022-04-25

应用CNCPS体系比较饲用小黑麦和燕麦草的营养价值组分

杨燕燕¹, 孙宇¹, 吴春会¹, 李运起¹, 武瑞鑫², 王明亚¹, 李秋凤¹

1. 河北农业大学动物科技学院, 河北保定 071000;
2. 河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所河北省农作物抗旱研究重点实验室, 河北衡水 053000

通讯作者: 王明亚,E-mail:hebeigrass@163.com;李秋凤,E-mail:lqf582@126.com
作者简介:杨燕燕(1998-),女,河北衡水人,硕士研究生,主要从事动物营养与饲料科学研究,E-mail:yangyy0630@163.com
基金资助:
河北省重点研发(19226615D);河北省二期现代农业产业技术体系肉牛创新团队高效养殖岗位建设项目(HBCT2018130202);河北农业大学引进人才科研专项(YJ201826)资助

Abstract

Abstract: In order to explore the nutritional value of forage Triticale (×Triticale Wittmack) and enrich the feed resource database of China,this experiment was conducted with Avena sativa as control.the carbohydrate and protein components of oat and triticale were determined,calculated and compared using Cornell net carbohydrate-protein system (CNCPS) classification method.The results showed that Dry matter (DM),Crude protein (CP),Crude ash,Acdic detergent lignin (ADL) and the Medium speed degradation protein (PB₂) contents in triticale were significantly (P<0.05) higher than those in domestic and imported oat.The contents of Acid detergent insoluble protein (ADIP),Soluble protein (SOLP),Carbohydrate (CA),Available fiber (CB₂) and Non-degradable protein (PC) in triticale were significantly (P <0.05) lower than those in domestic and imported oat.In conclusion,there was no difference in carbohydrate between domestic and imported oat,and they all were better than triticale in carbohydrate.Protein components in Triticale were superior to domestic oat and imported oat.

Key words: Triticale, Oats, CNCPS, Ruminants, Nutritive value

摘要： 为探究饲用小黑麦(×Triticale Wittmack)的营养价值,丰富我国饲料资源数据库,本试验以燕麦(Avena sativa)为对照,应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系(CNCPS)中碳水化合物和含氮化合物的分类方法,测定燕麦和小黑麦的营养成分,计算其碳水化合物和蛋白质组分,并进行比较分析。结果表明:小黑麦干物质(Dry matter,DM)、粗蛋白(Crude protein,CP)、粗灰分(Crude ash,Ash)、木质素(Acidic detergent lignin,ADL)和中速降解真蛋白质(Medium speed degradation protein,PB₂)含量均显著高于国产燕麦与进口燕麦(P<0.05);小黑麦的酸性洗涤不溶蛋白(Acidic detergent insoluble protein,ADIP)、可溶性蛋白(Soluble protein,SOLP)、糖类(Carbohydrate,CA)、可利用纤维(Available fiber,CB₂)和不可降解蛋白质(Non-degradable protein,PC)含量显著低于国产燕麦和进口燕麦(P<0.05)。综上所述,在碳水化合物方面,国产燕麦与进口燕麦无差异,均优于小黑麦;在蛋白组分方面,小黑麦优于国产燕麦和进口燕麦。

关键词: 小黑麦, 燕麦, 康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系, 反刍动物, 营养价值

CLC Number:

YANG Yan-yan, SUN Yu, WU Chun-hui, LI Yun-qi, WU Rui-xin, WANG Ming-ya, LI Qiu-feng. Applying CNCPS system to Evaluate the Nutritive Value of Oat and Forage Triticale[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(4): 931-935.

杨燕燕, 孙宇, 吴春会, 李运起, 武瑞鑫, 王明亚, 李秋凤. 应用CNCPS体系比较饲用小黑麦和燕麦草的营养价值组分[J]. 草地学报, 2022, 30(4): 931-935.

