Ecological Values， Environmental Affections， Publicity and Education， and Farmers’ Willingness to Maintain the Achievements of Returning Farmland to Grassland ——Evidence from Field Investigation of Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in the “Two Districts” of the Capital of China

doi:10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.11.029

Acta Agrestia Sinica ›› 2025, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (11): 3785-3798.DOI: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2025.11.029

Ecological Values， Environmental Affections， Publicity and Education， and Farmers’ Willingness to Maintain the Achievements of Returning Farmland to Grassland ——Evidence from Field Investigation of Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in the “Two Districts” of the Capital of China

ZHANG Li-juan, REN Liang, KONG Wei, YUAN Zhu, YANG Zhi-hui

1. Institute of Ecological Construction and Industry Development, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou, Hebei Province 075000, China

Received:2024-12-08 Revised:2025-02-25 Published:2025-11-13

生态价值观、环境情感、宣传教育与农户退耕还草成果保持意愿——基于首都“两区”坝上农牧交错带的实地调研

张利娟, 任亮, 孔伟, 袁铸, 杨智慧

1. 河北北方学院生态建设与产业发展研究院, 河北张家口 075000

通讯作者: 任亮,E-mail:renliang699@163.com
作者简介:张利娟（1983-），女，汉族，河北张北人，博士，副教授，主要从事环境行为、生态经济与可持续发展研究，E-mail：771273657@qq.com
基金资助:
河北省教育厅青年拔尖人才项目（BJ2021072）；河北省教育厅重大课题攻关项目（ZD202326）资助

Abstract

Abstract: Farmers continuously maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland and actively participate in grassland ecological management， which is a strong guarantee to consolidate the effectiveness of grassland ecological construction and improve the environmental governance system of co-construction， co-governance and sharing. Based on the survey data of 384 farmer households from four key counties in the bashang agro-pastoral ecotone of the “two districts” of the capital， this paper empirically analyzed the impact of ecological values， environmental affections， publicity and education on the willingness of farmers to maintain the outcomes of returning farmland to grassland used the structural equation model. The results showed that， ecological values positively affect environmental pride and the willingness to maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland， while environmental guilt negatively affect. And the effect of ecological values on environmental pride was stronger than that on environmental guilt. Environmental affections played a partial mediating role in the influence of ecological values on the willingness to maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland， and the indirect effect was stronger than direct effect. Further， environmental pride and environmental guilt were parallel mediators in the influence of ecological values on the willingness to maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland， and the mediating effect of environmental pride was stronger than that of environmental guilt. Publicity and education have complex moderating effects， positively regulated the influence of ecological values， environmental guilt on the willingness to maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland， while negatively regulated the influence of environmental pride on the willingness to maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland.. Finally， the study concludes with policy recommendations structured across four dimensions： cognitive cultivation， behavioral incentive， affective community bonding， and institutional safeguard systems.

Key words: Ecological values, Environmental affections, Publicity and education, Willingness to maintain the results of returning farmland to grassland

摘要： 农户持续保持退耕还草成果是巩固草地生态建设成效的有力保障。本文利用首都“两区”坝上农牧交错带384份农户数据，分析了生态价值观、环境情感、宣传教育对退耕还草成果保持意愿的影响。结果表明：生态价值观促进环境自豪感和成果保持意愿，抑制环境愧疚感；环境自豪感促进成果保持意愿，环境愧疚感抑制成果保持意愿；环境自豪感和环境愧疚感是平行中介，起部分中介作用，且环境自豪感的作用强于环境愧疚感；宣传教育具有调节作用，增强了生态价值观、环境愧疚感对成果保持意愿的影响，削弱了环境自豪感对成果保持意愿的影响，调节了生态价值观通过环境自豪感影响成果保持意愿的中介关系。最后本文从认知培育、行为激励、情感联结、制度保障4个层面提出了政策建议。

关键词: 生态价值观, 环境情感, 宣传教育, 退耕还草成果保持意愿

CLC Number:

ZHANG Li-juan, REN Liang, KONG Wei, YUAN Zhu, YANG Zhi-hui. Ecological Values， Environmental Affections， Publicity and Education， and Farmers’ Willingness to Maintain the Achievements of Returning Farmland to Grassland ——Evidence from Field Investigation of Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in the “Two Districts” of the Capital of China[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(11): 3785-3798.