0
/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2022.04.018

https://manu40.magtech.com.cn/Jweb_cdxb/EN/Y2022/V30/I4/931

References

[1] 何鹏亮,汪娅梅,揭红东,等.不同刈割期对饲用小黑麦草产量和营养品质的影响[J].草地学报,2021,29(11):2609-2614
[2] 李冬梅.饲草型小黑麦的遗传图谱构建及草产量和抗锈病相关基因的QTL定位[D].兰州:甘肃农业大学,2016:1
[3] 朱铁霞,高凯,王国成.小黑麦研究进展[J].内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版),2011,26(4):433-437
[4] 王增远,陈秀珍,孙福贵.牧草小黑麦及其产业化优势[C]//中国草学会饲料生产委员会第15次饲草生产学术研讨会论文集,2009:50-53
[5] 游永亮,赵海明,李源,等.抗逆高产国审'冀饲3号'饲用小黑麦新品种的选育[J].草地学报,2020,28(4):1145-1152
[6] 姬亚红,张永志,张艳秋,等.饲用小黑麦、黑麦和小麦拔节期和灌浆期营养价值比较[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2020(23):98-101
[7] 李新一,刘彬,王加亭,等.我国饲草供需形势及对策分析[J].中国饲料,2020(11):129-133
[8] 王静香,赵跃龙,刘祖昕,等.疫情下的中国畜牧业发展分析与展望[J].农业展望,2020,16(10):82-88
[9] SIFFEN C J,O'CONNOR J D,VAN SOEST P J. A net carbohydrate and protein system for evaluating cattle diets:II. Carbohydrate and protein availability[J]. Journal of Animal Science,1992,70(11):3562-3577
[10] 殷满财,聂召龙,张国模,等. CNCPS及体外产气法评价青海地区6种常用粗饲料的营养价值[J].青海畜牧兽医杂志,2018,48(6):1-8
[11] 朱丹.奶牛不同碳水化合物组成日粮营养价值评定研究[D].长沙:湖南农业大学,2015:1
[12] 靳玲品,李艳玲,屠焰,等.应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评定我国北方奶牛常用粗饲料的营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2013,25(3):512-526
[13] 温媛媛,李妍,李建国,等.生马铃薯条加工副产品与稻草混贮和全株玉米青贮的发酵特性及康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系组分比较[J].动物营养学报,2021,33(9):5036-5045
[14] 李菲菲.不同茬次、刈割期对苜蓿干草/青贮CNCPS蛋白组分和品质的影响[D].石河子:石河子大学,2019:1
[15] 苏玲玲,古再丽努尔·艾麦提,侯良忠,等.应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评定新疆反刍家畜常用粗饲料的营养价值[J].草食家畜,2021(5):32-38
[16] 田静,申成利,张建国.狼尾草属4种牧草饲用价值研究[J].饲料研究,2021,44(7):114-118
[17] 徐生阳,谢艺潇,李文麒,等.不同料型草产品对羊草营养成分、康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系碳水化合物组分及体外消化的影响[J].动物营养学报,2020,32(11):5341-5346
[18] 孙红红,初汉平,丁维芹,等.采用CNCPS体系评价菏泽农区青山羊常用粗饲料营养价值的研究[J].现代畜牧兽医,2021(2):16-20
[19] 李真真,哈斯,刘庆华,等.应用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系评价粗饲料脂质的营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(12):5873-5880
[20] 马占霞,田雨佳,卢冬亚,等.豆粕、双低菜粕及普通菜粕碳水化合物分子结构分析及营养价值评价[J].中国畜牧杂志,2020,56(9):144-149
[21] 兰贵生,王芳彬,张智安,等.利用康奈尔净碳水化合物-蛋白质体系与聚类分析技术评价油菜秸秆营养价值[J].动物营养学报,2019,31(4):1877-1886
[22] 陈思,周强. CNCPS体系评价黔紫金草的营养价值研究[J].现代食品,2019(22):177-180
[23] 黄万里,王建平,刘宁,等.不同水培时间下大麦苗的营养价值及CNCPS组分[J].草业科学,2019,36(7):1811-1818
[24] FELDSINE P,ABEYTA C,ANDREWS W H. AOAC International methods committee guidelines for validation of qualitative and quantitative food microbiological official methods of analysis[J]. Journal of the AOAC Interational,2002,85(5):1187-1200
[25] LICITRA G,HERNANDEZ T M,SOEST P. Standardization of procedures for nitrogen fractionation of ruminant feeds[J]. Animal Feed Science&Technology,1996,57(4):47-58
[26] 周荣,王加启,周振峰,等.饲料非蛋白氮与可溶性蛋白测定方法概述[J].中国奶牛,2011(11):39-41
[27] 郭冬生,彭小兰.蒽酮比色法和酶水解法两种淀粉测定方法的比较研究[J].湖南文理学院学报(自然科学版),2007(3):34-36
[28] KIRK T K,OBST J R.Lignin determination[J]. Methods Enzymology,1988,16(1):87-101
[29] 潘晓花,杨亮,杨琴,等.反刍动物饲料碳水化合物和蛋白质组分划分及消化道代谢规律[J].动物营养学报,2014(5):1134-1144
[30] 张玉洁,赵亥山,薛瑞林,等.小黑麦干草对羔羊生产性能及采食行为的影响[J].草业科学,2020,37(2):355-362
[31] 张婵娟,贾志海,王润莲,等.小黑麦干草在肉羊日粮中适宜添加水平的研究[J].中国畜牧杂志,2016(19):38-40