张利娟, 任亮, 孔伟, 袁铸, 杨智慧. 生态价值观、环境情感、宣传教育与农户退耕还草成果保持意愿——基于首都“两区”坝上农牧交错带的实地调研[J]. 草地学报, 2025, 33(11): 3785-3798.

References

[1] LIU J W. Develop the effective strategies for grassland restoration[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2018，26（5）：1052-1055 刘加文. 大力开展草原生态修复[J]. 草地学报，2018，26（5）：1052-1055
[2] ZHANG L X，YUE X，ZHOU D C，et al. Impacts of climate change and human activities on vegetation restoration in typical grasslands of China[J]. Environmental Science，2023，44（5）：2694-2703 张良侠，岳笑，周德成，等. 气候变化和人类活动对我国典型草原区植被恢复的影响[J]. 环境科学，2023，44（5）：2694-2703
[3] SHEN H H，ZHU Y K，ZHAO X，et al. Analysis of current grassland resources in China[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin，2016，61（2）：139-154 沈海花，朱言坤，赵霞，等. 中国草地资源的现状分析[J]. 科学通报，2016，61（2）：139-154
[4] ZHOU Y H，ZHAO Y X，HU Y J，et al. Analysis on factors influencing willingness of farmers with cropland to forest program to resume farming in 19 provinces[J]. Forest Resources Management，2021（2）：1-10 周银花，赵有贤，胡延杰，等. 全国19省区退耕还林工程农户复耕意愿影响因素分析[J]. 林业资源管理，2021（2）：1-10
[5] CHEN C，WANG L Q. Consolidating the achievements of the sloping land conversion program： research progress in farmer households’ willingness and behavior and recommendations for countermeasures[J]. World Forestry Research，2023，36（2）：95-101 陈琛，王立群. 巩固退耕还林成果：农户意愿与行为研究进展及对策建议[J]. 世界林业研究，2023，36（2）：95-101
[6] JI S R，LI M，CHEN F L. Influence of resource endowment on the deviation between herdsmen’s protection willingness and behavior： based on the moderating effect of ecological cognition[J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica，2025，33（3）：948-959 吉思融，李敏，陈霏璐. 资源禀赋对牧户草地保护意愿与行为悖离的影响研究——基于生态认知的调节效应[J]. 草地学报，2025，33（3）：948-959
[7] CHEN C，DU W X，WANG L Q. Assessing the impact of the expiry of the first round of farmland return subsidy on farmers’ willingness to use slcp land—mediation test on farmers’ subjective well-being[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning，2023，44（3）：177-185 陈琛，杜温鑫，王立群. 首轮退耕补贴到期对农户退耕地利用意愿影响研究——基于农户主观福利的中介检验[J]. 中国农业资源与区划，2023，44（3）：177-185
[8] CHEN R，JIANG Z D，XIE C. Analysis of farmers’ willingness to return to farmland and its influencing factors in the post-returning farmland era—based on the survey of 1757 farmers in 17 provinces[J]. Rural Economy，2016（6）：38-44 陈儒，姜志德，谢晨. 后退耕时代退耕区农户的复耕意愿及影响因素分析——基于17省1757个农户的调查[J]. 农村经济，2016（6）：38-44
[9] CHEN C，XIAO H，WANG Q J，et al. Study on farmers’ willingness to maintain the sloping land conversion program in ethnic minority areas under the background of subsidy expiration[J]. Forests，2022，13（10）：1734
[10] CHEN X D，LUPI F，HE G M，et al. Factors affecting land reconversion plans following a payment for ecosystem service program[J]. Biological Conservation，2009，142（8）：1740-1747
[11] WU X T，WANG S，FU B J. Multilevel analysis of factors affecting participants’ land reconversion willingness after the Grain for Green Program[J]. Ambio，2021，50（7）：1394-1403
[12] BAI M，YUAN P. Restrictive factors and promotion paths of farmers’ comprehensive development in the process of modernization[J]. Reform，2021（12）：116-126 白描，苑鹏. 现代化进程中我国农民全面发展的制约因素与推进路径[J]. 改革，2021（12）：116-126
[13] ZHANG K J，YU F W，YIN C B. An mechanism analysis of the influence of industrial organization mode on rice farmers’ green production behaviors[J]. Rural Economy，2021（12）：72-80 张康洁，于法稳，尹昌斌. 产业组织模式对稻农绿色生产行为的影响机制分析[J]. 农村经济，2021（12）：72-80
[14] CHEN G S，WU H Q. Why does emotional governance become a new turn of rural community governance： interpretation based on “effective governance”[J]. Truth Seeking，2022（4）：96-108，112 陈桂生，吴合庆. 情感治理何以成为乡村社区治理的新转向——基于“治理有效”的解释[J]. 求实，2022（4）：96-108，112
[15] HOU W F. Rural emotional governance from the perspective of state governance： dimension，dilemma and approach[J]. Gansu Social Sciences，2024（2）：101-108 侯万锋. 国家治理视野下的乡村情感治理：维度、困境与进路[J]. 甘肃社会科学，2024（2）：101-108
[16] YAO L Y，ZHAO M J，XU T. Economic rationality or ecological literacy？ logic of peasant households’ soil conservation practices[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University （Social Sciences Edition），2016，16（5）：86-95，156 姚柳杨，赵敏娟，徐涛. 经济理性还是生态理性？农户耕地保护的行为逻辑研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报（社会科学版），2016，16（5）：86-95，156
[17] LI H L，XUE C X. Environmental emotion or economic rationality： motivation of the farmers’ low-carbon production behavior[J]. Issues of Forestry Economics，2023，43（2）：143-153 李换利，薛彩霞. 环境情感和经济理性：农户低碳生产行为的动因[J]. 林业经济问题，2023，43（2）：143-153
[18] JIA Y J，FAN Z J，ZHANG X Q. Influence of environmental values on residents’ willingness to choose green and low-carbon lifestyle： environmental attitudes-based mediation effect[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment，2023，37（12）：1-9 贾亚娟，范子珺，张新奇. 环境价值观对居民绿色低碳生活方式选择意愿的影响——基于环境态度的中介作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，2023，37（12）：1-9
[19] LI X Q，LI Y H，XIAO L M. Personal values，willingness of farmers and decision-making of farmers’ pro-environmental behavior—an empirical study based on the questionnaire of farmers in Anze County of Shanxi Province[J]. Forestry Economics，2021，43（4）：17-29 李秀清，李亚洪，肖黎明. 个人价值观、农户意愿与亲环境行为决策——基于山西省安泽县农户调查问卷的实证研究[J]. 林业经济，2021，43（4）：17-29
[20] DE GROOT J I M，STEG L，KEIZER M，et al. Environmental values in post-socialist Hungary： is it useful to distinguish egoistic，altruistic and biospheric values？[J]. Sociologický Časopis / Czech Sociological Review，2012，48（3，Special Issue：The Transformation of Environmental Values and Behaviour in Post-communist Europe）：421-440
[21] TENG Y H，JIN Y L，FAN X H，et al. A study of voluntary pro-environmental behaviors of rural residents based on norm activation theory—take the national ecological civilization experimental zone（Jiangxi） as an example[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University of Finance & Economics，2022（2）：25-35 滕玉华，金雨乐，范小红，等. 基于规范激活理论的农村居民自愿亲环境行为研究——以国家生态文明试验区（江西）为例[J]. 新疆财经大学学报，2022（2）：25-35
[22] LI R，XIE M Y，ZHONG L S，et al. Environmental concern，environmental affection and pro-environmental behavior of tourists in worldwide natural heritage sites[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment，2023，37（12）：192-200 李瑞，谢梦月，钟林生，等. 世界自然遗产地游客环境关心、环境情感与亲环境行为研究[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，2023，37（12）：192-200
[23] WANG J M. Dimension structure of environmental emotion and its influence on carbon emission reduction—Two-factor theory hypothesis of emotion-behavior and its verification[J]. Journal of Management World，2015，31（12）：82-95 王建明. 环境情感的维度结构及其对消费碳减排行为的影响——情感—行为的双因素理论假说及其验证[J]. 管理世界，2015，31（12）：82-95
[24] ONWEZEN M C，ANTONIDES G，BARTELS J. The Norm Activation Model： an exploration of the functions of anticipated pride and guilt in pro-environmental behaviour[J]. Journal of Economic Psychology，2013，39：141-153
[25] LI W，WANG Z H，LIU X G. Mechanisms of public education influencing waste sorting willingness of urban residents—The mediation of environment emotion and moderation of moral identity[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment，2021，35（3）：21-28 李玮，王志浩，刘效广. 宣传教育对城市居民垃圾分类意愿的影响机制——环境情感的中介作用及道德认同的调节作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，2021，35（3）：21-28
[26] XUE C X，YAO S B，LI H. Study of impact of environmental emotions and skills on pro-environmental behaviors of tea growers in qinba mountain area[J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin，2021，30（9）：2287-2298 薛彩霞，姚顺波，李桦. 环境情感与技能对秦巴山区茶叶种植户亲环境行为的影响[J]. 长江流域资源与环境，2021，30（9）：2287-2298