Applying CNCPS system to Evaluate the Nutritive Value of Oat and Forage Triticale

应用CNCPS体系比较饲用小黑麦和燕麦草的营养价值组分

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 15

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	WANG Li, WANG Chuan-jie, PAN Min, CHENG Zhi-qiang, WEI Yuan-hao, HUA He-liang, YIN Zhi-tong, ZHAO Guo-qi, HUANG Qian-qian. Study on Silage Fermentation Quality and Rumen Degradation Characteristics of Four Silage Maize Varieties [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 568-574.
[2]	LIN Dou-dou, ZHAO Gui-qin, CHAI Ji-kuan, GONG Wen-long, SU Wei-juan, ZHANG Li-rui. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of M1 Generation of Oat Mutagenized by NaN₃ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(3): 587-593.
[3]	CHEN Yong-guang, JIANG Hui-xin, DONG Bo-ying, LIU Li-lin, QU Hong-lei, MA Qiu-gang. Effects of Triticale Hay Replacing Chinese Wildrye on Performance and Blood Indexes of Dezhou Growing Donkey [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 440-445.
[4]	DUAN Lian-xue, MA Xiang, JU Ze-liang, LIU Kai-qiang, HE Ji-tong, JIA Zhi-feng. Effects of Nitrogen Reduction Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Avena sativa ‘Qinghai’ [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2022, 30(2): 471-478.
[5]	WU Hai-yan, QU Zhen, LIU Zhao-ming, LABA Dun-zhu, TONGSANG Cuo-mu, QU Ni, NIMA zhuo-ga, MA Yu-shou. Comparative study on Production Performance of Oat Varieties Based on Principal Component Analysis [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(9): 1967-1973.
[6]	TONG Yong-shang, YU Xiao-jun, XU Chang-lin, WANG Peng-bin, SONG Jian-chao, LI Zhen, LI Ying. Effects of Sowing Date on Forage Yield and Quality of Seven Oat Varieties in Tianzhu Alpine Region [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(5): 1094-1106.
[7]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, MA Xiang. Phenotypic Diversity of the Panicle Among 590 Covered Oats Germplasm Resources in Apline of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(3): 495-503.
[8]	LIU Bei, SONG Yu-mei, SUN-ming, MAO Pei-sheng. Physiological Responses of Mitochondrial AsA-GSH Cycle to Imbibition of Deteriated Oat Seeds [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(2): 211-219.
[9]	HE Peng-liang, WANG Ya-mei, JIE Hong-dong, DENG Hui-fen, XING Hu-cheng, JIE Yu-cheng. Effects of Different Cutting Time on the Forage Yield and Nutritional Quality of Forage Triticale [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(11): 2609-2614.
[10]	FU Dong-qing, WANG Yan-chao, SONG Lei, WANG Xu-zhe, ZHANG Fan-fan, MA Chun-hui. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density on Production Performance of Early Maturing Forage Oat in Shihezi,Xinjiang [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2021, 29(10): 2364-2371.
[11]	HAO Shuang-nan, QIN Jie, LIU Pan-feng, YANG Wu-de, ZHANG Mei-jun, FENG Mei-chen, WANG Chao, SONG Xiao-yan. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on Stem Characteristics and Lodging Resistance of Oat [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1572-1579.
[12]	WANG Xiao-xue, LI Yue, ZHANG Bin, JIA Ju-qing, FENG Mei-chen, ZHANG Mei-jun, YANG Wu-de. Effects of Drought Stress and Rehydration on Root Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1588-1596.
[13]	WANG Wei-qiang, LIU Jing, TIAN Xin-hui, DU Wen-hua. Evaluations on the Adaptability of Triticosecale Wittmack ‘Gannong No.4’ in Different Regions of Qinghai Province [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1626-1634.
[14]	LU Yong-xiang, ZHAO Man, CHEN Liang-yin, CHENGQi-ming, YOU Ming-hong, LI Da-xu, CHEN Shi-yong, BAI Shi-qie, LI Ping. Effects of Lactobacillus brucei and formic acid addition on fermentation quality and bacterial community of oat silage of different harvest stages in the Tibetan Plateau [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(6): 1736-1743.
[15]	LIANG Guo-ling, LIU Wen-hui, ZHANG Yong-chao, LIU Yong. Effect of Lodging on the Grain Filling Process and Non-structure Carbohydrate of Oats [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2020, 28(4): 1024-1033.