[27] YAO H Y，ZHANG J S，YAN X X. Effect of environment cognition and environment emotion on green mining behavior[J]. Journal of Xi’an University of Science and Technology，2020，40（3）：549-556 姚海燕，张金锁，闫晓霞. 环境认知与环境情感对于绿色开采的影响[J]. 西安科技大学学报，2020，40（3）：549-556
[28] DUAN L，HU L L，HAN X Y，et al. The impact of quantitative carbon emissions information on tourists’ willingness to carbon offset[J/OL]. https：//link.cnki.net/doi/10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.20240517.002，2024-05-17/2024-12-07 段黎，胡伶俐，韩小云，等. 量化碳排放信息对旅游者碳补偿意愿的影响研究[J/OL]. https：//link.cnki.net/doi/10.16323/j.cnki.lykx.20240517.002，2024-05-17/2024-12-07
[29] LIU J Y，CHI S Y，ZHAO M J. Social norms，cultural orientation and farmers’behavior of centralized pesticide packaging disposal： mediating and moderating effects of environmental emotion[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment，2024，38（6）：70-76 刘霁瑶，池书瑶，赵敏娟. 社会规范、文化取向与农户农药包装废弃物集中处理行为——基于环境情感的中介作用和调节作用[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，2024，38（6）：70-76
[30] CHEN M Z，HUANG J M，ZHENG R B，et al. Analysis on the influence mechanism of farmers’ cognition and environmental emotion on cultivated land protection behavior[J]. Resource Development & Market，2022，38（3）：305-312 陈美招，黄嘉铭，郑荣宝，等. 发包农户的认知与环境情感对耕地保护行为影响机制分析[J]. 资源开发与市场，2022，38（3）：305-312
[31] TENG Y H，CHEN D N，RAO H. Research on consistency of energy conservation consciousness and rural residents’ daily indirect energy conservation[J]. Ecological Economy，2021，37（8）：105-111 滕玉华，陈丹妮，饶华. 节能意识与农村居民日常间接节能行为的一致性研究[J]. 生态经济，2021，37（8）：105-111
[32] TENG Y H，LIU C J，CHEN Y，et al. Decision research on rural residents’ clean energy applied behavior based on a SEM model[J]. China Population，Resources and Environment，2017，27（9）：186-195 滕玉华，刘长进，陈燕，等. 基于结构方程模型的农户清洁能源应用行为决策研究[J]. 中国人口·资源与环境，2017，27（9）：186-195
[33] ZENG Z J，HAN Z Y，ZHOU B Y，et al. Effect of publicity on public awareness and willingness for domestic waste management： a case study in a model village in China[J]. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management，2023，25（6）：3228-3236
[34] ZHANG H P，WANG D X. Review on the impact of returning pasture to grassland ecological reward on farmers’ behavior and the evaluation of policy effect—based on the perspective of the farming-pastoral ecotone in northern China[J]. Ningxia Social Sciences，2017（S1）：150-155 张会萍，王冬雪. 退牧还草生态补奖对农户行为影响及其政策效果评价研究评述——基于北方农牧交错带的视角[J]. 宁夏社会科学，2017（S1）：150-155
[35] CAO S X，CHEN L，YU X X. Grain for Green Project： willingness evaluation of the farmers in northern Shaanxi Province of China[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology，2009，20（2）：426-434 曹世雄，陈莉，余新晓. 陕北农民对退耕还林的意愿评价[J]. 应用生态学报，2009，20（2）：426-434
[36] YANG X J，XU J T. Program sustainability and the determinants of farmers’ self-predicted post-program land use decisions： evidence from the Sloping Land Conversion Program （SLCP） in China[J]. Environment and Development Economics，2014，19（1）：30-47
[37] WANG G Y，MA O Z，WANG L G，et al. Local perceptions of the conversion of cropland to forestland program in Jiangxi，Shaanxi，and Sichuan，China[J]. Journal of Forestry Research，2019，30（5）：1833-1847
[38] JIA H L，YANG M L，XIAO C Q，et al. Impact of livelihood capital on farmers’ willingness to re-enroll in the program of returning animal breeding grounds to grassland based on geographical detector： a case of Yanchi County in Ningxia[J]. Areal Research and Development，2020，39（2）：143-150 贾红丽，杨美玲，肖成权，等. 基于地理探测器的生计资本对农户再参与退牧还草意愿的影响分析——以宁夏盐池县为例[J]. 地域研究与开发，2020，39（2）：143-150
[39] ZHANG Z H. Assessing the impact of off-farm employment on farmers’ maintenance willingness of sloping land conversion program： evidence from 1132 participant farmers[J]. China Land Science，2020，34（11）：67-75 张朝辉. 非农就业对农户退耕还林成果保持意愿的影响——基于1132个退耕农户的调查[J]. 中国土地科学，2020，34（11）：67-75
[40] JIN L S，XU K，PANG J. Impact of ecological cognition on farmers’ willingness and behavior of participating sloping land conversion program： based on survey data from two poverty-stricken counties in Yunnan Province[J]. Journal of Agro-Forestry Economics and Management，2020，19（6）：716-725 靳乐山，徐珂，庞洁. 生态认知对农户退耕还林参与意愿和行为的影响——基于云南省两贫困县的调研数据[J]. 农林经济管理学报，2020，19（6）：716-725
[41] SHI H T，WANG Z Y，YAN L. The influence of ecological cognition on farmers’ grain for green behavior： based on TPB and multi-group SEM[J]. China Land Science，2019，33（3）：42-49 史恒通，王铮钰，阎亮. 生态认知对农户退耕还林行为的影响——基于计划行为理论与多群组结构方程模型[J]. 中国土地科学，2019，33（3）：42-49
[42] CUI M，XIA X L. Influence of perceived value and policy incentive on farmers’ willingness and behavior to maintain the achievement of returning farmland to conservation[J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment，2022，36（8）：28-37 崔民，夏显力. 感知价值、政策激励对农户退耕成果维护意愿与行为的影响[J]. 干旱区资源与环境，2022，36（8）：28-37
[43] CHU L Q，JIANG Z D，WANG J H. The impact mechanism of herdsmen’s grass-livestock balance maintenance： cognitive limitations and emotional dependence[J]. Chinese Rural Economy，2020（6）：95-114 褚力其，姜志德，王建浩. 牧民草畜平衡维护的影响机制研究：认知局限与情感依赖[J]. 中国农村经济，2020（6）：95-114
[44] MA Y Q，LI J H，CAO W，et al. Projecting the carbon sink potential and contribution of Grain for Green Program in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei region[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica，2024，79（3）：732-746 马寅秋，李佳慧，曹巍，等. 京津冀地区退耕还林还草碳增汇潜力及贡献预估[J]. 地理学报，2024，79（3）：732-746
[45] QIN Y J，WU A B，ZHAO Y X，et al. Analysis of the spatiotemporal conversion between ecological land and production land in the farming-pastoral ecotone and the forces driving it： A case study in the Bashang region of Zhangjiakou[J]. Arid Zone Research，2023，40（5）：798-807 秦彦杰，武爱彬，赵艳霞，等. 农牧交错带生态与生产用地时空转换及其驱动因素分析——以张家口坝上地区为例[J]. 干旱区研究，2023，40（5）：798-807
[46] ZHUO Z J，KE Y H，HONG J M，et al. Ecosystem service values and their changes of Bashang Plateau，Zhangjiakou since 2000[J]. Wetland Science，2022，20（2）：162-175 卓昭君，柯樱海，洪剑明，等. 2000年以来张家口坝上高原生态系统服务价值及其变化[J]. 湿地科学，2022，20（2）：162-175
[47] STERN P C. New environmental theories： toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior[J]. Journal of Social Issues，2000，56（3）：407-424
[48] LIN L M，LIU Z B，DU Y Q，et al. Psychological cognition of pollution prevention of family-oriented scale pig breeders and environmental regulation influence effects[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture，2018，26（1）：156-166 林丽梅，刘振滨，杜焱强，等. 生猪规模养殖户污染防治行为的心理认知及环境规制影响效应[J]. 中国生态农业学报，2018，26（1）：156-166
[49] YU T，YU F W. The impact of cognition of livestock waste resource utilization on farmers’ participation willingness in the context of environmental regulation policy[J]. Chinese Rural Economy，2019（8）：91-108 于婷，于法稳. 环境规制政策情境下畜禽养殖废弃物资源化利用认知对养殖户参与意愿的影响分析[J]. 中国农村经济，2019（8）：91-108
[50] HAYES A F，ROCKWOOD N J. Conditional process analysis： concepts，computation，and advances in the modeling of the contingencies of mechanisms[J]. American Behavioral Scientist，2020，64（1）：19-54
[51] CAO N M，SUN B H，REN Z R，et al. The relationship between political participation and local government trust： a moderated mediation model[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology，2022，28（1）：73-79 曹柠梦，孙炳海，任梓荣，等. 公众政治参与和地方政府信任的关系：一个有调节的中介模型[J]. 应用心理学，2022，28（1）：73-79
[52] QU Y，HUANG C H，XING R F. The impact of firms’ ecological product innovation on Chinese consumers’ purchase intention—based on the moderation role of institutional propaganda innovation[J]. Journal of Shandong University of Technology （Social Science Edition），2024，40（4）：5-17 曲毅，黄琛涵，邢润丰. 企业生态产品创新对中国消费者购买意愿的影响——基于制度宣传创新的调节效应[J]. 山东理工大学学报（社会科学版），2024，40（4）：5-17

Ecological Values， Environmental Affections， Publicity and Education， and Farmers’ Willingness to Maintain the Achievements of Returning Farmland to Grassland ——Evidence from Field Investigation of Bashang Agro-pastoral Ecotone in the “Two Districts” of the Capital of China

生态价值观、环境情感、宣传教育与农户退耕还草成果保持意愿——基于首都“两区”坝上农牧交错带的实地调研

PDF

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

References

Related Articles 4

Recommended Articles

Metrics

Comments

[1]	CHEN Yi-lin, LI Dong-qing, CHENG Bao-dong. Impacts of Herdsmen Settlement on Livelihood， Productivity and Ecology in Pastoral Areas [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2025, 33(5): 1578-1587.
[2]	DONG Shi-kui, TANG Fang-lin, PING Xiao-yan, YANG Zhi, YANG Xiu-chun, LIN Chang-cun, LU Xin-shi, WANG Tie-mei, JI Bao-ming, XU Bin, SU De-rong. Study on Multi-dimensional China’s Grassland Classification in New Era of Ecological Civilization [J]. Acta Agrestia Sinica, 2023, 31(1): 1-8.
[3]	WEI Wen, GAO Wa, SHI Shang-li, TIAN Qing-song, YU Feng-chun. Ecosystem Change Analysis of Agriculture and Animal Husbandary Regions in Last Ten Years:A Case Study in Taipusi,Inner Mongolia [J]. , 2012, 20(1): 31-36.
[4]	FANG Min-yan, ZHANG Ming, ZHANG De-gang. Environmental Benefit Evaluation of Different Plant Configuration Patterns in the Greening Areas Surrounding Baosteel Workshops [J]. , 2009, 17(3): 365-370.